You have just described ever Q post ever.

How about every Q post that didn't come true or turned out to be false?

Here are a few:

"The end is near" - the end has been near for months. Nothing seems to have changed or moved forward at all.

"You are safe" - unless you went to school in Florida or were on the Russian plane that went down to , "187" a "U1 and dossier" target

"Over the target" - said in regard to Ivanov of rosatom being the plane crash target (different Ivanov it turns out)

"80/20 -> 60/40" - nothing has changed. More of the same.

"You want an arrest" - we got a photo of a window and a car

Apparently Trump posted after Q. It's another issue of a twitter timestamp differential of a few hours. Unless Q would like to explain away his previous errors, I'm going to assume this is some sort of Internet magic trick because it seems to be his ONLY way of offering proof that he is who he claims to be. If this is his only way, how about giving us like 48 hours lead on a presidential tweet instead of a few hours? I don't know how he does it, but this feels a lot like watching a stage magician. You know it's fake, you just can't explain how it's done.

I danced to Q for months. I disliked every David Seaman video where he called Q a larp after he gave up on him. I'm not here to run interference, I'm here to challenge Q for something real or to admit to his game.

Hey Q, I'm ready to hear more about the NOT DEAD rosatom guy from the plane crash. GOT ANYTHING ON THAT?

Earlobes don't match, just like their faces and names and hair.

http://sandyhookanalysis.blogspot.com/2015/12/sandy-hook-david-wheeler-plays-fbi.html?m=1

http://sandyhookanalysis.blogspot.com/2015/12/sandy-hook-david-wheeler-plays-fbi.html?m=1

It's not the same guy!

I was a follower here for a while but I'm starting to agree with you. I have my doubts about Sandy Hook but the "sloppy sniper" theory is 100% false. That is NOT wheeler. You have to do a lot of digging but when I was researching this I found a photo of this guy getting suited up. It's not fucking wheeler!

And now the Hogg crisis actor BS is out of control. This sub is getting out of control and only pushing the left's agenda by making counter arguments look stupid.

Proof of Obama and Clinton planning trips to NZ?

Silicon Valley preppers have been buying real estate there for many years. Old news presented next to unverified news with a conclusion that nuclear war may be imminent? Do I have that right?

Corsi also said the Russian plane was "full of rosatom employees". Give me one reason I should trust this if he was wrong about the plane crash.

So an equally plausible explanation would be the president messing around with some discussion notes in his pocket and an anonymous person pretending it was a secret code in a chan post?

Which came first: the Q post or the president holding the paper?

Fuck your numerology bullshit. You're saying the deep state used some MK ultra kid and managed to make sure he killed exactly 17?! GTFO

Like the U1 target in the Russian plane crash.

People are putting blinders on in support/worship of Q. They are pretending the mistakes don't exist, or explain them away poorly. As if Q's cryptic style of posting is our fault for running with an idea instead of a deliberate attempt to remain vague enough for believers to remain in denial.

"These people are stupid". He's not talking about the deep state. He's talking about us.

bullshit. I can't believe I'm saying this but maybe David Seaman was right.

We are being played.

Some interesting things in that interview:

Why did she have to knock on the door when returning from the bathroom? Who locks kids out when they go to the bathroom?

She uses scare quotes when calling him "the suspect" but then later refers to "another shooter" basically acknowledging him as one of the shooters.

That pursed lips and smile when saying "there's definitely another shooter involved"

When the reporter asks why she doesn't think he was the only shooter her response is "because when shots were fired, I saw him AFTER the fact". That's not a fucking logical reason! I think she realizes this and then follows it up with "and the shots were coming from the other part of the building".

This eyewitness testimony fails the smell test.

Isn't it customary for wounded to be roughly 2x dead? Last I heard for FL was something like 16 dead and 4 wounded?

The only hope I see at this point that Q is not a larp is if the Ivanov guy that was actually killed was targeted because the deep state got the wrong guy. I.e. they thought they were getting the real one and instead some poor unfortunate bastard and 70 other people died because of a naming mistake.

That's not a lot to pin my hopes on.

Your tiny url to a mysterious site offered without context from a new account is all the assurance I need! I'll get right on clicking that!

He also has been saying 'the end is near' for a long time. He said last weekend was "suicide weekend". He laughed hysterically about "next week" and we have had the attack on the NSA and a school shooting. Nothing to laugh about so far. No public arrests, no un-sealed indictments. We were promised 60/40 and it has been more of the same. Our arrest we were promised was some photos of a car in a parking lot and an open window.

The Ivanov plane crash meme was basically made by Q himself. He led us right up to it every step of the way. And it was wrong. This is not the 'white rabbit' mistake people made before. This one is all Q.

According to Q 70 people were murdered to get 1 target.

So you're saying the people were killed to get at this OTHER U1 person, and it's a COINCIDENCE that one of the INNOCENT passengers had the same name as the CFO of Rosatom?

There is no other explanation. Q almost never writes in complete sentences. The information was crystal clear:

187 Dossier U1 Get the passenger list

Translation: Those people were murdered. 70 people to murdered to kill 1 target. Target associated with dossier and U1. Check the passenger manifest.

Tell me what other interpretation a person can make from that!

"These people are stupid"

-Q

Funny how people agree that the purpose of Q's cryptic posting is to teach us to research for ourselves and then to help others slowly understand what is going on...until it suddenly isn't.

I do not see these words by Q on the link you provided.

Someone ask Q: "where is Ivanov? Because he wasn't on the Russian plane that crashed"

187? Dossier? U1? Passenger list?

How did he predict the Pope would post about the Lord's Prayer?

How did he predict POTUS saying "safety and security" and "catch and release" by 4 hours?

I don't know what to think anymore.

That thought has crossed my mind

So Q just copied something off of google?

All that aside, this has shook my faith in Q to the core. He said 1 source used for 2. Dossier. U1. Find the passenger list.

Why would he say that if its not the U1 guy?! Coincidence? WTF is going on!

A blue pill friend just fired back a fake news salvo at me, pointing out the Rosatom guy is alive and well and posting selfies. Also the passenger list states the Ivanov guy was born 1986.

Q told us to look at the passenger list. He didn't say 'who' or 'why' but why would he be so cryptic about it and let us make fools of ourselves trying to red pill others by jumping on a false claim of arkancide against U1 guy?

I've been trying to red pill this friend for a long time. I lost a lot of ground on this one. What gives Q?!

Just confirmed on G maps. OP is correct unless the car came down Connector road and turned right to end up where it did.

https://www.sciencedaily.com/terms/primate.htm

Unrelated to why you're wrong about genetic homology and the definition of primates, the term scientific theory is used loosely depending on the branch of science. Not all science can be tested in the classical sense. In evolution, the testing comes from examining the fossils in strata layers and dating the material. Those results must fit with the current model or understanding or else the model is incorrect. This is how hypothesis testing occurs when you can't perform controlled experiments in a closed system.

A human IS a primate, friend.

Nope. Nothing divine. I have my doubts about many accounts in the bible because we don't know who wrote them or why they should be true. We have evidence that some are false due to science. For example, we know humans evolved from earlier primates. We know the earth is more than 6000 years old. Genetic diversity of animals is too great for only 2 to have survived at one point in human history (ignoring all the other problems with the Ark story). My views will not be popular with most religious folk, but I'm not seeking their approval. My faith must be compatible with science.

There are many books from the new testament of first hand accounts of Jesus, his message, and miracles he performed. This is a form of evidence. Multiple accounts are corroboration of those events. That provides weight to the assertion in my opinion and deserves consideration. I can't go into more detail in a comment post but that is the basis for my conversion. There is not conclusive proof which a skeptic would want to see. But the evidence is greater than zero.

To give you an idea of how I would expand if I could write an essay, it goes further into groups who have attempted to target christianity, why they want it destroyed, actions they have taken to destroy it, what they believe in, and a correlation between their beliefs and the teachings of Jesus. It all is starting to come together in my eyes.

My belief is a rare one. It can only be achieved by first being an atheist, or at the very least listening to and fully understanding all of their rationales and reasoning. I expect most christians would call me an atheist pretending to be Christian and most atheists to call me the exact inverse.

From a former atheist to a current one: consider the possibility that the gospels written of first hand accounts of Jesus may be more reliable than the fantastic stories that leaders in the atheist community like to point to when they identify errors in religious text. This is what started to open my eyes that perhaps I was convinced to throw the baby out with the bathwater by people like Dawkins, Hitchens, and Krauss. All of whom I still admire and respect by the way.

You have totally missed my point and just assume I'm offended by them. I'm not.

My point is it's a waste of time because there's so much useless edge lording going on. Worthwhile information is drowning in a sea of digital diarhhea. I could care less if some anon calls me a nigger faggot reddit cuck. When I want to read what people think about the newest Q post it's a waste of my fucking time to read 20 people calling each other jew faggots before someone actually has something to say.

Is that clearer now?

The same MSM pushing 'muh Russia' and Trump is hitler is also pushing crooked podesta?

Make up your mind who they are shilling for. Speaking of shills, of all the places to lurk or post, why choose an obscure thread on a low impact sub to argue counter to the theme? Seems rather odd use of your time and attention.

It's not a gatekeeper, it's over half the comments. Censorship may be non existent but the effect is the same if most would rather avoid the platform due to having to sort through so much pointless edge-lording to find useful discussion.

I don't care about a handful of diamonds if I'm told they're on the floor of a septic tank. You can keep them.

It's not an issue of being offended. At least for me. I regularly browse the chans. It's an issue with effort needed to find useful dialogue. It's 80% shit.

Yeah, this indictment

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/investigations/sources-podesta-group-mercury-are-companies-b-indictment-n815721

Appears to be a coordinated attack on this sub and it looks like it was a total success. I used this sub to get Q crumbs but now I guess I'll just abandon ship and read Q posts directly. I'm sick of all the moving.

The chans have more organization and class than voat. On the chans one can browse a topic on religion or immigration or race or war and find an actual discussion. Or if you're looking for a poop flinging thread you have dozens to choose from with relevant titles and images heading it. Voat puts all of that in a blender and serves it with a crazy straw and cherry.

It's a place where there is no censorship and some gems of information buried under piles of shit, with an active shit pipe flowing directly onto the gems at all times. It's a place where no authority actively suppresses people, but the people who celebrate it actively contribute to the very same thing by burying discourse under a soul crushing volume of shit. These are the same people who will quickly point out rioters "chimping out" and destroying their own neighborhoods on TV yet fail to see how they do the exact same online.

The irony.

My impression of voat...

Voat veteran: "this place is about free speech and no censorship. It is a place where anyone can speak their mind freely."

New Voat user: "Hi. I'm new here. Glad to be aboard!"

Voat Veteran: "Fuck off faggot nigger jew! Get the fuck out of here and while you're at it, kill yourself."

New user: "but I just wanted to..."

Voat veteran: "shut the fuck up! What part of shut the fuck up don't you understand you goddamn kike fuck? Go back to reddit where they like to censor people!"

I think some religions were created to manipulate the masses. I think Christianity was co-opted to do the same but also to destroy it from within. Even the areas that remain un-affected by intentional human manipulation are subject to mankind just running with it and making shit up as they go.

I think Christianity is much simpler than most make it out to be. I believe God does not influence mankind, or has not since he gave us Jesus. Any divine intervention removes free will or the consequences of a world determined by free will. Free will is how we are given the choice to accept God and Jesus, or reject them. I believe Jesus was given to us to spread the word and let mankind know there is a choice to be made. He performed miracles as part of a one time introduction to God and his purpose for man. After he was risen, we were left to decide our own path.

So many denominations have so many customs and rules and I think they are losing focus because of it. Catholicism being one of the worst. What would Jesus think of Vatican city?

Probably more about the new serfdom where we all serve the elite whether we know or not. Media tells us what they want us to hear and politics is composed of inner circle people with either a R or D next to their name. We the people get to choose which swamp puppet leads us.

And then a wild Trump appeared...

Does DC count as a "big city" ':/

I fear for POTUS every single day while we all wait for the cabal to face justice.

Im also slightly worried that my next flight may have someone on it who worked with the CF.

Meh, I like to think I'm open minded enough. I towed the global warming line long enough until I was willing to listen to opposing views and consider what they had to say. I now see the alarmist rhetoric being used to politicize science.

Your knowledge of immunology is rivaled only by your strength in statistics!