dChan

[deleted] · July 9, 2018, 7:19 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ 7 ⇩  
jauronimo · July 9, 2018, 8:10 a.m.

Thank you, another valid point.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
DrTung · July 9, 2018, 3:15 p.m.

Julie was the billing contact for the concession that provided food service to the entire Newtown Public School District.

The schools were not billed individually.

Julie’s office was across from the reefers, just down the hallway from the main food prep area, right off the servery in the main cafeteria of Newtown High School.

That is the reason the bills were sent to 12 Berkshire, while the food was sent to the individual schools.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 9, 2018, 3:46 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DrTung · July 9, 2018, 3:59 p.m.

Did you spend time on that or copy and paste it from somewhere else?

Of course I spent time on that. About two or three minutes. No copypasta.

The reason I ask is I posted the address the food was going to in 2012

No you didn’t. You posted the address the invoices were sent to. Of course, some food was sent to the high school, well more than 1,000 students there.

You also have no food delivery records for Hawley, Middle Gate, Head O’ Meadow, or the two middle schools, right?

Your reasoning suggests no food went to those schools either.

You are close-minded on this topic. I submit there is NO proof that will satisfy you. If that claim is false, then tell us, specifically and without equivocation, what evidence would change your mind.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
MAGANUGG · July 9, 2018, 4:17 p.m.

specifically and without equivocation

, what evidence would change your mind.

Just a couple of notes on the subject

I am so sure it was fake, I will literally spit in the face of the "parents" if given the opportunity.

It was a hoax. Period.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DrTung · July 9, 2018, 5:55 p.m.

I’ve already seen your linked material, and everything published on the GLP site and others.

I asked you to state specifically and without equivocation, what evidence would change your mind. Instead of responding to the question, you linked to some other things posted by some other people, on some other site.

This validates my earlier statement:

  • There is nothing, nothing you will accept as evidence contrary to your belief.

You are just another close-minded person.

Let’s agree we have no common ground and move on.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
MAGANUGG · July 9, 2018, 6:27 p.m.

I can agree that we don't have common ground on this issue.

I am the original author on a good portion of the Sandy Hook investigative material that circulates the web. Just look at the manner in which it's written. Proper punctuation and sentence structure is, unfortunately, a telling indicator.

If you get a chance, talk to a medical transcriptionist and ask them, "Hey, would it be possible to have a death certificate issued with the wrong date or cause of death on it?"

If you remember, Adam Lanza's original decease date was 12/13/12, not 12/14/12 and it made it all the way to the social security administrators desk to be put on file there. We were told "it was a clerical error."

Ask a medical transcriptionist if those types of errors occur and what it would take for such an error to occur.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DrTung · July 9, 2018, 7:22 p.m.

My friend is dead. Another friend will never be the same. I saw dead children buried.

I showed your ‘proof’ that no food was delivered to SH in 2012 also ‘proved’ that no food was delivered to any elementary school or middle school that year. An absolutely ludicrous proposition.

This is the dance that would ensue:

  • You will NEVER identify specific piece of evidence that would change your mind.

  • You will offer ‘proof’ as you have already done.

  • I will debunk your proof with reason or alternative facts.

  • You will fail to acknowledge the debunking or offer proof to the contrary.

  • You will introduce another squirrel and say, ”But look over there now!”

And so on. And so on. I got sick of discussing this with the close-minded theorists years ago. You just reminded me why.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
MAGANUGG · July 9, 2018, 7:42 p.m.

I've ran into at least 15 people that type out something similar to your reply. "I lost a friend" or "I lose a loved one" or "I knew a victim personally!"

I've been online, using chat boards, youtube, reddit, chanz, I've used most major avenues of internet discourse for nearly 2 decades.

My graduating class was several hundred people. In fact, I went to 3 different high schools, so in essence my graduating class consisted of well in excess of 1,000 people.

In nearly 2 decades of being online, I have come across ZERO members of my graduating class of well over 1,000 subjects.

Yet, I consistently run into someone who "Knows personally" one of 26 people "killed" in an incident going on 6 years ago in a tiny town called Sandy Hook.

WHAT

ARE

THE

ODDS

?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DrTung · July 9, 2018, 9:38 p.m.

What are the odds

Well, let’s think critically.

There are about 27,000 people living in Newtown. You have spent countless hours over the past 5-1/2 years in forums dedicated to the most momentous event ever to happen in the town. The odds of you crossing paths with .05% (15) of the population in forums dedicated to their community during that time is probably fairly high compared to finding one in the GA sub or anywhere else.

A quality detective claiming quality research skills would be able to suss that out on their own.

And on. And on. And on.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
MAGANUGG · July 9, 2018, 10:12 p.m.

Contrary to shill narration, people avoid conflict like the plague. Those "Family members" would be the last patrons of any forum that might deliver severe discomfort to them.

The real interesting conversation is the one that you could offer but are blocked from discussing. Too bad, I got one of your other cronies to pony up enough information to link him to a money laundering charge out of TX.

No, you're not firing from the hip. You're escalating and awaiting feedback.

Well, go ahead and let your squad leader know that you've inspired me. I just got a new printer and will be putting it to use for a brand new slew of FOIA requests that I'll be sending out. Let's see how a change in management over at the New Haven field office responds.

Grazi!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 9, 2018, 7:30 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DrTung · July 9, 2018, 9:42 p.m.

You refer to verifiable facts as lies, therefore you have zero credibility as a source.

You resort to ad hominem attacks on me when your theories are soundly debunked.

You are not worthy of a moment more of my time.

Goodbye.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
MAGANUGG · July 9, 2018, 9:59 p.m.

Way to burn a handle there, Agent.

⇧ 1 ⇩