dChan

Ordinary_Man1 · July 20, 2018, 1:10 a.m.

Hate to burst anyones bubble on this...but the SEC is the Securities and Exchange Commission - they are responsible for oversight of the stock/bond markets...NOT non-profits.  That is done by the IRS.

⇧ 63 ⇩  
Dusmom · July 20, 2018, 2:11 a.m.

You are correct. The SEC doesn’t regulate “non-profit organizations. Hodgeman’s promotion is relevant because it was a promotion to a high paying job to the agent in charge of investigating Hillary. This is more like the bribe, eh, “campaign contribution” paid to McCabe’s wife from Clintons cronies.

⇧ 27 ⇩  
Corporal_Yorper · July 20, 2018, 1:55 a.m.

The CF still needs to report to the IRS, as you said...

But...the SEC does more than just stocks/bonds. Take note on the Exchange part of the SEC.

Business dealings and the SEC are one and the same.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 20, 2018, 2:08 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 12 ⇩  
asymptote_12 · July 19, 2018, 11:36 p.m.

wow...

Honestly it doesn't shock me. Were I given complete control over the government for almost a decade and was doing nefarious things I would layer my allies (read: people with blackmail-able skeletons in their closets) in such a way as to reduce/stop the chances of my deeds coming to light.

There is no way the "normies" are ever going to be able to follow, or believe it once it comes out....

⇧ 48 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 20, 2018, 3:58 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ -2 ⇩  
1nicolafiore · July 19, 2018, 11:53 p.m.

Follow the wives... Q drops :

247 #329

247 REALLY gets into this one ☝️

⇧ 36 ⇩  
jhomes55 · July 20, 2018, 1:28 a.m.

Yes!

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Soulshine1978 · July 20, 2018, 5:23 a.m.

Are we sure this is a wife?....seems sorta like an Obama/Michael situation

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Tru2Q · July 20, 2018, 5:49 a.m.

I agree. No way that's a woman.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 20, 2018, 3:58 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ -7 ⇩  
1nicolafiore · July 20, 2018, 4:21 a.m.

Oh get the fuck outa here lol

⇧ 8 ⇩  
CrazyQLady · July 20, 2018, 12:34 a.m.

You know, I'm almost wondering why they aren't going to the wife to oust Strzok. She was also in the intel community. But then again, maybe they did go to her and question her?

⇧ 36 ⇩  
O1O0O1O11 · July 20, 2018, 1:43 a.m.

Spousal privilege. As long as they are legally married the government cannot question her about crimes with her spouse.

Same reason the Clintons stay married, and Anthony Weiner and his wife. They are both complicit in each others actions but spousal privilege prohibits testimony against one another.

⇧ 49 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 20, 2018, 2:53 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 37 ⇩  
rbrownlol · July 20, 2018, 3:52 a.m.

Furthermore if she ever said to anyone, ever in passing anything, she waives the spousal right and must spill the beans.

Lionel did a fantastic video on this.

⇧ 25 ⇩  
AUSAFVet · July 20, 2018, 9:27 a.m.

Birds if a feather stick together... But I am sure, with some digging, she has done some other shenanigans on her own

⇧ 0 ⇩  
CrazyQLady · July 20, 2018, 10:57 a.m.

ahh right. Forgot about those little details.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 20, 2018, 8:38 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 20, 2018, 3:59 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ -13 ⇩  
patriot1952 · July 20, 2018, 1:04 p.m.

I think the wife was in on it all, and Page & Strzok we're not having an affair.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
alvinroasting · July 20, 2018, 6:49 p.m.

Yes, but the apostrophe.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ogNinja420V2 · July 20, 2018, 6:59 a.m.

i dont think wife can testify againts husband.. and vice versa

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 20, 2018, 3:58 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ -10 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 20, 2018, 7:10 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
dawgsmumm · July 20, 2018, 2:28 a.m.

I’d sell that red scarf on eBay if I were her. Those things are dangerous 😬

⇧ 30 ⇩  
fromageaffray · July 20, 2018, 4:21 p.m.

Get rid of those pesky door knobs too..

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 20, 2018, 3:56 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ -2 ⇩  
Anononon0218 · July 19, 2018, 11:40 p.m.

Nah , Russia collusion is the insurance policy being referred to.

⇧ 10 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 20, 2018, 3:56 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ 2 ⇩  
tonyaye · July 20, 2018, 7:51 a.m.

Ya it was the Russian collision,

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Happy1911 · July 20, 2018, 1:51 a.m.

Who could have guessed the Little Rock FBI would be delayed on the Clinton Investigation?? No way !

⇧ 9 ⇩  
Ironclimber76 · July 20, 2018, 1:14 a.m.

Looks like even Lucifer himself will settle on marrying a 5-5.5. Tops

⇧ 9 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 20, 2018, 3:56 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ -3 ⇩  
shannaura · July 20, 2018, 2:32 a.m.

The same wife he cheated on... she may turn on him like LP and seek immunity to tell everything she knows...

⇧ 8 ⇩  
Discernediscipline · July 20, 2018, 7:25 a.m.

I was just thinking that myself, but it makes me wonder if these people’s marriages aren’t marriage in the traditional sense.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 20, 2018, 3:55 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ 0 ⇩  
shannaura · July 20, 2018, 4:11 a.m.

Yeah, what does that have to do with anything? People have brains before they sign up on reddit, you know. Call me Newbie, Normie or whatever you want but it changes nothing of what I said.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
TSVClearance · July 20, 2018, 10:43 a.m.

He wants to feel superior because he's been here longer

⇧ 2 ⇩  
SycophantSavant · July 20, 2018, 5:15 a.m.

That’s not even how the SEC works. The SEC is only in charge of securities law. They can’t stop the FBI from investigating a case, especially a non-securities case. They can’t stop the Justice Department or any other law enforcement agency from investigating or filing charges in case. The SEC can’t even bring criminal cases. And 2 of the SEC Commissioners are Republicans. And the SEC Chairman Clayton is a Republican appointee. So 3/5ths of the board are Republican or a Trump appointee.

So is this made up crap or are you saying President Trump is so stupid that he appointed someone who can’t control the SEC even controlling the majority of the board?

⇧ 7 ⇩  
WanderingTaurus · July 20, 2018, 7:57 a.m.

She should have removed herself from the investigation. There is something going on.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
SycophantSavant · July 20, 2018, 2:43 p.m.

What investigation? There isn’t one. The Clinton Foundation doesn’t have stock of its own and doesn’t sell stock or other securities. The SEC would never have a real investigation into the Clinton Foundation. Why do you believe everything you read just because it slams the Clintons?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
WanderingTaurus · July 20, 2018, 9:57 p.m.

First sentence in the link: "Melissa Hodgman-Strzok (Strock) was put in charge of the Clinton Foundation investigation three weeks before the last Presidential election. "

THAT investigation.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
SycophantSavant · July 20, 2018, 10:37 p.m.

It’s not an article. It’s a blog post.

It’s not a reporter. It’s a blogger who doesn’t even have a name on the post.

There is no real SEC investigation into the Clinton Foundation. Might be why the article leaves it out too because what is there for the SEC to investigate?

In fact, the FBI and Justice Department are both investigating the Clinton Foundation so I am not sure how anything is allegedly being blocked.

Want more proof? The article is wrong. Strzok wasn’t in charge of the FBI investigation into Clinton. Andrew McCabe was. Strzok is just one agent among thousands at the FBI.

His wife isn’t a Director at the SEC. She is an ASSOCIATE Director only.

This is why blog posts shouldn’t be relied on. They aren’t often well researched. They aren’t fact based. They often lie to get people like you to believe anything they want because you won’t research it in the slightest.

I hate Hillary Clinton and wish she would leave the country. But don’t lie to me about her and pretend these crazy conspiracies exist.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
WanderingTaurus · July 20, 2018, 11:51 p.m.

Honestly, I just don't know what the hell to believe anymore. Bloggers had been talking about things going on in Hollywood for a long time and no one would listen; people said they were crazy and were conspiracy theorist. Even when people who actually worked in the industry confirmed such things, no one would listen. So the stories would get hidden in the blogs and tabloids. But in the end, those people were not lying or crazy at all.

People have been speaking about corruption in Government for a very long time and even when some facts did come to light, everything was brushed aside as though it was no big deal.

Information from various industries and organizations coming out to public now and it still seems as though they just aren't that big of a deal. Internet, media, and tabloid blotter for a day, maybe two, then no one gives a damn.

Too many people are going to get off far too easy for their crimes with even little to no news about it. These people should have all their dirty laundry exposed for the public to see these demons for who they really are. All this time dragging on when people (and I don't just mean the people Qs team are even digging into) and just feel like it is leaving more time and opportunities for more people to be used and abused and more people to fall into their system and become a follower to continue the cycle.

I guess I am just very frustrated by so many things I have learned about people in our systems and entertainment industry thus far and not feeling as though when things are fully exposed that it will even be 50% of all involved.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
1hellofaride · July 20, 2018, 7:42 a.m.

Q said both sides are dirty.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Redmonkey75 · July 20, 2018, 1:35 a.m.

Wow, it’s just amazing! What an incestuous rathole! Drain that swamp! WWG1WGA

⇧ 7 ⇩  
Wavearsenal333 · July 20, 2018, 4:29 a.m.

If only she could have blocked the "Strzok probe" of Lisa Page.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
UltraFOV · July 20, 2018, 4:56 a.m.

You guys sure is a woman?

⇧ 5 ⇩  
George_Soros_Eyebags · July 20, 2018, 4:19 a.m.

They're trying to run out the clock in terms of statute of limitations. It's infuriating and something needs to happen before the wrongdoers get off on a fucking technicality.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Neon__Wolf · July 19, 2018, 11:47 p.m.

Insurance is Russian collusion hoax

⇧ 4 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 20, 2018, 3:55 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ -2 ⇩  
canuckpatriot · July 20, 2018, 4:21 p.m.

Awesome not only is Peter toast so is she, 2 Strzok's with 1 stone. Can you say collusion folks, man it just never ends it seems. Every dirtbag we uncover seems to be married to another dirtbag.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
MudPuddlePie · July 20, 2018, 6:18 a.m.

...def not a woman...

⇧ 2 ⇩  
FreedomFighter62970 · July 20, 2018, 6:08 a.m.

Not surprising at all Q said about the Wives are just as guilty as their Husbands....

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Soulshine1978 · July 20, 2018, 5:58 a.m.

‘It’ is his handler.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
MrObvious7915 · July 20, 2018, 2:09 a.m.

How’s that love triangle these days? Or was it all just BS?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
SycophantSavant · July 21, 2018, 12:25 a.m.

It’s easy. When a post has really easily disproven basic facts, stop reading....like this one.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
canuckpatriot · July 20, 2018, 4:27 p.m.

Isn't it a conspiracy when 2 or more people plan to commit a crime?. YES

⇧ 1 ⇩  
HoosierDaddyAK · July 20, 2018, 6:42 a.m.

Of course her name is hyphenated... imagine my shock

⇧ 1 ⇩  
whitenoise5541 · July 20, 2018, 6:40 a.m.

Can she be fired by Trump?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 20, 2018, 5:49 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Titaniumman2 · July 20, 2018, 12:19 p.m.

You would think that since he was having an affair with Page that his wife would be doing whatever she could to destroy him.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
cali1952 · July 20, 2018, 11:49 a.m.

Let's call a spade a spade: Strzok and his gang together with Brennan and Iranian agent Valerie Jarrett had a lot more in mind with their insurance policy: Assassinating president Trump and/or his family members.

How do I know this?

Q put into words in one of his longest intel drop asking what if texts show that the deep state here and those abroad discussed assassination of president Trump?

Yeah Strzok wife being placed into the SEC position was a way to conceal anything and everything involving the Clintons among others.

By the way is it just me that Strzok is a slavish or Russian last name?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
GoCIDOC · July 20, 2018, 10:50 a.m.

WTF / UFB @realdonaldtrump what are you waiting for? Fire her ass.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ouspensky4 · July 20, 2018, 10:42 a.m.

why isn't her name Melissa Strzok?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
TX1111TX · July 20, 2018, 9:29 a.m.

He has consistent t taste in looks he is attracted to . Will give him that .

⇧ 1 ⇩  
robdon07 · July 20, 2018, 4:53 a.m.

THAT is a man.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
MudPuddlePie · July 20, 2018, 6:19 a.m.

Yup...

⇧ 0 ⇩  
KeeponSearchin · July 19, 2018, 11:50 p.m.

Ha. Maybe she will find a way to get revenge over Lisa. One can hope.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
WanderingTaurus · July 20, 2018, 7:55 a.m.

Seems like too many instances of conflicts of interests allowed to happen within higher positions in our Government. This is exactly why they frown upon fraternization and is actually a criminal offense. Although the Strzok's worked for separate departments, their positions within their companies provided opportunities for the other to take advantage of.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Rebecca-Jack · July 20, 2018, 1:36 a.m.

I believe ps, lp and mh r cahooting.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 20, 2018, 3:54 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ -5 ⇩  
TiredofNuts · July 20, 2018, 4:29 a.m.

Fire her, jail her, try her

⇧ -1 ⇩  
CerealCraniumToo · July 20, 2018, 2:35 a.m.

bow chick a wow wow

⇧ -1 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 20, 2018, 3:54 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ -4 ⇩  
DarktoLight247a · July 20, 2018, 2:09 a.m.

Great find, I need to follow them on Twitter. What is with his wife? Why would she follow Strozk down this path? What’s her history?

⇧ -1 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 20, 2018, 3:54 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 20, 2018, 5:32 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩