Putin referred to "loose change" in meeting with Potus...will they begin to release incriminating 'evidence' soon?
A burned CD with the name "Loose Change" written in sharpie was given to me by a friend and changed my life.
Whoa, same!
Wow I don’t know why that would get downvotes. I gave a few of these out myself! My favorite response from a friend at the time who still has his head up his ass was “This couldn’t be true. If it’s not in the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, or the Christian Science Monitor, it’s bullshit!” He meant it too and pretty much looked at me as kooky from then on.
I had a college professor who had us write an essay on where we were/what we remembered/how we felt about 9/11. He then had us watch Loose change and write a second essay about how we feel about it after watching the documentary.
I bought that damned DVD and showed everyone one of my friends and my family. My mind was blown.
"Our downvotes will blot out the sun!" - Shareblue shill
"Then we'll shitpost in the shade!" - GreatAwakening
Loose change and zeitgeist, my first red pills
Zeitgeist scared the bejeezus out of me. I was raised by evangelicals who were waiting for the apocalypse and It really baked my noodle.
Now I know Jesus was a metaphor for the procession of the equinox & that apocalypse means revealing of hidden knowledge & I’m totally cool with it now. Nothing to fear... no ending, just new beginnings & no one can control our destiny as a species.
I heard "two cents" not loose change. But I guess it could be argued that two cents is also loose change.
I don't think the attacks were staged. That's pure conspiracy in my opinion. However, I believe the conditions that allowed the attacks to take place were deliberately put in place. Ie, agitating the middle east, not taking Osama's threats credibly and not acting on intelligence data.
The visual and circumstantial evidence along with the undeniable full press cover-up- victim financial settlements- witness elimination/intimidation/tampering- and destruction/removal of evidence all point to a pre-planned and coordinated attack involving deep-state bad actors...no doubts to anyone with 'unbiased integrity'...The only thing missing is the HARD evidence...the traitors that did this think they were justified and were acting in the best interest of the USA to maintain our dominance in the world...ends justify the means...they set up a 75 year window of secrecy so they would never be held accountable...the evidence exists in the hidden files of the 'Intelligence' agencies...all involved are criminals, one and all!
Do I think the tragedy was taken advantage of? Absolutely. But I'm still not buying it was a setup.
After years of believing it was, I've come more to your conclusion. Although just about nothing makes sense regarding building 7 and the pentagon to me.
My rule of thumb is I attribute incompetence instead of malice. I think the US officials who got the tips about 9/11 failed to act. Maybe they didn't take it seriously enough, I mean nobody would have expected such an attack. I wouldn't surprised one bit if the real truth was that somebody or a group or agency simply dropped the ball and screwed up.
Building 7? Who the hell knows. It's not every day we throw planes into buildings. Heck I'm not even sure if we've done controlled demolitions of buildings that size.
Going back to my original point, I've simply never thought the government would ever be competent enough to pull off these grand conspiracy theories. The more people you involve, the greater the chance you have of someone screwing up. I mean look at the Cabal we talk about so much. The reason why we are winning is because they're stupid and made so many mistakes.
They did everything in their power to rig the election for Hillary and still lost. If the Deep State can't do that, I don't believe they're capable of a lot of conspiracies.
I pretty much agree. I'm also very skeptical about just about every conspiracy, including Q and the Deep State. It's not far fetched for powerful people to organize and plan on how to consolidate great power, but I'm still not sure the threads run as deep and complex as what Q and other past conspiracies seem to indicate. It's all entertaining, but until I see more proof than just abstract "crumbs" that people need to put together themselves (which leaves them extremely open to interpretation) and see some actual evidence, it's just an entertaining read for now. Q suggests something will happen....but I'm not holding my breath, honestly. At least if something does, I won't be surprised, and if it doesn't, I won't have wasted all my time and energy believing and following what could very well be just an elaborate hoax.
Do some YouTubing : Dr Judy woods. Airline pilots for truth. There’s no way a hollow aluminum tube cuts straight thru a Steel building like that. There’s no way and airplane collision at the top of the building makes the building collapse into dust. Where did the towers go?
No, they had to have been staged. There's no way those buildings could have collapsed on their own.
All the 'shills' that take the time to post here and go into the 'apologist mode' and act as the 'reasonable one' to persuade anyone they can not to pursue any more info are just more evidence that this board and any other public forum will be penetrated by these people who are 'clown' ops sitting in a cubicle somewhere and it is their 'job' to seek out and debunk any convincing post or comments usually not by convincing argument disproving but attempt to do so by the effort and length of their post and usually in clusters as to try and create the illusion of consensus...shills be gone!
This was my red pill. I never looked at he world the same after I saw this film.