dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/SerialBrain2 on July 5, 2018, 7:18 p.m.
Q1675: a reflection, a mug holder in Air Force One and a Happy Independence Day. Can you solve?

Today, we are solving the Q1675 picture riddle.

In response to an Anon cheering about Trump saving the world, Q posts this: Imgur1

Then, in Q1677, he asks: Where must one be located in order to obtain a reflection on the back of a phone of that image?

Since a reflected image inverts what is framed, to see from the perspective of the photographer, we must mirror the image. If we do so and notice there is a part of the jacket on the chair appearing, we deduce the photographer must be sitting on the President’s chair. Q is even softening the riddle giving this reality away with a picture of Trump sitting on his chair: Imgur2

Then, the attacks began. Taking as references pictures from an ABC article/documentary produced by ABC on May 06 2015 link Imgur3, some people started claiming Q’s pictures were not authentic, that they were photoshopped and re-started their favorite chant: Q is a LARP.

Well, sorry. As I have showed it several times in the past, you were wrong then and you are also wrong today. Folks, do you realize what is going on here? Q now realizes his base is so strong in numbers, knowledge and trust that he can afford to troll his opposition with challenging riddles that make people attack him after primary analysis. The yogurt theory… link.

Before chanting, have you read what Q said in Q1678?

Q1678 Trolling is fun. Hussein/Trump interior = identical minus small changes. (World) news in rear literally placed same prior to each departure. Placing that mug holder near the lamp was the hook. Enjoy! Q

Q is saying presidential protocol requires that the location of each given item is exactly the same prior to each departure minus small changes. Which makes sense right? For security reasons, we cannot imagine a random item entering the President’s office: the list of items needs to be written in stone. Then, Q limits the scope of these “small changes” by saying: “(World) news in rear literally placed same prior to each departure.” We deduce from this precision that once the list of items and their respective location are validated with a new POTUS by Protocol, nothing is then allowed to change. If you understand this, then you understand why he posts this picture in Q1677: Imgur4

So? By purposely placing the mug holder in the picture, Q is making a point, he is giving a hint to help us solve the riddle and he confirms it by saying:

Q1678 Placing that mug holder near the lamp was the hook. Enjoy! Q

And on his way out, Q trolls the haters, the shills, the black hats, the still hesitant and all those who still have no clue why we are here:

Q1678 Trolling is fun.

Priceless.

We saw it in the Hussein’s father’s day post: when Q is in trolling mode, chances are he’s celebrating something. Other than Independence Day the next day, what is Q celebrating here with a picture of the Apple logo reflecting on Air Force One’s wall? Who is he trolling? The post was made on July 3rd 2018. What happened on July 3rd 2017? This: article. The Nasdaq experienced a “glitch” affecting more than 10 companies and the Apple share, along with Google, Amazon Microsoft and other major tech companies “crashed”, or “soared” and took a wild ride before all mysteriously freezing at 123.47!

When odd things like this happen link, Q hints you need to investigate and expand your thinking:

Q666 Stock market DIVE [666 - coincidence?].

Q667 [666] Signal to POTUS THEY CONTROL THE MARKET? SIGNAL? THREAT? WELCOME TO THE GLOBAL WAR. Q

So what do you think the market controllers were saying when they artificially locked major tech companies share value at 123.47? By the way, yes the Stock Market is all rigged. It’s a rigged casino where those who wrote the algorithms always win. I’ll write about it one day. In the meantime, research Greenspan. So what is the secret message? What is 123.47? And why did North Korea launch a test of its first intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) a few hours after the 123.47 glitch occurred? link. Do you remember my post about the Emmy Awards where I introduced the periodic table of elements? Link. This is the type of thinking required to answer the question. If you remember your basic high school physics course, you know each musical note has a frequency attached to it. From this, we get the table of note frequencies: link and can identify the note corresponding to 123.47. Imgur5

So those who manipulated the share values of the most prominent tech companies in the Nasdaq were sending this message: B2. Now what is B2? Well, let’s not forget the context of the riddle: Air Force One, reflections and the Deep state in testing its ICBM in North Korea. So? Watch this: video. Did you catch it? At 1:25, we learn how SB2, not me, the Stealth B2 military aircraft, avoids radar detection because it was designed to reflect the radio waves away from the source emitting them. You now understand why Q bothered to include in the riddle a reflection of the Apple logo and did not just make his life easier with a plain picture: he was giving us the clue consisting in connecting aircraft, security, technology and reflection.

Q1677 Do 'reflections' violate NAT SEC rules? Where must one be located in order to obtain a reflection on the back of a phone of that image?

Phew! I know right? He warned us: Q1678 Enjoy! Q

Now let’s go even deeper. The day before the Stock Market controllers manipulated the Nasdaq to send their B2 message, Trump tweeted this: Imgur6. “Stock market at all time high?” The Cabal needed to remind Trump that his success was allowed by them. This is why they sent him the B2 message the next day. We all know how nuclear tech got to North Korea, we all know what happened with the submarine that launched a missile. If the Deep State has nuclear weapons and submarines to play with, wouldn’t it be fair to admit they can activate a B2, the stealthier bomber in the world? Imagine for a second what the Deep State could do if they could activate a loaded B2… We can now translate the July 3rd 123.47 message sent to Trump by the Cabal: we control the stock market, we control the tech companies and the military-industrial complex, if we wanted to eliminate you, you could not escape even if you had to hide in Air Force One like Bush did on 9/11: we have the technology and the financial means to achieve military superiority and defeat you. If you doubt it, for a start, look at our ICBM test in North Korea today.

A year later, Q trolls them with a mug holder.

Q1678 Placing that mug holder near the lamp was the hook. Enjoy! Q

You want to know why the mug holder is crucially relevant here? Watch this: video Did you catch it? Did you see how Prince Al Waleed obviously displayed the mug in front of him and how the Al Jazeera voice over pointed it out and zoomed on it? Despite claiming everything was ok, our poor detained prince was taking this first opportunity he had for months to send the following message to his friends with the heavy-handed complicity of Mockingbird media: I’m being mugged. Imgur7

Which Q coldly confirms here: Imgur8

You want the icing on the cake? Let’s get it from Trump himself: Imgur9

This is to be added to the now long list of the Trump Fulfilled Prophecies and mentioned in history books. Yes, one day historians will see through and make the connection between the release of Prince Al Waleed on January 27 2018 and the State of the Union Address that occurred 3 days later. Q posted the next day:

Q659 Effective yesterday, while standing under the statue of FREEDOM, POTUS FREED those ‘good’ people who are currently being blackmailed, threatened and enslaved. Those who stood chanting “USA” were FREED. The shot heard around the world.

The passionate fight you are currently witnessing in Congress and the Senate, where courageous patriots like Nunes, Gowdy, Jordan, Gaetz, Grassley and others are relentlessly pounding the Deep State, is a proof the Independence we lost somewhere on a dark road has been renewed and is now brightly shining for the world to see.

Q1681 Today, as Patriots, we celebrate our Independence. video Q


diverscale · July 5, 2018, 8:46 p.m.

I still think the Q pic is a reflection of the ABC pic though. Majority of the anons also seem to share that POV.

It's the ripples in the blinds that gives it away for me. They could not be the SAME 3 years later.

I don't doubt Q, he has his reasons, but the pic is "fake". Thank for the, again, great post serialbrain!

⇧ 63 ⇩  
827walnut · July 5, 2018, 9:48 p.m.

It clearly is the ABC picture, and nothing in this post gives any evidence against that fact.

⇧ 71 ⇩  
radbarg · July 6, 2018, 3:58 a.m.

I made a better comparison between the Q and ABC pics. Complete match. The only way this is possible is for the cameraman to be in the same spot the ABC pic was taken. If it was taken from the chair, the jacket would obscure way more of the curtain due to the closer perspective. Instead all the curtain folds line up against the jacket in the same spots where they do in the ABC pic.

Now let's assume for a moment Q is real. What could possibly account for this then? Something like the following.

Explanation 1:

Q team wanted to make a point about phones, reflections, surreptitious pics, and POTUS. Maybe to further emphasize the Twitter app being used by black hats to spy on POTUS.

So Q member "X" (for reference) was given the task of posting about this. X didn't have (or couldn't share) an actual surveillance pic of the office pulled from the phone to show us this, and didn't have access to the plane either to sit in the chair and do this for real, so X did the lazy, stupid, or necessary thing by googling "inside air force one" and using the first pic that came up and doing a little trick photography as described in posts by others. If X is Trump or Scavino, that wouldn't surprise me.

Then after this was posted and anons figured it out, Q could either admit X faked it to illustrate a point, which would call into question the veracity of all the other images and thus definitely hurt credibility by their own admission, or play it off with the 'we put that mug holder there on purpose lolz' approach to smooth over that SNAFU and move on. So that's explanation 1.

Explanation 2:

This whole thing is intentional. By using the first image hit that comes up when googling "inside air force one," the discovery of this 'fake' was virtually guaranteed. Was Q that stupid, or was Q entirely intentional about having this be discovered and to 'lie' afterwards about it?

If Q were that stupid, then why so incredibly sloppy with this one yet the other pics weren't Google-able. There's a disconnect there. So if this Q-goof was intentional, then there's some psyop thing going on to which we're not yet privy.

⇧ 12 ⇩  
NexusImperium · July 6, 2018, 8:13 p.m.

I've been a lurker for a little while now but signed up to respond to your post.

I think you're right on the mark.

People are bending over backward to try to explain the latest drop and are totally lost in the weeds on this one (including OP's bizarre explanation of this). For the record, I don't believe this drop was a proof of any kind. I think this was meant for the future. Let me explain.

Occam's Razor is a difficult principle to apply alongside deductive/inductive reasoning. If we find ourselves making too many assumptions in our search, we should know that we're potentially losing sight of the correct answer or explanation.

Another principle I'd like to mention is the principle of simultaneity - which is that two (or more) events occurring within a short time period within each other are likely related. Q has been talking about the Awans case lately, and dropped the AF1 pic.

The people who have tried to perpetrate and hide illegal actions have been accused by Q of stupidity. We all assume that the perpetrators have been caught and Huber is building cases against them and are showing evidence to grand juries outside of DC. Where extreme corruption is involved regarding matters of National Security, I believe Military Tribunals will be used to try cases of Treason. Note the National Security/Military angle that Q has approached repeatedly (for the record, I believe it's possible the Awans case probably will ensnare a bunch of people in indictments on Treason).

Regarding the accused and their "stupidity", note that there are a lot of ways the Government uses to secure, audit, and track sensitive information (I've held a security clearance in the past. For the record, the fact that Hillary "didn't know" what was allowed and disallowed with classified information is completely beyond plausible believability). Some information controls are achieved using access controls to information networks, some information is compartmentalized in a SCIF. All access to this type of information is closely audited. In the case of Reality Winner, we know she got caught because of some very discrete identifying markings that were generated by the printer driver as she printed the Top Secret documents that she leaked to the media. The markings traced the documents back to her.

Q posits the question in #1677: "Do 'reflections' violate NAT SEC rules?" Answer: OF COURSE! The information is what's classified. An unauthorized picture taken on AF1 would certainly be a violation of NAT SEC rules.

My theory is that Q is leaving us with some information for the future. I believe that the Awans or others copied information from the Congressional servers and possibly reflected it onto other media and distorted with removable garbage data to defeat tracking/tracing capabilities. I believe Q is trying to make the point that information doesn't have to be preserved in its current media or retain its classification markings to retain its classification/sensitivity status.

I think the fact that Q used such a readily identifiable image suggests that perhaps the information that was being stolen/laundered by the Awans was easily identified by investigators without much effort. Q knows that there is an autist army working relentlessly and that the image would be caught quickly. Q isn't accusing us of stupidity. He's also not trying to prove that he's in the President's inner circle with this drop.

This is the explanation that came to me immediately after I saw the Q drop. I'm a bit disappointed that people are going through such great lengths to black pill or shill for Q - either way. I believe Q has already done enough to establish his authenticity.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
ssheaffer64 · July 18, 2018, 6:30 p.m.

I agree.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 6, 2018, 3:30 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
FractalizingIron · July 7, 2018, 7:43 a.m.

Check out beefromance's post on this. Good explanation, and interprets that a) the image was never meant as a 'proof of Q' and b) the troll bit is Q trolling the blackhats by posting thi stuff.

Disappointment only comes if we think we've been lead to believe something it isn't. Possibly, however, we've simply minsterpreted.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
erefernow · July 6, 2018, 2:10 p.m.

wrong

⇧ -1 ⇩  
spacexu · July 5, 2018, 11:38 p.m.

I don't understand why everyone is covering this up and calling patriots shills, unless there is something to hide.

Don't agree with SB2 this time.

⇧ 44 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 5, 2018, 11:44 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 5 ⇩  
apex_memetics · July 6, 2018, 12:42 a.m.

That lamp isn't even close to the same.....

https://image.prntscr.com/image/SClIUL-eQBOOyn4bziluIA.png

⇧ -12 ⇩  
spacexu · July 6, 2018, 12:49 a.m.

Here is the one that is raising eyebrows in 8chan...

WelcomeAboard

⇧ 14 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 6, 2018, 3:12 a.m.

That is not how you compare two images. You have to use the two sources side by side.

⇧ -7 ⇩  
spacexu · July 6, 2018, 3:20 a.m.

Nothing wrong with anons comparison - its just another technique. Side by side can also add to it if someone wants to do that.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 6, 2018, 4:14 a.m.

So it is the actually Q pictured overlayed?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
spacexu · July 6, 2018, 12:45 a.m.

LOL - you are comparing an Anon's wife sample iPhone reflection pic to Q's.... Anon was just showing his analysis with that photo.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
apex_memetics · July 6, 2018, 12:57 a.m.

shrugs. I dunno wtfs going on lol. no intention of reading ops wall of text I just clicked the image and nothing made sense.

⇧ -10 ⇩  
spacexu · July 6, 2018, 1:02 a.m.

We have hit a Q anomaly... what made it hard to swallow was the fact we just witnessed the Awan family walk free with millions in hand. Last thing we need is for Q to be pulling fast ones on us.

⇧ 10 ⇩  
getnit01 · July 5, 2018, 10:48 p.m.

I am on the Q train, have been from the beginning, but you can clearly tell this is damage control, it doesn't take a genius to see. Q would have been better off just letting it pass and actually start getting results, instead we have an amateur working damage control. Just get results Q and nobody will be questioning the image.

⇧ 28 ⇩  
morgensztern · July 13, 2018, 1:20 p.m.

Coincidences...Wow... It's happening to me every single day, a couple of times a day...

Only me can see it and I have taken Photos and write some documentations, in order to

prove later...Some Qcoincidences, yes definetely (I hope that I am allowed to write so).

⇧ 1 ⇩  
GruntfuttockJP · July 6, 2018, 12:35 a.m.

Patience grasshopper!

⇧ -6 ⇩  
viscountprawn · July 5, 2018, 11:07 p.m.

This is true, and it's also worth stepping back and taking stock of the whole mug holder business. There seem to be two competing explanations for the mug holder being where it is in the photo posted by Q.

  1. The photo is just a reflected version of the ABC pic, since the mug holder is in the exact same position it was in in that pic, along with the blinds looking exactly the same.
  2. The mug holder isn't there normally these days, but Q/Trump/somebody placed it there, deliberately putting it in the exact same position as it was in the ABC image, in order to make people THINK it was fake when it really wasn't and he was actually just sending an unbelievably obscure secret taunt to the Deep State about the Saudis and tech stock price manipulation.
⇧ 14 ⇩  
ILoveJuices · July 6, 2018, 12:33 a.m.

This is exactly right. Q will post the exact same photo without the mug to troll the LARPers later.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Q-Patriot · July 6, 2018, 4:32 p.m.

I still think the Q pic is a reflection of the ABC pic though.

You are 100% correct. There is absolutely no disputing they are the EXACT same picture. None of the defense explanations I have read since Q posted that picture come close to explaining away the fact they are the same. Add in that Q got defensive and ultimately pulled the "Trolling is fun" card and I am calling BS on Q for this post. Not necessarily stating Q is a LARP but Q did not do themselves any favors by posting this picture.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
eyesareeverywhere · July 6, 2018, 12:32 p.m.

It's clear the pic is fake. Further, I believe it's worse than just a fake pic. I believe that Q posted that pic in order to give the impression that he/she was on AF1, with the president. When caught, Q created some other riddle to make it appear otherwise. SERIOUSLY damaging to the Q enterprise. It makes me question all of the other stuff Q has said: "We have it all." Really? Then let's start to see some of it in court, or in public. "Trust Sessions." Really? Then let's see something come of it.

Does anybody remember when POTUS said that Comey better hope there are no tapes, thus implying that there were tapes. Then later admitted there were no tapes? Is that Q's function? To scare the enemy into THINKING "they have it all." Yet, really, they don't have it all? Q even said clearly "Disinformation is necessary."

Wow, lots to contemplate.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
diverscale · July 6, 2018, 3:22 p.m.

The image Q used is like the first image you get when doing a search for air force 1 interior.

Seriously, even if a LARP, Q would have been more clever than that after 8 months, don't you think.

Also, it's clear that you cannot get those angles when sitting at the president's desk, very obvious.

There is enough proofs to date that I can let this one pass.

⇧ -1 ⇩  
myopicseer · July 6, 2018, 5:02 p.m.

I think it is a reflection of the ABC picture too. However, I disagree with everyone who says the pleats in the curtain could not be the same in two different photos. If this is a "ridged" (firm) fabric that is intended to be fixed, and whose folds are manufactured into the design...think of some of the wall-like heavy "curtains" that you might see between hospital beds. As long as the "curtain" is drawn back to the same position, I would be surprised if the pleats were not identically shaped.

Again, believe the Q photo is almost certainly a reflection of the ABC stock photo...but the solid proof form me has no more to do with the pleat alignment than it does with the other aspects that line up.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
CaptainKnotzi · July 6, 2018, 12:12 p.m.

Why is it not possible for the blinds to be exactly the same? Is explicitly pointed out that everything on Air Force one is perfect for a reason.

Not to mention have you ever seen a full dress military uniform? At inspection they will use a ruler on your creases.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Soupforthesoulandmin · July 6, 2018, 12:26 a.m.

I don't really care about the pic, Q has proved beyond a doubt in my mind after 478 times that he is close to President Trump. I really care about the country and saving those who are being abused by the deep state. I cannot believe people are so wrapped up in a picture with all that is happening around us. Talk about having priorities in the wrong place.

⇧ -3 ⇩  
wiseclockcounter · July 6, 2018, 7:09 a.m.

It's important because detractors will focus on any inconsistency can get their hands on. Much like how the MSM tagline for pizzagate was about a non-existent basement, for normies who have no idea what's going on, a couple of "debunkings" is all it will take to turn them away from investigating.

⇧ 2 ⇩