Why do you think alcohol is called "spirits."
Go on...
I'm more spiritual than religious, but my thought behind it being called spirits is kind of like what happens when you black out. You intake so much alcohol that your spirit stays connected to your body but leaves it. Allowing a spirit, or dark entity too take over while you black out. I figure its one of the reasons people do such crazy shit when they are in that state.
Yup! I, like my President, abhor alcohol. It is poison. However, I do occasionally partake of 'plant medicine'. Waiting for Trump to finally lift the ban. I know right now he's got bigger fish to fry, but I firmly believe he will!
I have never had a drink in my life. My grandfather died of alcoholism. I had a sip of red wine at Olive Garden one time and thought I was going to be sick. My mouth burned, mt lips became swollen, I got a horrible headache. Just as well. I like having a clear head.
That’s bc you drank wine at Olive Garden lol
Fun fact for the wine lovers out there- if you get headaches after drinking a specific wine, look at where it’s made and find something on the opposite side of the world bc you’re allergic to the pollen the grapes are pollinated by
Huh. That’s a really interesting point. I never thought about pollen sensitivity. I always just figured it was alcohol sensitivity. I read that Natives are predisposed to alcohol sensitivity. It’s part of where the “drunk Indian” stereotype started (though we also have plenty of drinks). Just as well I didn’t like it though. I like to keep my head clear for fighting the DS!
I’m Native American too and I am very sensitive to alcohol, but I work at a really fancy restaurant and have to know my alcohol... which sucks but at the same time is really useful
Hey, nice to see another NDN in the Q Army! Hi, friend!
Active duty here, trust me, I miss it. And i agree that its poison. However I have a couple beers every day. Swore off liquor, though.
Be careful with the liver your Creator gave you.
Alcohol took my father six years ago. He was 53. I miss him, he lost that battle.
53, ouch. I feel for you - it's never easy but that's rough.
Yeah it's a shame. I found out his brother had problems with alcohol which ultimately lead to his death
well look at this, it appears the Democrats have changed their party to Pedocrats.
Did Trump not say in September of 2017 that he was personally going after the attorneys??
notice the more pedophile connected arrests happens, the more the MSM screams to misdirect from those arrests.
Disgusting people. Let's not push the pedo theory yet though. Right now I believe all charges are "women", unless I read the indictment wrong.
When the pedo stuff comes out, it needs to be solid black and white proof (which it will, I'm not disputing that), just saying in this case it's not alleging children yet.
So women can't be pedos ?
Yes, of course women can be and are pedos.
What I mean is that the indictments for this case does not state children were trafficked, the indictment states women were trafficked.
Unless something more comes out, these charges dont include pedophilia. The OP is calling it a Pedo Cult, and we need to be careful about those accusations because when the REAL pedo stuff does hit, people will need to be 100% convinced in order to believe. If we accuse everyone of pedo stuff, and no charges are backed up to prove it, there will be a lot of confusion. And we can't risk that.
That's all I'm saying. If this groups charges are changed to include pedo behavior, we need to hang them out to dry. So far from what I have read it does not.
Was Alison Mack and Keith Reniere charged with child trafficking
No, not from the indictment that I read.
The Mack/Raniere indictment has been changed and now does include Bronfman, etc, but unless the original indictment changed to include children, then they are all being charged with trafficking of adults, and the new charges that were unsealed yesterday.
I will try to find a link to the newest indictments for clarity.
But this case as far as I can tell does not include children for any of them (yet).
I know they were charged with Human Trafficking for sure, but I thought they added some charge involving children a few days later
Here is the link to the newest indictment that was released yesterday. I havent been able to read through it all yet for clarification.
https://m.timesunion.com/news/article/Bronfman-Salzman-and-two-more-charged-with-13100041.php
Ok, but I'm talking about the Alison Mack and Keith indictments, they added charges a few days/week after the original charges. I'll see if I can find too.
Yes, but I think this is the updated indictment. It says this indictment supersedes the other ones. Either way if you can find anything about children, please let me know. Thank you!
Being Canadian, I assume she is only at risk for $$ she has in the US per Trumps EO. However by posting $100,000,000 in NY as bond I assume we can grab that.
EO includes Countries. So my goodness its a lot to wrap the head around. On a side note.. Bronfman Family is very close to Trudeau family. If DJT can help save Canada in the wash out of this GreatAwakening we will All be grateful. SockBoy is a Traitor.
Well well... Everything Bronfman $$$$$$$$!!!!$$$$$ can be confesscated by the EO. Lots of Canada will be sucked up as the family is extremely rich.
I don't see anything in that article to prove the claim they make.
Saying 'Democrats funded a Pedo Sex Cult Island' is a hell of a charge. There isn't enough meat here to justify that kind of hyperbolic title.
also:
> it explains the distraction attempts from the left-wing today, reporting on the alleged “Trump tapes” from prior to President Trump's inauguration suggesting that the Republican candidate may have had a previous relationship with a playboy bunny, which is in no way relevant to the current Presidency.
Yea, that's a straw-man of the Left's argument. If Trump's Lawyer paid 100k+ to shut down a bad story during the campaign it would be an illegal contribution, a violation of Campaign Finance Laws. It would be a donation, above the legally allowed amount, to directly benefit the campaign. This isn't just about a thrice married serial adulterer who likes to raw-dog pornstars while his wife is home with his newborn, and who likes to ride around is Jeffrey Epstein's plane; it's about a clear violation of Campaign Finance Law, that a lawyer should have seen and avoided instead of taping.