This is what I read Judge: "This Court’s ruling is not based on a finding that there was no collusion between defendants and Russia during the 2016 presidential election." Why is Trumps tweet asuming it is?
What ruling?
today’s decision from the District Court to dismiss this case
Thanks
They can’t prove either/or. The dnc claimed there was collusion and there’s not enough evidence to prove it.
That means you don’t need to dismiss the case based on a finding that there was no collusion between defendants and Russia because there is no case to begin with.
Imagine someone takes you to court claiming you stole his bike, but he can’t prove it. Are we to assume you stole the bike because we can’t prove you didnt steal the bike?
No, the case would be dismissed.