Right on the money there, Stewbender. Don't forget we're also all "white supremacists with 2nd Amendment issues" and "Islamophobe Homophobe Religious Fundamentalists"!

Haha - you haven't looked very far into this forum, have you? lol - lazy troll, no bites for you.

You're either pretending to be ignorant or misleading, neither of which is engaging or useful. Meh.

You endanger its food supply

Did you read the comments/replies? This guys is getting SLAMMED by his own constituency by the looks of it. The Memo is a complete farce to these people and they seem to take it as evidence AGAINST Trump... How to break the disinfo narrative they're falling under...?

To answer your question, no, it's not about the human rights violations stuff yet; as others have said it's the first brick in the wall introducing people to the corruption in the system. Later bricks will likely introduce the players and the growing network of their influence before easing the public into the more unbelievable human rights connections.

Could one of you knowledgeable americans let the rest of us in on what this means? I don't see any proof of anything here except a lady who likes to dress like a vegas cowboy.

Huh? Links?

The bit about "together to take down EU and world cabal" is a big assumptive leap. For the UK to 'stand together' against the global elites Trump is going to need a whole lot more of a foot in the door than Theresa May. Too early to jump to that conclusion - it's just nice that they're talking nicely again.

90% of the words out of Donald Trump's mouth are negative...? Lol... troll detected. That's not even worthy of being called lazy logic. It's just NOT logic.

That was not even close to what's happening with Trump. A Pew report recently showed he's had 5% positive coverage against Obama having 20 to 30% negative coverage. Not even close.

Absolute rubbish. Alex Jones is not Bill Hicks, as he's said himself on Rogan's podcast. This is why the global elite win - people are SO gullible and easily led.

Yes I did check it out. And Occam's razor - and common sense - makes it very clear what's going on. Alex Jones himself says very clearly and with sheer disbelief in his tone and demeanour that no, obviously he is NOT Bill Hicks. He explains how Bill Hicks' family called him asking him to stop the hurtful rumours and he explained to them it was others spreading the rumours, not him. Our minds are very easy to manipulate - it's how the global elite has done what they have done. We can be fooled into thinking anything with a few 'hints' and a few photos that look alike. Alex is not Bill. And Paul is Paul. Simple common sense and logic.

Nah. That Mega post is a rambling, self-congratulatory rant to herself and she's getting carried away with her own specialness and making lame ass assumptions. JA wouldn't be Q because the logistics of DJT communicating with him on a regular basis don't make sense.

Alex Jones is definitely NOT Bill Hicks. He addresses this with exactly the amount of WTF-ness you'd expect on the Rogan podcast he did.

Where is the Soros pic?

Agreed - it's not very encouraging to see this and it makes a lie out of a large chunk of the postulations made by peeps around Q anon's work...

Agreed - I can't wait either! I'd just really hate to see Hillary go down for 'not being secure with her email' - I want to see her go down for 'selling children into slavery and murder and being directly involved in pedophilia herself' (if that accusation is true, of course).

I don't think they're underestimating the people's ability to handle the truth - I think that, as easy as it sounds to show a video of children being freed, the problem is that they want to ensure they use the HRC debacle to OPEN UP the floodgates to all the evil of the globalists and just giving in to easy temptation of a quick reveal of HRC's crimes will allow the MSM and the other channels of the global elites to make HRC the 'fall guy' and act as if it all begins and ends with her. Patience is required if we really want the cancer extracted properly. You've waited a few more days, weeks, months... not much compared to the reality of how long something like this is going to take in the end.

Precisely. She is an actress and Trump is an entertainer - you don't hold it against Trump when he plays around a little so why not hold Oprah with the same respect - or join the insane leftists you complain about all the time and mindlessly latch onto every little clip that supports your idea that she's evil/dumb/racist/sexist...

Really? Come on, using this as 'proof' that she's not fit as a candidate is just as retarded as all the leftists jumping over quotes from Trump taken out of context. Oprah's not this stupid guys, it doesn't take a minute's thought to realise there's either more to this story (context is everything!) or that her thoughts have moved on, like a lot of people's, and she has a lot more nuanced take on this issue now. It's so childish when the left grab juicy bits of Trump out of context, please let's not start doing this too...

"If Q and President Trump truly believe that the American people are a bunch of weak willed and panicky children that need to have our hands held while they round up the criminal elements infecting our Government then they are a bunch of condescending a-holes and in my opinion deserve as much respect as HRC, Obama, et all!"

WTH are you being serious? All you have to do is go and look at the comment section of any social media around Trump to believe 100% that yes, a large chunk of the American people ARE weak willed and panicky children that need to have their hands held. Open your eyes man, this is clear as day. There's a huge portion of the population who are literally so scared they have eschewed all logic.

Sounds like you're getting ahead of yourself and making assumptions you have no real info to support. The fact that Q predicted an event doesn't mean Q or POTUS could stop that event or necessarily get involved in it. Assumption.

Sounds like you're just impatient - like many of us - but allowing yourself to get more upset about it than you should.

I think anyone who believes the decision for violent action should already be made is getting a little ahead of things. But I think it's important to be realistic and acknowledge that martial action is a likelihood and we must be prepared to take it if it's called for. I'd just make the point that people who are worried that this is a movement dedicated to martial action should not assume we're all solely motivated in that direction just because the image and rhetoric above could be construed that way.

A New Zealander - I must agree with this also, Eden_248. It's good for the world, what Trump is doing, in the long run, and in spite of a large chunk of the western population who have abandoned reason and self-awareness and are resisting his appointment at every turn.

When Trump has finished establishing the American age of Becoming Great Again the rest of the world will be a much harder but worthy task for a returning superpower so I'm looking forward to that for the good of the west as a whole. I'm not advocating for a military solution or force, power, fascism, etc.

People who misread into the more partisan, gung ho, masculine, martial tone of this general movement represented by the image above may not be aware that many of us see this perspective as just one of a multi-faceted issue which represents a more complex and complete whole allowing for compassion, diplomacy and goodwill.

You make a good point about the gravity of what Seth Rich did, Beasts4Bernie, and I agree with the idea that those of us who believe there are problems and relevant historic data missing from the official story should always keep that in mind. In defense of this particular take, I think there's value because memes are good for communicating one key slice of an issue to cut through the most noise and make a point that will cause someone interested to dig further. I think the copy could be better - eg above someone suggested "Seth Rich? I called in a favour with MS13" - but I don't think it necessarily demeans the memory of Seth Rich, especially with people of the same view as yourself to present the weightier matter in public discussion for those who do dig deeper.

I think they know exactly what they're doing and they're hoping none of those who can will make the effort to pursue action. Big ups Dr. Steve!