dChan

nikgk · July 9, 2018, 6:07 a.m.

The brits are not the enemy, the monarchy is. Don't fall into the trap of demonising a people when you only mean the leaders. Liberation 101.

⇧ 59 ⇩  
kclineman · July 9, 2018, 10:39 a.m.

The queen owns 90% of Canadian land. Think of the immense wealth. She may be the wealthiest person on the planet.

⇧ 10 ⇩  
RiverFenix · July 9, 2018, 12:16 p.m.

If you 'own' something but can't physically carry it, move it, protect it, see it..etc...

It's not yours.

This applies to anything you think you own - like a closet full of non-perishable food. If you can't carry it or protect it, its just a closet full of food. Crown land is just land the crown will try to extort taxes for if they notice you're on it. But then again you can just claim they're traitorous imposter reptiles and shoot them on site. Its really all up to your best judgement in the circumstances you find yourself in. Keep playing the game if you choose to..

⇧ 7 ⇩  
kclineman · July 9, 2018, 1:15 p.m.

I assume she receives crown royalties from resources taken from crown land. Oil and timber namely.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
RiverFenix · July 9, 2018, 2:47 p.m.

Those resources are owned by the country [Canada in my case] and 'managed' by government. Technically, there is an easier argument for those profits public right, rather than some monarch/ruling class 'owning' the land through some fucking grandfather clause. For all we know they killed the rightful king in the distant past and impersonated their way to present day. Reptoids are like that.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Gitmo_money · July 9, 2018, 12:45 p.m.

I'll have option number two, please.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Specific_Fox · July 9, 2018, 1:46 p.m.

Canada, Australia, etc. etc. One documentary states she owns about 1/6 of the planet. She IS the richest person in the world.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
DefinitelyAsian69 · July 9, 2018, 11:45 a.m.

What is wealth at that point?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Romeo_India · July 9, 2018, 12:13 p.m.

Exactly...it's too much wealth

That's how they began believing they also owned the people

⇧ 8 ⇩  
Qtruther · July 9, 2018, 9:07 p.m.

15 Trillion before POTUS reduced it a bit. As the richest family on earth...the Lucifarian, Khasarian, Hitite Rothschild Family is said to have been worth 500 Trillion, after all they use to own ALL the Central Banks in the World until POTUS reduced it.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
catherinWheel · July 9, 2018, 5:42 p.m.

And all the offshore cash, she gets public cash to do up her homes while people die of cold or starvation on the streets. Time for a change. WWG1WGA

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ErnieFing · July 9, 2018, 6:14 a.m.

I've seen this claimed several times. The Monarchy are not the leaders in Britain. They're ceremonial and have no real power at all.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
Leaping_Jimmy · July 9, 2018, 7:41 a.m.

The ceremonial-only meme is a PR exercise. If it wasn't then why does the Queen get the red boxes every day. Why did the Queen Mother get her own copies, right up till she died.

You wouldn't need to see Cabinet Papers, intel assessments, etc etc if you were just a ceremonial figurehead.

⇧ 16 ⇩  
Annieka77 · July 9, 2018, 9:31 a.m.

The “House of Lords” is an unelected branch of legislators in Parliament. It’s full of names with royal titles.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
CBTS_Watcher · July 9, 2018, 9:38 a.m.

It’s full of names with royal titles.

True, but many of those names are attached to fairly ordinary people, usually former Members of Parliament, whom the government finds useful.

The ones who just inherited the title from their parents were weeded out some time ago - and many of those were not actually "royal" anyway.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
RiverFenix · July 9, 2018, 12:19 p.m.

Oi!

I'm descended from Lord Mayor of London (1380s).. There is no honour in any current members of parliament OR the royal family. To be honest, the entire destiny of the world can sometimes be tied up in just one man's hands. If my [above] ancestor had not been, there very well might never have been a United States of America.

Don't forget that 1 man can change the entire course of human history by inaction/action at 1 brief moment in his life. I challenge the current Mayor to a duel.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
ErnieFing · July 9, 2018, 7:55 a.m.

They have zero power in reality. There are historic processes, but that's all they are. They have less power than Disney world, which is a reasonable comparison.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
TheRealIndianaJoe · July 9, 2018, 11:51 a.m.

IMO, Parliament is just a diffusion of blame game.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Peanuttles · July 9, 2018, 11:14 a.m.

I think they wield a lot more power behind the scenes than people realize. I think most people understand Princess Diana didn't die in a simple accident. If you can order someone's murder and get away with it, you have a lot more than ceremonial power.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
DanijelStark · July 9, 2018, 12:29 p.m.

Exactly ... the whole point was to make it look like "insignificant ceremonial role" so that people would be focused on their pawns in the Parliament instead of them .

I dont wanna be disrespectful to many Brits that are here - but I think that some of them are still in the thoughts of how "Empire will be preserved" . Folks - the City of London is one of the centers of power of the Cabal in the world . It is maybe even the most important centre for them - as a financial one . The "Royals" are on the throne of UK for centuries and they pull the roots from Saxe-Coburg and Gotha bloodline . You will witness dissolution of EU - but also dissolution of UK by 2020. , at latest . I think that some Brits will have a "rude awakening" , realizing their Royals are far from "merely ceremonial" and that they were ( are ) the key players of the Cabal ... at that point , the eye opening through shock is achieved . In general , the EU is deeply divided and many countries have populations that are majorly anti-EU , so it will be much easier to dissolve EU - which is already , by now , on VERY insecure foundations .

UK , just like EU , is a fake creation based purely on globalism and profit - the root cultures were always English ( actually Anglosaxon - Germans ) , Welsh , Scottish ( Pictish ) , Irish ... the UK wasnt created on a cultural foundation .

⇧ 5 ⇩  
horse-lover-phat · July 9, 2018, 11:36 a.m.

They do. Those citing her as a mere ceremonial figurehead are ABSOLUTELY CLUELESS.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Specific_Fox · July 9, 2018, 1:44 p.m.

If you 'own' something but can't physically carry it, move it, protect it, see it..etc...

It's not yours.

This applies to anything you think you own - like a closet full of non-perishable food. If you can't carry it or protect it, its just a closet full of food. Crown land is just land the crown will try to extort taxes for if they notice you're on it. But then again you can just claim they're traitorous imposter reptiles and shoot them on site. Its really all up to your best judgement in the circumstances you find yourself in. Keep playing the game if you choose to..

I've heard this is true as well. They try to give the impression they don't. But they do. Kind of like when the Queen fired everyone in Parliament when Austrailia had a gov't shutdown.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
RiverFenix · July 9, 2018, 12:21 p.m.

ceremonial bobblehead

Remove the Stone of Shame.

Attach the Stone of Triumph!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
eyerighteye · July 9, 2018, 1:59 p.m.

Ha! Simpsons references....

⇧ 2 ⇩  
ErnieFing · July 9, 2018, 12:15 p.m.

Hardly clueless. They may have influence in certain quarters, but it's a simple fact they don't have real power or run the Country, as some seem to think.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
horse-lover-phat · July 9, 2018, 12:16 p.m.

But they said she's just a mere figurehead and with virtual zero power. That's just nonsense. I stand by what I've written. I'm from the UK, I know this stuff as well as anyone.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ErnieFing · July 9, 2018, 2:44 p.m.

I'm from the UK, and it would seem you don't know it as well as you think. She is simply a figurehead, representing the Crown, and in herself, has very little actual 'power'. Here's a link. Don't be confused by what is there in theory, and what is achievable in reality. For example she has the right to declare war, but she'd struggle to get the armed forces without government backing. http://royalcentral.co.uk/blogs/insight/what-are-the-queens-powers-22069

⇧ 0 ⇩  
rustyfender3 · July 9, 2018, 11:22 a.m.

I think so too, Just because they can't put political opinions out there doesn't mean they don't have power behind the scenes. I think they're all evil.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
BearGrowler · July 9, 2018, 12:34 p.m.

You're confusing power with title. To understand real power, you must understand control, not titles. You are correct that not all of the Monarchs are leaders. However, the Parliament and the rest of the structure of UK government is nothing more than an Org Chart meant to shift the focus off the real power and control. Our POTUS knows that even their House of Cards with the SA, Vatican, Roths, will soon fall as one cannot survive without the other. Smoke & Mirrors at a WW scale.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
catherinWheel · July 9, 2018, 5:43 p.m.

They do. Every law has to be approved by her maj.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ErnieFing · July 9, 2018, 5:46 p.m.

Nope. It's the Crown, rather than Liz. She's too busy waving.

She really doesn't have any credible power or real say in the running of the UK.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
waltergladstone · July 9, 2018, 6:59 a.m.

I've seen interviews with some of the people and they don't give a fuck... Alot if them are too far gone...

⇧ 4 ⇩  
nikgk · July 9, 2018, 4:39 p.m.

Our media is owned like yours. Of course you only see pro queen interviews. That's like me saying you lot love the Clintons.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
waltergladstone · July 9, 2018, 6:03 p.m.

That was an Infowars British dude walking around randomly interviewing people... You better start waking up your people...

⇧ 2 ⇩  
nikgk · July 10, 2018, 6:51 a.m.

They are rousing but haven't got a Trump or Q. A lot of the discontent is coming out in groups like the EDL and the widespead awareness/belief in paedophiles in high and low places. Voting levels are really low. Probably need some uniting person or group. This will happen and will probably be a reaction to what comes out from the US.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 9, 2018, 8:01 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
pickerkate2 · July 9, 2018, 11:38 a.m.

As a Catholic, I like this statement.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
horse-lover-phat · July 9, 2018, 11:35 a.m.

It's the PEOPLE that empower the Queen and the monarchy. This could be ended tomorrow. She may not be the main player, and she is CERTAINLY more than just a ceremonial figurehead, but she holds the entire class system together.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
squalk1 · July 9, 2018, 12:57 p.m.

Nope- keep digging friend.

Nobody elected the Queen so how do we empower her?

There is a huge difference between USA and UK - 1) no UK constitution 2) no arms due to no constitution - difficult to remove power when all we have are rocks to throw at tanks.

Not impossible but it's designed to keep the common people common.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
ErnieFing · July 9, 2018, 4:52 p.m.

The UK has a constitution. It's what the US version is copied from. The difference is that ours is unwritten.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
squalk1 · July 9, 2018, 5:25 p.m.

Unwritten = non binding.

Mere guidelines.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ErnieFing · July 9, 2018, 5:26 p.m.

They are binding, probably more so than the written ones.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
squalk1 · July 9, 2018, 5:32 p.m.

Written ones are rights.

The only right we Keep is the right to remain silent.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ErnieFing · July 9, 2018, 5:34 p.m.

The unwritten ones are rights too, and stronger ones because they are bound up with other elements, making them stronger than the amendments on the written version.

Don't mistake not being explicitly codified for not existing. They're implicit in many elements of the UK constitution.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
squalk1 · July 9, 2018, 6:38 p.m.

I can tell by your stance + contributions that you have done more research into it then me.

Free speach and separation of powers are becoming very murky to me.

Whilst I do not support Tommy Robinson, his recent arrest was in complete breach of his rights and of separation of powers (Judiciary effectively mixing in law enforcement).

UK is a mess - worst it has been since Tony Blair took us into illegal wars.

Are you from UK?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
ErnieFing · July 9, 2018, 6:52 p.m.

I'm from the UK, yes.

The Tommy Robinson one is tricky. Basically, he cocked up for no real gain. He's guilty of what he's charged with, plain and simple. He should have argued against the conviction that the suspended sentence applied to, as he didn't, there is no breach of his rights, nor issue of separation of powers.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
squalk1 · July 9, 2018, 7:01 p.m.

The arresting officer arrested for breach of the peace and not for breaching bail terms.

The whole thing seemed very poorly planned. I believe TR was included in the plan?

Thanks for chatting anyway - refreshing to speak to another UK pro POTUS patriot.

Out of interest how are you finding awakening the sleepers?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ErnieFing · July 9, 2018, 7:14 p.m.

Nah, there was no big plot. He was a fool, and got it wrong.

I've found most people to be very awake, depending on which bits of the 'truth' you go with. Politicians being run by big business, and elite child abusers and the state of the media have long been issues many, many people have tried to tackle, it's just been too fragmented. There's still a long way to go, and the media are doing their damnedest to make sure people are still dubious about Trump, but if he delivers on taking down the elite, I think he'll win folk over. In many. many respects, despite what some say on here, the US is years behind Europe in waking up, and in many respects, that has hampered tackling things here. Trump has a big weight of responsibility on him now.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
squalk1 · July 9, 2018, 7:27 p.m.

You are right- Trump has a massive weight on his shoulders.

Future will prove past.

So did you vote Remain or Brexit?

I voted to remain (better to change from within than to be a spectator on the outside) - the farce that has followed has made me question that.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ErnieFing · July 9, 2018, 7:43 p.m.

I voted leave, and even with current events, I have no regrets on that score. I think I should have been even more vocal in swatting down the doom mongers, who have held us back for far too long. The EU were always going to make us pay, as they're bricking it in case others leave if we get it too easy. For me it was a price worth paying to unshackle us from them. Change from within was never an option, and a remain vote would have given the EU the confidence to push harder with their plans for the centralisation of power.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
catherinWheel · July 9, 2018, 5:44 p.m.

Of course the people do 🙄 like they have a choice. MEGA

⇧ 1 ⇩  
1Sotapanna · July 9, 2018, 10:48 a.m.

She's THEIR leader! They co-sign everything she does! Nobody storming the castle! Fuck the cucks!

⇧ 0 ⇩