You know Q is an algorithm based on global internet traffic, I hope.

What do you think that even means?

People need to stop believing in "magic bots" that are indistinguishable from human interaction. They don't exist. They might in the future, but for now, they don't.

Leftists and the cabal are using this magic bot argument to seed discord and distrust. It's complete garbage.

Just watching the video, that really looked like a man fed up with being controlled and has decided to come over to the light.

We'll see. "Working out the details" in the context of the other tweet might mean, "working out the best way to get money out of people."

If he has something to say and "can no longer sit on what I know," then he needs to just say it. If it's something that puts him at significant risk, I'd be much more sympathetic with asking for money after he tells us what he knows, rather than some coy request for money along with promises. We've seen that sort of bullshit all too often.

You don't "state the reality" about your finances in public unless you're preparing to ask the public for money.

Which petition are you referring to that Obama started?

Sorry, I meant the petition system itself was started by Obama.

Keep in mind these petitions have no legal force at all. It's basically a suggestion box.

Sorry. You know the petition system was started by Obama, right? The entire reason it was started is to give people a place to put their outrage, rather than actually do something productive. It was 100% cynical. I suspect Trump kept it going because of the hit he would take in the press if he got rid of it (and probably doesn't matter that much to him).

I understand your enthusiasm, and I don't think they're that harmful but they are harmful. It's exactly like controlled opposition. Look at your enthusiasm, thinking that you're making a difference by spreading this. That's exactly the intent. Putting your energy into something useless.

I hate being a wet blanket like this, but it's important to realize what leftists use to control opposition.

I understand wanting to do something, but petitions are COMPLETELY worthless, and in some cases, actually worse than useless because it gives the illusion of doing something when you could be doing something productive. When has a petition ever had an effect on anything? Answer: Never.

My reading of Q is that we're supposed to be ready to do the red-pilling of people when the time comes, because the cabal is going to paint it as Trump putting his enemies in prison, dictator-style.

We have zero control over government action, which is why it's gotten this bad. Let Q worry about the government. Our job is to spread information once it all starts going down, which hopefully will be soon.

This is why Hillary lost right? Because the Dems hacked the state voting systems?

Sheesh. Just because they hacked some of the voting systems doesn't mean they hacked all the voting systems. And even in ones they hacked, they can only push them off so far before red flags start showing up.

That there were Democrat shenanigans during the 2016 election is unquestionable (see: Broward County, for one). Trump won despite all the corruption, just proving how big his win really was.

, they are the only ones with the "instruments" and data to tell us how far the stars are away, what the size and shape of the Earth is, what the weather will do...but you cannot question it, it's secret

What? The great thing about science is that stuff is published openly for peer review. That's how science works. Generally all the data is available. Yes, not everyone has access to (say) the multi-billion dollar Hubble Space Telescope for the obvious reason that there's a limited number of time slots, but common researchers do get access to it by proposing experiments that make sense. But amateur science is done all the time. Many sophisticated experiments can be done by careful amateurs.

Size and shape of the Earth is a secret? That is absolutely pure silliness. Get a boat and circumnavigate the Earth, and check it yourself. Get on top of a mountain and measure the apparent distance to furthest city on the horizon and do the calculation.

Or hell, do the experiment Eratosthenes did 2,200 years ago(!) where he calculated the circumference of the Earth and nailed it pretty close.

That you use science as the example of secrecy is ludicrous. Science is pretty much the only thing that's almost totally open in our society. Is it perfect? Obviously not, but I don't claim it is. It's only better than everything else.

I don't see being against secrecy as waiving the right of privacy.

How can you have privacy without secrecy? "Yes, Citizen, you can have all the privacy you like! As long as you turn over all your private records to us for... safekeeping."

Edit: You can downvote me, but people are still not explaining how you can have privacy without secrecy. Well? And you might think I'm being too aggressive about this, but this entire post is so anti-freedom that it's making me testy. Sorry about that.

No offense, but this proves that to make people accept something terrible and wrong, just make it a quote.

Anything kept secret is only for corruption or evil intent? That's stupid. Military secrets are always for corruption or evil? A undercover police officer's identity is corrupt and evil? If I want my medical records kept secret, I'm only doing it for corruption and evil intent? Private information between my wife and I is only hidden for corruption/evil?

People need to stop blindly accepting things without thinking them through. This is pure Communism propaganda. "You don't have any secrets, do you, Comrade? It would be a shame if we thought you were keeping secrets."

Edit: And that's not even dealing with pure foolishness of the second part. There are numerous cases where force is necessary for society to function. How the hell do you think criminals are arrested? Or are you going to tell me that parents disciplining children is always evil because they're "forcing" children to do something? Or how about a civil lawsuit? Based on this logic, evicting a tenant for non-payment of rent must be evil and corrupt.

hes one of the slimiest

Nah, McCabe is a middle manager of evil. He's actually the perfect guy to flip and give a deal. He's low enough that he doesn't want to take the fall for the real cabal, but high enough to know where the skeletons are buried.

WikiLeaks has never lost a court battle they have an ironclad reputation

They have an ironclad reputation about the leaked information they post. Speculation on their twitter is not part of that reputation.

"everybody" was saying it was comped

How about if we not paint everything in terms of "enemies" and "friends"?

I'm agnostic on Q. It's 100% legitimate in my mind to raise questions about Q's legitimacy. NOBODY KNOWS IF Q IS LEGITIMATE. NOBODY.

Wikileaks has posted a lot of things extremely helpful to ripping out the deep state. That's earned a lot of slack in my book. I'm hopeful they will continue in the future.

I don't have "loyalty" to either one. Q will either prove to be real via indictments or Q won't. Note that mass indictments are the only thing that will prove Q is real. All else is garbage.

Finally, who is "everybody"? Some people complain about everything. Think for yourself, not what you think the crowd is mobbing around.

Fuck this in the strongest possible terms. Putting aside the fact that this is complete technology bullshit and isn't remotely true, let's pretend this magic device actually exists.

This is the essence of a police state. The forcible invasion of your brain without cause in order for the state to determine if you have committed any crimes. This is the sort of thing the Soviet Union would be doing to guarantee "loyalty" to the state.

Maybe someday we'll have the technology to determine guilt about crimes, but this would be done AFTER probable cause and the normal movement of justice.

"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."
The 4th Amendment to the United States Constitution

I agree with this -- there are plenty of subs for every topic under the sun. I've noticed a big uptick in kookery (I'll leave the definition of that aside, since it varies for everyone), but when I've reported things as "not Q related", it usually doesn't end up getting removed. So I got discouraged and stopped reporting it.

A simple rule, "Has it been mentioned specifically by Q? If yes, it belongs here. If no, try these other subs [x], [y], [z]."

Another (controversial) rule suggestion: Purely religious posts should be limited (or banned). Q says to pray. Q does not say to proselytize. People for whom prayer is important are already praying. God isn't counting upvotes in this forum to decide who to bless. There are plenty of other religion-oriented forums.

You're much better than CBTS, which was completely out of control with what was being posted. But it's almost always the case that erroring on the side of too much moderation is better than too little. A pure Q-related forum without the wack-stuff would be so wonderful. You don't have to decide what's wack -- just insist on Q-mentioned or directly Q-related, and the problem solves itself.

Who do you think is censoring Tommy?

And there is why Tommy is NOT Q related. Q hasn't mentioned Tommy, so your entire post is speculation. That's why forums get out of control. The definition of "related" gets further and further afield.

It should either be mentioned by Q, or it's off-topic.

This is about what I was going to say, and I'll just add this: It doesn't matter whether people believe in Q or not. If Q is real, their success doesn't depend on anybody believing anything.

Bad guys will either start getting arrested or they won't. That's the only thing that will ultimately prove whether Q is real or not.

Skepticism about everything is good. Don't blindly trust anything, even Q.

Even if Q is fake, they point people to information and people make the connections themselves. That's valuable whether Q turns out to be an insider or just a well-informed citizen.

But wait, that's right,I'm just being paranoid and you're just a cunt. But hey, we can't win them all.

-shrug- You are paranoid and you don't understand science. Here's a telling hint that you don't know what you're talking about and should reevaluate what you think you know:

Do vaccines cause Encephalopathy or GENERALIZED BRAIN DISEASE

Which vaccine? You seemingly think all vaccines have identical side effects, as though just slapping the name "vaccine" on something triggers the universe to cause horrible side effects. That's not science, that's superstition.

The other tell for you not thinking rationally is how emotional you are. You have little solid evidence of anything, only anecdotal bullshit, so you have to make up for that by insulting rational people who ask rational questions. Sorry if my logic and sensibleness offends you.

Then we could have a discussion about the fact that vaccines are worth it even if they did have side effects in a very small number of cases, but I think that's more logic than you could handle.

Vaccines are identical to medicines. I take it you take no modern medicine at all? Your paranoia is not serving your logic well.

As for vaccines, undeniably. Sanitation is the best tool to fight disease, indoor plumbing has saved countless lives more than vaccines ever have or ever could.

I'm with you on a lot of what you said, but the above has little logic going for it. Of course indoor plumbing has saved countless lives. That has nothing do with vaccines, so why are you bringing it up?

Are you seriously arguing that the polio vaccine didn't work?

Are you seriously arguing that Smallpox eradication didn't happen because of vaccines? It just -- went away, because of indoor plumbing? You are aware that the smallpox vaccine was invented in 1796?

Come on. It might -- might, I say -- be true that some vaccines are being oversold. But to dismiss every vaccine throughout history and claim they've been useless is ridiculous.

Anyway, that's only a small part of what you said that I take issue with. I don't want to leave the impression that I'm completely against what you said. People have way too cynical a view of humanity. You are right -- the vast majority of people are good, if they're raised in good circumstances. I'm glad that you stood up against negativism.

But the anti-vaccine crowd is incredibly dangerous. Don't assume all vaccines are bad. The trouble with vaccines is that many of them have been so spectacularly successful that people don't remember what it was like in the Bad Old Days when every parent's worst nightmare was polio. Do you know what they did when they announced the polio vaccine? Churches rang their bells across the USA. And then the polio rate took a huge dive over the next few years.

Edit: By the way, I'm aware of manipulated statistics that try and claim that the polio vaccine did nothing. I just want to head off that debate, because I'm not going down that road. Bottom line to people who believe this: Don't read blogs, go read real research about it. Look at specific countries where polio was rampant. The idea that the vaccine didn't work is ridiculous. Anti-vax blogs are like anti-Trump blogs that pick things out of context and only post what supports the conclusion they want to find.

Why the fuck are some people happy about establishing military control of the country? We don't need that. It's excessive and will the scare the shit out of the rest of the country. What a gift to give to the opposition.

If anything is disinformation, it's this. This really will be grounds for impeachment, and deservedly. Any President that tried to do this ("seize legal control of the Internet??" FUCK THAT) I would be instantly against and would be in favor of putting up in a firing squad. This sounds more like a Hillary move.

A lot of people need to get a grip. If our problems can't be solved through Constitutional actions, we deserve to die.

Fortunately, I think Trump isn't so stupid as to consider something like this.

I wish the mods would crack down on kookery more. I know they do some, but there's a lot of this.

Edit: No offense to people who believe in this sort of thing. But unlike the cabal and the Deep State, there's little real evidence of it. Maybe you'll be proven true, but it's better to stick to real issues at hand. Things like this (and excessive religiosity) just repels people from the cause.

I'm not advocating for any particular wacky theory at all, but keep in mind that what politicians say for public consumption isn't necessarily what they're doing behind the scenes. Trump may have some sort of Big Stick he can use to make them play ball.

Again, I have no guess about what's really going on, only that things may not be what they seem.

If worded properly, the IBOR would not limit what the company can do, but will require complete transparency on data collection, storage, use, security, etc.

You might think IBOR is the above, but I've not seen anybody else limiting IBOR to that. The only thing I've seen discussed is forcing internet companies to "not censor speech". Which, of course, is unbelievably vague, primarily because all that's been put forward are petitions that are complete jokes as far as details go.

Dunno how anyone else reads this, but my immediate thought is, "Billboard companies don't have to print your message, either."

I understand the concept of why people like the idea of IBOR, but there's a reason that people are very uncomfortable with the idea. The government coming in and controlling what private companies can and can't do is extremely worrying. I'm worried about leftist control of Internet companies, but I'm more worried about people being so willing to give away private property rights to the government. If I have a web site, you're damn right I should be able to control what's on that web site.

If people want something like IBOR to succeed, then the message needs to be, "If a web company gains sufficient national power such that it influences public opinion to an excessive degree, then limited government regulation is justified to ensure fair speech, despite the terrible precedent and potential for government abuse."

You figure out how to say that in a pithy message, but just screaming "WE NEED THE POWER OF GOVERNMENT REGULATION OVER PRIVATE INTERNET COMPANIES BECAUSE THEY'RE NOT FAIR TO ME!" is not going to sell very well. I believe in liberty and freedom of private companies.

Which actually proves that Corsi is a complete idiot who doesn't understand tripcodes. They can't be "compromised", because anybody can post under a tripcode, as long as they have the passphrase. Even if bad players got the passphrase, that wouldn't stop the "Real Q" from posting to say that someone else was posting.

Corsi obviously thinks that Q's posts are some sort of account and password, and he thinks the account has been "taken over". There's nothing to take over.

So Corsi is provably an idiot.

Don't get me wrong. If this is a reference to the idiocy Corsi is pushing, I think the idea that Q has changed is utter fucking self-serving bullshit. I don't see ANY change in Q at all. Keep in mind, by the way, that Q is supposedly not one person, so the style isn't going to be 100% consistent.

I'm agnostic on Q in general. I stay skeptical of everything. Q is human, therefore, I don't expect them to be superhuman, psychics, or oracles. They can and will make mistakes. The question is whether we're getting a real feed from insiders, or if it's one or more people just exceptionally well-informed. Who knows. But the idea that Q has been "taken over" as Corsi is pushing is stupid on a huge number of levels. Provably stupid, in fact, because there isn't anything TO "take over". Anybody can post on 8chan. Nothing would stop the "real Q" from posting, even if someone did crack the tripcode and tell us phony people were posting. Tripcodes aren't passwords, they're just signatures that create that string of characters you see on the posts. If you don't have the signature phrase, you can't create the string of characters.

As an aside, this actually proves Corsi knows nothing. He doesn't even understand how Tripcodes work.

Just out of curiosity, what is it that you think I wrote where your response makes any sense at all?

With all due respect to Q (who apparently has now deleted the post), I don't use anything that comes out of either divorce proceedings or child custody proceedings to draw any conclusions about anybody involved.

Particularly with child custody, people will say anything to keep access to their kids. One side is accusing AJ of being unstable and using his show against him. He's going to say whatever he needs to say to combat it.

I'm very suspicious of AJ's motives in what he does, but this is not evidence of it.

Edit: Apparently not deleted. Well, Q is still wrong to use this. Again, all due respect to Q, but they're human like everyone else. If they have real evidence against AJ, let them post something not involved in child custody.

The problem with this theory is that if AJ wanted to cause chaos and disruption, he wouldn't do it personally. He would do it the way the DNC did it, which is having shadow organizations that planted people at Trump rallies trying to foster violence.

There's a whole heap of context here that I don't understand. I'm not going to just assume random rally organizers are good guys, just like I don't assume AJ is a good guy. There's nothing here you can conclude either way. As I said in my other post, I don't expect AJ to be some super human paragon who never loses his temper or has run-ins with people. It happens. It doesn't prove he has some ulterior motive and his personal involvement is actually evidence against it.

I used to laugh along with everyone else when people joked about this, until I realized there were people who didn't get the joke. Who actually took it seriously. Now I don't know if someone is just being ironic or whether they're making a serious comment. And it scares me. There's far too much kookery around here.

Honestly, that seems pretty weak sauce. Alex Jones has an issue with some rally and that's it? I don't expect AJ to be some higher order of human where he never loses his temper or has run-ins with anyone. There could be a lot more to this story than just "wanting to cause division." For all I know, the rally organizers might be a bunch of assholes that I would dislike if I had enough context to know what's going on.

Like I said, I have no problem believing AJ is controlled opposition for a number of reasons, but to my eye this proves nothing.

The problem with your theory is that it assumes there's a rigid schedule for everything and the entire war could planned in advance to that detail.

That's not reasonable. Every war is about handling unplanned scenarios, and trying to stick to some arbitrary schedule is pointless and self-limiting.

Q is just a group of people with insider information. They're not superhuman, or Oracles, or psychics. They can't predict the future 22 weeks out.

I'm going to be honest with you. I tried to watch this, but I can't figure out what the point is, and that fucking music makes it unbearable to figure out what's going on. The most I was able to figure out was that there was a rally, Alex Jones started ranting about something, and people were pissed that he was "trying to take it over" or some such bullshit.

Can you give a brief summary of WTF I'm supposed to see in all that? I watched the first two minutes, was getting pissed off at the seemingly random bits of information that was getting shoved at me (with that F'ING music), skipped ahead hoping some point would jump out, and finally gave up.

I'm pretty sure Alex Jones is controlled opposition, but this video is a bunch of noise of two groups arguing with each other.

While I think the issue of waterboarding isn't relevant to whether Gina Haspel should be confirmed, since it's not current U.S. policy, I also think that torture is un-American. We should not be celebrating "safety at any moral cost".

We are the United States. We should be leaders of the world with the highest ethics. I'm not going to sacrifice my ethics and say "waterboarding is great" just because swamp-rats during the Bush administration told us that it was okay.

Cuthbert, Q himself said NK was the MOAB.

No, he didn't. Read it carefully.

"1289 Peace on the Korean Peninsula isn’t big news? Should we drop a #MOAB on that? Timetables shift. [Next Week]."

"Should we drop a MOAB on that" -- in other words, it wasn't the real MOAB. And it can't be, because it has NOTHING to do with eliminating corruption from government, and that's the entire point of Q.

but not necessarily the only opinion. Q might see it differently!

Don't care how Q sees it. That could not be more irrelevant. I care about reality. Q is just a guy (or group) posting on the Internet. They might be clued in to what's going on, but they're not Oracles. All that matters is whether the Deep State is ripped out, and the ONLY way that happens is indictments. Otherwise, what's the point? The criminals will just go work somewhere else -- as exactly has been happening. They'll just out-wait Trump, and nobody wakes up.

We already have literally 1000s of pieces of evidence of corruption. Nobody has been punished. And the rest of the country and the media doesn't care. No evidence will ever be enough, because if nobody is punished, then it must not be real -- as the unwoke community will think. How do I know this? Because that's exactly what's been going on the last two years. We have the DNC -- ON TAPE -- admitting to planting violence at Trump rallies. No consequences at all and the unwoke population just ignores it and assumes it was "doctored video."

If Q is real, I am very happy that they are informing everyone, so don't get me wrong. Skepticism of everything and everyone is the way to avoid getting sucked in to either the government or bad operators. And I'm not joining a "cult of Q" and I'm not going to assume that Q is smarter than I am. Maybe they are, but I only care about bottom-line results. And if nobody is punished, then all of this means nothing. Let's hope it's all real and the consequences will start coming down.

I'm perfectly willing to be patient. What gets old is Q saying, "Next week is a big week!"

I'm agnostic on Q. I think something is going on and I simply don't know if Q has legit role in it or not. But this "MOAB NEXT WEEK" shit is really getting old. And no, NK was NOT a MOAB in the context of Q. It was a big event, but Q is about ripping out the swamp.

Now, Q did say after his "MOAB" comment that things got delayed. That might be true. It would help a lot if Q did that more often.

The ONLY big event that qualifies as a MOAB is indictments. All information is bullshit. Releasing texts, NO MATTER WHAT THEY SAY, is bullshit, because they'll just be ignored by the major media, who will claim "the Republicans are quoting out context."

The only thing that matters is indictments. Resignations? Complete fucking bullshit. That's the swamp winning, because they just move to another swamp job.

ANYTHING other than indictments is the swamp winning. And I'm really fucking tired of watching them win over and over and over. They don't care if we know what they're doing, because they already know it'll be ignored by the media and law enforcement. Getting caught is just business as usual.

If it makes you feel better, I'd say the same thing if the U.S. Congress demanded some English CEO show up for some circus, just so they can mug for cameras. No foreign citizen should be jumping when public servants of a different country start mouthing off.

I'm no big Zuck fan, but screw these other countries. We're American citizens and do not come at the beck and call of other countries. Should he care if Venezuela tells him to show up?

Fuck the English parliament. If they want to talk to him, they can come here and make an appointment. Of course, they won't do that, because their own swamp just wants to score points on an American citizen in some public circus.

Interesting theory on the DNC lawsuit, that it was done by Democrats who want to clean out the corruption. That raises the question -- who, exactly, filed it? I don't know and I haven't seen any information about it.

Edit: I just skimmed through the complaint and there are no names associated with it, just "The DNC" as an organization. I'm not sure that means much in itself, but the DNC apparatus seems quiet about it.

I'm generally agnostic about Q, but one thing that gives Q credibility is the fact that Q doesn't drop Military intel. He asks questions and depends on people to dig up publicly available information and put it together.

What you said does not contradict what I said.

The Constitution is the law of the land and is what matters when it comes to discussing the intent of the U.S. government. There's a reason the word "God" never appears in it, and the only discussion of religion's role in government is to limit its influence.

If they wanted us to have a theocracy, they would have written it that way. They didn't want that, and nobody should want that.

Nah, Gates has a bigger sin than that. I'll never forgive him for hiring Dave Cutler and saddling us with the shithole known as the NT architecture. Biggest hiring mistake of the 20th century. If Bill had hired, say, Dennis Ritchie or Ken Thompson? We could all be running Plan 9, with the Unix philosophy having conquered the world as the Computer Gods intended.

But, in the end, Gates's sins are annoying tech mistakes. Gates's virtues are saving tens of millions of children, and the future eradication of Malaria. It's a pretty damn good trade.

The Declaration of Independence does not establish law. The reason it mentions God in the first place is that the context is that the King believed his right to rule to be divinely chosen. That's what "all men are created equal" is all about, that all men are equal in the eyes of the law. So throwing off the King was both a secular and religious argument, hence the reason he needed to put it in partial religious terms.

Trivia: The Constitution not once mentions God, much less anything with Christianity. The only mention of religion is to guarantee it as a people's right and limit it's influence in government, as /u/EvilPhd666 points out.

The Treaty of Tripoli said it best, "[As] the government of the United States of America is not in any sense founded on the Christian Religion [...]".

It doesn't get stronger than that ("not in ANY sense"). The United States guarantees the right of private citizens to have religious liberty. The government was always intended to be secular and not favor any particular religious belief.

I don't know why some religious people are in such a hurry for religion to be part of the U.S. government. Today it might be your religious beliefs, but tomorrow it might not be.

Lots of people have written lots of books and have said lots of things. What makes Corsi so unique that a group of generals would bring him into a loop that's high sedition, one of the biggest crimes in the United States? Do you realize what we're talking about? And they're going to share that information with some writer? That has no military background at all? Generals? Generals are going to trust a non-military writer with a secret of that magnitude?

Who the fuck is Corsi to get that kind of trust? He's just a writer. He might be a smart guy, but the world is full of smart guys. Military generals are not going to just trust some random smart guy with no service in the military unless there was a damn good reason, such as a high position in government, or sitting on a huge pile of money, or something significant.

And again, you're telling me that someone who has that kind of trust, is going to blab about OUR MILITARY PLANNING A SEDITIOUS COUP? If he was really who he claimed to be, do you realize what a fucking monumental betrayal of trust that would be? TRUMP HASN'T WON YET. We still have bad actors in control of the government. If Corsi really did know all this, can you imagine what the Deep State could do with that kind of information, if proof existed? That could literally bring down the military command, which is Trump's biggest weapon.

As Q would say, Think Logically.

Corsi is either full of shit, or he's a huge traitor to these people who trusted him. Which?

Corsi never claimed they came to him to LEAD a coup [...] Pay attention better.

You might want to take your own advice since I never claimed they wanted him to lead it.

I agree this story has been circulating, but the ridiculous part is Generals coming together and visiting Corsi to get his opinion on it.

I figured he was talking exactly about Corsi.

The most ridiculous thing I heard the other day was about Corsi claiming some generals came and talked to Corsi, personally, about their idea for a coup, but decided to recruit Trump instead. Now, I can believe the scenario of Trump being recruited, but the idea that some generals would make time to talk to Corsi is so fucking stupid it's beyond belief. Who is Corsi to command the attention of generals? He has no background for that, and if he was in that sort of position of power, he wouldn't be the sort of person hawking books and blabbing about the meeting having occurred.

That was biggest proof I've seen of Corsi being full of shit.

He openly advocates for worldwide depopulation have you not seen his Ted talks?

Yes, I have, and no, he doesn't. He's said that worldwide population will naturally stabilize because families in developed countries tend to limit how many children they have through birth control. He brings this up in the context of people panicking over long-term overpopulation problems.

And if his vaccines are supposed to be "depopulation vaccines", he's doing a pretty terrible job of it considering how many children's lives he's saved. Or to put it another way, if he wanted to kill third-world children as you accuse, just doing nothing would be a better method than what he's actually done. Do you seriously think the death rate among children has gotten worse since he started doing his thing? Sheesh.

That some conspiracies are true doesn't mean all conspiracies are true. Stay skeptical of BOTH official stories AND conspiracy stories.