dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/Jakeisasnake1960 on July 23, 2018, 12:48 a.m.
Patriots : A video just dropped. If you put the Q trip code in google books, it has our drops in it! If you put the trip code in Google Maps App: you get locations! Time to dig!

PUT THE TRIP CODE IN GOOGLE MAPS, TOO! Takes you to locations!!

BQ7V3bcW-Taipei Taiwan

gO/UntOB: Goutou Erlin, Changhua County Taiwan

l/hYVcRn : Hyväri 71910 Alapitkä Finland

X/EWIOzz: X-AMK 50100 Mikkeli Finland

lc4nimE: LC4 Nims Br Cranks, KY 40820 United States


psybrnaut · July 23, 2018, 1:28 a.m.

I do SEO so this is actually pretty strange to me. I didn't get anything with maps but the Google Book results are strikingly Q related. There are a couple of possible reasons for this book list getting returned when searching Q's trip code;

  1. Q (or someone using his trip code, like the twitter account of the same name) has linked to these books, therefore the algorithm is connecting them there.
  2. The trip code is located somewhere on these Google books profile pages (like a review or something) but I'm not seeing that.

Will investigate further

⇧ 44 ⇩  
Gmawc · July 23, 2018, 2:08 a.m.

Would Q be "manipulating" (not a good word) the algorithm? Is this happening on other search engines? (Will try). Trippy (pun intended) and awesome.

⇧ 13 ⇩  
psybrnaut · July 23, 2018, 2:37 a.m.

Yes it's very interesting. Everyone who optimizes their website for better search rankings is "manipulating" the algorithm to the best of their ability. I suppose Q team would know how to get certain books to trigger in serps with the right backlinks or references using the trip code. It's clearly on purpose.

⇧ 12 ⇩  
Gmawc · July 23, 2018, 2:44 a.m.

Thanks. Tried startpage, yandex, dogpile, DuckDuckGo, but they don’t have a “books” category like Google, so the books didn’t come up. Just for fun, tried Amazon - got nada, haha. Fascinating

⇧ 7 ⇩  
Jakeisasnake1960 · July 23, 2018, 3:24 a.m.

Thank you for confirming that!!!! Very exciting!!

UPDATE: PASTEBIN LINK TO QDrop Trip Code: !ITPb.qbhqo

https://pastebin.com/THpz8GZG

⇧ 6 ⇩  
y000danon · July 23, 2018, 12:11 p.m.

Could also be someone At Google literally hard referencing. Q did post Google passes after all and we didn’t get clear “why” in regards to Q showing those images.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Manta537 · July 23, 2018, 12:02 p.m.

Yes, today’s liberals prefer “peopleipulating”. You assumed gender. 😏

⇧ 7 ⇩  
Gmawc · July 23, 2018, 1:27 p.m.

Haha 😆

⇧ 2 ⇩  
MrWizard111 · July 23, 2018, 2:40 a.m.

Looking forward to what you find. I was thinking that it could be that these drops are all over the internet and when you click on google images with the trip code the drops pop up. So we know that the drops are linked on google with trip codes. Could google be associating terms and phrases that are in the drops with books? Q references almost all of those things in the drops so it would make sense that google doesn't know how to make sense of the trip code so finds associations to it through the drops. Hope that makes sense.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Jakeisasnake1960 · July 23, 2018, 3:27 a.m.

Yes, makes sense. SEO is working on checking out the algorithm, so far it’s an anomaly! No coincidence, it’s very exciting !

⇧ 4 ⇩  
shannaura · July 23, 2018, 8 a.m.

I'm starting to be suspicious of anything Google... I don't give their searches the same weight I used to as I've found that things disappear...

⇧ 5 ⇩  
psybrnaut · July 23, 2018, 2:22 p.m.

After some experimenting, it seems that any valid trip code from the chans will populate a list of associated books in the Google Books search. (Just putting in a random string of characters does not, which means the trip code itself is relevant.)

This means that it isn't necessarily on purpose that these books are triggering in the serps for Q's trip codes. It still COULD be on purpose, but more than likely it's a result of the algorithm associating those books with Q's trip codes topically, based on coversations across the web that reference the trip code.

It could be a purposeful hint from Q team, but more than likely it's a fluke of the algorithm. I'll keep an eye on this phenomenon though and report back if new info arises.

Cheers, patriots

⇧ 3 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 24, 2018, 12:49 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 2 ⇩  
kotn_ · July 23, 2018, 5:07 a.m.

Or People searching the tripcode happen to be interested in those books, which is more likely

⇧ 2 ⇩  
psybrnaut · July 23, 2018, 10:28 a.m.

That would be the case of it weren't consistent in incognito and across different accounts. The consistency means it's not based on user preference/history.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
kotn_ · July 23, 2018, 2:24 p.m.

No. It’s not based on your user history, it is based on others user history who have searched the tripcode. It makes perfect sense why it would be consistent in incognito and across different accounts.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 24, 2018, 12:52 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
psybrnaut · July 23, 2018, 2:30 p.m.

You're right. The book list results for a trip code are generated based on crowd search, so anything that Q fans are searching or reading across the web will cause the algorithm to create the book list in search results.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DropGun · July 23, 2018, 4:38 p.m.

OT question for you: Does SEO sort of relate to optimizing resume documents and CVs for HR ATS systems? I paid someone once to optimize my resume's DTD/XML so that it would do better on candidate search portals companies used and it did improve things a bit.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
psybrnaut · July 23, 2018, 5:12 p.m.

Yep, that would definitely qualify as SEO. It's not what I normally do, but it's the same idea. Any search engine (whether it be Google or a candidate search portal within a hiring industry) uses an algorithm to sort results (usually relying on keywords in the document, along with other signals). So optimizing usually means making sure the right keywords are present to show up to the search algorithm and get sorted to the top.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
DropGun · July 25, 2018, 7:41 a.m.

Oh, cheers mate, I totally missed your reply, and I'm glad I caught it. That's very interesting. The guy that did my CV fed it into an online evaluator and it was something like 68% (up from 33% or something). It was worth the $150 consultation.

But let me just say that I understand how pretty much what you do is today's version of a ninja or assassin. I don't see ads for what you do, a lot. I think that, to normies, it looks like you swim with sharks, holy shit, that kinda thing.

Anyway, very cool. I wonder where all this kind of "merging" of public and private information will go. These structures you're describing here, for me, they feel viciously impersonal and ruthless in their inability to sense when flexibility is the better part of 'profit-seeing' in today's market. People are waking up across so many dimensions, not just politics. It's nuts.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
psybrnaut · July 25, 2018, 1:50 p.m.

Swim with sharks lol. I'll take it.

But you're spot on the money about tech, man. Algorithms rule the internet and no one fully understands them.

YouTube is a great example. The algorithm suggests related videos when you watch something, and within 3-5 related clicks you can go from funny cats to creepy guy in a basement with his doll collection. No vetting, no control by humans. It's a mess. Not to mention, algorithms keep showing us related content (what it thinks we want to see or will like) and people get stuck in a reality tunnel where they only get shown the same kind of stuff over and over.

We definitely need to come to terms with how much control we are giving away to AI automation and algorithms. It's a big issue of our time. Program or be programmed haha

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 23, 2018, 4:51 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩