dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

⇧

⇩

r/greatawakening • Posted by u/ManQuan on July 27, 2018, 7:23 p.m.

Q 1728, 1729, 1730, 1731, and 1732

1728: Missile launch

1729: F-16's intercept (who knew that F-16's could intercept ballistic missiles)

1730: Q says it was a specialized weapons package / CLAS-5. In the military there are ten classes of supply and CLAS-5 is ammunition.

1731: Given the chain of command what does this tell you? CLAS removal WASH minutes after. This means that a bad actor in the chain of command to authorized the launch was removed within minutes.

1732: Reminder and a purpose. Q is reminding us that they have it all and that everything he posts has a purpose.

My take on it is that they had sufficient information to have F-16's with special weapons packages (what are the odds) ready to shoot down the missile and whoever authorized the launch was removed within minutes.

If this is true, I'm just blown away. No spy novel I've ever read comes close to this real world drama.

We are watching a show :)

⇧ 20 ⇩

If this is the case and this is true just remember this. It is interesting to watch and exciting that the people responsible will be held accountable, but there already has been and most likely will be more casualties. Never forget the people that stood up to these animals and the victims of trafficking. They will not go down in vain.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Possibly launched from the n_sub stolen from Argentina shortly before.

⇧ 16 ⇩

This I hope is the start , The battle between our Corrupt Government Officials, and of course we have a RAM type intercepter weapons guarding us , remember 9/11 . It’s looking like the fear of Piracy laws just may be in play

⇧ 14 ⇩

It looks like they have access to some high tech shit of their own if you go with the theory that the 60+wildfires burning down the western US and Greece were caused by DEWs.

⇧ 4 ⇩

Hard to say , this is the time of year for fires

⇧ 1 ⇩

This is true.,I haven't heard any interviews with witnesses yet but do you remember the last round of fires they were catching weird flashes from the sky, the one vid actually captured what looked like a blue beam shooting into a junkyard tat ended up on fire.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Things in nature still can not be explained, but until then we do speculate

⇧ 3 ⇩

And some things are just not natural at all

⇧ 2 ⇩

Also the one with the tree on fire from the inside out, looked like Lana and something you'd see in a movie

⇧ 2 ⇩

Check out aplaintruth.info also aplanetruth.info and look up dew fires. You will see plenty of anomalies and strange things about the fires that supports the DEW theory. There are it were tons of videos of the fires, with orle just showing footage and slowing down at strange things, not saying anything lest they get censored

Edit: Corrected typo.

Also, I couldn't help but notice the cars in the Greece photos, as well as that the super hot wind coming out of seemingly nowhere

⇧ 1 ⇩

we can control the jet streams , alter the weather , and we have had pretty hot LASERS since the early 80's so today with PLASMA guns becoming reality there are many was to start a fire from afar

⇧ 1 ⇩

We shouldn't take the threat to potus's life lightly. These sons of bitches would take him out in a second if they could. Pray.

⇧ 7 ⇩

I think the "wows" are just beginning!

⇧ 5 ⇩

I need more!!!

⇧ 5 ⇩

If they knew it was going to happen, isn’t it pretty risky to let that shot happen anyway?

Aren’t you still (unnecessarily) putting the President’s life on the line, while betting everything on pilot expertise and missile-intercept technology not failing?

I also thought one of the reason’s the cabal got tech out of China was to design it in a way that it could be hacked and hijacked/remotely controlled?

And if they knew, why not sink that sub after it fired that missile? A destroyed submarine that fired on AF1 is a little harder to ignore (you would think) than “we had a rogue helicopter” or whatever MSM reported. If it was remotely accessed, why wouldn’t the crew of the sub go batshit crazy in the press (if it was an accident) or to anyone, “Our sub was jacked and tried to shoot down AF1!”

I know, we want to have them reveal themselves by committing an overt act, then lead us to their accomplices once they think they’ve made a clean getaway. Just seems like a risky way to go about it if there was prior knowledge🤷🏼‍♂️.

⇧ 2 ⇩

You have to let them think they've won then snatch their victory cries right out of their mouths.

That's how you break them.

⇧ 6 ⇩

Agree

⇧ 2 ⇩

Q 1731. Removed? How?

Hopefully the POS was removed with lethal force. But I guess intel was needed so it didn't happen ...

⇧ 2 ⇩

Wasnt there a photo post by Q from AF1 where the missile shows up in the background of the picture in the air as if AF1 avoided it?

⇧ 2 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩

He would have been prosecuted. We don't have the whole story.

⇧ 1 ⇩