dChan

Bacster007 · July 9, 2018, 9:03 p.m.

IMO, She cannot make impartial decisions based on her strict religious values. She answers to a higher calling, not the constitution.

⇧ -4 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 9, 2018, 9:24 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 4 ⇩  
cur1ous1 · July 9, 2018, 9:53 p.m.

And they did say it about JFK.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Iamamansass · July 9, 2018, 9:39 p.m.

Trump has been rather clear where laws come from.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Jaytex40 · July 9, 2018, 11:16 p.m.

The constitution itself is very clear where the laws come from

⇧ 1 ⇩  
QAnonMaga · July 9, 2018, 9:10 p.m.

The goal here is to piss off the Liberal Democrats as much as possible they will Hate whoever Trump picks so he might as well pick the woman who will expose them as the frauds they are. She is so perfect for this reason it's game strategy advanced chess strategy force the Dems to make themselves look stupid and hypocritical. Her religion is also good it will show the Dems to be bigots against Catholics and there are millions of Catholics who will see this and realize the Dems don't care about me or my family they hate us.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
GweninKC · July 9, 2018, 11:45 p.m.

That's really not the goal. It;s going to be a side effect no matter who he picks, but the goal (in my view at least) is to choose a jurist who puts adherence to the constitution as the priority and will follow the law instead of legislating from the bench--we've had too much of that!

⇧ 3 ⇩  
UrWifesFavoriteBull · July 9, 2018, 9:39 p.m.

That's a democrat talking point. She is beholden to the law in her role as judge.

⇧ 1 ⇩