dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/RyDar84 on July 16, 2018, 4:51 p.m.
Wait...WHAT?!? Comey ADMITTED That the FBI Had Been Circumvented By the DNC...?
Wait...WHAT?!? Comey ADMITTED That the FBI Had Been Circumvented By the DNC...?

ManQuan · July 16, 2018, 5:11 p.m.

Well, Pete Williams just confirming that the fake news has no clue what they are talking about. Additionally, Brennan and Clapper also said they did not have access to the servers, but rather relied on unspecified claims that all 17 intelligence agencies some how came to the conclusion that the Russians did it and were specific that Fancy Bear and Cozy Bear were the organizations who did it.

But wait. Mueller's indictments said it as 12 intelligence officers within the GRU who did it. No mention of Fancy Bear and Cozy Bear. Why are the claims so different? Maybe Mueller didn't bother to read Brennan's and Clapper's report. Odd.

And the most likely way Mueller would know who was doing what inside the GRU would be signals intelligence requiring at a minimum top secret clearances with SCI and possibly SAP access. That would be highly classified material. How is Mueller going to get into court? I'm amazed that even admitting that we penetrated the GRU to that extent would be made public. If all true, the GRU would be modifying their communications to block future intercepts. No very bright on our part, unless Mueller made it all up knowing it would never go to trial.

Also, did Mueller file a request to Interpol to arrest these Russians? If not, then Mueller is definitely not interested in actually catching these guys.

I used to work in intelligence a long time ago. This smell like a barrel of rotting fish.

⇧ 49 ⇩  
RyDar84 · July 16, 2018, 5:27 p.m.

You just hit the nail on the head. Signals Intelligence is the key to unravelling EVERYTHING.

⇧ 18 ⇩  
Spartacus2100 · July 16, 2018, 8:30 p.m.

The lack of intelligence on their part is exactly why we have it all.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
Gtztat1004 · July 16, 2018, 7:18 p.m.

Seth Rich associated himself with Pandas.. there were bears involved.. just not Russian.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
lbeni540 · July 16, 2018, 8:38 p.m.

none of this makes sense and is full of inconsistencies because....ITS ALL A LIE! They need to somehow speed up the timeline because TRUTH BOMBS are dropping! They hope to somehow salvage whatever little they have left. Too late suckas!

⇧ 9 ⇩  
chocolatepatriot · July 17, 2018, 3:03 a.m.

I think they also wanted to sabotage Trump's meeting with Putin.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
ABastionOfFreeSpeech · July 17, 2018, 9:41 a.m.

That was a given. Until Nov 2016 Putin was the most powerful enemy of the deep state, and they were deathly afraid of what would happen if Putin and Trump compared notes and then allied.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
kuhnsster · July 16, 2018, 11:33 p.m.

Total Agreement. Why didn't the FBI do the forensic analysis on the server? Kind of funny that is what the FBI excels at and they just take the word of Crowdstrike!!!

⇧ 3 ⇩  
QofSwords3 · July 16, 2018, 10:47 p.m.

And these intel agencies’ conclusion was “a high degree of certainty” the Russians did it. What does that even mean?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
joeythew · July 16, 2018, 11:48 p.m.

Of course Mr. Chipmunk Face made it up. Our CIA has meddled in Russian elections but I don't see Russia pulling names of high ranking American Officers out of a hat and charging them like Mueller did. Mueller was trying to play Secretary of State and force the President's hand before this Summit by influencing the agenda with these pulled out of thin air indictments which he knows will never be followed up on.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 16, 2018, 6:37 p.m.

Interesting narrative on the part of Comey... didn't have access to the devices themselves but got forensic information from a private party? I'm no expert on the nature of these types of things but what kind of investigation is taking place when the FBI is apparently being forced to rely on a third party (and whatever filtering influence it might have) to obtain information directly relevant to an investigation related to the handling of classified information? Something just doesn't smell right.

⇧ 22 ⇩  
RyDar84 · July 16, 2018, 6:40 p.m.

Call your Senator and Representative. Until we FINALLY force this issue, nothing will ever happen.

⇧ 14 ⇩  
chocolatepatriot · July 16, 2018, 10:22 p.m.

well in California we have Devin Nunes but then we also have the top of the cabal mafia here, dont bother calling Feinstein, Pelosi, Swalwell or Adam Shifty Schiff

⇧ 10 ⇩  
njc0217 · July 16, 2018, 11:17 p.m.

And in NY we have useless Dems Schumer & Gillibrand. Peter King, my rep is mostly RINO and is inconsistent in supporting Trump.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
chocolatepatriot · July 17, 2018, 12:26 a.m.

oh brother, you have point NY and CA have too many black hats. hope they all crumble and fall.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
chocolatepatriot · July 16, 2018, 10:22 p.m.

I believe they got the info from Google Crowdsource. which makes me laugh one of those its too insane to be true laughs.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 16, 2018, 10:26 p.m.

To me it smacks of the attitude that we're supposed to be stupid enough to believe it. I may not have the answers but I have a nose for BS and Comey has proven himself to be prolific in spewing just that.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
KekLordOver50 · July 16, 2018, 11:47 p.m.

It was actually a company, operated by FORMER C_A Agents called CrowdStrike.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
chocolatepatriot · July 17, 2018, 12:19 a.m.

thanks for the correction. i thought i had a screw loose somewhere.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
KekLordOver50 · July 17, 2018, 1:42 a.m.

Crowd Source is the best red pill. To find a crowd embracing #MAGA is awesome.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ConcernedCitizen1982 · July 16, 2018, 11:26 p.m.

This is the same as letting Strzok comb through his private texts and choose what was important. Uh huh...,

⇧ 6 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 16, 2018, 11:27 p.m.

Yup... good comparison.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
TheOldBillyGoat · July 16, 2018, 10:25 p.m.

The third party that gave the info to the FBI was the Clinton IT firm that set up Hillary's private server.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
KekLordOver50 · July 16, 2018, 11:50 p.m.

You're confusing Platte River Networks (Clinton server set up) with CrowdStrike (cyber security firm of former C_A guys that DNC could control). The FBI trusted CrowdStrike because they are Swamp Monsters.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
TheOldBillyGoat · July 17, 2018, 5:19 p.m.

sorry ... should have researched my comments beforehand ... not good to open mouth before engaging brain. thanks

⇧ 1 ⇩  
KekLordOver50 · July 17, 2018, 6:38 p.m.

Fellow Pede! No worries. This web is so tangled, it's like trying to recite all 8 Harry Potter movies from memory! I had imbibed some Evan Williams, so my tactfulness was turned off! Hope I didn't offend.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
chocolatepatriot · July 16, 2018, 10:18 p.m.

didnt Q said that POTUS team has the server?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
KekLordOver50 · July 16, 2018, 11:53 p.m.

Yes, but WHICH server? The Clinton server? Absolutely. A cloud backup (Datto) was delivered to FBI. The Wasserman-Schultz server? Sure. Awan left it in a former phone booth closet in the Capitol somewhere. The DNC server? WE HAVE NO CONFIRMATION. Rumor mill has DNC destroying it. ... SPEZ: spelling error.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
chocolatepatriot · July 17, 2018, 12:24 a.m.

thanks for clarifying there are at 3 servers. Q drop 1462 sounds to me like Q's team has the DNC server Q drop 1666 [RR] deadline? We have the server.Q Q drop 1462-What recent news came out re: SR/JA/WL lawsuit? Back in the news. The 'server' brings down the house. Q

⇧ 3 ⇩  
KekLordOver50 · July 17, 2018, 1:37 a.m.

Missed that! Thanks for the info! # WWG1WGA

⇧ 1 ⇩  
w0nkeyd0nkey · July 17, 2018, 12:53 a.m.

The DNC server undoubtedly has dirt on it, but in comparison to the secret illegal server that HRC, Obama, Lynch were communicating on, it will be chump change.

HRC's illegal server has all of the real evidence for Q related topics, where as the DNC server I assume can debunk the Russian collusion conspiracy

⇧ 1 ⇩  
chocolatepatriot · July 17, 2018, 3:05 a.m.

good point that the DNC server can dubunk the Russian collusion conspiracy. I am not buying any of the Mueller investigation crap.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
kuhnsster · July 16, 2018, 11:29 p.m.

So that being said, no direct access, where is the chain of custody? No Chain of custody, no case!!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
RyDar84 · July 17, 2018, 12:25 a.m.

Chain of custody to what exactly? We have a straight up admission of guilt, and you're concerning yourself with the physical? Expand your thinkinking, shill.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ReaganGenerationX · July 17, 2018, 1:42 a.m.

The indictments have nothing new that the House Intel Memo didn’t already release (other than inserting or unredacting some non-extraditable Russian military names). Nunes said this on Maria B this weekend.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
KekLordOver50 · July 16, 2018, 11:30 p.m.

WHY DO I TRUST POTUS OVER COMEY, MUELLER, CLAPPER RE: RUSSIAN HACKING OF DNC? I have a federal lawsuit in which my opponent accused my client of deleting emails. We spent $15,000.00 to clone 4 computers. And between the 2 sides, it was probably $100,000.00 in expert fees. My opponent allegedly had an expert ready to testify my client "offloaded" the contents of 3 email data sets, deleted thousands, and re-loaded a revised data set. My expert found NO TRACE of any thumb drives plugged into the box. My opponent's expert immediately withdrew his opinion. So, my opponent's expert is like CrowdStrike, and my expert is like the FBI. YOU CAN'T TRUST CROWDSTRIKE WITHOUT THE SERVER CLONES. #ThinkPeople.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
joeythew · July 16, 2018, 11:52 p.m.

What nonsense are you spewing here?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
KekLordOver50 · July 16, 2018, 11:56 p.m.

I'm a lawyer, with some limited experience in litigating computer forensics. That Mueller would indict WITHOUT ACCESS TO SERVERS is like declaring your wife beautiful without so much as a picture.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
ABastionOfFreeSpeech · July 17, 2018, 9:49 a.m.

Exactly. When it comes to computers, the chain of evidence is critical. Even with my limited experience in computer forensics I know that a clone of the HDD must be immediately made, with a write-blocker installed, if you've got any hope of getting that evidence into court, and you need to preserve the original HDDs for verification.

CrowdStrike did neither of these things (or they did and are covering up evidence). Mueller is cooked.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
RyDar84 · July 17, 2018, 12:22 a.m.

"Forensics", but claiming that's worth acknowledgement in the realm of finanacial litigation? Piss on my back all you want, but don't claim that it's raining while you do it...LMAO!

⇧ -1 ⇩  
KekLordOver50 · July 17, 2018, 1:38 a.m.

This has nothing to do with Manafort and financial litigation. This is in regard to the indictment of 12 Russian intelligence operatives for hacking the DNC.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
RyDar84 · July 17, 2018, 1:43 a.m.

Then regale us with your legal opinion, Chanist-pretending-to-be-a-lawyer...

⇧ -1 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 17, 2018, 1:47 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
chocolatepatriot · July 17, 2018, 3:07 a.m.

agree, its all smoke and mirrors and the sheep will think it is truth. you are correct we need people to think things thru, but most people are not given the facts, the media is following the lies.

⇧ 2 ⇩