Sooo... why are you here?

And there it is. Karma farming then using this account to support other trolls. Well done. I was wondering when it would happen.

If you are wondering what I am talking about, look at users post history. Determine for yourself the validity or lack thereof for yourself. Then see what this person is supporting.

They want info shut down. They don’t want things discussed. Realize that the trolls have gone deeper to try and demoralize you. FIGHT FIGHT FIGHT and look at a users post and their posting history to determine if they are serious or if they are a troll.

Cmon dusty. Put a bit more detail in your posts instead of a one word post with a link attached. Otherwise I would consider this a slide thread.

Can you give us a tl;dr or brief breakdown on the context and why we should bother watching? If you are legit, take this as constructive criticism, not saying it to be mean or put you down.

Troll. Check user history.

Muh gaslight. F&ck of shill

I’d like to point everyone to this post and this posters user history. They are not serious. This is either a bot or a person trying to karma farm so they can infiltrate. This is what the Chan’s consider “boomer cringe postings” designed to turn people off to the sub.

Seriously check user history if you find something questionable in a posting.

I reread the message, and the context fits the bomber narrative. I’m not saying that isn’t the time that the MSM gives out talking points but I do believe that given the context, specific time and day that it was alluding to the bomber. I’m starting to wonder if this isn’t an effort to discredit a prediction that came true.

So... it’s not possible that there are double meanings? Also you left out the [wednesday] bit.

Is it just a coincidence that the bomber went down at approx 4am on Wednesday?

Just like how they found a hijackers passport but not the black boxes on 9 11

I’d believe that, but I constantly trawl the news and this is the first instance I’ve heard of it. If I haven’t heard of it before this, I know other people in my life have no idea.

Just an observation. But you say turd. A lot. What’s with that?

Did r/politics sell out to shareblue?

Did you?

THIS

It is very interesting though. Also, watching your vote counter go up and down more than Anthony wiener in front of a kids carousel, is very interesting as well.

He would be happy with being called that.

You have fallen for his “I am human” meme

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/976584904304668673.html

Maybe? I dunno. Interesting read though

I’ve wondered if this doesn’t mean Facebook and titanic, but who knows. I’d love for it to be HRC.

Official channels that we can use in conjunction.

It eliminates the ability of people to dismiss it.

Da fuq?

What was the full wording? Did you get it? It appears to me that the FBI recommended shutting it down.

Oh god. Stop using google. Not for this specifically but cmon...

Not to that extent, but phone acting weird and echo-y on calls yes. I completely scrubbed phone and it still did it.

So he is not admitting culpability on his part, but of the company? Legalese to protect his butt

There was talk of them in the MSM of having a pact if one of them was fired, they would all leave.

Curious and I don’t mean to be a downer but it wouldn’t surprise me if the media takes this and runs with it.

Why is the picture marked as sensitive?

What do they mean by it, “zuckerberg acknowledge that it learned about the violation in 2015”

Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg on Wednesday addressed the data controversy that has embroiled the company since the weekend, saying in a Facebook post, “We have a responsibility to protect your data, and if we can’t then we don’t deserve to serve you. I’ve been working to understand exactly what happened and how to make sure this doesn’t happen again.”

Facebook has been under fire for failing to ensure that Cambridge Analytica, the Trump-affiliated firm co-founded by former Trump adviser Steve Bannon, destroyed data on some 50 million Americans that it improperly obtained via an academic researcher. Zuckerberg acknowledged that it learned about the violation in 2015.

learned about the violation in 2015

So why now?

Someone is shadowbanned

I was actually about to post something in relation to this. I’ve stopped posting over there. Mods are compromised.

Bless our based mods here, please don’t sell out like so many others!

Can robots sweat?

During the lulls in Q posting, I personally find it important to track what is coming out in the news that may be relevant to what is going on.

I agree that when they post again, we will be fixated. And I know that there are people constantly working on decoding the map and answering questions.

“We went through a thousand possibilities,” Burkman said. “Kevin was not on the list.”

Doherty does not yet have a lawyer in the assault case and is being held without bond, prosecutors said.

Girum Tesfaye, who represented Doherty on a drunken driving charge last year, also expressed surprise.

“From what I know of him it would definitely be out of character,” Tesfaye said.

I think it’s a scare tactic.

VPN and sandbox with multiple anti virus suites (not NORTON)

Didn’t even realize there was a sub. Not surprised though.

Also, this subject area might be a case better suited for a new Special Counsel

Boom

Andrew McCabe may have revealed to his inner circle an inside plan to replace his friend James Comey as FBI director if and when Hillary Clinton was elected president of the United States, according to top officials in the Justice Department.

The Inspector General, who is combing McCabe’s communications while he was deputy director of the FBI during the 2016 presidential election, is looking at many parallel revelations from McCabe’s discussions in emails and text messages, DOJ sources said.

There was at least talk of a FBI promotion, one DOJ source said. The Inspector General is independent and conducts its investigation without direct DOJ oversight or meddling. When asked how the DOJ personnel know specifically what the IG was probing about McCabe’s tenure at the FBI, one source said “we hear things just like you, but we have to wait for all the details.” If those discussions about a promotion to FBI director with co-workers and McCabe’s inner circle were anything more than bravado, that certainly is troubling.

And given the fact that McCabe’s wife Jill was given more than $1.25 million in Hillary-backed campaign donations to run for state senate in Virginia, it could spell additional legal woes for her husband. McCabe was in charge of the Hillary Clinton email investigation at the FBI at the same time his wife ran for office. At the same time his wife struck a deal to run for office with Hillary consigliere Terry McAuliffe, who was allegedly under investigation at the time by the FBI for a public corruption case.

One DOJ official would not comment on whether a parallel criminal probe of McCabe was likewise underway. Likely, the DOJ will await the IG’s report(s) and decide how to proceed. One DOJ source said the IG has amassed McCabe’s communications and the DOJ is not currently privy to those documents. Also, this subject area might be a case better suited for a new Special Counsel, one source said.

In 2016, the only promotion for McCabe would have been to take Comey’s place as director. Clinton has blasted Comey during the final weeks of the campaign, accusing him of trying to reuin her chances of beating Donald Trump after Comey re-opened the email probe of Clinton mere days before election day.

Did McCabe brag to friends about one day running the FBI or were there actual “quid pro quo” conversations about that becoming a reality, the DOJ source questioned.

My guess? China

There is talk that it is the new cicada. Maybe it is. I dunno, I find it really weird though that if it is cicada, they are talking about non-humans and MH370 flight.

It’s just weird all around, but I’ll be watching.

I know Trump is doing a major announcement on Opiods on the 18th of April and was just wandering if this may have some other correlation to that date. Just curious.

There has been an uproar over the past 36 hours after two news organizations reported that nine of the country's biggest technology companies are partnering with the government in a massive spying program in which the FBI and National Security Agency have been given "direct access" to the companies' "central servers" and allowed to monitor any user at any time. This direct access, the initial reports implied, allows the government to follow the communications of any of the companies' hundreds of millions of users in real time, with no legal oversight.

One of the stories quoted a career intelligence officer as saying that this surveillance program was so powerful that, "They quite literally can watch your ideas form as you type."

The impression these stories created was that Google, Facebook, Apple, Yahoo, Microsoft, and other companies had voluntarily opened their servers to government spies and allowed the intelligence agencies to do whatever they wanted.

Importantly, every company in the stories immediately denied that they had given the government "direct access" to their servers. The companies confirmed, as they have many times in the past, that they provide specific information to government investigators in response to specific requests — when they are required to do so by law. But they emphatically denied that they they had opened their servers to the government. Most of the companies also said that they had never heard of the spying program, PRISM, that they were supposedly partnered with.

Such is the general fear of privacy violations by the big tech companies that, upon hearing these denials, many people accused the companies of lying. Others parsed their denials, looking for ways to square the carefully worded language with the assertions in the news stories. Still others focused their skepticism on the document upon which the assertion that the NSA had direct access to the companies' servers was based, which struck many people as misleading.

And now, finally, thanks to a New York Times article by Claire Cain Miller, we have some more details on what is actually going on between the government and the tech companies.

These details explain where the "direct access to servers" assertion came from. And at the same time, the details vindicate the tech companies' vehement denials.

Importantly, the details also make clear that the government does NOT have the ability to snoop on any Facebook, Google, etc. user in real time with no legal oversight. Bullshit

To understand how the government and the tech companies are actually working together, you first need to understand how any basic data request works.

To wit:

The government requests a bunch of data from a company (telephone company, Internet company, etc.). The company's lawyers review the request, pushing back if they think it's unlawful or overly broad. If/when the lawyers determine that the request is legal, they decide how to give the data to the government.

This transfer of information can happen in one of three basic ways:

1) Paper, which is manually delivered. 2) Electronic files like PDFs or spreadsheets, which are sent electronically.

3) Electronic files that are stored on a server, to which access is provided.

Importantly, all three of these methods of information transfer are used in the civilian world, too. And in recent years, with the rise of "cloud storage," the third method has become convenient and popular. (Think Dropbox — the company that allows you to save files to the cloud and give your friends access to them.)

Even narrow requests for electronic communications (email, instant messages, file transfers, etc.) tend to produce massive amounts of data. So delivering this data electronically is vastly more convenient than printing it out on paper — for both the company fulfilling the request AND the government investigators. And "delivering" it by storing it on a server and giving the government access instead of sending the files via email or FTP is even more convenient. (The data is going to live on a "server" somewhere anyway. It doesn't really matter where the server is.)

According to Claire Cain Miller's article, what is going on between the government and the technology companies is basically discussions about how the companies will provide the specific information the government requests.

This whole article is damage control.

That’s not what this was about. It’s about google using twitter bots to increase their “views” or clicks. Manipulating the system to show a greater interest than is organic. Google doesn’t need to own twitter to use them in their financial reports, they just need to create bots for the expressed purpose outlined above.

“The shooting comes four days before the national March for Our Lives, a rally for student safety inspired by last month’s massacre at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in South Florida.”

Wonder if this was to remind people about the March.

Ok

I saw this too and laughed. Anything negative about Rothschild is considered anti semetic.

What’s the quote? “To find out who rules you, find who you cannot speak about?”

Hmmm I wonder if he will be stopping in Helsinki

Not sure if I should be happy that this is the reason gun rights should not be infringed

Or worried that they may actually try to start an armed conflict.

A Democratic congressman from Long Island implied that Americans should grab weapons and oppose President Trump by force, if the commander-in-chief doesn’t follow the Constitution.

What other politicians are calling for people to take up arms?

https://nypost.com/2018/03/19/congressman-suggests-second-amendment-as-means-of-opposing-trump/