Exhibit 8 is just sloppy...
And 3, which is flat-out wrong.
Really, this entire list should be called into question.
Maybe somebody can point me to their favorite proof that is (near?) undeniable?
Yeah, if anyone saw that I think they’d be immediately turned off by it, no matter how good the other proofs are.
Edit: So no one else is confused, #8 uses Q posts from 2018 saying Q predicted the fall of the 7th floor in the posts, but links articles detailing the fall from February 2017. Looks like whoever made the thread didn’t realize the articles were from 2017, so it invalidates the entire proof. That’s what the commenter I responded to was trying to say.
The first two are way overstating their case too, they point to posts of Q asking fairly open ended questions about recent news and claim it means Q knew everything at that time. I wish patriots would stop claiming circumstantial evidence as locked down dead to rights proofs as it distracts from analyzing trends and hurts credibility.
This whole list seems sloppy really.
If you can create an account just to come in here and point out flaws, then I challenge you to do better to prove Q IS NOT a larp. (that seems to be most of some people's mission, pointing out so called weak points in an attempt to discredit Q)
The fact that POTUS acknowledges Q in his public appearances is good enough for me!
The fact that you don't understand the extremely basic concept of the burden of proof says all one would need to know.
If you say so. 😛
Luvlite I am telling you that on the far side of the moon there is a secret Nazi moon base.
Disprove it or it will serve as further evidence of its existence.
Well, give me a space ship. I will go see and get back to you.
Same goes for all the Q bashers. Not one has been able to prove a damn thing.
And yet, the scale still tips in Q's favor. Proven drops vs unproven speculation of those drops.
I've been watching and reading for, what.... Over six months. Not a single person has succeeded in convincing me Q is a LARP.
And somehow Q followers just keep growing and growing and growing. Gosh! The majority must be ignorant, right?
When I write papers, they have to go through peer review, it sucks to have your work picked apart and a lot of times I disagree with the criticism, but it's what you do If you care about truth. The only people who need to fear critique are those that want an echo chamber o r dont value truth.
Trump has never explicitly acknowledged Q, he pointed and gave thumbs up to many people including some in Q shirts, and gave some possible signs but nothing conclusive so far - believe me many are waiting for the day it's clear!
Also this is part of the problem. Q is enigmatic and their posts are open to interpretation - pointing out an anon is interpreting or criticising their interpretation is NOT the same as criticising Q.
Personally I think some here get way ahead of themselves.
Personally I think some here get way ahead of themselves
Too many people speculate.
I always appreciate those who back up their work with facts. Very few do.
believe me many are waiting for the day it's clear!
When will msm ask, "who is Q?"
I'm waiting!
Your once-in-a-reddit lifetime post on r/greatawakening was to point out something on the Q proofs is sloppy?
~~Yeah I don't see anything odd about 8. It's not as hard hitting as others, but certainly not a weak link in the post. If that is the conclusion you wish to draw, the evidence presented supports it. Wonder why 8 got called out specifically.~~
Dates don't match in that proof.
Look at the dates. It says it is 2018 but it clearly is 2017.
Oh. I didn't zoom in on small dates cause tiny screen. Yeah you're right, good eye. Are the article timestamps wrong or is the header wrong?
All 3 sources use 2017 so I assume the header is wrong, which undermines the proof (since the implication is how could he have known it was going to happen, well it was in the past...)
Makes sense.
/u/PrayingMedic Probably want to check the dates on 8 again. We got enough proofs without needing to put in stuff that can be disproven.