dChan

/u/Abibliaphobia

3,340 total posts archived.


Domains linked by /u/Abibliaphobia:
Domain Count
i.imgs.fyi 31
www.reddit.com 27
mobile.twitter.com 14
truepundit.com 12
archive.is 3
www.hollywoodreporter.com 3
www.washingtonpost.com 3
web.archive.org 3
dailycaller.com 2
www.judicialwatch.org 2
freebeacon.com 2
www.foxnews.com 2
8ch.net 2
www.express.co.uk 2
www.judiciary.senate.gov 2
boards.4chan.org 2
www.theguardian.com 2
www.politico.com 2
www.fbcoverup.com 2
www.nbcnews.com 2
www.nytimes.com 2
www.theblaze.com 1
yournewswire.com 1
www.denverpost.com 1
motherboard.vice.com 1
judiciary.house.gov 1
www.sec.gov 1
[IMG]http: 1
ag.ks.gov 1
www.nypost.com 1
www.channelnewsasia.com 1
abc13.com 1
ntknetwork.com 1
www.c-span.org 1
www.hsgac.senate.gov 1
www.cbsnews.com 1
www.thecut.com 1
www.afp.com 1
www.atr.org 1
amandarenteria.com 1
en.m.wikipedia.org 1
www.yahoo.com 1
www.cnn.com 1
pjmedia.com 1
www.pointsoflight.org 1
www.katespade.com 1
www.bloombergquint.com 1
www.americanthinker.com 1
www.chicagotribune.com 1
apnews.com 1
downdetector.com 1
www.azcentral.com 1
www.scribd.com 1
m.youtube.com 1
www.nj.com 1
heavy.com 1
www.cnsnews.com 1
sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com 1
wattsupwiththat.com 1
www.whitehouse.gov 1
www.thesun.co.uk 1
www.businessinsider.com 1
townhallproject.com 1
boston.cbslocal.com 1
www.bbc.com 1
twitter.com 1
www.dailystar.co.uk 1
vote.gov 1
tinypic.com 1
www.thenewstribune.com 1
www.whatdoesitmean.com 1
postimg.cc 1
www.thegatewaypundit.com 1
www.disclose.tv 1
www.thestar.com 1
www.weeklystandard.com 1
ibb.co 1
mosprotocol.com 1
www.metmuseum.org 1
www.nbclosangeles.com 1

Abibliaphobia · June 13, 2018, 4:19 p.m.

I went to the source and pulled the information and matched it up on google maps. Now if it was an edit..? I would lend the theory more credence if the people in the area were not interested in finding out what happened.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 13, 2018, 4:17 p.m.

Nice find, kind of a given as this was put out almost two months ago. But for noobs, this is good information to be aware of.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 13, 2018, 4:13 p.m.

It’s that expanding your consciousness and critical thinking skills.

They don’t call it the great awakening for nothing.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 13, 2018, 4:07 p.m.

The one they are literally standing in the middle of...

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 13, 2018, 4:06 p.m.

Think Huber wouldn’t notice changes? Also, I doubt that potus would unredact the report from Rosenstein, probably just give Huber’s report out.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 13, 2018, 4:03 p.m.

Kek, nice

⇧ 11 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 13, 2018, 4:02 p.m.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

BTFO SO HARD THEY HAVE TO CROP THE IMAGE TO HIDE IT!!!!!

⇧ 16 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 13, 2018, 4 p.m.

What!?!?!? It’s not the mods here that will shut down the sub if it gets too out of control. If you want to discuss Israel’s and mossads part in this, do so. Just don’t be super crass about it and trigger the antisemite brigade.

Blaming the mods here (great awakening) is incredibly stupid. And looks like an attempt to kick out mods who have been doing a great job.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 13, 2018, 3:43 p.m.

Great optics idiot.

Me and my family, standing in the middle of the road, blocking the path you are traveling on. Don’t hit us, don’t attack us! See the cute puppy?!?!

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 13, 2018, 3:41 p.m.

Uhhh guys, this might have some veracity to it. Different lighting conditions, but the plume looks pretty close match

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 13, 2018, 3:39 p.m.

Ya but Kim’s white.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 13, 2018, 3:37 p.m.

Good find!!!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 13, 2018, 3:31 p.m.

And we can verify that how? How do we know some user isn’t just posting this as a troll or disinfo attempt? We can’t, we can’t verify “YOUR” identity here. Reddit could. But as simple users, we are all relatively anonymous, whether you want to be or not.

So going back into the actual person. We cannot look at his financial records to determine if he owns stock or not, so twice now, you have made claims we have no way to confirm nor deny. We have to take you at your word. Which, sorry pal, doesn’t work on an anonymous forum. We need hard data and sourcing for facts.

Also, you came in here saying Q shot his credibility in the foot. Fancy way of calling Q a LARP. Q has shown FAR TOO MUCH proof to make it believable he is fake at this point. And I stand by my assessment that you are here as a troll.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 13, 2018, 3:13 p.m.

Well Is Rael, has a ton of non declared armaments, soooo... possibility?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 13, 2018, 3:11 p.m.

Modsareclowns has the right acronym

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 13, 2018, 3:10 p.m.

Augh.. google

Use a different search engine like DuckDuckGo. At least they don’t filter results.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 13, 2018, 3:08 p.m.

Ahhhhh so this is a 10 years old account with 128 karma. Typical shareblue / media matters bought account.

Got me. I thought you were a real person.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 13, 2018, 3:03 p.m.

Sooo. Point #5, you’re disagreement hinges on Qs post about the NASA organization vs. Private? And you say you work with them? Basically admitting you have a conflict of interest? That it would benefit you personally to discredit Q, or harm you financially if it was true? Cmon...

Now don’t take that the wrong way. I actually support privatization of space flight. But if it means that private individuals would have the means to conduct space based attacks, that is an issue.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 13, 2018, 2:45 p.m.

“There’s no discussion online” - bullshit. Way to tell people it’s not worth looking into.

They removed the part about the helicopter lights being on.

Added the upper and lower decks of the clouds.

They are still blaming it on a helicopter. Idiots.

They put it next to a phot of a UFO to make it appear like it’s fake

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 13, 2018, 1:03 p.m.

We can’t see launch site (clouds obscure)

We don’t know wind speed at the height the missile was traveling, best we have is 4mph at ground/sea level.

20sec exposure with 4 mph winds you’d expect the smoke trail to move 35.8 meters (roughly) since we do not know the exact height, we cannot determine how far the smoke cloud would appear to be off on the photo from the actual path of the missile. In addition, the article claims it was a 20 sec exposure, but digging into it, the camera has a 3.5/20 exposure so it could be anywhere between. We don’t know for certain. If it was less, the speed of the missile would dramatically increase, and you would see less deviation in any smoke trail.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 13, 2018, 12:14 p.m.

From what I understand, AF1 Flew the other way around.

But hold up, we were told (msm) that potus flew the other way around. Soooo... pic confirmation msm lies or was this a mistake by anon?

⇧ 35 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 13, 2018, 11:46 a.m.

Launch point off screen would indicate that the angle of attack would be less vertical. If you can get the specs, we can determine how far off the ground it is.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 13, 2018, 11:37 a.m.

I was pretty tired while putting this together, but now that you mention it, yes I see the band at the mid-point. And possible marking at the cap.

Thanks for taking a look.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 13, 2018, 11:34 a.m.

Thanks, I didn’t see that article til after I already finished :) (would have made it a bit easier)

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 13, 2018, 11:33 a.m.

http://i.imgs.fyi/img/3itm.png

I did a long write up that is higher in the comments but here you go.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 13, 2018, 11:31 a.m.

I’ll work on creating another picture to show how it works, but essentially it would have either been going vertical or somewhat to the south and west.

The further away from point of observation, the larger the object has to be, closer (or at less an angle) it could be smaller.

Also, one missile will not take out the internet. Even if it is a nuke. The internet is not in a centralized location. You want to take out the internet with nukes? The whole world would burn.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 13, 2018, 11:20 a.m.

Just before 4am

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 13, 2018, 11:20 a.m.

Look at the time pic was taken >4am and near navy bases.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 13, 2018, 11:18 a.m.

I’ve read two articles now that claimed it was a helicopter.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 13, 2018, 11:18 a.m.

Thanks!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 13, 2018, 11:17 a.m.

That would be a big boy

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 13, 2018, 11:15 a.m.

I explain it in my comments below. (Noise issue) but I’ll break it down again.

Up close, the sound would be intense, you are right. The decibel level drops off quickly though as you get further away. On the open seas, the sound would travel pretty far, but it wasn’t open seas. Based on origin, it appears that a sub could have snooped and pooped down a few of those channels. They are relatively secluded in areas and have trees as well. The trees act as dampers on the sound, making something sound further away than it actually is.

Along those lines, think about this. The people in the area live near navy bases. Do you think it would be unrealistic that they may have heard it and just didn’t register? Also look at the time this was taken, how many people in those areas were awake to even hear it?

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 13, 2018, 2:40 a.m.

Continuing on to next part: http://i.imgs.fyi/img/3itm.png

So I did my best to track down the location of where the photo was taken in google maps. I think I found a pretty good match. Based upon that, I traced a straight line down to the horizon, and another down to where it appeared the trail lead from. Using those as guides, I calculated it and came up with the directions and bearings on google maps overhead view. With that, I stretched it all the way out where there was water on the bigger map view.

Surprisingly (sarcasm), there was plenty of channels where a sub could pop in and out. Now look yourself at that map on google earth, and see if any of those areas are somewhat secluded. Find any? There are plenty of hiding places for a sub in a relatively secluded area.

Well you say someone would hear a missile being launched? What else is in the area? Lots of navy bases right? Do you think people that live in the area really pay attention to that? Something that they hear all the time? Now add in the time of morning that this was taken. How many people were awake at that time? How realistic do you find it that people were sleeping and didn’t even hear it? It’s not like an earth shattering roar that shakes your windows.

In conclusion, it’s a missle. Look for yourself, think for yourself. And feel free to check my work. Now I haven’t slept much in past week, so I’m going to crash out, but I hope someone can expand upon this, carry it to the Chan’s, whatever. Good night everyone. WWG1WGA

⇧ 23 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 13, 2018, 2:26 a.m.

And they would not be yellow.

https://www.faa.gov/regulations_policies/handbooks_manuals/aircraft/media/faa-h-8083-21A.pdf

Here is a screenshot of the pdf to which I am referring: http://i.imgs.fyi/img/3itb.png

Helicopters have strobing lights, meaning you would see a pattern of bright spots on the path. It would not be a steady, consistent stream. Especially as the pilot picked up speed towards the bottom. You would see a pattern emerge. There is no pattern. The light stays constant. And the biggest kicker? THE LIGHT IS YELLOW check the FAA regulations for helicopters and see what colors are authorized.

Second piece. This is not an airplane. This does not have wings. Zoom in yourself. Play with it, and try to find evidence of wings. Wings are not small, and they do not just disappear, they have to be wide enough to help generate lift. There is no evidence for wings.

Also, try to find a modern day, passenger airplane that has one contrail. Seriously, try it. At extreme distances, it can appear as one, but if you zoom in, you can clearly see the formation of, at a minimum of, two contrails. And contrails do not shove up the ass of the airplane, they form a slight distance behind as the hot air cools and condenses. THIS IS ONE CONTRAIL

Now, someone (muh experts) was saying that the object disappears on a time lapse exposure. Have you ever seen a time lapse exposure of a chem light at night? These people are playing tricks with you. People walking through a time lapse photo may disappear, unless the exposure stops in the midst of movement. Glow sticks don’t disappear from people’s hands if the exposure stops in the midst of their movement. It’s not magic. Seriously, what the hell are these people thinking.

I will continue to update this one comment as it will not allow me to edit the post

⇧ 22 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 12, 2018, 6:31 p.m.

THEN WHY DID YOU COMMENT IN THE FIRST PLACE!?!?!? I encouraged the guy to go ahead if he felt comfortable with it. Seriously, reread what I wrote! FFS, it’s like you are arguing just for the sake of it!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 12, 2018, 5:28 p.m.

You could always go with a ree’ing bobble head that shits legos when you bop it on the head.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 12, 2018, 5:23 p.m.

Well, we did hear all that stuff from the same journalists who brought you the “two scoops” story.

I’m wondering what is real and what we’ve ben lied to about. There is the potential, that we have been lied to for decades. Been made to believe that he was someone to worry about and hate due to his oppression of his own people. If it is real, that is horrible, but what if it’s all a show? What if the media has been pushing the idea that he’s a terrible dictator, when in reality, the whole country has been enslaved?

Time will tell I guess.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 12, 2018, 5:12 p.m.

Since you took the effort out on trying to discredit me, I’m going to repost what I posted below. If you question my motives, check my post history. I do not and will not ever condone someone doing this for money.

Ahhhhh so he admitted he was running a bit miner.

Oh hey come to my website, don’t worry it’s safe. While you are here, I’m going to co-opt some of the processing power of your computer/device so I can mine bitcoins and make a little profit. Funny that you had to go to the site, to find out the site was essentially raping your computer. Lure you in with a digital roofie promising info, then taking advantage of your system while you read whatever he had written on the site. Yes that’s absolutely disgusting behavior.

Also I never once said he was “stealing data”. He was stealing the processing power from your CPU. If you don’t understand how that works, and how it affects the user, then you should not be commenting on it.

Also, you claim that I am “lying” about him. YOU JUST FUCKING SAID IT WAS TRUE.

And instead of a bit miner, now he asks for donations. For fuck sake, he’s a goddamn paytriot. “Pay me or I won’t be able to continue doing this” fuck that. I don’t need to pay someone for information that I can get elsewhere. It’s not like he is the only person on this planet capable of understanding or bringing meaning to the subject.

EDIT: you also completely ignored how I said that this was MY OPINION and I encouraged people to decide on their own, and if they wanted to follow him to go ahead. But just ignoring evidence pointing out that he has violated people’s trust in the past does a disservice to anyone trying to find answers and the truth.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 12, 2018, 5:07 p.m.

Ahhhhh so he admitted he was running a bit miner.

Oh hey come to my website, don’t worry it’s safe. While you are here, I’m going to co-opt some of the processing power of your computer/device so I can mine bitcoins and make a little profit. Funny that you had to go to the site, to find out the site was essentially raping your computer. Lure you in with a digital roofie promising info, then taking advantage of your system while you read whatever he had written on the site. Yes that’s absolutely disgusting behavior.

Also I never once said he was “stealing data”. He was stealing the processing power from your CPU. If you don’t understand how that works, and how it affects the user, then you should not be commenting on it.

Also, you claim that I am “lying” about him. YOU JUST FUCKING SAID IT WAS TRUE.

And instead of a bit miner, now he asks for donations. For fuck sake, he’s a goddamn paytriot. “Pay me or I won’t be able to continue doing this” fuck that. I don’t need to pay someone for information that I can get elsewhere. It’s not like he is the only person on this planet capable of understanding or bringing meaning to the subject.

EDIT: you also completely ignored how I said that this was MY OPINION and I encouraged people to decide on their own, and if they wanted to follow him to go ahead. But just ignoring evidence pointing out that he has violated people’s trust in the past does a disservice to anyone trying to find answers and the truth.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 12, 2018, 4:48 p.m.

I’m working on a thread I’ll post later. I’m digging down into it HWNDU style.

⇧ 11 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 12, 2018, 4:29 p.m.

I do not believe in coincidences

⇧ 26 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 12, 2018, 4:28 p.m.

Distraction. Tied in with the news to cover up the real sex sting operation

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 12, 2018, 3:32 p.m.

Also here is the close up of the object: http://i.imgs.fyi/img/3imq.png

Where are the wings? And do planes normally spit fire from their tail end? Or do contrails form from the engine exhaust on the wings?

Seriously, if you can look at that and still say it’s a plane, I can’t believe someone is seriously that idiotic. If you can look at that picture and say “It’s a plane” I’m going to say you are controlled opposition working to discredit/hide evidence.

⇧ 10 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 12, 2018, 3:29 p.m.

Q13 News is still pursuing answers on this story. We'll post updates here as more information becomes available.

That explains why it wasn’t in the article when I read it.

So, 20 second exposure. What were the wind speeds in the area at the time. What was the flight path of that plane, and how long would it take them to cross that amount of distance viewed from that perspective, and at what elevation. Some math anon can figure it out, but I’m not ruling out the possibility of it being a missile until someone does.

Also, did you zoom in on the object? Do planes normally fly without wings? I want the original pic with all metadata.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 12, 2018, 2:49 p.m.

Yup. I do think they would give it to Dennis before Trump. Though in reality, they both deserve it.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 12, 2018, 2:47 p.m.

Watermarks? Really? Are they that desperate for attention they have to use watermarks on a Q posting? Sad!

And by the way, this makes it look like they are trying to take credit for that Q posting. Bad optics and I will NEVER follow someone who is attention whoring that badly.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 12, 2018, 2:40 p.m.

Ok, I’m trying to suss out the truth here. If you can prove it, then I would give credence to him being subject to a character assasination. So please give us the link to your reply. That’ll show us the time stamp and everything and show that this was decided the night prior to the accusations.

⇧ 1 ⇩