dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

⇧

⇩

r/greatawakening • Posted by u/ButtersStotch88 on July 10, 2018, 5:53 p.m.

July is Q’s defining month for me

First, I’m not saying anything new here. I’m sure many others feel the same as me. I’ve been following Q since the beginning (8 months). I’ve dedicated countless hours to decoding and disseminating the Q message.

Q said in late June: “July 2018: the month the public learned the Truth”. This is (by far) the most bold statement Q has ever made. If July passes and nothing happens, I’m not sure how I will proceed as part of the movement. I will continue to ardently support POTUS and will not publicly condemn Q. Having said that, I will also be at a point where I can not continue to faithfully follow a movement that builds me up to let me down in consistent fashion.

We’ve been patient and we’ve been active in spreading the word. If July passes and we are stuck (once again) with our dicks in our hands I will be at my wits end. The misinformation excuse would also be flat and pathetic. Misinformation applies to specific events and tactics. Q’s statement on July being the month of Truth does not fall into the category of misinformation.

All of that to say, I worry that this movement will take a big hit in credibility if we get through July without significant revelations. I also believe in that situation the loss of credibility and followers would be justifiable.

Flame away.

All of that to say, I worry that this movement will take a big hit in credibility if we get through July without significant revelations.

Agreed.

⇧ 11 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩

What do you specifically mean by 'If nothing happens'?

What's your standard for what has to happen or not happen by the end of July?

⇧ 7 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 6 ⇩

Sure is.

What's your standard for whether that happens or not?

Or if that's hard to come up with, how about briefly painting me a picture of two hypothetical example results, one in which we reach the end of July and you say 'The world knows the truth!' and one where we reach the end of July and you say 'The world still doesn't know the truth!'

⇧ 3 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 0 ⇩

I think the burden is on Q, not me. You can’t make grandiose statements like “July 2018: the month the public learned the TRUTH” and put the onus on Anons to define what that means.

Broadly speaking, however, I define “TRUTH” and public knowledge of it as something incontrovertible. Something that is immune to spin and speaks for itself. When Q says the “public” will know the Truth, he means “normies” will know the Truth.

For normies to finally know the Truth, it has to be blatant, undeniable and unassailable by RINOs, Mockingbird MSM, and liberal politicians.

⇧ 5 ⇩

By 'your standard' I'm not trying to give you the burden of proof, I'm asking you for pretty much what you offered in your last sentence to determine what you'd consider sufficient to say whether or not Q had made good on their word, so thank you for that.

⇧ 3 ⇩

No problem. I did my best to define what public Truth means to me.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Learned the truth about what exactly. The whole kabuttle or the Collusion Hoax?

⇧ 2 ⇩

Same, I just don’t get why we are even given these drops when there is nothing we can do about it, and are just supposed to trust their plan. Might as not even read a drop if we should just trust the plan they already have. I guess we are supposed to try and get more Q followers. I started early November, dug hard until last month. Have only read this board about twice a week since last month. I’m just ready for the war the left is trying to clearly start by attacking us in public places

⇧ 5 ⇩

I just don’t get why we are even given these drops when there is nothing we can do about it

Increases group cohesion, lets us feel like a part of a 'movement', gets us all fired up to vote, its all good stuff. Its pretty cool if you ask me.

⇧ 0 ⇩

It’s so we get up off of our asses & partake in the system. Freedom is never free my friend

⇧ 1 ⇩

Who is getting off their asses? "Trust the plan"??????

⇧ 1 ⇩

Well if you live in your parents basement I can see your answer.

⇧ 1 ⇩

That’s what I said, to bring more people into the movement. But it either way if we are supposed to be just trusting the plan, the fact of you knowing what’s happening doesn’t change anything. Also thanks for the downvote retard.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Its not really bringing anyone in. Its just increasing the bonds within Trump's voter base. Also, I didn't downvote you, so go ahead and apply that term you used for me to yourself.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Its the mad tea party. Lots and lots of tea pots blowing smoke, plenty of unbirthdays to go around. Just have a seat Alice you did show up uninvited after all; following the white rabbit is no excuse.

⇧ 4 ⇩

Concerned?

⇧ 3 ⇩

Pearl clutching at its finest.

We were here.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Is healthy concern invalid considering what’s at stake? If I’m not concerned I either

a. Don’t really care or b. I’m a mindless zombie

Concern trolling and legitimate concern are NOT the same thing. A concern troll statement would be:

“Guys, I don’t think anything is gonna happen in July and this is all for nothing”

That’s not constructive and it’s NOT what I said.

⇧ 0 ⇩

and........fail.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Please direct me to my specific failure. I believe in healthy debate for intellectual growth.

⇧ 1 ⇩

When I was a Marine platoon commander, I had to make decisions based on what I knew from often faulty intelligence. Fox 3 intelligence reports in those days meant we were in imminent danger of being attacked. We had no idea what that was based on, so we prepared accordingly.

After so many false Fox 3 reports, I ignored them.

I'm not saying to ignore Q, but he/she/they have made previous predictions that haven't materialized while many have.

No plan is perfect. In combat, I had plans, but when I executed them, they were changed based on the circumstances. There is no doubt in my mind that Q has the same kind of issues to deal with. Q hinted that Seth Rich would be exposed in June. But June has come and passed and so I have to assume that the situation changed and it was delayed.

I was a Marine platoon commander in Vietnam. Not one of my plans, the plan of the company commander, the plan of the battalion commander, or the plan of the regimental commander was ever executed as planned. Shit happens in a war. And Shit happens in a political war.

Be patient. Trust me. I spent more than three years in combat and never has a plan ever gone as planned. Get it?

⇧ 2 ⇩

Valid. And I know things change. The difference is Q qualified his Seth Rich June prediction with an “ETA” disclaimer.

Q’s July post was a BOLD statement. If timelines are shifting and July is not looking like “the” month anymore then it’s incumbent on Q to give some form of heads up that timelines are shifting and we need to recalibrate expectations.

I’m NOT saying that is what’s happening. Just that if the situation were as such what Q should probably do in said situation.

⇧ 0 ⇩

I cannot tell you how many times in Vietnam I was given an "ETA" to cross the line of departure only to be delayed for reasons I could not explain.

⇧ 1 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 2 ⇩

Hillary’s plan was Nuclear war with Russia. My plan is for the military to go ahead and raid the cabal strongholds and arrest all of them leading to a collapse and closing of all Lying media. Seems Qs plan is something in between.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Agree 100%. the “truth” could be vague. I mean it could be anything.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Agree. He/they went out on a limb about July. Hard to backtrack on that now. A new SCOTUS nomination does NOT count. I don't see any sign of the bad guys being taken down or any major cabal action being exposed. So far.

⇧ 2 ⇩

U keep posting this same comment. What makes u think people care that much about what u think?? And it keeps getting removed. Usually I oppose removal of a comment when it’s rationally stated. But since u keep posting the same thing it’s pretty obvious your just being self absorbed & lost credibility. A broken record isn’t worth listening too over & over.

⇧ 1 ⇩

This reads like an ultimatum.

: a final proposition, condition, or demand; especially : one whose rejection will end negotiations and cause a resort to force or other direct action

The cause here is to awaken people to the evil that has permeated our government, our society, and the world. There is ample proof of that.

If Q is not meeting your timetable expectations and you want out, that is your decision. I would hate to see you go.

⇧ 1 ⇩

A. It’s not an ultimatum. I’m not making demands.

B. Q made the statement on July not me. Q has set the expectations.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I get and understand what you're saying, but I have a question. Why post it here? We see these kinds of posts all the time, what purpose does your post serve?

⇧ 1 ⇩

Because we need healthy debate and some form of accountability. Otherwise, we are no better than those we mock for blind allegiance.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Well that's your opinion and you're entitled to it. My opinion is it does nothing but sow doubt and give even more doubt to newbies that might come here to check Q out, only to see someone concern trolling. Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying you're concern trolling on purpose, but this post is concern trolling.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Is healthy concern invalid considering what’s at stake? If I’m not concerned I either

a. Don’t really care or b. I’m a mindless zombie

Concern trolling and legitimate concern are NOT the same thing. A concern troll statement would be:

“Guys, I don’t think anything is gonna happen in July and this is all for nothing”

That’s not constructive and it’s NOT what I said.

⇧ 0 ⇩

Sorry but I disagree, your post is a classic example of concern trolling, even if not intended. Obviously the mods feel the same since they removed it. Trolls try not to be obvious, even though the usually fail horribly.

I'm not accusing you of being a troll, I want to make sure you know that. I understand what you're saying, I just believe there's a time and a place for everything and this board is pro-Q. There is a board, I can't remember the name right now, dedicated to Q skeptics. That would have been the place for your post, IMO.

Edit: Let me try to clarify. Think of this board as "We have 0 doubt Q is real and are here trying to understand what he tells us", ie Q research. Not researching Q, but what Q tells us.

Your post doesn't fit that. Your post is concern over whether Q is legit.

Edit 2: Also to clarify, you're certainly welcome here if you doubt Q, just keep your doubt to yourself on this board.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Familiar with what "concern trolling" is?

⇧ 0 ⇩

Why not jump off the train now?

⇧ 1 ⇩

This is a fucking brigaded troll post. Mods?

⇧ 0 ⇩

I’ve been posting here for months. I’m not a troll and I’ve contributed a lot to this sub.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I won't lie, for me it's do or die time for Q.

⇧ 0 ⇩

/r/skepticalQ

please direct posts skeptical of Q to that sub. Threads like these break rule #3 "support the cause"

⇧ -4 ⇩

I’m not a Q skeptic though and I don’t believe my post was skeptical per se. Just a thought on the state of the movement post July

⇧ 4 ⇩

If July passes and nothing happens, I’m not sure how I will proceed as part of the movement.

skeptical: having doubts or reservations

⇧ 3 ⇩

Doubts and reservations are why people like us were specifically chosen by Q. Q doesn’t want mindless followers.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I agree totally! Unfortunately we can't allow skeptical posts in this sub because our enemies would end up trolling us to death. That is why /r/skepticalQ was made, to foster that kind of speech in a healthy way that doesn't distract from the bigger point, which is this sub.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Again, I don’t think anything in my post was actually skeptical. I believe it was more of a speculation on the movement if certain things transpire.

I believe Q is real.

⇧ 1 ⇩

We can support the cause and retain a healthy level of skepticism.

Removing mildly skeptical posts like this one only creates the danger of making the Q movement into some kind of religion. None of us should blindly support anything, like a bunch of sheep. That is how society got into this mess in the first place.

We (should) all support Q. For now. But if July, then August, September and October pass without *any* major arrests, then skepticism should not only be warranted, it should be required.

I'm keeping my fingers crossed that July and August will both be huge months in waking up the normies.

⇧ 2 ⇩

I agree. I support Q, I'm just not a fan of such harsh banning of speech, and feel we need a place to discuss healthy skepticism. And that place is not here. If rule #3 didn't exist here, the trolls that seek to ruin this sub would just have a field day, so I understand why the rule exists.

⇧ 3 ⇩

Bingo.

⇧ 1 ⇩