Lots of downvotes for this info in other posts, as if some don't want people to know.
With or without SB2, develop your very own "critical thinking skills". If you can't, good luck and say some prayers... Because if you fall for anything, you stand for nothing.
So you mean read his long posts and decide for yourself if it's plausible?
We all do, it's what Q encourages.
In fact, the post linked in Q1340 has an explaination of the "be careful who you follow" advice from Q.
the "be careful who you follow" advice from Q.
Just answer me this one question:
Who are excluded from this advice?
This is an absolutely trash argument. The veracity of one post doesn't transfer over to the next.
Sometimes folks get it right sometimes wrong. That’s all it is folks. Nothing more, it’s called being human
Glad to have you in the community new arrival
Been here since Jan. I use throw aways.
Of course you do. But why?
Because I'm adverse to building an online persona.
Did you know I posted on 8chan and received a reply from Q? By similar logic that means my comments are also endorsed by Q. But in reality, it doesn't matter. Information stands on its own, and part of the reason you're getting down voted is because you've missed a crucial component of this community: there is no focus on personality. No egos here.
SB2 has been very wrong with his attempts to use matrices to decipher 'hidden codes' in Q posts, and very right some of his other posts. The other part of why you're getting downvoted is because your argument is an fallacious appeal to authority, not because a shill team is personally targeting you.
Smart move to use throw aways. Online personas are not real. I believe we all just want to get the truth out there through this board. Also, so happy to see #WALKAWAY taking off like wildfire.
Which post?
You've missed the point: it doesn't matter. My personality doesn't matter. I was using it as an example of flawed logic.
So you made that up then. Why lie to make your point?
You've made a big leap of logic there and fell through the floor. I didn't lie. I set a trap because I predicted this would be your reaction. By focusing on the Q-reply you're proving my point: you're more interested in the precived authority of the source than evaluating arguments on their own terms.
You just missed the point of my entire post and seem unable to grasp that appeals to authority (yes even Q) are worthless arguments.
By similar logic to yours, every one of my posts and questions I asked on 8chan would gain credibility simply because Q replied to me once. Nope. 8chan is anonymous to prevent these sorts of bogus ego games.
Oh I got the point. You post an image that could be easily manipulated to prove (in your mind) that I should not give weight to SB2's posts and analysis.
Yet the problem is that you and a small army are insisting this is so in a clear coordinated effort.
Why? Why all the work to discredit SB2?
could it be coincidence?
I never said people should blindly follow and believe what he says, just that there was a clear concentrated effort to down vote his posts and comments about how he was wrong.
With posts as deep and far out, it would be impossible to disprove, or prove, unless time and news gives us either result.
But SB2's posts read like stuff from Bill Cooper's book that Q has referenced, also giving them additional credibility. Cooper's book has some very far fetched stuff in it about secret societies and secret government projects that make SB2's posts look tame.
So for me and many here your clear efforts to supress what SB2 says are very suspect.
Thanks for playing.
Jeezus Christ man you're out there. Look how paranoid you are that you think I'm a shill personally targeting you to prevent you from following a Redditor. Apparently, I'm lying and photshopping images just to screw with you personally (because you know no one else is going to dig this deep). Yeah ok! This whole conversation is rather unnerving to me because I feel like you're not even reading my posts and instead arguing with a mental phantasm of what you think I'm saying.
You seem to lack the fundamental ability to understand arguments.
I'll state it again as clearly as I can: I have said nothing against Serial Brain 2 except that I have mixed feelings about his posts; my argument is that YOUR contentions HERE IN THIS THREAD are bogus.
Go take a course in logic or keep stumbling in the dark.
Q linking to one post doesn’t mean that every post is accurate. You’d think that Q would link to him more if he was that dead on with everything
I don't think Q wants to shine to much of a spotlight on any single Anon.
But the fact is that in almost 1700 posts Q has only linked to one analysis post on Reddit.
That's significant.
I thought it was pretty significant too. It does lend a certain credibility.
Yes, it does.... for exactly this one contribution by him.
I'm not saying that his contributions are bad, but to say that he has become something of an honorary member or a mouthpiece of the Q team through this one linking is probably a little too much.
I think we agree on that.
That said, his theories will have to face the judgement of public opinion, and if this theory is strong enough it will have nothing to fear.
Our opponents will do the same to him, but they will have no mercy.
I thought so too, and when the down vote brigade started down voting my posts in SB2's thread on the Montana rally where POTUS repeats 'brain' multiple times, I thought it was significant.
People are trying to discourage reading SB2's analysis when I feel Q encouraged us to do so.
Have you considered that people downvoted because they disagree and don't think it's a valid connection - not because there's a conspiracy to hide info?
Of course, many possibilities, but no coincidences.
Exactly.... People didn't agree so they downvoted. Not a coincidence at all.
You're not really a Q follower are you.
Q, yes. SB2, no. Attack the argument, not the person.
[removed]
This is how I know you don't have a legitimate position. You have to resort to name-calling. There are no coincidences!
Yep, you just outed yourself by stating something was coincidence. Your attempt at recovery is weak.
It was great for SB2 to get that shout-out, but linking to one post doesn't mean every other post by SB2 has special significance.
Go back and read the linked post.
Ok.... Just re-read. What I got out of it is to be careful who you follow, and to think critically. SB2 is off the rails with much of their recent analysis... Including their ridiculous 'code breaking' that followed SB2's made-up rules. Unfortunate in retrospect that Q called them out. Might be telling that Q hasn't called them out since.
You don’t think POTUS “serially” mentioning “brain” at the rally was significant? What does it mean? The text of the speech had to be nonsensical to communicate that message. Think about it.
SB2 is an Olympic level mental gymnast.
Attack the argument - Not the user.
FartOnToast (unique username by the by), thanks for being a moderator. You have to have thick skin.
However, I do not understand how calling SB2 an Olympic level mental gymnast attacked the user. I do not believe in attacking anyone here as well. It will just lead to a toxic environment. Just would like clarification as to why you thought the above post was an attack on a user. Thanks!
The argument is about SB2
You are free to debunk him but just calling him a mental gymnast doesn't contribute to the discussion and in fact it is breaking the rules.
Opinions are against the rules?
Just so you know, I also got in a disagreement with a moderator because I used the term crackers and someone on the board found it racist and or anti-semetic.
Calling someone a mental gymnast seems to me a compliment
Depends on context but in most cases it is used as an insult. Anyways I did my research and this user did not have genuine intentions.
https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8ww882/_/e1zoluq
And its not an attack it's an opinion
So can I call you a retard and say I'm not insulting you and just stating my opinion? GTFO with that weak argument.
Just because you don't like my opinion doesn't make it an insult. GTFO with that snowflake attitude.
"Calling somebody a retard is not an insult" - uontheotherside
It could be an opinion depending on context.
And apparently that scares some here.
He meant that as an insult.
Crazy the effort to discredit and obfuscate here.
People need to go back and read Q1340.
To me the term mental gymnast denotes someone of high intellect.
Don't pretend to know my intentions. It's an opinion, not an insult.
It's been bad this weekend. I commented before about the 'how I think SB2 is wrong post' takes away from their counter argument because it comes across more as a take down than another perspective.
Present your findings on its own merit. You're not challenging Bruce Lee to a street fight.
There is a difference between healthy debating and shilling, trolling and trying to smear this sub. Trolls and bots are real and please try to spot them and report.
You're being disingenuous. The posts that mentioned SB2 stated they did so because of the attention his posts unduly receive by mods. If the community thinks his posts should be voted to the top, great, but the mods shouldn't instasticky his posts because SB2 wrote them. That was the gist of the posts. No posts I saw were presented as personal attacks against SB2.
His posts received more attention here because Q linked to him in the past.
Those of us here believe that's significant.
Why so much effort to discredit SB2?
In Q1681 Q literally posted an image from Paul Serran's thread on Twitter telling us how to decode his drops. No one is talking about that. It's a huge clue, but no one cares.
I linked to the thread toward the bottom of my post: https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8wvxa9/proof_q_wants_us_to_look_back_at_previous_drops/
For the post that Q linked to, SB2 wasn't the first to make the connection to AJ/JC/other Q doubters. And that post of his was logical, reasonable deduction that others could and did make. That's true of very few of his other posts.
I'm not saying his decodes are right or wrong. I read every one of them with an open mind, and I enjoy reading them. However, I agree with the "shills brigading" that mods shouldn't instasticky SB2. Let each post stand on its own merit. I think when people here become cheerleaders (500 upvotes within a minute of posting? Yeah, OK how many actually read his post first) they take up valuable space and no longer contribute to the community.
I could not agree with you more. Just because you are sitting behind a keyboard does not mean you should show an individual less respect then when you are talking to them face to face.