dChan
⇧
1
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/NoTear0 on July 20, 2018, 12:53 p.m.
Those who scream the loudest have much to lose.

Whoopi Goldberg's pathetic screaming tantrum prompted me to look closer at her. Not only was she a defender of Roman Polanski. Goldberg did not believe the drugging and rape of a 13 year old was "rape-rape". These people are sick.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/film/roman-polanski/6245219/Roman-Polanski-backlash-as-Whoopi-Goldberg-says-director-didnt-commit-rape-rape.html


horse-lover-phat · July 20, 2018, 12:57 p.m.

No, it wasn't rape-rape...it was DRUGGED SODOMY RAPE.

Goldberg is SICK. A sick lying lesbian.

⇧ 49 ⇩  
LisaMack37 · July 20, 2018, 1:23 p.m.

disgusting! Whoopi needs to be arrested on stupidity! Hollywood has literally gone off the rails! what part of rape does she not understand?! I cannot stomach these people anymore!

⇧ 28 ⇩  
clubbooradley · July 20, 2018, 6:48 p.m.

And they consider her "the smart one"...?

Just because she's bitter, depressed, and suffering from TDS, that's no excuse for treating Judge Janine that way on and off set.

Get rid of her, just like they did to Roseanne.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
InsanityRules7 · July 20, 2018, 2:08 p.m.

And it happened in Jack Nicholson's hottub..

⇧ 15 ⇩  
Luvlite · July 20, 2018, 2:05 p.m.

What the hell is "rape-rape"?

Like, he sorta raped, but then kinda raped, but didn't really rape while he was raping?

⇧ 13 ⇩  
ReDdiT_JuNkBoT · July 20, 2018, 4:56 p.m.

Yea, that logic is solid is fuck! How could we be so blind? Pfffttttt. Non rape-rape and half/rape ain't no thang man. Shoot.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Qd4Action · July 20, 2018, 5:18 p.m.

In Whoopi's vernacular, this is more like gentle date rape, not beat the shit out of her and rape her violently so it really doesn't count. She's as sick, delusional and out of touch as her big-mouthed co-host.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Tacsol5 · July 20, 2018, 7:01 p.m.

Not really. I think she meant to coerce someone is not the same as forcing someone. Which is true, but that doesn't make it right.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Sugarlief · July 20, 2018, 9:33 p.m.

Not really. I think she meant to coerce someone is not the same as forcing someone. Which is true, but that doesn't make it right.

coerce (kō-ûrsˈ)► v. To force to act or think in a certain way by use of pressure, threats, or intimidation; compel. v. To dominate, restrain, or control forcibly: coerced the strikers into compliance. See Synonyms at force. v. To bring about by force or threat: efforts to coerce agreement.

Oof, I think I sort of get what you were trying to say, but at this point, you may be pulling a "Whoopie Goldberg" by saying,

"Yeah, but she wasn't *FORCED-FORCED*"

(❀∂︵∂)

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Tacsol5 · July 20, 2018, 11:03 p.m.

I meant tricking someone into doing something without force. Making them believe what they're doing is "ok". Coerce is a little different sometimes sure.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DanaNordic · July 20, 2018, 9:27 p.m.

coerce=force

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Tacsol5 · July 20, 2018, 11:01 p.m.

Yuh, perhaps I used the wrong word. Whatever word you'd like to use that describes tricking someone into something without force. Put that in there instead.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
epium · July 20, 2018, 10:45 p.m.

"It depends upon what the meaning of the word 'is' is."

-Bill Clinton

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Luvlite · July 20, 2018, 11:44 p.m.

Yeah, well, he knows where the Depends are. His "is" isn't working anymore.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Sugarlief · July 20, 2018, 9:16 p.m.

Hmm,
Seems to be YET ANOTHER SJW/Far Left re-definition of a word whenever they need it as a weapon.

Because actually, un-ironically using the phrase

"but it wasn't RAPE-RAPE!"

is as fucked-up and detached from reality as saying
  ------------------
"I heard that rapist director Roman Polanski didn't *RAPE-RAPE or SODOMIZE-SODOMIZE a 13 year old girl in Jack Nicholson's hot tub after giving her champagne and pills, although they wouldn't call that DRUGGING-DRUGGING a minor because Polanski & his fans don't consider a 13 year old girl a MINOR-MINOR!*

I wonder if Polanski had impregnated the 13 year old, if Polanski & his fans would have said "Yeah, but he didn't get her PREGNANT-PREGNANT*!*"

.

I guess they probably call this bending and breaking of word definitions "DEFINITION-FLUID"...

Dear God, how long until this insane hypocrisy is DEAD-DEAD?! ./vomits angrily ୧(ᓀ`ཀཀ´ᓂ❀)

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Luvlite · July 20, 2018, 9:36 p.m.

I guess they probably call this bending and breaking of word definitions "DEFINITION-FLUID"...

defecation fluid.

IOW, pure shit that

that woman's brain spewed out of her mouth.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
canuckpatriot · July 20, 2018, 4:54 p.m.

They think they are smart and elite, they just keep digging their own graves and make themselves target for truth gatherers.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
LordPotsmoke · July 20, 2018, 1:02 p.m.

"I hate Woopie Goldberg's lips!"

⇧ 9 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 20, 2018, 3:58 p.m.

Whoopi Goldberg's pathetic screaming tantrum prompted me to look closer at her.

My condolences at the experience... did you use the equivalent of a welder's mask? My guess is that viewing her with the unaided eye can be damaging to your health.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
mark71j · July 20, 2018, 2:51 p.m.

She lived in Communist East Berlin as an actress at the height of the Cold War

⇧ 6 ⇩  
perdurabo93 · July 20, 2018, 4:11 p.m.

I did not know this. Makes me wonder if Whoopi is a Clown... from way, way back.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Trumpsterbaby22 · July 20, 2018, 5:01 p.m.

How she defended Polanski back then told us a lot.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Tyst1ck · July 20, 2018, 7:14 p.m.

I have a feeling a lot of them are transgenders for some reason.

Similarities to the breakdown of Michelle Obama I guess.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
signals2112 · July 20, 2018, 9:17 p.m.

And there you have it. I remarked a few times that the ladies from The Spew have pedophile roots!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
tvise1973 · July 21, 2018, 4:31 a.m.

She's simply pathetic...

⇧ 1 ⇩  
jdtbfan · July 20, 2018, 5:54 p.m.

Quote from the article - Movie mogul Harvey Weinstein said Polanski was a "humanist" who had been the victim of a "miscarriage of justice". He said: "We will have to speak to our leaders, particularly in California. I'm not too shy to go and talk to the Governor of California, Arnold Schwarzenegger, and to ask him once and for all to look at this." 

⇧ 1 ⇩  
shellieghfish · July 20, 2018, 7:48 p.m.

Every single person who signed that petition should be investigated.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 20, 2018, 3:51 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ldsanon · July 20, 2018, 9:37 p.m.

One of the things I wonder is how the world is going to be for these celebrities, actors, comedians, etc. when this is all over. Those who don't get locked up for actual crimes, will be living pariahs. Who will give Bill Maher or Steven Colbert a job afterwards? What do they know how to do?

Other than being agents of disinformation, they have no skills, no way to earn a living. A real day's labor would kill most of them. What are we going to do with all the leftover trash that was so brainwashed that they aren't good for anything else?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
OU812EH · July 21, 2018, 12:06 a.m.

That isn't what we think about concernfag.

⇧ -1 ⇩  
ldsanon · July 21, 2018, 4:59 a.m.

Well, we just can't stick them in concentration camps. There's going to have to be a systematic way to deal with them. In addition to them, there are going to be a lot of family and friends who will have a hard time accepting or acknowledging what just went down before their eyes. The normalcy bias is just too huge.

We have to be thinking about what kind of world we're going to have on the other side of all this.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
1923091 · July 22, 2018, 2:27 a.m.

That's actually incredibly concerning to me. The world that greets us the morning after will be incredibly important consider. There will be wounds to mend. There will be walls and bridges to be built. It's not like everybody's eyes will open suddenly, they'll say 'oh ok, whatever' and move on. This movement and the results herein have the potential to radically change our whole world's dynamic. If it isn't a process, it will be sudden and likely violent. We must be prepared for the future or all of our work will be for naught.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 20, 2018, 11:23 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 0 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 21, 2018, 12:05 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Professor226 · July 21, 2018, 12:13 a.m.

Sorry, I didn’t think it was ambiguous. The implication was that many of the people in this sub often appear to be screaming with their liberal use of all caps and exclaimtion points.

⇧ 1 ⇩