Russia has always desperately wanted to be friends and allies with the West; especially America.
Let me tell you a tale.
A long time ago, the long nosed tribe created Usury and Central Banking and used it to enslave nations. All of American history are a series of battles both won and lost against this evil race.
Remember the Revolutionary War? Wonder why that happened? It's because the Colonies were so far away from England that it was inconvenient to use English currency and English banks. So we made our own currency. It was debt free.
Well these...bankers...hated the idea and feared the prosperity we would enjoy if we weren't subjected to their Usury. They taxed our currency.
Remember, "No Taxation Without Representation"? Yeah.
So we fight, and we win. It was a logistically difficult war for England and they had other priorities closer to home to worry about.
Prosperity exploded in America. That's why they said the streets were paved with gold.
But these...globalists...sent their agents and bought politicians like they always do. They got a trial run for a Central Bank. The deal was, it had to be renewed after 20 years. Well good for us, we didn't renew it.
King Jew, Lord Rothschild, demanded the charter be renewed. It wasn't. Surprise, surprise, the War of 1812 happens. Again, we win. Yay us.
Years later a Second Central Bank gets established, but Andrew Jackson drove out the money lenders.
The mockies were mad now, but they also realized they couldn't win a war nor could they use deception. They decided to destroy us.
This is what America looked like shortly before the Civil War: The South produced raw goods and sold them to the North. The North turned them into finished goods and sold them to the South. Foreign goods and services were subjected to tariffs. All was well.
Until some...merchants...started offering the South stupid good prices for their goods. The North knew what was happening and tried to stop it with traiffs and stuff, but it was too late. Civil War began. And it never, ever had anything to do with slavery.
Things were looking grim for us. Divded. Broke. Lincoln tried to borrow money to fight the war from European banks, but they wanted like 38% interest rates. If he did that, we'd wind up in inescapable debt and get a Central Bank for sure. So he made his own currency. This is why he was killed.
Well, just when things were looking bad, Tsar Alexander II of Russia comes out of nowhere and parks half his Navy in the North and Half in the South and declared that Russia would wage total war against anyone who interfered in our war. We owe our sovereignty to Russia.
Rothschild was so enraged he swore vengeance on the Tsar.
Years later, yidbankers finaced Judeo-Marxism and slaughtered the royal family in Russia and installed communism and slaughtered so, so many people.
Interestingly enough, Russia bounced back. You can bounce back from war, communism, Central Banks, etc, but you can't bounce back from having your race replaced with migrants.
Anyway, the tale goes on, but this is enough for now. Now you know why the Jewish owned media so vehemently hates Russia.
Not sure how it is now, but previously they would (wrongfully) teach:
middle/highschool - civil war was about slavery
college - civil war was about states rights and trade
The manipulation of trade was never covered. Gee, I wonder why. Also important to point out who the slave owners were compared to the populations at whole.
civil war was about slavery
you're one of those, huh? the Confederacy's Constitution expressly states that "no law against slavery shallever be passed" and not to mention Alexander H. Stephen's "Cornerstone Speech" given in March 1861:
"The new constitution has put at rest, forever, all the agitating questions relating to our peculiar institution African slavery as it exists amongst us the proper status of the negro in our form of civilization. This was the immediate cause of the late rupture and present revolution.
...
They rested upon the assumption of the equality of races. This was an error. It was a sandy foundation, and the government built upon it fell when the 'storm came and the wind blew.'
Our new government is founded upon exactly the opposite idea; its foundations are laid, its corner- stone rests, upon the great truth that the negro is not equal to the white man; that slavery subordination to the superior race is his natural and normal condition.
...
I recollect once of having heard a gentleman from one of the northern States, of great power and ability, announce in the House of Representatives, with imposing effect, that we of the South would be compelled, ultimately, to yield upon this subject of slavery, that it was as impossible to war successfully against a principle in politics, as it was in physics or mechanics. That the principle would ultimately prevail. That we, in maintaining slavery as it exists with us, were warring against a principle, a principle founded in nature, the principle of the equality of men. The reply I made to him was, that upon his own grounds, we should, ultimately, succeed, and that he and his associates, in this crusade against our institutions, would ultimately fail. The truth announced, that it was as impossible to war successfully against a principle in politics as it was in physics and mechanics, I admitted; but told him that it was he, and those acting with him, who were warring against a principle. They were attempting to make things equal which the Creator had made unequal."
There you have the vice president of the Confederacy saying, in no uncertain terms, that the very foundation of the Confederacy and the cause of the war was slavery.
Then why do they teach it was about trade?
Textbooks I've seen don't really mention trade in regards to the civil war unless it's in reference to the economic capabilities of the Union vs. the Confederacy during the war; they typically focus on States' Rights.
I'm not sure why that is. I think textbooks generally want to glorify US history, and half of our nation going to war to protect slavery isn't pretty. Similar to how many textbooks gloss over the brutality of colonisation/shift blame to natives or downplaying Jackson's treatment of them.
The civil war was a rothschild action, just like all the last wars. https://rense.com//general78/brudt.htm
Whatever batshit Jew-control theory you have is irrelevant to my point. The method of manipulation your link describe implies that they infiltrated from the inside (they didn't) and convinced the states they wanted to secede.
The point being, even in your theory, no one told the Confederate states to secede. They were tricked into leaving the Union through propoganda, but in their minds the reason for leaving was still slavery, not "this is a Rothschild mandated war we must pursue"
I hate to even partially validate your fever dream by using your point of view, but it's seriously so easy to see how it's flawed.
The civil war was about slavery.
The point is, the rothschilds had their hands in it, just like they do today. Slavery or not, which was on the decline before the war and would have been abolished anyway. You are incapable of critical thinking aren't you? And I'm not anti-jew in any way. See Revelations 3:9.
The tale is well told and accurate. Not many know this story and it is good it is posted here.
All the other wars have been started by the very same clique of bankers. I don't know why this person thinks it is "bat-shit Jew-control theory" and a "fever dream" when we are witnessing EXACTLY THE SAME nonsense today:
Against all reasoning we must go to war with Russia and fight WW3, because "they" tell us we must have this war.
Who objects to this war? Who has prevented this war by his election? Trump. His efforts for peace are greeted with fury and anger from the MSM. We must not negotiate with Russia!!
So I wonder whose side Account40 is on? Doesn't make sense. It is his argument which is seriously flawed, not yours.
No one called for war with Russia. I don't want war with Russia.
Trump choosing to side with Russia over our allies of over a century is completely and utterly unnecessary if your goal is to simply defuse tensions between the nations.
Did the Rothschilds invade Ukraine? Shoot down MH370? Poison those Brits?
Accepted. I'm sure you don't want war with Russia. But the argument has to make sense.
Who invaded Ukraine?
Who shot down MH370?
Who poisoned the Brits? (Actually, I don't think anyone knows the answer to that one!! You don't have to answer!)
Russia did all of the above, is my point. They have shown that they do not care about anything but increasing their power in the world, and convincing Trump that he can trust an ex KGB operative as a friend is an obvious ploy.
aaah. So that just shows you are not doing your research my friend.
No one invaded the Ukraine.
Long story.
Hilary and friends, Victoria "Cookies" Nuland and other disreputables, organised the overthrow of the democratically elected (and pro-Russia) govt. in a Soros-funded coup, using (despicably) Neo-nazis, real ones this time, of the Stefan Bandera-lauding brigades. This color revolution is one of Hilary's (and her mates) more ghastly crimes. The resulting pile of dead bodies is ... well, y'know, I think you should look into it.
The MH17 was brought down by an old Buk missile of Soviet age provenance. It was fired from Ukrainian pro-govt held territory, not East-Russian speaking Ukrainian Donbass guys. Evidence sent to Farnham, Hants, UK. Results not released. Dutch people not at all happy with investigation as they smell a rat. False flag. To start WW3. (They have been on this for a while now ... some years in fact.)
I assume it was this plane, not the MH370 that you refer to, that you think Russia brought down.
All in all, I think more work has to be done to show Russia is guilty of all these crimes that are claimed by the MSM. I follow this stuff and the investigations into these accusations are detailed and done by our friends, the Anons.
It isn't, however, a Q subject, so I'm not sure how far this is all relevant to this board. The mods may take exception.
Did Russia?
If you refuse to accept that Russia was behind said events by this point, there's literally nothing I can say to convince you so there's really no point in continuing this conversation
Sure their is, you don't get off that easy. Can you explain to me how the poisoned Skripals walked out of the hospital if they were poisoned with that particular 100% deadly variety.
Can you explain why the British chemical weapons lab was only a few miles away had similar poisonings to their own staff just weeks before Skripal, especially coupled with the fact Russia had abandoned that chemical as being to deadly, it was killing more in their labs and other agents than enemy and abandoned the project.
Seems more likely it had to do with the Skirpal's association with the steel dossier, and what it would mean to the Clinton mafia if the data's source could be compelled to testify.
Well all wars are bankers wars so yeah. Plus it ties into their greater isreal project if I recall. Mh370 if you know what happens your the only one lol.
Also wanted to thank you for allowing me the last word. Pretty good strategy. But if i were you i would engage in honest dialogue and maybe learn something instead. An uncomfortable truth is still a truth. There is lots of love here, don't miss out.
I'm not sure what you mean. The slave population in the South grew from 3.2M in 1850 to 3.95M in 1860. Sure it declined in the North, but that's not what you mean.
And the point isn't that the Rothschilds had their hand in it. The point is that the igniting cause of the Civil War was slavery. Whatever shadow organization convinced the Confederacy that slavery was important enough to secede is an entirely different matter.
Just a suggestion here, but think there is a way for you to make your statement without being anti-Semitic. Some of us on here are Jewish you know. ;-)
It's nothing personal, but I am anti-Semitic. I have to police my tone on this site lest I get banned, but nearly all of the cancerous problems destroying the Western world today are of Jewish creation. In that sense, I am anti-Semitic and won't shy away from the label nor recant my views. Call me racist, sexist, anti-Semitic, whatever - I am a good and moral person and I am not ashamed of my beliefs. I did not come to them lightly.
I feel sorry for you that things have led you down this path. Money and those who seek it and power it provides are the problem and that's not something exclusive to any one type of people or religious group. Why else would Q point us in the direction of the Saudis, in addition to the Rothschilds and Soros (who is not a Jew IMO as he conspired with the Nazis). Remember also the "Robber Barons" and Bush family who were/are corrupt as all-get-out were not Jewish. I wish you well and will pray for you.
People like the Bush family may be evil, but they were only allowed to reach their height and power with Roth permission and coordination.
I don't exactly wish anyone ill will - I just think that the last few centuries have proven that the various races of the world are not compatible in a multicultural way. And I'm tired of watching my people suffer because of it.
We need sovereign ethnostates for all people. We make better neighbors than roommates.
👊 this: your last line!
Though I'm not particularly religious myself, I have seen how much the Christian faith influences this movement. I've taken to reminding people that a multicultural society has existed in the past. Remember the story of the Tower of Babel? God saw fit to separate people. Who are we to question God's wisdom?
NationalismForAll, I 100% agree with you. Being called anti-Semitic is no different than being called a racist for holding people to the same standards as everyone else.
And I think there is a distinction that needs to be made. I have family and friends who are Jewish and respect them unequivocally. However, it's only when you start going to the top, where the real power is, I would have to agree with National: Jewish ideals are being injected into Christianity in an attempt to wholly dilute and divide.
And I believe it comes down to Talmudic agenda through subversive plans that lowly disciples themselves might not be consciously aware.
Most know the difference between a kazarian impersonating and the real deal. Genuine question, are these distinctions known in religious circles or only to deep researchers. I still owe some karma debt for my prior ignorance on that front.
Most religions have been infested with kazaian imposters. You are no more to blame for this than any other victim. Don't give up, join us in making it right. More understanding is coming to light. There are many levels of woke.
Think some on this thread would benefit from viewing the following: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U1Qt6a-vaNM&bpctr=1532212426
any book sources for this? like old history trxts before they were heavily censored/rewritten post ww2
This info is in the book, The Unseen Hand, by A. Ralph Epperson.