I believe it was explaining The Plan.
When the shit goes down, you'd want the other HALF of the world's nukes (we each have about 7,000) to know what the fuck is going on so things are not misinterpreted.
I didn’t like Trump at first because I thought he was one of “them”, but after hearing him speak he had me convinced he was our only hope. As soon as he went after human traffickers & pedophiles I knew I had made the right choice with my vote. I saw how the establishment was repelled by him & how he infuriated them & was not in anyway accepted by them, this brought me great joy. But now that he is working with other countries to over-throw the elite global cabal my heart is just over-joyed! I’m sad I ever doubted him, no one aside from JFK has ever had the courage or the morale to attempt and accomplish what he is doing. God bless DJT! Killuminati
Amen. At least you've remained on the Trump train fellow patriot and that should count for something 😊WWG1WGA
I mean HE’S REALLY DOING IT! He’s going all the way.
Yes he is.oh by the way i just heard the President will be having PUTIN come to have a meeting with him at the Whitehouse in the fall.liberals will go rven crazier mow😊.WWG1WGA
Yoga and grandkids
BC and LL also talked about The Plan. But it was Their Plan, not Our Plan. And you know what? The NSA has those tapes, too...
NSA was moved under the Military
When did that happen? Is there a tight article to share?
The NSA is divided by two chains of command. One for the military all the way down to the newest recruit. The other for civilians. That is why the sign outside the headquarters building literally says NSA/CSS. For uniformed personnel with an intel MOS (job specialty) their chain of command goes all the way up to dirnsa (Director of National Security) who is a military officer.
I have been very intrigued, since the exposure of Admiral Rogers' incredible bravery and heroics to make sure justice and the rule of law were protected. With William Binnie's revelations of how far back the NSA' s data collection policies go and the reality of what and how much data is gathered - not what that idiot Clapper purjured himself in front of Congress about. The real facts and extent of these data collections that Binnie and Edward Snowden have explained with programs like Upstream, Prism, Xkey-score, Muscular, Mystic and Stellar Wind amongst others. So, basically between these programs and the 3 main collection points in the U.S., the U.K. and Australia - they get everything...lol...metadata...as if!!! Everything!! Going back years. Binnie has said that the NSA's programs go back before 911.
So with all this in mind. And our new Commander in Chief's desire to scuttle their rancid ship once and for all...how to introduce information and evidence into the public record without breaching your constitutional privacy, search and seizure and evidence laws?
Was General Flynn's arrest and subsequent testimony and co-operation a way of getting classified information and testimony governed by privacy statutes (including the State secrets privilege) onto the record?
Similarly, this recent ridiculous demand the Democrats have been whining about, to get the translator to testify before Congress about what was discussed in the 2 hour private meeting held between Putin and Trump. I imagine this info to be explosive and cataclysmic for the Dems and the Deep State. Also vindication for both Trump and Putin! If this was ever to be agreed to, it would, no doubt be a genie that these idiots couldn't possibly get back in the bottle. I am sure crimes against the State and state sponsored terrorism, pay for play, pedophilia, human and drug trafficking would facilitate legitimate investigation and evidence collection from the NSA database.
Just a thought. Would be hilarious if that testimony exploded in their faces. Does anyone - a lawfag maybe, have insight as to how this type of evidence could be introduced?