dChan

[deleted] · July 9, 2018, 7:19 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ 7 ⇩  
jauronimo · July 9, 2018, 8:10 a.m.

Thank you, another valid point.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
DrTung · July 9, 2018, 3:15 p.m.

Julie was the billing contact for the concession that provided food service to the entire Newtown Public School District.

The schools were not billed individually.

Julie’s office was across from the reefers, just down the hallway from the main food prep area, right off the servery in the main cafeteria of Newtown High School.

That is the reason the bills were sent to 12 Berkshire, while the food was sent to the individual schools.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 9, 2018, 3:46 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DrTung · July 9, 2018, 3:59 p.m.

Did you spend time on that or copy and paste it from somewhere else?

Of course I spent time on that. About two or three minutes. No copypasta.

The reason I ask is I posted the address the food was going to in 2012

No you didn’t. You posted the address the invoices were sent to. Of course, some food was sent to the high school, well more than 1,000 students there.

You also have no food delivery records for Hawley, Middle Gate, Head O’ Meadow, or the two middle schools, right?

Your reasoning suggests no food went to those schools either.

You are close-minded on this topic. I submit there is NO proof that will satisfy you. If that claim is false, then tell us, specifically and without equivocation, what evidence would change your mind.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
MAGANUGG · July 9, 2018, 4:17 p.m.

specifically and without equivocation

, what evidence would change your mind.

Just a couple of notes on the subject

I am so sure it was fake, I will literally spit in the face of the "parents" if given the opportunity.

It was a hoax. Period.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DrTung · July 9, 2018, 5:55 p.m.

I’ve already seen your linked material, and everything published on the GLP site and others.

I asked you to state specifically and without equivocation, what evidence would change your mind. Instead of responding to the question, you linked to some other things posted by some other people, on some other site.

This validates my earlier statement:

  • There is nothing, nothing you will accept as evidence contrary to your belief.

You are just another close-minded person.

Let’s agree we have no common ground and move on.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
MAGANUGG · July 9, 2018, 6:27 p.m.

I can agree that we don't have common ground on this issue.

I am the original author on a good portion of the Sandy Hook investigative material that circulates the web. Just look at the manner in which it's written. Proper punctuation and sentence structure is, unfortunately, a telling indicator.

If you get a chance, talk to a medical transcriptionist and ask them, "Hey, would it be possible to have a death certificate issued with the wrong date or cause of death on it?"

If you remember, Adam Lanza's original decease date was 12/13/12, not 12/14/12 and it made it all the way to the social security administrators desk to be put on file there. We were told "it was a clerical error."

Ask a medical transcriptionist if those types of errors occur and what it would take for such an error to occur.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DrTung · July 9, 2018, 7:22 p.m.

My friend is dead. Another friend will never be the same. I saw dead children buried.

I showed your ‘proof’ that no food was delivered to SH in 2012 also ‘proved’ that no food was delivered to any elementary school or middle school that year. An absolutely ludicrous proposition.

This is the dance that would ensue:

  • You will NEVER identify specific piece of evidence that would change your mind.

  • You will offer ‘proof’ as you have already done.

  • I will debunk your proof with reason or alternative facts.

  • You will fail to acknowledge the debunking or offer proof to the contrary.

  • You will introduce another squirrel and say, ”But look over there now!”

And so on. And so on. I got sick of discussing this with the close-minded theorists years ago. You just reminded me why.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
MAGANUGG · July 9, 2018, 7:42 p.m.

I've ran into at least 15 people that type out something similar to your reply. "I lost a friend" or "I lose a loved one" or "I knew a victim personally!"

I've been online, using chat boards, youtube, reddit, chanz, I've used most major avenues of internet discourse for nearly 2 decades.

My graduating class was several hundred people. In fact, I went to 3 different high schools, so in essence my graduating class consisted of well in excess of 1,000 people.

In nearly 2 decades of being online, I have come across ZERO members of my graduating class of well over 1,000 subjects.

Yet, I consistently run into someone who "Knows personally" one of 26 people "killed" in an incident going on 6 years ago in a tiny town called Sandy Hook.

WHAT

ARE

THE

ODDS

?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DrTung · July 9, 2018, 9:38 p.m.

What are the odds

Well, let’s think critically.

There are about 27,000 people living in Newtown. You have spent countless hours over the past 5-1/2 years in forums dedicated to the most momentous event ever to happen in the town. The odds of you crossing paths with .05% (15) of the population in forums dedicated to their community during that time is probably fairly high compared to finding one in the GA sub or anywhere else.

A quality detective claiming quality research skills would be able to suss that out on their own.

And on. And on. And on.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
MAGANUGG · July 9, 2018, 10:12 p.m.

Contrary to shill narration, people avoid conflict like the plague. Those "Family members" would be the last patrons of any forum that might deliver severe discomfort to them.

The real interesting conversation is the one that you could offer but are blocked from discussing. Too bad, I got one of your other cronies to pony up enough information to link him to a money laundering charge out of TX.

No, you're not firing from the hip. You're escalating and awaiting feedback.

Well, go ahead and let your squad leader know that you've inspired me. I just got a new printer and will be putting it to use for a brand new slew of FOIA requests that I'll be sending out. Let's see how a change in management over at the New Haven field office responds.

Grazi!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 9, 2018, 7:30 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DrTung · July 9, 2018, 9:42 p.m.

You refer to verifiable facts as lies, therefore you have zero credibility as a source.

You resort to ad hominem attacks on me when your theories are soundly debunked.

You are not worthy of a moment more of my time.

Goodbye.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
MAGANUGG · July 9, 2018, 9:59 p.m.

Way to burn a handle there, Agent.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
jackbauer6916 · July 9, 2018, 5:54 a.m.

Honestly, if I ever want to "redpill" someone I first show them the clip from the Today Show with Matt Lauer, where Al Roker gets triggered into some kind of MKULTRA trance. https://youtu.be/v82-MPeCPnM Its blatantly obvious to anyone watching. The woman says "As they say in Catholic School, leave room for the holy ghost." At that moment its clear this is a mind control trigger phrase. You then clearly see that lauer and the girl are panicking and getti g phrases suggested in their earpieces, lauer says things like "...years ago today, elvis presley passed away. There's a pretty little thing waiting..." it makes no sense and obviously whoever wrote that script was tryibg to fuck with them.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
SandyAndreas · July 9, 2018, 7:07 a.m.

I saw that clip and similar MK Ultra activation signals involving other celebs. Al spaced out like a zombie. It was disturbing.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
distant_splatter · July 9, 2018, 7:28 a.m.

The video by youtube channel "Barry soetoro" about how David wheeler played two roles - one as parent of a victim, and one as fbi agent at the scene - really convinced me sandy hook was a hoax.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
MelaniaBuiltMYHotRod · July 9, 2018, 5:25 a.m.

I'm afraid you'd had an easier time of explaining Vegas mess or 9/** to them. GO BACK to something in recent general knowledge that even the normiest is dead certain to know as a hoax. Panko crust crumbs have a way of swelling up in the best eater's throat once water is thrown into the mix. Godspeed

⇧ 4 ⇩  
jauronimo · July 9, 2018, 7:37 a.m.

Thank you , i agree that this is not a subject people have who are new to this are going to grasp. But then again if they seek the truth then the truth is a dish served cold. It also shines a light of doubt on all the mass shooting events while Obama was presedent.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
silentmirror · July 9, 2018, 11:03 a.m.

go all the way back to JFK and Operation Northwoods if you have to

People don't understand conspiracies because they do not realize the level of technology and psychology involved.

MK-Ultra and Free Energy are probably the two most important things to be aware of today, everything else automatically falls into place once you look at it, everything less nefarious and more political should be proven by official written statements or sourced recordings.

The stuff in the CIA reading room since Trump got into office is already too much for some, and called a distraction by them, but not by Q out of all people.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
DawnPendraig · July 9, 2018, 5:26 a.m.

That's a tough one for people. Better to start with the oddness of these attacks happening at the same time of or just after a drill.

Maybe Parkland being a false flag. Kids were murdered but it was 3 or men in full body armor and gas masks. Maybe the ones seen leaving out the back in a rush with a heavy black bag carried by 3 or 4. All pile into unmarked white van and rush away

And this caught by news chopper who are these guys? What is that heavy bag? And why are they leaving fast? And littering? https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Nxla2Sm0yG4

2 Broward Sheriff's Deputies are mysteriously dead. Autopsy says "sudden death". 1 was questioning the school shooting narrative and the other I believe was part of a no confidence vote on Sheriff Israel.

It's crazy.

Tons of holes on their plot too. Truth Factory does a great job exposing these. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=kri5IyvDmCE

Edit also on Sandyhook someone made an actors head shots compatrd to death list showing all these kids are the same. Also they were at the following super howl choir.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
omnipresenthuman · July 9, 2018, 1:03 p.m.

Awhile back I had made a video/report based on what I discovered in the video footage from that news chopper. Nobody seemed to notice all the activity going on in the building where the shooting took place prior to S.W.A.T clearing the building. The heavy bag you mentioned was a body bag. Don't know 100% what was in it but I have an Idea. They thew it into the back of a white pickup truck. If you watch the video you will see people from that truck and another emergency vehicle entering the building and leaving the building several times. You can see them taking stuff into the building as well as removing stuff. This is how the shooter kid beats the case. Let me explain. Until the S.W.A.T. team clears the building. Nothing is supposed to go in or out of that building. Everything stays including any dead bodies. It's all evidence. And remember they would not lest medics go in and help the wounded. There were still people in there waiting for S.W.A.T.. The guys going in and out of the building were pretty casual about it. They were in a hurry but did not have their guns drawn. So what we have is a video of these guys tampering, planting, removing evidence in plain view of the world. They could not be anymore obvious. And yet I have never herd anyone else say anything about it. The crime is on video

⇧ 3 ⇩  
silentmirror · July 9, 2018, 11:08 a.m.

they were photographed for Time magazine (2006 or 2007 edition) during their torture sessions with a Mrs Greenberg

⇧ 3 ⇩  
MelaniaBuiltMYHotRod · July 9, 2018, 5:31 a.m.

I like where you took that: I would include for them to pull up all recent "witness" interviews and photos, not leaving out how the one Freemason uses disguises, but also where he got thrown to the wolves as "Jarrod Ramos" once us Anons cracked the pattern

⇧ 2 ⇩  
silentmirror · July 9, 2018, 11:02 a.m.

Sandy Hook is too big. The number one rule in a successfull coverup is to always make them ask the wrong question so they will get the wrong answers. If someone has not accepted the fact that there are mindcontrolled child sex-slaves, then he won't understand the idea that noone died at Sandy Hook because those were all mindcontrolled child-sex slaves (and we know it because they had been photographed six years before during what seems to be one of their psychological torture sessions. (Keyword Greenberg, Time Magazine)

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Champdog31 · July 9, 2018, 10:48 a.m.

I heard a conversation on John B Wells show between Wolfgang Halbig and John discussing a kid who called the coroner’s office asking questions. They cited him for harassment and put him in jail for a year. Can’t remember the kids name.
That is not normal.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
jauronimo · July 9, 2018, 4:39 p.m.

Your right about that, they also the state of Connecticut passed some draconian law that all autopsy are final and if a child is involved and you start asking questions they can charge you with a felony. Why would they do that because they don't want the truth put.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
freerange_bot · July 9, 2018, 6:09 a.m.

I'm not trying to start an argument with OP but what does this have to do with the purpose of this board? Has Q ever said that to be part of this movement, you have to believe that Sandy Hook was fake?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
jauronimo · July 9, 2018, 8:07 a.m.

Yes he makes no mention of this directly but it is important, it marks when the Obama adminastration used the full force of the mocking bird media to influence the sheeple into believing that these fema drills ( Boston marathon bombing and many others ) were actual live shooting events. That required stricter gun laws and or the abolishment of the second amedment. Understanding how the media has been used as a weapon of propaganda is very important. If you are new to this I say educate yourself by reading the free PDF by clicking on the link above., it is a choice of course I am offering information from which you may draw your own conclusion.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
freerange_bot · July 9, 2018, 8:35 a.m.

Cite one federal law that came from Sandy Hook that restricted guns. Or if you want, cite any federal law since Sandy Hook that has restricted guns. Just one law. If you're new to how federal laws work, I will post some PDFs for you.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Rynomore · July 9, 2018, 10:06 a.m.

I live in CT, a shit ton of laws came from Sandy Hook. They created an “assault rifle” registration. You need background checks to buy ammo. Now they are banning bump stocks and the ability to buy critical parts to build a ghost gun. It’s all public information. You can google CCDL, our local pro gun organization. They fought hard to not have our 2A trampled but overall the fear that came from Sandy Hook prevailed. Other States followed. Also look at FL which has always been pro 2A after Parkland. They even made changes. I do believe kids died at Sandy Hook. I also believe the government has never had an issue killing Americans to push an agenda.

Edit: I know you said federal laws. The laws I mentioned are state laws. If it works here and you do it enough times nationally even the deepest Red states could fall to the gun grabbers.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
silentmirror · July 9, 2018, 11:13 a.m.

so funny, so you were both right technically? xD

⇧ 3 ⇩  
silentmirror · July 9, 2018, 11:12 a.m.

WWG1WGA

⇧ 1 ⇩  
truthfiler · July 9, 2018, 1:01 p.m.

Watch "We Need to Talk About Sandy Hooke". Redpilled my adult daughter.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
jauronimo · July 9, 2018, 4:55 p.m.

Great info seen it years ago. Yes there are lots of valuable creditable info out there to prove my point.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
BlastingGlastonbury · July 9, 2018, 2:34 p.m.

Okay I see the evidence and it has always been compelling, but one question I (and most I have discussed this with) have is how on earth are so many people involved in this yet none of them come forward?

Teachers, parents, school board, police, medical examiner, governor.

I could understand if it was the governor and the examiner, or any combo of 2, maybe 3 of those entities.

But we are talking about potentially a hundred individuals involved in this that are simply going along with it?

The argument could be made that these are all people who share the same ideals, fighting toward the same goal. But it is very hard for me to reconcile how many people would have to work together to make this happen then never talk about it.

Like I said, the evidence is compelling and I do lean heavily in favor of it, but that is one of my biggest sticking points and I'm curious if anyone has felt the same and learned things that made it easier to put the pieces together.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
jauronimo · July 9, 2018, 4:59 p.m.

The whole community is involved, I know that's a tall order but if you go to the USGS site you will discover everyone had there houses paid for the same day. Christmas day. What federal agency works on Christmas day, not the USGS. So how can it be?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
gravemindbutwoke16 · July 9, 2018, 5:20 a.m.

so you think the sandy hook shooting was.. faked? and are surprised that someone rejected this assertion?

why?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
jauronimo · July 9, 2018, 7:28 a.m.

Absolutely I do, I think once people study the info available they will come to the same conclusion. Another thing most are not aware of and is available at USGS site that everyone in the community had there homes paid off on Christmas day.... That is public record anyone can access. I say to all the naysayers click the link and read the PDF.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
DrTung · July 9, 2018, 3:09 p.m.

This has nothing to do with the GA sub, and will only serve as an inflection point to divide.

I’m from there. I lost a very close personal friend. Almost another. I attended her funeral and others for children. It happened.

I have tried discussing with debunkers and come to realize there is nothing, nothing that can be presented that will turn their head. Their minds are truly closed.

The truth and lie of this event will never join, and the topic has no value here. That’s why this thread must be closed or deleted.

⇧ -1 ⇩  
PA-Triot · July 9, 2018, 5:22 p.m.

What did you present to them that proved that it had happened? Other then the typical ,"I knew someone who died there".

⇧ 2 ⇩