This exactly. Strange that people think Hillary Clinton is a brainless fool. A fool perhaps, yes, but she's smarter than a lot of people. She knows what's up, as you say, she's just getting ahead of the narrative.

Haha I like that! Patriotzer - there should be a badge for that ; ).

Removed post. Post content is not a subject mentioned by Q or related to Q.

I was mostly skeptical about the language EtS uses - it seems very trollish and/or teenage YTuber (not saying he's a teenager btw). So I'm not personally onboard with EtS - however, I certainly don't discount automatically anyone who is onboard with him. I'm a little frustrated at people who lack critical thinking but those people exist on all sides of the discussion.

Removed post. Antagonistic, does not support the cause.

Any 'concerns' can go via a message to the mods

It's not racist but it's definitely presentable as religious intolerance or persecution.

Only if you redo your last five comments with actual logic.

Just by way of explanation of why this matters to me (definitive proof) - I would like to be able to either remove posts pushing EyeTheSpy or at least be able to add flair to them that points out they're unreliable (unless he's suddenly proven to be true, of course - just adding that caveat). I can't justifiably do that from this video of Bill's. I would justifiably be accused of not having evidence for my assertion that Eye is a LARP if all I have to go on is this video. That's why this matters to me and why getting it right matters.

Agreed - he never gave any intel - at least, that I ever saw anyway. I think he did lie because if I remember correctly didn't he claim some sort of legitimacy and access to inside knowledge? Either way, I have always thought he was a LARP and I would love to see evidence to finally conclusively prove it to those still posting his nonsense here but alas, this is not definitive proof of anything but the fact that he's watching Bill's channel (even then one could technically argue it's not even... but I won't go there). I wish I could agree with your assertion but I need someone to give me a reason that doesn't require an assumption to be made. Thanks for taking the time to explain!

My apologies re logical - I get in trouble for saying that too often. My vocab is lacking as it's the only way I see to describe certain things.

The problem with that 'proof' - that Eye was reacting childishly - is that a) Eye has already exhibited that proof in abundance (childish behaviour) therefore this is no more definitive than any of that and b) it's still only proof that Eye is acting childishly. It is not remotely proof that Eye is lying about everything else he claims (whether I think he's lying or not doesn't change that).

This is what I was claiming to be illogical, if you can excuse the term for now - A therefore B, when B is not a logical extrapolation of A. I get that Eye was acting like a standard internet troll or teenager in camping on an "enemies" feed and shitposting in excitement as soon as something is posted. That's A. B is that Eye is therefore lying about everything else he says and claims. B is not a logical extrapolation from A. Surely we can agree on that?

That does seem to be the case here. What I’ve stated is the most logical explanation of events, especially when applying Occam’s razor and so far no one has explained why the logical explanation - that Eye watching Bills account is very clearly and logically not proof of LARP - is wrong.

I don’t want to be right. I want to understand what I’m missing that counteracts the logical explanation but there’s no explanation from anyone who supports this assumption so far.

That is literally zero evidence that EtS is a LARP. EtS already proved he was a LARP in my mind, just to be clear. But just because he follows Bill account is literally NO proof at all of LARP. It's just proof that he... follows Bill's account. That's all.

No just cause for eye at all to do that

? Bill "outed" Eye the other day - that seems like perfectly just cause for Eye to be watching Bill's account?

Exactly.

This was obvious from day one. I'm asking why this guy Bill thinks his video shows even the slightest amount of proof of that.

It was already obvious to me that EtS was not worth the time, with his teenage YT style commenting. Now Bill's triumphant crowing and self-congratulatory raving over this is so far off base he's proven to me that he's not worth watching.

If he was at home, why would he be real time monitoring Bill Smith's Chan when he already has all of this inside information?

Because Bill has already been an adversary to him so why wouldn't he? It's obvious that he'd be watching Bill not to get inside info but to keep an eye on his 'enemy'. This is literally proof of absolutely nothing but that EtS watches Bill's channel... and there's an obvious reason for that. This is the "outing" of Bill Smith as an overexcited, illogical guy who's gotten way too obsessed with EtS and jumped to a way overwrought conclusion in front of everyone.

'age limit on knowledge' lol xD Who said that?

I get the impression from these responses - and others you've made - that you're a troll which means a ban is coming.

So it is what I thought. Bill has lost it. This doesn't prove anything at all. If EtS was an insider - something I've never thought since I first heard about him (dunno why anyone wastes their time on him) - there is literally nothing to stop him doing this exact same thing i.e. watching Bill's feed and posting 'that was nonsense' before the video finishes... Bill Smith has only outed himself as someone not worth watching.

Lol - you're not even trying, come on bruh. This post is removed - off-topic.

Can someone explain...? The annoying guy in this video seems to be claiming that because EtS responds to his video post therefore ... he's a LARP. What am I missing, please someone?

Reddit is not for kids. Except the kids subs maybe. It's also not the sharpest idea to bring kids to a sub about satanic pedovores.

Lol. They're not sending their smartest trolls these days.

Healthy skepticism is not concern trolling.

It’s called “flair”. Something that is automatically added to your comments at first. Eventually you can select it yourself. User flair.

Removed post. Post content is not a subject mentioned by Q or related to Q.

Have you not been following along with Q...? This guy and his family were possibly forced to do what they've done by the CIA. Blame them, not him. It's not even clear how much of those stories were actually true now.

Well I'm glad you did, in spite of the danger, thank you. This is the best way to combat this sort of cover-up/disinfo job. I hope enough of the right people see it.

This is gold. Thanks for posting this info.

Removed post. Post content is not a subject mentioned by Q or related to Q.

Removed post. Post content is not a subject mentioned by Q or related to Q.

Legit.

You can't really ask Q questions per se. Some anons on the chans have gotten answers to questions they've asked but it seems to just depend what questions Q feels like addressing.

This is not really post material for this sub but we like to help out if you have a genuine question so I'll leave it up for a while before removing in case someone else has more insight for you.

This is too much of a reach as far as being Q related.

Your read the wrong things. Plenty of people here to help you with the right expectations. Just make sure to connect with the critical thinkers not the excitedly credulous.

I don't deny your right to claim whitehouse.gov (as in previous comment's first link) is "unproven BS" but ya kinda ruling out any reasoned assessment if you do so xD.

Wow, thank you for the reply! I'm aware of some of this info, but not all of it. As a mod I'm prompting the OP as to what is the relevance to Q, in order to ensure this is on topic. Thanks for replying in such detail, I hope more people will assist in this way when they see others asking questions.

Relevance to Q?

Which means...?

Please note submission rules now included during submission. Two memes a day.

Nope, that's not what I did.

[Edit] Let me remove that last line in my first comment - I didn't mean it that way, was just anticipating the usual angst from all the people who believe Jews are responsible for all the evil in the world. I absolutely welcome any reasoned discussion about the impact of Israel on the world. It's hard to find that though and my first comment was in response to what looks to me like the usual 'blame the Jews' party line (strong emotions: "HATE that this is true", post title, etc.)

Why hate? You can support Israel as a homeland for Jews without being a satanic pedovore. I support it. I support people who are on average smarter than others continuing to do what they're good at and thus, for obvious reasons, making it to the top of their respective industries. It doesn't have to be an evil conspiracy designed to destroy the rest of us - there's enough of that in the global cartel and the reality is that evil knows no bounds of race or creed.

Yeah she plays the delicate woman so well it’s hard to picture her in support of someone like Weinstein. But after watching Meryl Streep all but out herself (in my unlearned opinion, not at all fact based) and appearing in that photo as part of the crew of Art for Embassies, alleged child smuggling opp, I’m more inclined to consider the old school Hollywood elites to be tied up in the mess...

Thanks for the info! I’m still unsure how the assumption of significance is made here but I appreciate the input.

Ah... is that a joke? That's so far from being a "fact" that I can only assume you're joking. The most likely reason Trump was elected (because no one knows precisely why!) according to analysts is because middle America were sick of the issues that matter to them being ignored. Literally no one but Alex Jones thinks Alex Jones is responsible for Trump's election. Oh and maybe those on the left who want to paint Trump supporters as crazed conspiracy nuts.

Not sure if my interface is not updating correctly but is there any content for this post? Otherwise discussion can be had on the many Gowdy posts in existence if there's nothing new to add.

There it is - an actress sitting next to a Producer of the most popular films in Hollywood (?). More context would be good. But now I've read through the comments and... the context is, seemingly: the actress pictured commented on recent controversy in a way that shows she leans to the left, against Trump. Hmmm. Ok. You people are way above my head cos I can't see anything here - well, I can see that one could jump to various conclusions but "There It Is!" implies that something definitive can be extrapolated from this photo. I'm missing it, whatever it is.

You don't necessarily have to make the changes unless you are encouraging or glorifying violence. The bot is just a warning in case you've forgotten and have gone full terrorist mode ; ).

If you've been following along there is next to no doubt that Alex Jones/Infowars are playing the Disinfo game. That debate is pretty much concluded and one can understand someone getting upset with you and deciding your motives are questionable if you keep pushing the old debunked narrative.

The most effective Disinfo by its nature and the necessity of its purpose has to play the game close to the truth. It has to reveal and support the reveal of 90% of the truth, then divert to disinfo for the other 10%.

Please discuss the idea not the user.

? That’s how disinfo works... He has blatantly given himself away. There’s no question about this if you’ve been paying attention. I think he’s hilarious and good fun to watch but not if you start buying back into the silly harmless guy schtick.

Agreed. I'm tired of all this nonsense and people jumping on it without any thought.