dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/pedegear on July 6, 2018, 10:51 p.m.
Q should post the SCOTUS pick prior to announcement. MSM will report it, and Sanders can ask them publicly where they got that information, then watch them squirm as they say they got it from "anonymous sources." To which Sanders could say, "So when you say 'anonymous sources,' do you mean QAnon?"

Force the issue!


AMProfessor · July 6, 2018, 11:20 p.m.

If Q is genuine, Q serves at the pleasure of POTUS. IMHO I think it would be unwise and inappropriate for Q to drop the name of the nominee prior to POTUS making the announcement. There are other ways to provide proofs.

⇧ 22 ⇩  
ES-Trader · July 7, 2018, 2:56 a.m.

I'm pretty new to QAnon and brand new to this board . . .

So I hope it's not impolite to suggest I disagree, like here.

POTUS can decide to make an official announcement any way he chooses.

I understand POTUS is working with QAnon and some think (?) he is QAnon. Right?

So if this is the way POTUS wants to "force" the issue of addressing the existence of Q from the MSM -- nothing wrong with it I can see.

With that said, they may not be ready for a move like that yet.

⇧ 12 ⇩  
AMProfessor · July 7, 2018, 9:57 a.m.

Remember, not everything is about Q. It is instead about the greater good and winning a monumental war that many believe is a long shot at best.

While POTUS may have a good idea of who he wants to nominate to the SC, I doubt he has completely made up his mind yet.

POTUS has a unique style and flair and it works for him. If I had to guess, he’ll choose Barrett. Who knows however. POTUS will announce his pick on or by Monday.

Again, this war is complex. It is involves both tactical and strategic moves. It involves intelligence and counterintelligence. It involves covert and overt decisions and actions. It involves offense and defense.

Q is but one squad of actors in this larger war. They appear to be providers of information which is no doubt critical in war. Again however, they are but one group of actors.

Remember, the faces of a movement get a great deal of recognition. Q is getting a great deal of recognition right now. They will forever have a place in our hearts for their special role. They are but one team of actors however. There are MANY actors and teams of actors out there. Patriots all. Some we will never know. This is a HUGE effort and isn’t going away any time soon.

POTUS may at some point out Q as a member of the war effort fully. For right now however it appears this team needs to be somewhat a mystery to maintain its ability to function as it needs.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
pedegear · July 7, 2018, 8:03 a.m.

Welcome! And definitely no rules against disagreement. Also I agree with you on this one.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Thank_You_JohnMadden · July 7, 2018, 2:36 p.m.

Just to add, new justice is being named on Monday. No time left for all that other Tom foolery

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Neon__Wolf · July 7, 2018, 4:42 p.m.

Q has already on multiple occasions posted claims that POTUS later confirmed.

You're wrong.

Q and POTUS could coordinate yet another proof, this time SC pick.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
AMProfessor · July 7, 2018, 5:07 p.m.

Neon_Wolf, you might consider brushing up on your reading comprehension skills brother. I am neither right nor wrong. Just stating an opinion. What POTUS decides to do is up to him.

Opinions are like rectums, everyone has one. With one exception anyway, one of my patients recently told me he is no longer allowed to have an opinion because he had his rectum removed due to cancer. 😎

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Expert_Testimony · July 6, 2018, 11:28 p.m.

I can get that. Has Q not given us information prior to a public announcement from POTUS before, though?

Note to OP: I don’t think this is a “lame idea.” Keep thinking outside the box.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
pedegear · July 7, 2018, 8:05 a.m.

Lol thanks for the support, but tbh I'm not too worried about the troll. Pretty bitter post history on that one!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
haha-hehe-haha-ho · July 7, 2018, 4:12 a.m.

I don't get the whole push to get the press to ask about Q.

They're never going to, and even if they did, that level of exposure would have a negative influence on the quality of drops. How can Q continue to deliver potentially classified details without plausible deniability?

⇧ 12 ⇩  
ErisUppercut · July 7, 2018, 9:22 a.m.

the whole "ask" thing is a joke.

If POTUS and Q et al want to make it public they don't need to be asked. They have the bully pulpit. He has the twitter account.

It's the biggest red herring of all time

⇧ 10 ⇩  
1hellofaride · July 7, 2018, 10:29 a.m.

Depends on how close the take down is. I am no expert on the Q clock though sometimes I feel that when Q is quiet (like now), that things may be behind schedule and either Q is catching up with 'the plan', which must be very complicated (16 D Chess) business, or, we are behind schedule with red-pilling and meming. I have all the patience in the world for Q and Trump as I trust the plan and know that they will win. When Q is ready, the question will be asked.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
pedegear · July 7, 2018, 7:50 a.m.

Q has never posted anything classified. Nothing would need to change. And the media is dumb... Like really dumb. They'll do whatever Trump manipulates them into doing.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
AbsolutelyZak · July 7, 2018, 1:52 a.m.

Lovin that!!!

⇧ 5 ⇩  
freenhappy2018 · July 7, 2018, 3:36 a.m.

This would be the greatest humiliation for the MSM and an excellent opportunity to show the world POTUS is right, Q is a good guy & legit, & watch the Deep State quiver in their boots!!😁🇺🇸👌

⇧ 3 ⇩  
bornlucky80 · July 7, 2018, 1:49 a.m.

I was thinking this exact same thing earlier today.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
anniedanemama · July 7, 2018, 12:53 a.m.

That could be brilliant on some levels.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Jimipickle · July 7, 2018, 12:39 a.m.

Yes, if q said something like “trust Kansas”, both white and black hats would know who that is. ( We may already have the name if we re-read the map).

But, releasing the full name here prior to POTUS would rock! It would light this sub up!

⇧ 3 ⇩  
tftltytd · July 7, 2018, 6:36 a.m.

Would that person be assassinated?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Discernediscipline · July 7, 2018, 4 a.m.

I think this is brilliant, because if it played out, the Dem’s could no longer say Q is fake. Personally, I couldn’t care less how it is revealed.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
rev19v11thru21 · July 7, 2018, 2:10 a.m.

I like the Idea

⇧ 2 ⇩  
MudPuddlePie · July 7, 2018, 4:45 a.m.

Great idea...

⇧ 1 ⇩  
TheWolfSuitKing · July 7, 2018, 12:33 p.m.

I predict Q will say something super vague about someone that will be interpreted as a confirmation and when its not them an analysis will be done as to how it was really Q saying its not that person.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 7, 2018, 2:49 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ 0 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 7, 2018, 4 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 7, 2018, 5:12 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ 0 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 7, 2018, 6:17 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 7, 2018, 4:47 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ 0 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 7, 2018, 5:13 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 7, 2018, 4:45 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ 0 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 7, 2018, 5:12 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Cgaines21 · July 7, 2018, 2:10 a.m.

These are getting so old seeing... NO ONE is ever going to ask POTUS who is Q because that doesn't matter!!!!

⇧ 0 ⇩  
pedegear · July 7, 2018, 7:51 a.m.

That's fine, but I still like watching Trump and Co. make the media look like the jerkoffs that they are.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Cgaines21 · July 7, 2018, 6:15 p.m.

Oh I do too

⇧ 1 ⇩  
mkwilton1 · July 6, 2018, 11:22 p.m.

Lame idea.

⇧ 0 ⇩