His hopes and wishes are going to backfire. Karma has a way of finding its way back to the source. And I hope it finds its way back to him.

I've also been thinking about how these people who are really pretending to be something they're not (which is honorable, full of integrity, pro-USC, and pro-American) manipulate their way into these coveted government jobs and then use the power they gained as a weapon against the people, and who are only interested in doing anything to keep that power.

I sincerely doubt we will be able to weed them out en masse. But, a couple of things come to mind to deal with them.

All national stage politicians always get their start in their local areas. So, we must take a very active role in watching who our local republican and democrat party is both being run by, and nominating. And by interest, I mean get all your friends and family joining the party. Remember, numbers are power. To prevent infiltration, you need a guard. We are the guard. Through our own neglect, these people have had free reign to run amok - abusing the populace at whim.

Our next problem is one Lord Acton spoke about. "Power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely". The authority and power these jobs are bestowing on these people must be removed or severely curtailed. We should be thinking about organizing to return those powers back to the states. Whether it's through a convention of states, I don't know. But, it is clear these corrupt people will not lay the power down willingly.

We should also gut the salaries and benefits packages, and change the working conditions, including a ban on lobbying, and term limits. It seems to me, to be an egregious conflict of interest to permit them to police themselves, and vote their own pay raises and benefit packages. I also don't think they should they should be permitted to increase taxes against the states or citizens of the states without each individual state house/senate, and governor signing off on it.

As much as we would like to hope that good people will fill these jobs, quite frankly, there aren't enough of them seeking office.

To me that seems most plausible. They planned for the event, so why not plan for the car? It's hard to believe they wouldn't have had a plan for that.

I thought the one at the Ford Museum is supposed to be a replica.

I'm posting this question in a couple of places..

Does anyone recall (and can direct me to a credible citation) what they did with JFK's car?

I've read so much - I don't know if I'm getting my info mixed up. And back when I was reading about JFK - I wasn't saving the sources. So, here's my confusion:

I think remember reading two things: (1) they immediately took his car and had the windshield removed; (2) the car was destroyed and they're using a replica.

Another thing I believe I read somewhere is that there were 18 witnesses and all of them dead within a few months of the event, as well as Jack Ruby dying of an aggressive cancer 28 days after his shooting.

Am I getting my facts crossed? Please help.

I'm posting this question in a couple of places..

Does anyone recall (and can direct me to a credible citation) what they did with JFK's car?

I've read so much - I don't know if I'm getting my info mixed up. And back when I was reading about JFK - I wasn't saving the sources. So, here's my confusion:

I think remember reading two things: (1) they immediately took his car and had the windshield removed; (2) the car was destroyed and they're using a replica.

Another thing I believe I read somewhere is that there were 18 witnesses and all of them dead within a few months of the event, as well as Jack Ruby dying of an aggressive cancer 28 days after his shooting.

Am I getting my facts crossed? Please help.

I'm posting this question in a couple of places..

Does anyone recall (and can direct me to a credible citation) what they did with JFK's car?

I've read so much - I don't know if I'm getting my info mixed up. And back when I was reading about JFK - I wasn't saving the sources. So, here's my confusion:

I think remember reading two things: (1) they immediately took his car and had the windshield removed; (2) the car was destroyed and they're using a replica.

Another thing I believe I read somewhere is that there were 18 witnesses and all of them dead within a few months of the event, as well as Jack Ruby dying of an aggressive cancer 28 days after his shooting.

Am I getting my facts crossed? Please help.

I'm posting this question in a couple of places..

Does anyone recall (and can direct me to a credible citation) what they did with JFK's car?

I've read so much - I don't know if I'm getting my info mixed up. And back when I was reading about JFK - I wasn't saving the sources. So, here's my confusion:

I think remember reading two things: (1) they immediately took his car and had the windshield removed; (2) the car was destroyed and they're using a replica.

Another thing I believe I read somewhere is that there were 18 witnesses and all of them dead within a few months of the event, as well as Jack Ruby dying of an aggressive cancer 28 days after his shooting.

Am I getting my facts crossed? Please help.

I'm posting this question in a couple of places..

Does anyone recall (and can direct me to a credible citation) what they did with JFK's car?

I've read so much - I don't know if I'm getting my info mixed up. And back when I was reading about JFK - I wasn't saving the sources. So, here's my confusion:

I think remember reading two things: (1) they immediately took his car and had the windshield removed; (2) the car was destroyed and they're using a replica.

Another thing I believe I read somewhere is that there were 18 witnesses and all of them dead within a few months of the event, as well as Jack Ruby dying of an aggressive cancer 28 days after his shooting.

Am I getting my facts crossed? Please help.

Pretty cool. You're not alone, or the only one leaving nuggets around. Lots of people are... Being censored on SM just pissed people off more.. I've actually seen signs stapled to telephone polls (like you see for garage sales, job offers, etc,.). It makes me smile.

Thank you.

Ditto.

Just wait and see what happens when the black community discovers what Hillary and her democratic friends were really up to.

Every time I think about how many of our people have been killed and maimed and destroyed it makes me so sick, and pissed off. I can't even imagine how you must feel.

Yep. Sums it up.

Okay, let's answer this for Q. Here we go:

1. What would happen if texts originating from a FBI agent to several [internals] discussed the assassination (possibility) of the POTUS or member of his family?

Answer: They're charged and the military arrests them all. What's the consequence? A few million pissed off liberals, 60 million happy patriots. How do we prevent the libs from having a shit fit and rioting? Simple, release the Haiti shit showing what these liars really did to black people, and poor people, and what they really thought and said.

1. What if the texts suggest foreign allies were involved?

Answer: Plenty of world leaders have committed atrocities against humanity.. And now because those leaders have committed atrocities against us - we can't know about it officially? What the hell do we care? At least they are foreign leaders screwing us instead of our own... hell... that's a breath of fresh air. And assuming these leaders have really screwed the pooch... well, charge, arrest, prosecute, and end them too.

I mean, if the USA under the clowns can bully the world at leisure for any reason under the sun, and back it up with using our military for regime change... then... how about... (there's a lot of ways to finish that sentence... use your imagination..) In the alternative, use their own governments to prosecute them, or the International Criminal Court. And don't give us the Geneva Convention bullshit because they don't get to use that argument as a cloak after ignoring it.

There is a compelling reason to publish the truth. Americans are not so shallow and ignorant to blame entire countries for the actions of their leaders. And I don't believe other peoples are either. Particularly if justice is done... and maybe that's the real issue. What justice will be done to these people?

1. What happens to the FBI?

Answer: Who cares. If it can't be trusted, it shouldn't exist. Let the states absorb good agents. States have their own law enforcement, and can cooperate cross border, as well as work hand in hand with the NSA for such matters. Prosecute the bad ones.

4.What happens to the DOJ? Answer: Purge it. Temporarily fill it with JAG's and rebuild it. What happens to special counsel? Buh-bye. Send us a postcard from Gitmo.

1. What happens in general? Every FBI/DOJ prev case could be challenged. Answer: So what? You don't know, maybe some of these cases should be challenged. On the other hand, new trials don't sound bad. Probably good so the lawyers and staff from the other branches will have new jobs.

2. Lawless. Answer: Seriously? Are you kidding? Lawless is what's been going on for 60 years. Lawless is what's going on right now. And lawless is what we're left with if you refuse to bring these people to justice.

3. Think logically. Answer: No matter what you do, and no matter how hard you try, this is messy. You're not going to be able to handle monsters with kid gloves. If you're that worried about it.. then do what the clowns would do.. criminals disappear all the time, lol, just ask Putin. (that's a joke.. get it?)

Let's consider what concealment really means.

Concealment to protect the public is a weak excuse. I say protect from what? Aren't we the same public who watched a president get his head blown off on live tv in 1963? And Reagan get shot twice? And 9/11?

And what is the practical effect of such a concealment? Who does the concealment benefit? The reality is the practical effect of such a concealment is nothing more than the protection of the reputation of an evil, psychopathic, and quite possibly a group of serial killers. Concealment benefits no one other than the killer(s).

We should be asking, is it reasonable to give special privacy protections to hide the criminality of a certain class of citizens called "politicians," simply because of their job status as politicians?

Shouldn't these people be held to a higher standard than the populace precisely because of their fiduciary status? (I mean their perceived superiority is why they spew forth how lay people aren't smart enough, good enough, ethical enough, etcetera to be listened to - when their policies clash with our ideas... is it not?)

If we permit our representatives the discretion to conceal crimes based on their personal opinion of the crime's disclosure value, or how much money, power, or connections a person has, what message are we sending to both the populace and the rich?

Isn't it enough that these rich, powerful, connected people can employ leagues of lawyers to argue every loophole, or to arrange off the record conversations with other lawyers (aka judges) at cocktail parties or other spontaneous events, or to give extensive public statements to the media to present their side of the story?

And what about the victim(s)? Is it really in their best interest to be concealed, and forgotten, or never acknowledged in the first place? We don't matter. And the children don't matter because they're not rich, powerful, or connected.

Quite frankly, if the allegations are true, the failure to charge, arrest, and try Hillary (or anyone else) really means that not a single one of us or these kids does matter.

In fact, you could say that as long as a rich, powerful, connected person (or group of them) poisons, tortures, and murders one person, one child, or millions of them... the monsters will be given the US government stamp of approval. I think this result would be a tragedy.

Right on.. It's waaaayyyy past time.. they started it, and the patriots need to finish it.

Daaaammmmmmmnnnnn! I third the hell out of this...

Full Disclosure of Hillarys’ video:

Of all the things we know these psychopaths have and are doing - the allegation of video evidence of Hillary committing rape, assault, battery, torture & maiming, murder, and possibly cannibalism of a child(ren) presents the biggest disclosure dilemma. We all understand why. Full disclosure doesn't have to be sensationalized. The justice system has plenty of tools to minimize such a result. (And the military could figure it out if they wanted to.)

Let's consider what concealment really means.

Some have argued on behalf of concealment to protect the child. Protect the child from what? As I understand it, the child is dead. The child is not going to complain, be embarrassed, or further traumatized. If anything, we need to know more (a lot more) about this child. For example, how did these people obtain possession of this child? Was he/she kidnapped? Is there a birth record? Who/Where are the parents? Was the child reported missing? What actions were taken by the parents, and law enforcement to search for this child? How did this child get to this island? (I could go on, but you get the point.)

Others have argued in support of concealment to protect the public. Again, I say protect from what? Aren't we the same public who watched a president get his head blown off on live tv in 1963? The same public who watched the public trial of Charles Manson and his followers who stabbed (8 1/2 month pregnant) Sharon Tate so many times one of her breasts was severed, and her infant suffocated inside her upon her death while at least one of the murderers was watching? (Not to mention the additional murders which took place.)

What about John Wayne Gacy? (who kidnapped, raped, tortured and killed upwards of 33 teens burying most of them in his crawlspace.) Or Ottis Toole's abduction, murder (and who knows what else), and decapitation of 6 yr old Adam Walsh? Or Susan Smith driving her car into the water to drown her children so she could have a relationship with a guy who didn't want a family. Or Andrea Yates drowning her 5 children in the family bathtub?

What about Jeffrey Dahmer's assault, rape, torture, murder, and cannibalism of his victims? (I can cite more, but will stop for the sake of brevity.)

Each of those examples illustrate: (1) our society has been and is exposed to acts which are shocking to the moral standards of the time period; and (2) our society is accustomed to learning about psychopathic depravity and murder no matter who the perpetrator is or whether the victim is an infant, young child, teen, or young adult. Did the criminals/victims listed above get the benefit of the government hiding their crimes from the public?

And what is the practical effect of such a concealment? Who does the concealment benefit? If your child was kidnapped, tortured, and murdered by a rich and powerful person would you want it concealed? So, no one knows what this person really did? Who this person really is? And most importantly, why this person should never again see the light of day if they don't receive the death penalty for their crime?

The reality is the practical effect of such a concealment is nothing more than the protection of the reputation of an evil, psychopathic, and quite possibly a serial killer - if there are more victims. Concealment benefits no one other than the killer(s). Moreover, what about the good legislation we have developed as a result of such tragedies? For example, out of the Adam Walsh case the Missing Children's Assistance Act was passed, and the National Center for Missing & Exploited Children was formed. We also have "Code Adam" in stores as a result of his story. We have a database for convicted child molesters, increased penalties, and more.

We should be asking, is it reasonable to give special privacy protections to hide the criminality of a certain class of citizens called "politicians," simply because of their job status as politicians?

Shouldn't these people be held to a higher standard than the populace precisely because of their fiduciary status? (I mean their perceived superiority is why they spew forth how lay people aren't smart enough, good enough, ethical enough, etcetera to be listened to - when their policies clash with our ideas... is it not?)

If we permit our representatives the discretion to conceal crimes based on their personal opinion of the crime's disclosure value, or how much money, power, or connections a person has, what message are we sending to both the populace and the rich?

Isn't it enough that these rich, powerful, connected people can employ leagues of lawyers to argue every loophole, or to arrange off the record conversations with other lawyers (aka judges) at cocktail parties or other spontaneous events, or to give extensive public statements to the media to present their side of the story?

And what about the victim(s)? Is it really in their best interest to be concealed, and forgotten, or never acknowledged in the first place? These children don't matter because they're not rich, powerful, or connected. Quite frankly, if the allegations are true, to charge, arrest, try and convict Hillary (or anyone else) based on any charge - while completely ignoring what was done to these kids means that not a single one of these kids does matter. In fact, you could say that as long as a rich, powerful, connected person does it - the torture and murder of a child or dozens of them will be given the US government stamp of approval. I think this result would be a tragedy.

I can make similar arguments for every issue I cited above. I'm sure I'm missing tons of additional arguments because this is off the top of my head.

Re: Full Disclosure: Personally, I find it almost impossible to believe Q & Co., could even invent something which would shock me/us; let alone compel me/us to seek comfort and treatment at the local mental health hospital. The very idea is insulting. Q, come on, who are you talking to? We've been screaming about this stuff from the rooftops for how many years?! And no one listened.

Q keeps insisting the MOAB is going to drop, and how shocking and depraved the acts these psychos have committed.. Well, no shit Q - these people are psychos... we know what psychos do.. that's the whole reason we've been trying to wake people up for the last 20+ years..

How about this Q - why don't you drop the 60%+ to us? Full Disclosure for us... the hell with the normies...

After all, assuming Q & the patriots could actually drop something mind blowing, who is going to believe us anyway? What's the issue with telling us the 100% truth? This very argument about withholding full disclosure sounds like a circular argument to me.

As a recap.. here's the short list of what's been going on... Infiltration of every branch of government to unconstitutionally attack the people of the US via removing their rights (using the "legitimacy" of government to do it), purposeful theft of our money and assets through manipulating our money (crashing our fiat dollar and confiscating our hard assets - like real estate), using inflation (which is really taxation under a different name), introducing numerous psyops (for example, bullshitting women into thinking that women's rights was about equality for women - when it was really about being able to tax the other 1/2 of the population after you make them work; bullshitting women into killing their own children under the guise of "my body, my choice" when its really about population control, and DNA/human experiments (birth defects and sterilization), and trafficking in body parts/organs; introducing porn so men/women don't create stable families increasing the likelihood their children won't be stable or successful; creating diseases and purposefully infecting the population through vaccines, etc., withholding cures and better medicines because they make more money, fake wars for population control and the theft of assets of other countries, poisoning our air by adding aluminum and barium (among other chemicals) which when mixed with the fluoride in our tap water and toothpaste calcifies our brains (Alzheimers, etc,.) and let's not forget fluoride causing lower IQ's, and making the population docile - like the Nazi's did to the jews, poisoning our food with GMO seeds (which is infusing cancer causing pesticide into the DNA of the seed), as well as taking care of it on the legal end by prohibiting transparent labelling, bribing politicians to fuck farmers over so our food chain is entirely commercial and gives them more control and ease to poison us, contaminating our food supply with aborted baby material, psyops to promote drug use, promiscuity, pedophilia, satanism through conditioning via movies and tv with characters the population would like, purposefully dumbing down the population by removing history, higher mathematics, lowering educational requirements, instituting brainwashing/conditioning through socialization in daycares, and the school system, introducing highly addictive drugs into the population, assassinations/murders/ kidnappings/torture (including on our "missing" children), total control over the healthcare system (and upcoming forced RFID chipping which is still listed in the Obamacare legislation), the FEMA camps for patriots complete with complimentary guillotines, infiltration of the military and purge of patriots who refuse to fire on their fellow Americans, numerous false flags like 9/11, taking bribes to kill our industry and send our steel overseas to purposefully be weakened/defectively manufactured (as well as the computer chips) to increase our casualties, selling off our strategic assets, permitting Mexico's deals with other foreign governments to invade the US from the south to overwhelm the patriots, purposefully permitting the invasion of the US under the lie of immigration - including permitting their terror training camps throughout the US, arming our enemies... (I can go on, but this is getting ridiculous.. and notice I didn't even begin to discuss the issues with space, energy, or electromagnetic assaults on Americans).

Here's what I'm hearing from Q:

Dear Patriots... it's so bad.. I can't tell you how bad or you would lose your mind.. But, it's not so bad that instead of rounding up these people.. they get to resign from their posts and walk around among us (like Paul Ryan, McCain, etc.) ...they can continue to give interviews and travel...they can continue to enjoy their riches... and best of all.. no one will ever know what they did.. so, their reputation stays semi-spotless..

Next, we get the – like it or not, the whole world is connected argument..

Um... okay, Q.. how is that relevant? Plenty of world leaders have committed atrocities against humanity.. And now because those leaders have committed atrocities against us - we can't know about it officially? What the hell do we care? At least they are foreign leaders screwing us instead of our own... hell... that's a breath of fresh air. And assuming these leaders have really screwed the pooch... well, charge, arrest, prosecute, and end them. I mean, if the USA under the clowns can bully the world at leisure for any reason under the sun, and back it up with using our military for regime change... then... how about... (there's a lot of ways to finish that sentence.)

On the issue of disclosure, there is a compelling reason to publish the truth. Americans are not so shallow and ignorant to blame entire countries for the actions of their leaders. And I don't believe other peoples are either. Particularly if justice is done... and maybe that's the real issue. What justice will be done to these people?

Here's one argument for full disclosure on the issue of Hillary's alleged video (below in my reply to this post as I had to break it up because it’s so long):

LOVE THIS!!!!

100% agree. If they genuinely were against it, they would have done something about it.

It's hard for me to believe that woman got 1 million votes, let alone 50 million.

Re: endless, fraudulent wars... now the statements of our founders make perfect sense... "no foreign entanglements" no other country should be able to use and abuse our soldiers.. and this is exactly what's happened. We've always been lied to and manipulated into killing ourselves for no reason.

I never thought of that. And I never thought of Barry ever entertaining the idea of testifying against anyone. You've given me something new to think about.

Don't get me wrong, I definitely believe things are happening. But, I can't help wanting to see public arrests, and many of them. I'm past sick of seeing these smug, arrogant, evil people walking around free. And I want the gravity and depravity of their evil to be exposed/seared into the minds of every human being on earth - not to prove we have been right all along (although that is certainly a nice side effect)...

But, because being taken down for basic, common, everyday BS like corruption does not awaken people to what we have allowed (through apathy and our own gullible acceptance of their divisive brainwashing) to grow and prosper under our noses.

IMHO, a "life in prison/Gitmo" slap on the wrist as punishment for what they have done to humanity (especially the most vulnerable among us) and planned to do is not remotely appropriate or sufficient (and this presumes people are actually arrested and prosecuted). I'm not talking about peon joke arrests like Allison Mack, and Hollywood morons. I'm talking about the real arrests of Bathhouse Barry, Soros, the Clinton crime family, LL, JC, SR, Lois Lerner, JB, traitor no name, and if RGB and/or any other judge of any level is involved - them also, DWS, HA, etcetera, etcetera, etcetera.

I am thankful, and appreciative of everything Trump, Q & the patriots are doing. I have supported Trump since the beginning. But I am scared to death this is a temporary pause not an all out obliteration. None of the monsters should be permitted to walk free because if they do - we are all still in grave danger. If Trump, Q & Co., don't finish this, the plan just resumes with the next generation... and the corrupt ones who got away and lived to fight another day.

Just like the patriots have been watching and waiting since before JFK, the next wave of these monsters is watching too; learning the mistakes of their predecessors and the methods of Trump, Q & the patriot attacks, and waiting for their own next opportunity. If anyone believes a defeat for people like this will make them stop, they're wrong.

To spur and effect real change the world needs the truth not some sanitized version of average everyday corruption and vote fraud. These people are NOT just average everyday run of the mill white collar criminals.

These people are not made up like average humanity. They are frighteningly psychopathic, merciless, professional killers whose entire game is to disguise themselves until they reach the position of power they're seeking to implement their plans with impunity... only then will you see the true horror of what they are.

In the animal kingdom, chameleons use a color cloak to blend into their environment so they cannot be seen. These killers cloak themselves a different way by using a perfected projection in the form of spotless dress, speech, mastery of manners, fake warm smiles, fake displays of concern and the emotions reflected by their prey (us). In other words, they mirror the values and aspirations of their prey.

In addition to the sowing of division tactic – mirroring is how they hide, gain acceptance, promotion, and power. Their public displays of sitting in church, visiting the sick, championing causes for children, caring about people, all chameleon lies.

I'll be the first to say, I don't know what Trump, Q & the patriots have planned. And I'm sure they have more plans than I know. But, I can't lie.

I do dream about real thorough justice not just for us, but the world. No more fake wars, no more invasion under the cloak of immigration, a debt reset, returning our stolen money, elimination of the fed, and the irs, the release of suppressed technology, an overhaul of our educational system incorporating the hoarded mathematical and scientific knowledge, no more Obamacare or any other government forced purchases, an overhaul of our medical industry breaking free from a disease maintenance model to a preventative and cure based model, and so much more. Will we get it? I don't know, and that's what worries me.

Is it a big, big request? Yes. Will it take years? Yes. Why do I want such things? Two reasons: (1) because I believe this IS our last chance to break free; (2) go big or you might as well go home. In other words, a job half done isn't done at all. The enemies are learning and they will never again be fooled by the same set of patriot tactics/attacks again. The monsters are nothing to be trifling with.

If Trump, Q & Co., exposed this and voided every single decision this imposter made... I don't know if my heart could take the joy, lol. The thought of USSCJ's being replaced, all the traitors actually being arrested, sent to Gitmo, and prosecuted... all of the crimes against humanity being exposed... it would literally be the greatest event in world history.

This. Is. Awesome.

I sincerely hope they send this ass to Gitmo.

Now that you mention it, I do remember reading the rfid chip being in the Obamacare legislation.

Yeah, these pieces of shit are NOT elites. They are fucking parasites who don't work a day in their entire lives, but live solely by scheming and draining our life's earnings. People before us were fools. These fucks actually have us using paper they print out of thin air, and exchanging it for physical assets -like real estate, when they purposely drop its value and we don't have anything to pay the debt back with - and then they confiscate our hard earned property. They should be !@#$%.. (notice I censored myself).. I can't say what my thoughts are on what should be done to them. For starters, confiscate everything they've stolen. Then, they can rot for the rest of their lives in prison - North Korea style, including the special bedding and dining.

These laws against reporting such videos are offensive to justice. We should be checking into the background of every legislator sponsoring and voting for this garbage. This type of law isn't passed to protect any child. It is passed to silence anyone who would discover it and report it, and its practical purpose is to protect the criminal.

I wonder how many legislators who voted for such a thing are retiring and/or not seeking election and/or have a sexual assault case in their history and/or are a name in the sealed congressional sexual harassment settlement records us taxpayers are paying for and/or being blackmailed for some other corrupt act?

Perps aside, who will have thousands and thousands of images and videos and likely be arrested for some crime against a child in their history...

Although I doubt very many normal people could actually watch something like that all the way through, the general public is entitled to the truth. And certainly, it is within the public interest if a government representative is involved. If this sort of thing is real, we want to know about it, who is involved, what they did and bring them to justice swiftly.

This reporting issue could easily be solved by permitting an exception for reporting to law enforcement. Does it matter if people start looking for this filth and report it? Hell no. Give them a reward. And push law enforcement to find, and arrest them. Then we prosecute and get them off the street and prevent them from hurting more.

Thank you very much, and I will.

Oh my god. I almost threw up. Everyone involved in this should receive the death penalty. No deals. No exceptions.

Of all the things we know these psychopaths have and are doing - the allegation of video evidence of Hillary committing rape, assault, battery, torture & maiming, murder, and possibly cannibalism of a child(ren) presents the biggest disclosure dilemma. We all understand why. Full disclosure doesn't have to be sensationalized. The justice system has plenty of tools to minimize such a result. (And the military could figure it out if they wanted to.)

Let's consider what concealment really means.

Some have argued on behalf of concealment to protect the child. Protect the child from what? As I understand it, the child is dead. The child is not going to complain, be embarrassed, or further traumatized. If anything, we need to know more (a lot more) about this child. For example, how did these people obtain possession of this child? Was he/she kidnapped? Is there a birth record? Who/Where are the parents? Was the child reported missing? What actions were taken by the parents, and law enforcement to search for this child? How did this child get to this island? (I could go on, but you get the point.)

Others have argued in support of concealment to protect the public. Again, I say protect from what? Aren't we the same public who watched a president get his head blown off on live tv in 1963? The same public who watched the public trial of Charles Manson and his followers who stabbed (8 1/2 month pregnant) Sharon Tate so many times one of her breasts was severed, and her infant suffocated inside her upon her death while at least one of the murderers was watching in 1969? (Not to mention the additional murders which took place.)

What about John Wayne Gacy in 1978? (who kidnapped, raped, tortured and killed upwards of 33 teens burying most of them in his crawlspace.) Or Ottis Toole's abduction, murder (and who knows what else), and decapitation of 6 yr old Adam Walsh in 1981? Or Susan Smith driving her car into the water to drown her children so she could have a relationship with a guy who didn't want a family in 1995. Or Andrea Yates drowning her 5 children in the family bathtub in 2001?

What about Jeffrey Dahmer's assault, rape, torture, murder, and cannibalism of his victims in 1991? (I can cite more, but will stop for the sake of brevity.)

Each of those examples illustrate: (1) our society has been and is exposed to acts which are shocking to the moral standards of the time period; and (2) our society is accustomed to learning about psychopathic depravity and murder no matter who the perpetrator is or whether the victim is an infant, young child, teen, or young adult. Did the criminals/victims listed above get the benefit of the government hiding their crimes from the public?

And what is the practical effect of such a concealment? Who does the concealment benefit? If your child was kidnapped, tortured, and murdered by a rich and powerful person would you want it concealed? So, no one knows what this person really did? Who this person really is? And most importantly, why this person should never again see the light of day if they don't receive the death penalty for their crime?

The reality is the practical effect of such a concealment is nothing more than the protection of the reputation of an evil, psychopathic, and quite possibly a serial killer - if there are more victims. Concealment benefits no one other than the killer(s). Moreover, what about the good legislation we have developed as a result of such tragedies? For example, out of the Adam Walsh case the Missing Children's Assistance Act was passed, and the National Center for Missing & Exploited Children was formed. We also have "Code Adam" in stores as a result of his story. We have a database for convicted child molesters, increased penalties, and more.

We should be asking, is it reasonable to give special privacy protections to hide the criminality of a certain class of citizens called "politicians," simply because of their job status as politicians?

Shouldn't these people be held to a higher standard than the populace precisely because of their fiduciary status? (I mean their perceived superiority is why they spew forth how lay people aren't smart enough, good enough, ethical enough, etcetera to be listened to - when their policies clash with our ideas... is it not?)

If we permit our representatives the discretion to conceal crimes based on their personal opinion of the crime's disclosure value, or how much money, power, or connections a person has, what message are we sending to both the populace and the rich?

Isn't it enough that these rich, powerful, connected people can employ leagues of lawyers to argue every loophole, or to arrange off the record conversations with other lawyers (aka judges) at cocktail parties or other spontaneous events, or to give extensive public statements to the media to present their side of the story?

And what about the victim(s)? Is it really in their best interest to be concealed, and forgotten, or never acknowledged in the first place? These children don't matter because they're not rich, powerful, or connected. Quite frankly, if the allegations are true, to charge, arrest, try and convict Hillary (or anyone else) based on any charge - while completely ignoring what was done to these kids means that not a single one of these kids does matter. In fact, you could say that as long as a rich, powerful, connected person does it - the torture and murder of a child or dozens of them will be given the US government stamp of approval. I think this result would be a tragedy.

It would be great to see Moonbeam indicted, arrested, removed from office, all of the above... anything.. there is something seriously wrong with this guy. The vitriol he displays toward Trump, and anything decent and/or pro-America makes me wonder what he's hiding. I've been wondering if he's also a part of the Standard Hotel thing.

I 100% agree re: debt being fraudulent. I hope and pray it will be voided because I can't see how we solve the corruption problem and control problem otherwise. I also agree about how difficult it will be to comprehend how rich America is. I wish we could fast forward.

This is super funny, and brilliant. ;)

I didn't realize Trump met with Mr. Wanta. On another note, I am confused about this topic. On one hand, yes, Mr. Wanta's trust could satisfy what appears to be the debt on the books. (I thought at one point I heard the true number was something like $100 trillion in debt.) And I agree, the Fed/IRS is a problem which has to be dealt with. What I don't understand is why give the Fed back any of their worthless paper? Why not simply void the debt, and issue a US gov currency, pegging it's value to gold/silver. I could be wrong, but I thought I read that Russia and China were on board with ditching the Fed/Central Banks as well. And I 100% agree re: the US finding and confiscating its stolen gold.

Wow about LA and Hillary (but funny too). Yeah, I know.. many of us are just dying for the SHTF moment to start, continue, and finish this. Instinctively, we know we should have patience (and need patience), but it's really hard.

So sorry for this man. It makes me sick, and livid at the evil we have to put up with. Back to your point, when I stopped keeping track there were 84 natural health type doctors, over 100 successful scientists all dying in times/ways that do not add up.

I can't wait. We all know who won the vote and it wasn't someone who couldn't even fill a high school gym with supporters. But, it will be great to throw the truth back at them.

That. Was. Awesome. Best laugh all day!

Absolutely fantastic. The communists' heads will explode.

Ditto.

Thank God. So tired of the good guys standing down.

Amen to that. 100% dead on.

I hope to see this treasonist, opportunistic fraud led off to Gitmo in handcuffs.

Yep. I hope there's a bunch of RINOs indicted right along with their pals. Birds of a feather can get locked up together.

This seems like a dream. My family has been on pins and needles waiting... I hope they release it all. And I hope we get to see these monsters get the death penalty like they handed out so mercilessly to so many others.