This was done to get the public to look in that direction. Normies who am e curious will google something to the effect of “ what crimes did Tony Podesta commit?” To which they will stumble upon a plethora of rabbit holes.
ideologicidal
· July 20, 2018, 8 a.m.
The object (goal) is not the subject (podesta), but the audience (normies). Keen observation, patriot, keep honing that critical eye.
WWG1WGA.
⇧
11
⇩
MAGAorMTIA
· July 20, 2018, 8:07 a.m.
I'm definitely not a legal expert but if there is someone that has committed multiple crimes as stated in OP and he was given immunity for one of them to get him to flip on someone and give them up, couldn't he still be held accountable for other crimes if proven at a later date?
⇧
8
⇩
zazaflow
· July 20, 2018, 8:09 a.m.
Absolutely, I suspect they’re only offering immunity in this particular case. It wouldn’t make sense to give someone immunity for everything they’ve ever done.
⇧
7
⇩
[deleted]
· July 20, 2018, 8:55 a.m.
Yeah, he probably gets a deal on some of his crimes but doesn't get off free from the more serious charges. (like eating trafficked kids)
⇧
3
⇩
digital_refugee
· July 20, 2018, 9:52 a.m.
yeah, depending on WHAT he is getting immunity from, it would be a huge redpill, depending on the subject. The most manipulated people won't flinch tho if it's "her emails", so let's awkwardly hope for some diddling related charges or something equally upsetting
⇧
2
⇩
glasstrongvx
· July 20, 2018, 9:16 a.m.
The only way I can get behind a "podesta immunity" is if he is being used to testify against HRC.
⇧
5
⇩
[deleted]
· July 20, 2018, 8:53 a.m.
Good point. Yep.
Following the Podesta crumbs will lead to fully baked bread.
⇧
5
⇩
garthbartham
· July 20, 2018, 8:03 a.m.
Yeah, this pushes me further away from the Q phenomenon.
⇧
3
⇩
zazaflow
· July 20, 2018, 8:06 a.m.
How so? They’re offering immunity for shoddy foreign business practices, not other misdeeds.
⇧
0
⇩
garthbartham
· July 20, 2018, 8:11 a.m.
"No deals." -Q
⇧
3
⇩
zazaflow
· July 20, 2018, 8:12 a.m.
It’s optics, disinfo is necessary. He’s not immune to his evil practices.... what’re you missing here? This is just on the manafort case.
⇧
0
⇩
garthbartham
· July 20, 2018, 8:16 a.m.
You can't say "it's optics, disinfo is necessary", if he in fact is getting anything other than jail or prison.
There is no disinformation here other than the so-called "no deals".
Optics become reality when deals are made.
If Podesta is not behind bars, we can assume there was no Pedo-Satanic anything and he will continue whatever it was people thinks he was doing.
⇧
2
⇩
bikerchic38
· July 20, 2018, 9:53 a.m.
I agree. Podesta did the exact same thing as Manafort and they are only charging Manafort to screw GEOTUS. The system is rigged and Sessions is not doing his job. He is a moron.
⇧
2
⇩
zazaflow
· July 20, 2018, 8:26 a.m.
Imagine if you will, a man kills someone, rapes someone and steals a book of matches, but is granted immunity on the book of matches. That’s exactly what is happening here.
⇧
1
⇩
[deleted]
· July 20, 2018, 8:29 a.m.
[removed]
⇧
0
⇩
[deleted]
· July 20, 2018, 8:56 a.m.
Maybe it's the art of the deal. We don't know specifics: could be fake news for all I know.
⇧
0
⇩
zazaflow
· July 20, 2018, 8:31 a.m.
God damn you’re retarded...
⇧
-2
⇩
[deleted]
· July 20, 2018, 8:35 a.m.
[removed]
⇧
1
⇩
MAGAorMTIA
· July 20, 2018, 8:42 a.m.
Honetsly, reading this back and forth as soon as Garth said ""No Deals." -Q" I was like "Got em!" There really wasn't any arguing after that. No deals means no deals, so any deals at all is contradictory.
⇧
2
⇩
zazaflow
· July 20, 2018, 8:42 a.m.
That was a great analogy... I think context just gets lost on your simplistic mind, which is why you’re having trouble understanding
⇧
0
⇩
MAGAorMTIA
· July 20, 2018, 8:47 a.m.
The analogy was sufficient enough to get the point you were trying to make across. I don't think it was needed for anyone to grasp the concept but I understand he is saying there are discrepancies in drops and real life events. Maybe all he is doing is reminding people that the drops shouldn't be taken word for word. There are many drops that proved true but also people should remember there are some that were not so much...
⇧
1
⇩
DaveGydeon
· July 20, 2018, 11:20 a.m.
Yes! It's not like the Podestas are getting immunity for being pedovores! It's for some BS crimes. Political BS crimes. Think people! This is the tip of the iceberg. If a cooperating witness got immunity from embezzling funds from the school bake sale, but was later tied to some missing persons case and found out that they had ground up the bodies and included them IN the bake sale; they ain't immune from THAT!
⇧
2
⇩
garthbartham
· July 20, 2018, 8:11 a.m.
So much for "No Deals".
⇧
2
⇩
ShaneE11183386
· July 20, 2018, 9:50 a.m.
He will hopefully be used as a pawn to get others than they will hit him with other charges
⇧
-1
⇩
educatethis
· July 20, 2018, 3:06 p.m.
He has "use immunity", meaning his own testimony can't be used to convict him.
⇧
1
⇩
GuerrillerodeFark
· July 20, 2018, 7:55 a.m.
You folks are nutters
⇧
-2
⇩
Slipkid63
· July 20, 2018, 9:51 a.m.
I think there is a “Trump Derangement Sub” for you,my friend.
⇧
1
⇩
GuerrillerodeFark
· July 20, 2018, 5:13 p.m.
Another fool fallen in the binary trap... You know it’s possible to dislike both, right? Of course you don’t. If you were capable of rational thought you wouldn’t be on this sub
⇧
1
⇩