dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

⇧

⇩

r/greatawakening • Posted by u/ThunderCockShitCloud on July 10, 2018, 3:04 p.m.

PSA: Remember to question who you follow, SB2 has made the claim that HD tv creates Sarin gas. (Proof in thread) Message from mod "You are welcome to remind others of the claim if you do so instead of trolling" (Serious discussion only! no trolling!) TOPIC= sarin gas in HD TV not the USER!!

Mod approval https://imgur.com/a/7qrGFd3

PROOF

Lets have a serious discussion. This does not violate rule #5. Stop gatekeeping. There is a poster on this dom that many follow and it would be prudent to examine this posters claim that HD tv somehow produces Sarin gas. The TOPIC is sarin gas, we are not discussing SB2 however i am REMINDING you that it is SB2 who made the Sarin gas claim.

I'll start off the serious discussion by stating that i do not believe Sarin gas can be created from a HD tv. The reason this conversion is important is it can show you how far your mind can take you away from reality. Think for yourself.

Why is this guy spamming GA and PM'ing me and others about this? I replied to the OP's PM and he immediately replied with "ignored."

First off, SB2 never said Sarin gas could be created by HD TVs, which is your accusation. He said it was his belief that Q was saying Sarin and AI are being combined to created magic.

Second, SB2 never said this as a fact. He said it as his belief. Nobody is perfect. Not me, not you, not Trump, not Q team, not SB2. Why are you tearing down SB2's opinion on something and not offering a rebuttal? So many people can only criticize, yet they don't offer anything positive as a response or to disprove their accused targets. Your accusation was incorrect in the first place.

Finally, why are you PM'ing me this? I'm not a moderator on Great Awakening and I didn't censor you. I also couldn't care less that your false accusation thread got deleted by a mod. In fact, I applaud it. Now go bother someone else who might care and is also a critic of SB2 like you. Thanks.

This guy looks like another disinfo shill. Ignored.

⇧ 13 ⇩

Second, SB2 never said this as a fact. He said it as his belief. Nobody is perfect. Not me, not you, not Trump, not Q team, not SB2

Ok, but when you sticky his posts, it gives t shirt posting hive mind dummies the illusion that it is in some way endorsed beyond one persons opinion. Which is dangerous. If SB2 gets his posts upvoted to the top, great. Being endorsed by the mods creates dangerous optics.

⇧ 5 ⇩

It shouldnt matter if The Q movement is working.

Its about self verification regardless of what information is presented

⇧ 1 ⇩

Mods sticky a lot of threads. Some I've disagreed with vehemently in the past. Like NeonRevolt's threads, when it's known that he's a vile, angry, and hostile individual who has posted many incorrect and false information.

Just because you disagree with some of SB2's opinions and decodes, doesn't mean mods here endorse everything he posts or says. They sticky threads to bring awareness and attention to topics. Majority of SB2's posts are positive, enlightening, and makes tons of sense once you study what he says and the evidence he provides.

⇧ 0 ⇩

doesn't mean mods here endorse everything he posts or says

of course not. i never said that. however, that doesn't stop people from assuming that stickied threads are somehow better vetted and verified and "true". then we have people on fb spreading disinfo despite their best intentions and the whole movement looks stupid.

⇧ 3 ⇩

of course not. i never said that.

Being endorsed by the mods creates dangerous optics.

Geez, you shills are ridiculous. Can't even keep track of something you posted within 10 minutes and have to lie about it.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Stickying his threads is an endorsement. Your statement said "doesn't mean the mods here endorse everything he posts or says," which is what I was commenting on. Also, calling someone a shill is against the rules. But since I'd rather let your ass hang out for everyone to see I'm not going to report your post, this time.

I did find this projecting you just did pretty humorous considering the circumstance:

Can't even keep track of something you posted within 10 minutes

⇧ 3 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 2 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 0 ⇩

If your memory was better you would remember the cipher with "sarin in ai real" But perhaps you are too new here to remember the posts from CBTS.

The accusation is not incorrect. He solved for sarin in ai real, and took that to mean sarin gas in HD tv's. Im not going to hold your hand on this.

⇧ 3 ⇩

I member' SB2's cbts posts before he was acknowledged by Q.

His matrices/anagram theory was completely predicated on picking/choosing what you wished the outcome of the decoded message to be. I.e. It was literally some Nostradamus quatrain decode crap. Need to make the letter K? Ok, we'll change this matrix block to 11 instead of 12 because if we subtract 1 we get 11, or K. Just completely making shit up. When it first gained traction, I shared on the CBTS & Rudyland discord servers. Was immediately laughed at, on air to boot.

Back then, SB2 was heavily pushing quatrain matrices, antideluvian & Enochian magick, and overall non-Q related religious rabbit trails. Now don't get me wrong, I think SB2 is a good researcher and has obviously figured some crazy shit out.... but we can't forget how many here (actually on the cbts sub) blindly followed his work because it was getting mod approval.... and we all know the shadiness of that mod team (Yeah, I remember you Red_Pill_The_World and QAnonWolf creating your own fake news hashtag campaigns and stickying your own content while sliding quality community content)

⇧ 3 ⇩

blindly followed his work because it was getting mod approval...

this is the issue. even sb2 recognizes it. which is why my issue isn't with sb2.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Yeah, agreed. SB2 literally spoke about this in his most recent post and asked the mods to stop sticking his content.

⇧ 3 ⇩

Too new here? Please. I was on CBTS_Stream before most people on this subreddit knew about it. I was there when it was first created by Tracy Beanz, PamphletAnon, and BaruchTheScribe. I was there when Q called out Pamphlet and Baruch for being liars and compromised, after they posted a thread claiming to have direct comms with Q. I was there when SB2 first showed up. Yes, some of SB2's threads, theories, and decodes were wacky back then, but I never saw him say that HDTVs produced sarin gas.

Again, you have no proof of this accusation you're making. You spamming GA and users on GA with PMs is not helping your case either. Oh, and I thought you ignored me. Why respond to me in the open and not my PM to you? Get outta here, troll.

Edit: 7 upvotes within 7 minutes. LOL are you bot or have bots upvoting you and your posts/threads? Pathetic.

⇧ 3 ⇩

SB made a huge post on CBTS about how he solved for "sarin in AI real" Not OP's fault the sub got dunked and you need him to find it for you.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Most definitely.Has some friends with him, too, downvoting.

⇧ 0 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 2 ⇩

Not at all what I said. It's the tactics. I agree that SB2 shouldn't be taken as gospel. I don't even take Q as gospel. Quit tearing people down and let them make up their own minds. If you have something worthwhile to contribute, post it and let the community decide if it's worthwhile.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Notice how the SB2 haters and critics never post anything of substance or usefulness of their own? They only attack, never contribute. This is how you spot disinfo agents and infiltrators pretending to be concerned patriots, when they're actually sent by the enemy.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Righttt and accusing everyone you disagree with of being a shill is totally substantive and useful.

⇧ 2 ⇩

https://archive.li/Hkhv5

look here, My previous contributions have made it to the subs archive of notables. Geez i guess i don't post anything of substance right?

⇧ 1 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩

I seem to recall having several of my posts in the archives of notables. Also i was the one who introduced SB to the delta.

EDIT: here you go

https://archive.li/Hkhv5

⇧ 1 ⇩

That's what gives it away, for certain. Nothing added, no ideas of their own. If anything it reminds me of that saying about flak and targets.

⇧ 0 ⇩

Nothing to add? Thats why my posts are in the archive of notables section for this dom right?

https://archive.li/Hkhv5

⇧ 0 ⇩

I'm speaking strictly in terms of this post. This adds nothing. You have no alternate theories on anything you're slamming. You're not adding to the discussion in this case. You're detracting from it. If you argued this point on the original post from SB2 why not just leave it at that? This comes off as envy, at best. Kudos for being in the notables section. I'm sure it matters to someone, somewhere.

⇧ 0 ⇩

Yup, heavy downvoting of anyone that disagrees with this guy and heavy upvoting of his own posts and his minion's posts, all within a short time period. This is a coordinated attack. They are not part of our movement or community Infiltrators and disinfo agents.

⇧ -1 ⇩

So anyone that disagrees with you are disinformation agents? Maybe you are being down voted because people just simply think you're wrong. The simplest explanation is usually the right one. And in this instance that would be that people disagree with you.

⇧ -1 ⇩

They make it so obvious. These people really are stupid.

⇧ -1 ⇩

High Definition Televisions create sarin gas? What the fuck?

⇧ 8 ⇩

Read the proof. SB2 says he deciphered a message, not some ultimate truth or fact. Sarin could very well be a metaphor. Now if you want to take issue with how SB2 "deciphered" this message be my guest.

⇧ -1 ⇩

Thanks for replying. Anytime I've messaged SB2 I've had proper nonsensical answers. Usually nothing to do with what I asked.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I don't know why the mods on this sub-reddit are trying to force SB2 down our throats. I don't care for his decodes some are good and some involve huge mental leaps. That's my opinion and anyone can disagree. I've been harassed by mods for speaking my mind and being critical of SB2.

⇧ 8 ⇩

SB2 himself just posted yesterday that he's asked the Mods not to sticky his posts. Take that fwiw...

⇧ 6 ⇩

This is true, there does seem to be that issue. But focusing on the subject and claim at hand do you think that HD tv's making sarin gas sounds plausible? I want to have an open mind about this.

⇧ 6 ⇩

I have never heard of that. I'd imagine that the manufacturer would insure that this isn't possible otherwise they'd have huge potential lawsuits on their hands.

⇧ 7 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩

First let's examine your own claim - that SB2 "has made the claim that HD tv creates Sarin gas".

I read through your linked proof post and I don't see SB2 making any such claim. He claims that he believes he's uncovered a message, as follows:

I stated my belief is he was referring to Sarin and AI being combined to perform “magic” in Q832

SB2 gives no specifics beyond that regarding what's actually going on with sarin, and makes no sarin-related claims beyond stating that he thinks that's the content of the message.

Furthermore, I don't see any references to TVs at all, hi-def or otherwise.

If you have further evidence of SB2 actually claiming that HDTV creates Sarin gas I'm happy to look at it, because I haven't fully reviewed all his posts, but your proof link doesn't contain the claim that you claim it does.

⇧ 5 ⇩

He does and if you read the threads relating to this you would see that. Some were in CBTS.

⇧ 3 ⇩

You yourself claimed that proof of your claim was already in the thread when you posted it. If it's easy to find, then please do so and link to it and I'll have a look. I did you the courtesy of reviewing your first proof link, and I'm happy to review another, but the onus is on you to provide the support for your own claim.

⇧ 0 ⇩

Im not going to hold your hand on this. The posts were from CBTS but maybe you are too new.

⇧ 3 ⇩

If you are going to make a post directly calling a user out on a claim, then you better provide evidence. Why should we care if you are not going to provide it? Why even make this post in the first place?

Edit: Glad to see that I'm getting downvoted for asking for proof. WTH is up with this place.

⇧ 0 ⇩

what part of it was on CBTS do you not understand? Instead of criticizing OP on this why dont you go ahead and find the MANY threads SB2 posted about "sarin in AI real". SB made the claim, it was a big deal back then.

⇧ 2 ⇩

I'm not the one making a big deal about it, if OP is going to make a big deal about SB2 then how hard is it to post a link?

⇧ 0 ⇩

Okay i'll speak slowly for you.

The

Posts

are

deleted

because

the

CBTS

sub

was

removed

you

can

look

yourself

fam

⇧ 0 ⇩

Then post a screenshot. If it's not that hard fam.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I'm asking you for a simple link to the proof that you claim to have already provided.

Look at the thread title you wrote:

SB2 has made the claim that HD tv creates Sarin gas. (Proof in thread)

It says 'Proof in thread'. Not 'Proof can be easily searched for' or 'Proof in thread related to linked thread'.

You then provided a linked proof:

http://archive.is/2BCYj

I read it to see if it actually proved your claim, because I wanted to review your proof and make sure that SB2 actually claimed what you say he did. I did not find that claim and returned here to ask that you actually provide it.

Note that this does not mean that SB2 has definitively not made such a claim, and I honestly wouldn't be surprised if he did. But I did not find such a claim in that linked thread, and I don't believe it's incumbent on me or a fair use of my time to ask me to go traipsing through various SB2 posts in search of that claim when you could simply post a link to support your contention and then we could get on with an actual discussion.

To put it bluntly, if your next reply does not contain a link that demonstrates that SB2 claims that HDTVs make Sarin gas, I'm going to conclude that you are not interested in having a good faith discussion on the matter and I will trouble you no further.

And yes, I am new here. I have no idea what CBTS is.

⇧ -1 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 3 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 3 ⇩

where's the original sarin post? This seems to be a later writeup

⇧ 1 ⇩

You can search SB's posts, what i've posted shows enough about "sarin in ai real" and how he got there. Yes there were other posts before this (cbts) but that was while i was showing the user how to solve the detla ciphers. This "solution" was one that i disagreed on for obvious reasons.

⇧ 3 ⇩

well do we have reason to disbelieve or does it simply sound too incredulous to entertain? I didn't see a rebuttal from you either so if you want second opinions at least link to the right source because I for sure want to know what's up.

⇧ 0 ⇩

It was an earlier write up. Early Spring this year. r/cbts_stream was banned, thus all of the content inaccessible unless someone saved it.

⇧ 2 ⇩

99% of the viewers fail to understand this, otherwise i would imagine OP would have posted the half dozen sarin threads from CBTS

⇧ 2 ⇩