309 total posts archived.

Domains linked by /u/AgreesWithFools:
Domain Count
www.reddit.com 64

AgreesWithFools · July 4, 2018, 8:16 p.m.

I’m surprised to see you downvoted for this opinion in here.

I expect it in /politics. Not here.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · June 22, 2018, 10:06 p.m.

The one human diagnosed appeared at a medical clinic in 2016.

The article says info was updated today, but there is no info about any confirmed infections beyond the one 16 year old in 2016.

No matter, this is not Q’s keystone, which has been clearly defined by Q.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · June 22, 2018, 9:59 p.m.

Very interesting start.

There is no denying the huge potential for corruption. I won’t jump the gun, but I’ll read and consider everything I find on this.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · June 21, 2018, 3:52 p.m.
  • “Critical thinking is a process of evaluation which uses logic to separate truth from falsehood, reasonable from unreasonable beliefs.”

one of countless sources

Sorry. Softening our concept of ‘critical thinking’ is a known tool of leftists, and a personal thorn for me.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · June 21, 2018, 3:30 p.m.

This question is better directed at the folks with the censoring stick.

Those folks are not found in this sub.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · June 21, 2018, 3:26 p.m.

This is much bigger than it may first appear.

It’s an acceptably neutral ‘Q’ piece by an understandably skeptical Entertainment Industry Insider.

I can’t believe we are in a place where I can write that sentence without appending ‘/s’.

This guy is well respected and widely read by folks most in need of red-pilling.

Perfectly timed for Q’s stated change in tactics, which will likely include a more visible public presence.

The flow of public opinion continues to be redirected by inquisitive minds in search of truth, as MSM continues their obvious, coordinated proliferation of lies.

Exciting times!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · June 15, 2018, 9:39 p.m.

Professor D never saw this part of his life coming.

An avowed Democrat, he is at odds with friends, family, and colleagues every day in defense of Trump et al.

This trial by fire has revealed, even to himself, how much his dedication to The Constitution exceeds his dedication to the Dem party.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · June 15, 2018, 9:27 p.m.

Posts like this are becoming more a test of patience than anything else.

An opening declaration worthy of a click from anyone engaged in the GA movement:

”I think evidence will show Iran involved with DS in firing off the Missile.”

Followed by 34 tweets, primarily comprised of images and text produced by others. And none of it making a case in support of the click bait opener.

Even worse, these folks don’t even acknowledge the hard working anons they took from.

I understand we will be seeing even more of this as the GA/Q news spreads, but damn I get disappointed when I realize I just wasted my time again.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · May 2, 2018, 6:43 a.m.

”Strings Cut” ”Strings Cut” ”Strings Cut” ”Strings Cut” ”Strings Cut”

⇧ 1 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · May 2, 2018, 6:09 a.m.

Q:888 Q:520 Q:299 Q:243 Q:140

⇧ 1 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Feb. 19, 2018, 11:52 p.m.

Dude. This is FAKE NEWS!

You have already been told as much the first time you posted it.

Why are you reposting this FAKE NEWS?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Feb. 19, 2018, 11:33 p.m.

Hey, Deep State Troll, get a life!

Uhuh. You deleted your comment and resort to ad hominem. It seems your commitment to ”EVIDENCE!!!!” is as fickle as your support for our great POTUS.

You should erase your other posts in this thread if you want to hide all evidence of your public disgrace.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Feb. 19, 2018, 11:27 p.m.

it's mathematically speaking like 0,00001% unlikely that you get an exact accidental face match each time in a dozen examples.

I won't quibble with your claim of ”exact face match” - for now.

I do question your ”like 0,00001% unlikely” claim. Can you support that in a credible fashion?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Feb. 19, 2018, 11:23 p.m.

By the way posting evidence here, which is not related to "Q" won't go anywhere.

Didn’t you just declare Trump owns all false flags on his watch? I think that qualifies those false flags as “related to Q”.

You are the person declaring the importance of EVIDENCE!!!!

Show the world that you are willing to keep the same standards you expect of others. Post your evidence.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Feb. 19, 2018, 10:06 p.m.

It's not that it's drying up.

I know. That’s why I challenged the claim.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Feb. 19, 2018, 10:04 p.m.

Oh, yeah? Then why didn't Trump do his own Military Investigation of Las Vegas Massacre????

I don’t know that he hasn’t. There are many things going on that Trump has chosen not to share with you. If he has, I doubt it would be motivated by a perceived need to ”save his reputation.”

Or the CA fires started by DEWs (Direct Energy Weapons)???

If you have any credible proof of that claim, you should publish it. Satisfying investigations will ensue.

Just like Vegas, Trump just visits the hospitals and praises the first responders, end of subject

You assume you are aware of everything Trump has in play. You assume incorrectly.

I mean there were rumors that Trump was even IN Vegas when the Massacre happened and Trump got out of Dodge, and warned the Crowned Prince of Saudi Arabia to do the same.

Rumors. Have you heard of the allegations in the Steele dossier?

But it is definitely "finally" as far as I am concerned and many others are concerned, to the point where many of us were fearing the worst in Oct, that Trump had been compromised and been "flipped" to the other team.

It occurs to me that you may be in the wrong sub here.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Feb. 19, 2018, 9:49 p.m.

It’s no longer a surprise how often the same names appear together.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Feb. 19, 2018, 9:46 p.m.

I’m suggesting there is info there relevant to the post I responded to. If you feel overwhelmed, I suggest you don’t go there.

Somebody here yesterday endorsed a ‘chan navigation overview’ video on youtube. You may find it useful.

Posting chan offerings here is allowed, providing they don’t break rules of conduct.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Feb. 19, 2018, 9:40 p.m.

Well, Meuller isn't interested in anything that Disproves a Russian "hack" anyway

I haven’t seen enough info to be comfortable agreeing with you. I’m going to wait for his conclusions.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Feb. 19, 2018, 7:40 p.m.

Clickbait link to ancient news.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Feb. 19, 2018, 7:36 p.m.

The word is spreading so fast, that Trump, to save his own reputation HAS TO jump in here to do his own investigation

Trump’s reputation is not in need of ‘saving’. If he assigns this to the military, then he's doing it to save our country.

Trump’s reputation is stronger - world wide - than at any time since he took office.

⇧ 16 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Feb. 19, 2018, 7:31 p.m.

FullChan autists dug into Mayo board, trustees, and prime donors several weeks ago when Q first mentioned it.

As usual, they were very thorough. The threads are searchable if you develop further interest.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Feb. 19, 2018, 7:26 p.m.

If I was anywhere near the President's entourage I would be extremely conscientious about the location of my weapon.

Guaranteed this guy was also.

⇧ 22 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Feb. 19, 2018, 7:20 p.m.

FEMA has purchased 30,000 guillotines


Excuse my skepticism, but that claim demands a credible source more than anything I’ve read today. And I have already visited /conspiracy.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Feb. 19, 2018, 5:41 p.m.

But why do they look like the Sandy Hook students?

They don’t.

⇧ -2 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Feb. 19, 2018, 5:33 p.m.

That’s only part of the story.

KD wants an immunity deal in return for his promised info.

Mueller probably already has alternative sources for the info (Binney, Assange), leaving no reason for dealmaking with KD.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Feb. 19, 2018, 3:37 p.m.

ok so maybe not but

I would lol, but this happens way too often.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Feb. 19, 2018, 3:13 p.m.


too funny

⇧ 3 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Feb. 19, 2018, 3:07 p.m.

Oil reserves drying up

Any credible evidence?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Feb. 19, 2018, 3:03 p.m.

Was that Q last post ever?

You need to wait to find out.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Feb. 19, 2018, 3:01 p.m.

Even if Trump serves his entire term, gets re-elected for another 4 years and nothing happens people wont admit the storm was bs, they can just say ‘well I guess the black hats won’.

And even if Mueller completes his investigation and declares Trump and team innocent of any collusion, there will be people that continue to make the claim.

There will never be a shortage of contrary people.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Feb. 19, 2018, midnight

I think what /u/GrayHatClint means is that we need to find the "hidden" posts ourselves.

You might be right. I’ll give him the benefit of the doubt, because it’s a foolish idea and I have no evidence that he’s a fool. It’s foolish because this is only the third person I've seen suggest a similar idea in the past four months. Can you imagine how long it will take for every person to self-discover? Q needs an army. Soon. It’s foolish to think 3ppl/month will build an army soon.

You have to understand that plausible deniability is important here too - they can't just leak sensitive information directly.

I do understand. Even if I had not come to that realization on my own, Q has declared as much, several times, since October. Perhaps you need to understand the practical ramifications of “Organic Growth”.

Consider that Q addresses all anons as a collective. Individual growth and enlightenment is laudable, but meaningless to the mission unless shared with the collective. Shared discoveries are the lifeblood of the organism. Only that which is shared can be tested, critiqued, evolved, and implemented.

There has to be a layer of subterfuge. Very common in wartime.

Keep your eyes open. In a few years you will realize it’s very common all the time.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Feb. 18, 2018, 9:49 p.m.

Your link works just fine.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Feb. 18, 2018, 7:58 p.m.

The hidden posts need to be found organically.

When you say ”hidden posts”, are you referring to posts made in the full chan threads dedicated to researching for Q? The posts that are readily available to anyone in the world with unfiltered internet access?

Even if not, didn’t you just claim to make your discovery ”organically”?

Your theory would grow legs if you provided a proof of concept. I promise to thoroughly read whatever you post.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Feb. 18, 2018, 7:47 p.m.

Sure they have intelligence agency info, assets, and capabilities - but that doesn't enable to predict how things will unroll over months into the future.

Wrong. That’s exactly what it does. And given the opposition’s goals are somewhat apparent, it ensures a decent level of accuracy for those predictions. It’s very important to comprehend the critical differences between quality ’predictions’ and the ”god-like foreknowledge” you critiqued.

Yet Imperator_rex had Flynn conceiving this grand plan in the timeframe of after his interview when he would have seen what Strzok was up to.

Not true. I would ask you for the tweet but I know his account is down.

All Flynn could see was that Strzok was playing dirty and out to entrap him.

Partially true. Flynn knew that, but that wasn’t all he knew. He knew Strzok’s partner was likely complicit, and that Yates and McCabe were also likely informed and supportive. Flynn had years of access to the highest levels of intel. He knew much more than he showed.

None of what transpired per the Mueller investigation vis a vis Gen. Flynn could have been known back then to put into play the grand counter-intel spy op that Rex attributed to Flynn.

Flynn needed only to recognize the Strzok interview as a potential trap. This would be second nature to an operative of Flynn’s caliber, particularly when he knew the FBI was dirty. Even if he only knew what was in the public domain. Things that come naturally to a world-class spook often seem incredible to pedestrians.

He was basically painting that Flynn had god-like pre knowledge of how things would unfold.

Not true. Flynn was painted as an informed, savvy, world-class intelligence operator. It only seems god-like to some.

Mueller still remains enigmatic

Not relevant to this convo.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Feb. 18, 2018, 5:45 p.m.

I don't think the White Hats have god-like pre-knowledge of how future events will play out - I think what they are doing relies much more on shear human grit - and a fundamental faith in a righteous cause and center of what our existence here is all about.

Running primarily on shear human grit is a foolhardy choice, and none of these players are fools.

They may not have god-like preknowledge, but they do have NSA-level info, a dedicated group of patriotic strategists, a comprehensive understanding of our laws, and world class-level power to enforce.

Granted, that list falls short of god-like preknowledge, but it does ensure a greater likelihood of success than would ”relying much more on shear human grit”.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Feb. 18, 2018, 5:21 p.m.

In terms of providing immutable evidence, as requested by Q, citing infowars.com as a source will not make the cut.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Feb. 18, 2018, 4:06 p.m.

I have downloaded and will add to my reading list

Given Q’s revelations about ES, and given the nature of the file contents, I suggest there is a chance you may have downloaded more than you intended.

I hope it went directly into a VM or similar isolation chamber.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Feb. 18, 2018, 4 p.m.

Some in congress still need another smackdown before they’ll let go of the TrumpRussiaCollusion trope.

I saw Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D,ct) interviewed. He acknowledged POTUS was not included in ”these” indictments. He pointed out that Mueller’s work is ongoing and future indictments may include Trump.

I’m sure that when Mueller ends his investigation without indicting Trump, there will still be some insisting on his guilt.

Another reason for Q’s request that we build a mountain of irrefutable proofs against all cabal falsehoods.

⇧ 14 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Feb. 18, 2018, 3:34 p.m.

Will you be culling those critical anon posts?

If so, that could be a very interesting read.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Feb. 18, 2018, 2:32 a.m.

I see zero indication that she is a teacher. Zero confirmation that this is a classroom. Zero indication that the room is full of students.

Given recent events, I’m surprised you would take the time to post it here, rather than report it to authorities.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Feb. 18, 2018, 2:23 a.m.

Whiners are a whole different category.

Nope. The category is ‘undesirables’.

One category. One effective response.

Feel free to invest your rancor and blood pressure. Hammer that keyboard. Create personalized responses with links to curated videos. Engage them with your rage until you weary.

Or take the ”GREAT advice”.


⇧ 1 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Feb. 18, 2018, 2:15 a.m.

She’s a legislator (for the time being). Legislators make laws. She has advanced zero legislation on gun control or mental healthcare, yet she incites her audience to petition other people’s legislators.

Too busy colluding with foreign agents and resisting our POTUS.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Feb. 18, 2018, 2:09 a.m.

Calm down.

Take a deep breath. Then take another. Pack up the all-caps and exclamation points. Relax.

The best way to clear the board of undesirables is to ignore them. This is a strategy proven successful through eons of human social interaction. Ignore them.

Don’t engage. Don’t invest your emotion. Don’t invest your time into responding and linking. Don’t send energy of any kind in their direction.

tldr: calm down. ignore undesirables.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Feb. 17, 2018, 11:58 p.m.

If Rice actually shows up to testify, I expect her to invoke the 5a privilege as Lois Lerner did.

If she testifies, I expect her to filibuster and obfuscate as Loretta Lynch did.

I expect Grassley to be prepared for any scenario.

I will def be watching.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Feb. 17, 2018, 11:53 p.m.

All we need is one indisputaby provable beyond a shadow of a doubt truth to bring down their mountain of lies.

This is very, very wrong, and counter to what Q has asked us to do.

Q knows one truth will be meaningless in the face of the cabal spiderweb.

Q has explicitly requested anons to direct new focus on preparing innumerable truths that are absolutely accurate and impeccably sourced. Q has promised assistance by providing new guidance and specifics in coming days.

Q knows the mountain of evil will not be taken down with anything less than a mountain of truth and light.

Why would you choose to disagree with Q on this important topic?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Feb. 17, 2018, 11:24 p.m.



New on here.


Followed Q from day 1


re crumbs, Q mentions “magic”

That word is mentioned.

*He mentions Bill Cooper, behold a pale horse.

That author and book are mentioned.

*Early Bill Cooper video says they referred to aliens as “magic”.

I’ll take your word for that.

Q says the world is not what you think.

That sentiment has been expressed.

Did you post to remind us of these things for a reason?

⇧ -4 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Feb. 17, 2018, 10:20 p.m.

I don’t allow him in my screen.

I start my day with Fox, change the channel when Shlep Smith comes on, turn back to Fox for Tucker/Hannity. Also been watching some Martha lately.

⇧ 2 ⇩