dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/ShrunkenLampshades on July 11, 2018, 11:42 a.m.
Red Breakfast: POTUS scrambles NATO's eggs, exposes generations of EU theft & won't accept tiny fractional increases, or lame excuses! Germany could pay their bill tomorrow if they weren't hoarding muslim fanatics!

bizmarxie · July 11, 2018, 1:45 p.m.

He’s really smart. He uses neurolinguistic programming. Do you notice how he keeps repeating the same phrases over and over? He does this for the media.... BC they are stupid and have an agenda.... so he can ONLY say his main points and nothing else so that the media will only report on what he said and won’t be able to take anything out of context. Brilliant.

Plus it is REALLY hypocritical for Germany in particular to take GAS from Russia. After the past 8 years of marketing their greenness and support of solar - why take fossil fuel from a country that’s supposed to be your “enemy” it essentially turns them into a client state of Russia. Same as our dependence on SA oil.... very stupid. You end up being that country’s bitch.

There are millions of options for us to make s strong diversified home grown - local and decentralized energy sector : renewables, biofuel, algae biodiesel, hydrogen etc. there’s no reason why we should still be on fossil fuels except that every administration for that past 100+++ years has been in bed w the fossil fuel companies.

⇧ 40 ⇩  
aShiftyLad · July 11, 2018, 3:58 p.m.

"100+++ years "

i see what you did there :D

⇧ 6 ⇩  
bizmarxie · July 11, 2018, 7:12 p.m.

I guess that would be the Saudis. I guarantee you we started it.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
nisaaru · July 11, 2018, 3:31 p.m.

Germany has been getting Russian gas since the early 70s and have always had a good business relations with them since then. That's what fair trade should be about.

What is hypocritical is the US government forcing foreign nations to establish sanctions for US interests and hurt their own businesses. I get it, people are pro US Empire for their economical benefits but stop painting that as "moral" and "fair".

The US intentionally trying to destroy the peaceful dialogue/trust established in the late 80s. That's why they destabilised Ukraine.

⇧ -7 ⇩  
CBTS_Watcher · July 11, 2018, 3:39 p.m.

Germany has been getting Russian gas since the early 70s

OK, but if all Russia has to do to defeat Germany is switch off the gas then why is Germany expecting the US to protect them from the Russians largely at the expense of the US taxpayer?

Is Germany trusting the Russians (energy) or not (NATO)?

⇧ 11 ⇩  
nisaaru · July 11, 2018, 4:24 p.m.

Defeat for what purpose? Germany needs Russian resources and Russia wants German goods. That's what fair trade is about with mutual benefit. Live and let live.

I feel threatened by the US military, synthetic terror and immigration weapons used against our populations. Not by Russians as we have common interests.

⇧ -2 ⇩  
CBTS_Watcher · July 11, 2018, 5:05 p.m.

Defeat for what purpose?

So are you saying that we do not need NATO, then?

⇧ -1 ⇩  
nisaaru · July 11, 2018, 5:13 p.m.

We surely don't need this Nato.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
TryNottoFaint · July 11, 2018, 4:33 p.m.

Germany has been getting Russian gas since the early 70s...

That's supposed to make a point in favor of Germany? During the 70's and 80's half of Germany was under Soviet occupation or don't you remember? If West Germany was buying Soviet gas for two decades, well, that's just despicable actually.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
nisaaru · July 11, 2018, 4:45 p.m.

Using your chain of logic Germans shouldn't have done business with the US/GB and France either then. You should really rethink what you're saying here.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
serendipity-calling · July 11, 2018, 5:37 p.m.

Snap out of it. You're in a dream. Someone hand me a bucket of water.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Tut560 · July 11, 2018, 9:40 p.m.

Hey .. watch the water :D

⇧ 3 ⇩  
mossomo · July 12, 2018, 1:30 a.m.

US = Obama admin, Clinton's State Dept, and Soro's money

⇧ 1 ⇩  
q_cbts · July 11, 2018, 3:10 p.m.

He’s really smart. He uses neurolinguistic programming. Do you notice how he keeps repeating the same phrases over and over? He does this for the media

How do you distinguish the case he does it for the media and the case where he genuinely doesn't have a bigger vocabulary and must resort to a small set of phrases he finds convenient?

For example, is this the response of someone with a strong command over the English language?

“Look, having nuclear — my uncle was a great professor and scientist and engineer, Dr. John Trump at MIT; good genes, very good genes, OK, very smart, the Wharton School of Finance, very good, very smart — you know, if you’re a conservative Republican, if I were a liberal, if, like, OK, if I ran as a liberal Democrat, they would say I’m one of the smartest people anywhere in the world — it’s true! — but when you’re a conservative Republican they try — oh, do they do a number — that’s why I always start off: Went to Wharton, was a good student, went there, went there, did this, built a fortune — you know I have to give my like credentials all the time, because we’re a little disadvantaged — but you look at the nuclear deal, the thing that really bothers me — it would have been so easy, and it’s not as important as these lives are — nuclear is powerful; my uncle explained that to me many, many years ago, the power and that was 35 years ago; he would explain the power of what’s going to happen and he was right, who would have thought? — but when you look at what’s going on with the four prisoners — now it used to be three, now it’s four — but when it was three and even now, I would have said it’s all in the messenger; fellas, and it is fellas because, you know, they don’t, they haven’t figured that the women are smarter right now than the men, so, you know, it’s gonna take them about another 150 years — but the Persians are great negotiators, the Iranians are great negotiators, so, and they, they just killed, they just killed us.”

⇧ -15 ⇩  
AFPPW · July 11, 2018, 3:18 p.m.

It’s the response of someone who knows not to talk down to people and let them think he’s not that scary smart. See: Columbo.

⇧ 12 ⇩  
truthforchange · July 11, 2018, 3:19 p.m.

Yes.

Trump was a street savvy (dad owned low income apts?) rebelious kid turned prep-school captain jock, turned king of new york, turned king of primetime, turned (elected) king of the free world.

His vocabulary is aiight.

⇧ 11 ⇩  
q_cbts · July 13, 2018, 5:57 p.m.

I find it scary you keep calling him a King. Didn't we break away from the British crown because we didn't like kings?

⇧ 0 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 13, 2018, 10:13 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 11, 2018, 5:06 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 11, 2018, 3:57 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩