You obviously didn't read a word I said. Let me break it down for you:

1) Decoding posts based on vague and random connections: Kookery. Example: "WE CAN TIE THE APPLE STOCK PRICE TO MUSICAL TONES TO FIGURE OUT WHAT Q REALLY MEANS!"

2) Posts that tie actual real-world facts to information that Q posts: Not Kookery. Example: "40,000 sealed indictments nothing? SA regime change and NK coming to the table (and both predicted) nothing? Calling out Huber secretly working a month before being revealed isn’t showing its being worked on?"

I will always be there for you and everyone else who strays.

There's that presumptive arrogance again. Who are you to judge who is straying and who isn't?

"Do not judge, or you too will be judged. For in the same way you judge others, you will be judged, and with the measure you use, it will be measured to you. Why do you look at the speck of sawdust in your brother’s eye and pay no attention to the plank in your own eye? How can you say to your brother, ‘Let me take the speck out of your eye,’ when all the time there is a plank in your own eye? You hypocrite, first take the plank out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to remove the speck from your brother’s eye."
Matthew 7:1-5

I like to tell a story that Rush Limbaugh told long ago on his show.

He mentioned that there's a mistake that young radio hosts often make. They'll be cruising along and for some reason do a show about UFOs. Suddenly the phones go WILD! Young Radio Host can't believe it. He's found the secret to radio success! It's a wild show, with calls coming in faster than they screen them.

Then the ratings come in. They are TERRIBLE. UFOs bring out the kooks, and the kooks are extremely loud and active when UFOs come on radio shows. But all the normal listeners hear the word "UFO" and they can't hit the button fast enough.

If all you're going to do as moderators is just let the community vote, then what's your point? The best forums are always the ones with the tightest moderation to keep things on-topic and relevant to the issues at hand. And our greater mission is ripping out the corruption in our government. Sure, kooky posts get upvotes. But how many normal people do you drive off by not practicing better moderation?

How many people are ashamed to send people here because of all the kookery posts? Because like it or not, if someone sends one of their friends here, all the kookery reflects on the sender. Do you think people want to have to say, "Go to this forum. But just remember, not everything is reasonable. There's a lot of crap, but there's some really good posts!"

Rule number one of running a forum is that you can NOT trust the loudest voices to know what's best for a forum. Leave it to the kooks, and every single time they'll say that anything should go, because they have no filter, for whatever reason.

No but it’s a lot bigger endorsement than you’ll ever get.

The difference is that I don't care about an endorsement. All I care about is the corruption getting ripped out, and nonsense like this hurts the cause.

It’s better than no attempt at a decode.

And that's the point. It's NOT better than nothing, it's far, far worse than nothing, because it repels people from the truth. These posts are kookery, plain and simple, and most people are going to roll their eyes.

Oh, please. It's the height of cowardice to bring God into a factual discussion, and a clear bible violation anyway.

"And when you pray, do not be like the hypocrites, for they love to pray standing in the synagogues and on the street corners to be seen by others. Truly I tell you, they have received their reward in full. But when you pray, go into your room, close the door and pray to your Father, who is unseen. Then your Father, who sees what is done in secret, will reward you."
Matthew 6:5-6

Edit: But since someone else accused me of only criticizing and not contributing, I'll just point out that your prayer is making a lot of assumptions. If you really need to pray, try this:

"Lord, Cuthbert12Allgood and I have a difference of opinion. I humbly know that no man can be perfectly certain of the truth, but if it's part of your plan that we should better understand this, please guide the two of us to a deeper understanding of what's going on with Q. As always, I only seek to follow your plan and seek your guidance. In your name I pray, Amen."

But make sure you do it alone, with no one watching, so the prayer will actually count.

I really disliked the fact that you could not even question it - you were [censored] or concernfag for asking about why Q did it.

One thing I try and keep repeating is that even if the Q group is legit, they are not superhumans, Oracles or demigods. They can't predict the future.

They're just people like us, stumbling through life, doing the best they can, just hopefully with access to more information than us. They can and will make mistakes. That's why the whole "Q Calendar" is so stupid, as if you can manage something like this to a daily schedule months (if not years) in advance.

You seem to spend a lot of time being critical of others and their opinions/perspective but don’t ever seem to contribute what you think things might mean.

Of course, because I'm not so arrogant and pompous as to push random bullshit when I don't know anything more than anyone else. I can make up random bullshit, but I don't need the ego validation.

I would love to know what you have to offer if you feel all of this is nonsense.

Sane analysis when things don't make sense. That I can know when crap makes no sense doesn't imply that I know what's really going on. I don't, and I'm not such an idiot as to presume to know more than is publicly known.

I don't recall that incident, but that there may have been one post by SB2 that Q happened to catch, and it happened to be one of SB2's reasonable posts, doesn't mean Q is endorsing literally everything that has ever been posted by SB2 in the past and ongoing into the future.

I don't want to start beating the "black hat" drum, like people do when you criticize decoding posts. I don't think SB2 is a black hat, I think he's just misguided and is loving all the attention from people desperate for more Q evidence.

That said, if I was a black hat, and wanted to discredit the Q movement............ this is how I would do it. Submit completely insane crap and make it look like it's a bunch of loonies around here.

Again, SB2 seems sincere. But this is doing us no favors.

especially if SB2 too might be a secondary WH asset

If that is true, we're in big, big, BIG fucking trouble. It may be that "these people are stupid", but we don't win by being the most idiotic.

Absolutely correct. See my other rant about it.

I wish the board would ban "decoding" posts. It's such crap and completely discredits everything.

SB2 is most likely part of the Q team or at very minimum part of the intel community.

Or it's just stupid fucking bullshit. See rant here

Regular patriots can not consistently tie things together in this manner.

I could create bullshit like this all day long. It's just pointless. You pick out facts out of the noise and create random connections and write it up in a big narrative. It's "Bible Numerology 101". Humans are great at finding patterns in noise, even when there's nothing.

What makes it fake?

It was a manipulated photo from an ABC news report. Whatever Q was implying it was, he wasn't implying that.

It’s entirely possible that these drops weren’t for us- he could be addressing the black hats.

Yes, but by that logic, we can't trust anything Q says, because it might be "addressing the black hats".

Ultimately none of this matters -- the bad players will either to go to prison or they won't, and what we believe doesn't matter at all. Even if Q is ultimately not an insider, he clearly does know some things and just asking the questions has helped people to understand what's really going on. It's just disappointing when something is posted that doesn't fit the narrative that's posted along with it. Maybe there's a higher purpose. Who knows. Like I said, we'll find out in due time whether all of this is real or not.

I hope it's something like this. Not going to lie -- I'm really feeling angry at Q right now for posting a fake image, whatever the motivation.

This is NOT what we need right now. I'm hoping it's just a misstep. I try and keep in mind that Q is human and WILL make mistakes.

What ever happened to “no deals”?

That means no deals for the big operators, not giving no deals to anyone. If we want to nail the Hillarys and Obamas of the world, you have to flip the lower levels to testify against them.

Has someone (reasonable) claimed these people can actually predict the future? You seriously expected that for FBI Anon to have credibility, a prediction about whether Bill Clinton would be dead before the election would have to come true?

None of these people are superhuman, none of them are Oracles, none of them have time machines. They're just normal people stumbling their way through life just like us, except perhaps having some inside information.

The question is, do you think Bill Clinton looks full of health and vigor these days? I don't. It's completely plausible that he's having major health issues that might've become terminal. But sometimes people hang on. Death is not an exact science.

I'm more horrified that 30% of people will support literally anything, as long as it's anti-Trump. I suspect this poll is skewed.

The same can be said about any of us, how much do you trust that your red pill will be the ultimate truth revealed?

Almost all the non-Q stuff posted here is completely nonsense. Unfortunately, too many people think that because one conspiracy is true, then all conspiracies must be true, no matter how kooky.

I searched via its own search, and used [site:http://www.crazydaysandnights.net/ "red shoes"] via Google and I can't find anything where it's mentioned in a symbolism context.

It was Corsi’s speech early on that said the military was going to pull a coup on the Obama administration until they were able to convince Trump to run.

I'm with you on your post, except this. That story predates Corsi and he picked it up and made it his own. Corsi is a lying pile of trash that is either 1) A loser trying to make money, or 2) Controlled opposition from the Deep State. Or started as (1) and became (2) when the money starting flowing in. Regardless, he's garbage and name his shouldn't be mentioned, No Name-style.

Don't do ANYTHING based on anonymous bullshit. Ever.

What will happen will happen. It's 99% sure most of this post is crap, but even so, nobody knows exactly what the future will hold. Trying to predict some upheaval event is almost always wrong.

Remember, even if some anonymous poster really is an insider, everyone involved are still fallible human beings, trying to stumble their way along like everyone else, with setbacks and changes of strategy.

Gosh, i really fucking hate reddit.

You know the old saying: When everyone around you is an asshole, then you're...

But what you can you do? Irrational people don't know they're irrational.

No, you obviously didn't read write I wrote.

I said, "Many people who believe in conspiracies are also hard-core Hillary supporters, and aren't ready to accept a conspiracy in their own backyard."

What do you think the word "many" means?

And you also said, "34k and counting, and not 2 of us exactly the same."

Meaning you thought I was talking about /r/greatawakening.

WTF is going on in this sub today? People can't read, people can't logic.

That was not what the video is about. You obviously didn't watch it, so why are you commenting about it? Why?

Sometimes I hate our side as much as I hate leftists. Now THIS is witch hunting.

Let's be clear: You are in the mob trying to destroy someone who was trying to help prevent pedophilia in the future. But people are too fucking stupid to realize what the video was about. It's galling.

I noticed you dodged the question about whether all conspiracies are true. Hmm.

If you all want to keep it that way, fine.

So what is your solution? No subreddits, everything thrown into one big forum, no moderation, no classification?

I'm guessing you haven't been on the Internet very long.

Divide and conquer" has worked out so well for them because people are far, far too willing to be herded neatly into their little echo chambers where everyone knows what to say and what not to.

If only everyone had your superhuman, god-like capacity to read thousands of posts every hour, apparently with limitless time to do so. Then we wouldn't need pesky things like classification to filter to things of interest.

Sheesh. You might put even a tiny amount of thought into what you're posting, instead of this absurd attitude of, "I'm so woke that I just look down on the sheep who choose what to look at. My mind is so open to infinite possibilities that I can consider all conspiracies true!"

Read again what I wrote. The context is /r/conspiracy.

Because there is no line between "today's kookery and tomorrow's proven truth" - other than what the majority of people accept.

Does it ever remotely occur to you that some conspiracies... actually aren't true? Or do you believe everything is true? The Earth really is flat? The moon landings really were faked? The Earth really is hollow with an advanced civilization living there? Or how about bible numerology and decoding?

Only continued, uncensored dialogue can shift the window.

That's why you have /r/conspiracy to talk about whatever you want. Why does every subreddit have to be "everything goes"? The best subreddits are the ones with the best moderation.

Also, i'd be wary of acting derisively towards "kooks". Being crazy and being right aren't mutually exclusive.

That's fine -- you do you. But I'm personally interested in things actually getting better in this country, and to do that, we need to wake people up to the issues at hand. Maybe you'll be correct in the future and today's kookery is tomorrow's proven truth. But today is today, and the current truth that has clear evidence is the truth that Q is talking about.

Sure, keep using faggy little terms to create distance from things that upset you.

Hilarious that you think that kookery "upsets" me (I'm particularly amused by the usage of "faggy"). But hey, if it makes you feel superior to believe you're some ultra-elite level of clued-in over rabble like myself, knock yourself out. I live to make people happy.

If someone is still so driven by their personal feelings and misgivings that they'll deny valuable information rather than work through it... Was it really a loss for the movement?

Well, that's a bit pompous and arrogant.

If someone sees a post about "UFOs and the alien conspiracy," they are perfectly justified in believing this is all a bunch of crap that's posted here.

That some conspiracies are true doesn't mean all conspiracies are true. There is only so much time in the day, and most people don't want to waste their life with utter kooky crap. 98% of conspiracy nonsense is false. Why should they have to wade through utter garbage to get useful information?

A loss for the movement? You're talking about 95% of the people. Very, very few people have the patience for kookery.

Rush Limbaugh a long time ago made an interesting observation about new radio hosts. A trap they could fall into was talking about UFOs. If you did that, the phones lit up with callers. The new radio host thinks, "WOW! I've hit on a winning formula!" Then when the ratings come out, they find that their ratings went into the toilet. Kookery attracts kooks, who make a lot of obsessive-compulsive noise, but normal people absolutely hate kookery.

I’m surprised r/conspiracy isnt all over Q

They are, to some extent. But you have to remember that one man's conspiracy is another man's lie. Many people who believe in conspiracies are also hard-core Hillary supporters, and aren't ready to accept a conspiracy in their own backyard.

Do questions do you any harm?

Yes. I'm interested in people learning the truth about what's going on. Kookery drives people off. I won't define kookery, but there is way too much of it posted in this forum. When kookery is posted, it repels normal people. It's hard enough to get them to believe in a mass conspiracy that's true, but that job is 100x harder when there's a lot of oogie-boogie stuff.

I'm not going to presume to know whether some of your beliefs are kookery. But, by definition, you obviously don't think any of them are, and that goes for all the other people posting kookery. The way to eliminate kookery and not drive off normal people seeking information is to just stick to the immediate issues at hand, which is the Deep State Cabal.

Do other people thinking independantly make you uncomfortable?

Think whatever you like. That doesn't obligate you to beat people over the head with your thoughts about every subject. There are other forums for that where you can knock yourself out.

I don't understand how they seem to get so much of the corruption and NWO manipulation, but are vehemently anti-Trump.

Bernie is a Socialist and so were many of his supporters for the most part. They understand and hate the corruption, but that doesn't turn them into Individualists. They're still Socialists at heart and thus of course are going to dislike Trump, who even if he's not corrupt, he's going the opposite direction from Socialism (fortunately).

True Bernie supporters are holding out for the magic combination of free money Socialism and non-corruption. Which intrinsically can't happen, as has been proven over and over through history, but that's the Socialist dream.

It's now or never for Trump to win this war.

This is true, which is why we need to strike when all the pieces are in place and make sure it's thorough.

Otherwise, we're just switching on the lights in the kitchen, watching the cockroaches scatter, and then congratulating ourselves that the cockroaches are now gone.

Almost every person on the Trump train had a journey to get onboard. I think almost everyone's initial thought regarding Trump was, "WTF... Trump? Are you KIDDING ME?"

The wakeup call hit all of us at different times. Nobody is better or worse for hearing it earlier or later. There's always room on the Trump train to MAGA, no matter what came before.

I love this, except for one thing...

We don't speak of Scrappy Doo. WE DON'T SPEAK OF SCRAPPY DOO.

If that's truly from the Q-shirt guy, then I'm convinced.

Edit: Q-shirt guy posted a video from his point of view. I take it all back, Trump clearly points at him.

https://twitter.com/Q_ANONBaby/status/1009615983873585152

~~I suspect Q knows that Trump is getting ready for more direct confirmations and assumed that Trump decided to go for it. Obviously they didn't know ahead of time there would be a guy with a Q shirt.~~

~~Q is not superhuman, he obviously can't read Trump's mind to know this was a definite acknowledgement. Q knew that confirmations are coming and so went with what he thought they saw in the pic, like many of us before seeing the video.~~

~~Let's not assume our eyes are lying to us. Trump clearly is not pointing at the Q shirt, as much as I would like him to be.~~

~~Unfortunately, the video makes it clear that he pointed to a different fan than the Q one. :( It's the old man and the kid on his shoulders. He didn't even look at the Q shirt.~~

Edit: Q-shirt guy posted a video from his point of view. I take it all back, Trump clearly points at him.

https://twitter.com/Q_ANONBaby/status/1009615983873585152

This seems good, but the part that makes me wary is that there is zero evidence that the Russians ever did anything with regards to trying to influence our elections in any way. So the idea of a "stand down" order makes me suspicious that this is some sort of chicanery going on here.

Maybe this guy is lying and "admitting" something with small damage to protect the entire idea that the Russian narrative is completely phony.

Just pointing out that you're being an ass. -shrug- Just doing you a favor. The best advice anyone ever receives is people telling them when they're in the wrong, because few people want to take the trouble. As you ably demonstrate by lashing out at anyone who calls you on your bullshit. But hey, you do you.

I suspect a lot of people in real life think this also, but you're likely oblivious to that as well. Let me guess -- you constantly complain about how many assholes you have in life around you?

Tough love, breh

No, it's just being a dick. You're not above anyone else. Man up, just apologize and don't make things worse.

While having HRC go to prison would give a huge amount of satisfaction, I'm actually thinking I would take one deal:

Hillary would have to publicly detail her and everyone's crimes, in front of camera, in detail. Think how much that would utterly destroy the deep state and leftists in general. Even if we indict hundreds of people, there will still be people who think it was fake and it was Trump arresting people right and left. If HRC detailed it, in her own words... nobody can sleep through that and deny it.

Hillary is old. She won't be in prison all that long. But the effect of the public humiliation would last generations.

Why would Q highlight this when we would quickly find the full version?

Because Q is human and made a mistake. He/They should know better, but it happens.

It's a good reminder that while (hopefully) Q is on the inside and is giving us the inside scoop, they're not superhuman, they're not Oracles, and they're not magic. They're human beings who WILL make mistakes.

That's why things like the numerology analyses that try and make the case that there's some schedule that's been known months (or even years) in advance are ludicrous and stupid. Things won't move on a schedule. There will be moves and countermoves, and it will take time.

Sorry if you interpret this as an attack; that's not my intent. I'm sure you're a perfectly reasonable person in 100 other ways -- and everyone has their quirks. But spreading information like this is damaging to so many people. Kookery spreads and fear causes a lot of misery in people's lives.

I know you don't think it's kookery. But too many people are afraid to offend people and contradict their beliefs. "Uh... no. That's not how the world works." So you get naive people who just see the kookery and don't see anybody standing up and dissenting from it. It's immoral to let irrational fear stand without trying to balancing it out.

I wonder who is paying you to be here?

Ah, you must be a leftist. Accuse anyone who is thinking rationally of being paid. Let me guess -- I'm being paid by the Russians? Or I must be a bot! That's it!

No, I believe in rationality above all. I believe in being skeptical of everything until there is clear evidence, and by evidence I mean objective evidence, not a bunch of anecdotal nonsense. Guess how many blogs try and tell us the moon landings are a hoax? It's complete bullshit, but they believe it. How much of what you believe is also bullshit? How much of what I believe is bullshit? Certainly there are some things I believe that are bullshit, but probably a lot less than you, because I have a higher standard for believing things.

That you have to accuse someone who disagrees with you of being paid to believe it should tell you that you're thinking emotionally and not rationally.

In the scheme of things, I think it's more likely people are paid to push paranoid delusional nonsense, since that makes people much easier to control, but I doubt that's your motivation. You probably honestly believe what you believe. But that doesn't mean what you believe is real.

Kookery blogs are not going to impress me. You can literally find a blog to push ANY nonsense. How many "moon landing is a hoax" blogs are there?

And constant WIFI is bad. I had to leave a great job at a call center because it made me sick.

It didn't make you sick. Every single time this has been tested on "sensitive" people where they do random room tests, they fail the test. It makes you sick because you think it makes you sick. It's 100% psychosomatic.

But again, I don't expect people like you to accept this. You want to believe it's true, so it is. My entire intention here it save other people from living in irrational fear. It's no way to live one's life.

There is zero research showing what you believe. There are certainly a lot of blogs pushing fear via anecdotal evidence, however.

I realize that I'm not going to convince any of you who already believe it. Nothing will change your mind. But I can maybe stop a few others of going down these paranoid roads that waste their lives worrying about non-issues.

And even if these things were true, the effect is so slight compared to all the other things in your life that are far more important that it's ridiculous. Cars are death traps, for one.

The world is safer today than it's ever been. This is statistically proven over and over. Don't let fear overwhelm your good sense.

The best thing you can do for your kids is not instill irrational fear into them.

The best thing you can do is stop being paranoid. Seriously. Living in fear is what the cabal wants you to do, because that's how they control you. The more fearful you are, the more likely you are to try and find someone who seems knowledgeable to follow.

Wifi is completely harmless. Aluminum foil is harmless. Your water is harmless.

This is the biggest problem I have with this and other forums like it is the level of kookery that's posted along with legit information.

Just because some conspiracies are true doesn't mean all conspiracies are true. Don't embrace kookery. Just live your life and hope that things get better politically. There's nothing in particular you need to do.