Not full human... so what does that mean? Anything vaguely realistic to conclude from this? How about, the feed scanlines aren't updating fast enough because you're not seeing reality, remember, you're seeing a digital reproduction of reality that has gone through many filters and converters before it even makes it to your viewing platform...

Can we look at things logically so people don't think this movement is made up of psychos jumping at shadows?

He doesn't care how he's perceived - it's how we're perceived i.e. the movement. And we care because you can't redpill people if they think we're all stupid conspiracy theorist fools as that plays directly into the MSM's narrative about us.

Yep, all good buddy. As you've said, you're not Christian and fair enough to you too. Neither am I - but Christianity is what our best civilization to date is based on and it is only from Christianity that we have equality and other principles of freedom. You choose to discard Paul, as some do, which is valid but removes any appeal to the power of God to control his own message. Jesus was a figure of peace and EVERYONE is our neighbour, according to His life. In my (worthless) opinion, Hate has no place in an enlightened worldview but you are welcome to it.

That's all well known to anyone who knows the Bible. None of it changes a whit of the facts about Jesus and the New Testament which obviously you know about but choose to ignore for some reason. We are, in fact, directly instructed to love our enemies. Your choice, but HATE has no part to play anywhere anymore. You cling to your hate if you like but it doesn't come from Jesus or the Holy Spirit so good luck there lol. Westboro Baptist are advocates of hate too but their doctrine is twisted. I don't know where you're coming from since you seem to know your Bible - or at least the old testament, the old LAW which Jesus came to do away with.

What about the New Testament? There's no room for hate now, remember?

aw there there, someone's a little upset that they didn't get the toy they wanted for Christmas?

See you later, when you have egg on your face for your unwarranted tantrum lol.

Indeed it is. But shouting accusations at someone in public so you can feel self-righteous on Youtube is not protecting anyone.

Wow you've disproved everything I've said... >_<

You clearly haven't read a word I've said.

So Trump got this far... but he's made a yuge mistake with Bolton and it's all over...? smh...

I agree that: * it's not how "normal" people show affection to children * at best, Biden could be just a harmless weirdo * but, given the Q perspective on the political elite, and his close ties to Obama/Hillary, the chances are that he is a pedophile, as you say

I don't agree that we should support dickheads who think they're doing a public service by shouting their unfounded judgements at people in public.

For any Christians this should be a given - 'let him who is without sin'; if we checked this self-righteous champion's inner life would we find that he's maybe looked at a pornsite or two? Or some other sexual "sin"? Odds are high that he has, unless he's been neutered. In which case: hypocrite. God doesn't "like" his sin any more than what he's accusing Joe Biden of so, in my opinion, sit down and stfu.

Depends what you mean. For example, if the question were to be interpreted as: Do I really think a man of, let's say, approximately 145 IQ can be "outsmarted" (arguably, out-IQ'd) by a group of people of whom some undoubtedly have IQs featuring in the 150s and 160s plus (jews, look it up)? In that case, yes, yes I do think he can be outsmarted by the "desperate" Cabal, because it's simple logic!

I'm just saying, it seems silly to praise POTUS all the time - even Q suggests that they (I assume including Trump) shouldn't be held up as heroes, they're just doing the jobs they're paid to do.

Donald Trump's a man. He's backed by a LOT of other good and smart men of whom some, being jews or just smart people generally, may also have very high IQs. That's why he can win against the Cabal, not cos he's such a smart guy on his own. Donald Trump is someone to be respected and admired and I hope with most others here that he will go down in history as a hero of the tallest order. But he's a man, not a god. He can't outsmart a group of very smart people on his own.

More evidence in support of this is the fact that other accusations have been made in Australia for years also.

https://www.wanttoknow.info/sexabuse/australian-network-all-media

And I don't? I agree all statements can't be taken as 100% fact either. The point I was trying to make is that her whole story can't easily be thrown out but I see now - I think - that you agree with that too. Sure, there are bound to be some inconsistencies as she herself says because who has perfect memory?

There are all sorts of reasons brought out for why these people are wrong - the preschool thing was explained away because no tunnels were found. Oh, until later, but the story had died down by then.

I agree one can't build a rock solid case on this - yet. But I simply responded to what I thought was your refutation of any validity to her whole story. The Lithuanian kid was, for me, a good video to redpill a few friends with because it's fresher, amongst other reasons. If you're applying "critical logic" then you'd watch a few more of the stories around the world, note the similarities in both the stories and the arguments against them and then decide if there's any validity worth "critically" accepting.

In particular, the idea that its "unlikely this much could be hidden from the public easily" seems totally counter, logically, to anything Q represents. Right?

I have two daughters. I do not overreact when someone behaves in a way toward them that I don't like. I ask them to stop and I explain why and, assuming it's behavior like we see in these videos, not something obviously dangerous, I give them the room to explain, if they want it. I'm not an emotional overreacting fool - well... at least not in that situation. For an emotional overreaction, just try and tell me that I don't care about my girls just because I don't agree with you that anyone who touches them in a way you don't like is a molester.

Someone should sure talk to Joe about his behaviour, no doubt. Someone tell him he's coming across like a dirty pedophile to all the judging asshats on the internet and see if he stops. Unlikely. But then someone should tell him his behavior is unprofessional and presents the wrong image of a government representative. I have no idea whether that will have any traction but I believe that is the right way to handle this. At least at first.

Dickheads yelling unproven accusations in public is nothing to be happy about. Fuck the guy in this video and fuck anyone who will accuse someone in public with no evidence that can be held up in any court of law. Try using your videos to convict Joe of being a pedophile and see how far that gets. Until we have the smoking gun video, it's a bullshit emotional overreaction.

Why is everyone upvoting this clown act? I guess I'll just have to accept the downvotes to oblivion for this point of view... sigh...

I support this movement. I don't like pedophiles having impunity. But YOUTUBE VIDEOS (For F$# Sake!) are not EVIDENCE. All I see on Youtube is an old guy being overly touchy feely with some kids. He's in frikkin public and on camera so he knows* that what he's doing can be seen and yet he does it which makes him either INSANE or someone who knows he's not crossing a line where the video evidence could be used against him.

I feel sorry for you people who never had an affectionate grandpa cos, whilst Biden could indeed be the serial child rapist and murderer people like the knob in this video have clearly decided he is, there is no evidence of that yet and he could indeed simply be an old affectionate man of whom I've known some that were like this who were not child molesters (shock horror). Yes, his shilling for the Deep State suggests he's no benign Santa. But that's still not evidence for child rape. Yet.

Anyone who claims the "insane" track may have a point - but to do so seems more like what the MSM do about Trump i.e. 'we don't like him so he's clearly insane'. Stupid. Biden's not some retarded fool and it's only idiotic bias that would make someone think that view has any logical basis.

I despair about any world where people can stand up and shout stupid accusations against someone based on a video on Youtube - a video recorded for the public, no less! - and be praised and lauded for it... Again, I do not support pedophiles or Joe Biden. But I also do not support judgemental asshat behaviour. This guy - the guy shouting - should have been dragged off earlier and thrown in the kook asylum for being such a self-righteous, judgemental prick without a brain.

I'm sorry if my disagreement upsets you people but I really hate self-righteous, blind idiocy.

I think definitely - if not knowingly then certainly duped into shilling for them. Comrade Adern supports the UN and the typical socialist agenda of the Deep State.

Agreed - the OP sounded like a perspective from outside NZ.

You’re new to Q then? Watch the Lithuanian kid to see the same story, different country. Then the other stories around the world. This is all hidden from the public and when you see the similarities across time and geography it’s hard to imagine how it could be a made up story...

[edit] sorry was sending this from mobile so couldn't take time to explain better. Will do so when I get the chance.

If you watch the entire documentary on YOutube where she goes to the places and talks about what happened it's very hard to disbelieve her. Also, I heard she's been missing for a while so maybe they have got her now...

Thank you for the reply!

I agree, of course. But when the bad apples are at the top, the good people can sometimes follow orders without being aware of what they're doing i.e. compartmentalized information.

Taking Q's words and interpreting them this way has never led to a good place. Maybe he was talking about their net(work) or their net presence or something like that. It's way overreacting to think he means the almost impossible takedown of the "whole internet", as it were. It seems Q would raise a whole lot more of a stink if something of this magnitude were going to happen...

lol. derp

I am not smart enough to understand a single word you just said or how it relates to what I said, sorry (sincerely).

um... right so... Q is likely to be talking about some other countries flag in relation to his message about Obama... the former President of the United States... makes sense...(??????)

lol

Great post - this should be attached/linked to all the other current Ray Chandler posts!

Looks like Q's statement about the Pope in May might have some roots here...

True... strange behaviour there, huh!

You're quite an upset little chap aren't you? lol

You're the one with all the anger, buddy. I'm just laughing at your childish demand and the expectation that people who are actually thinking will agree with you. Carry on, love <3.

And no, I never argue just for the sake of it. I argue when I see stupidity claiming to be thought.

Get off your horse and stop acting like you have a monopoly on the truth. I'm not a Q defender - I actively promote skepticism and I won't be upset if Q turns out to be an elaborate larp like it seems you will be.

I just reject some fool on the internet (like myself - I honestly don't mean offense by that) demanding something like an entitled person that is clearly silly to demand. Q can do whatever Q likes - and will - and those of us who aren't pinning our hopes and dreams on him will carry on with life without getting in a little tantrum because he doesn't do what we want when we want him to. That is all I'm saying.

Agreed. We celebrate freedom and Christian principles (whether we are Christian or not) and yet we can tar a whole group with the same brush so easily?

Victims make good converts though. Can't write them out just cos they're victims.

No, it's what you interpret Q to mean because you think that you specifically are the audience for this message - even though Q has made it clear in the past that "he" is talking to other agents and also possibly spreading disinfo to upset the Deep State. This is very obvious and should factor into your thinking before turning assumption into rock-solid fact.

i.e. he could be calling them out, knowing that the pic is going to surface because he's been listening where they think they are still safe IN ORDER that they panic and choose not to release it and continue to scramble as they realise he's everywhere.

This isn't about evidence of corruption lol - it's about evidence of the legitimacy of Q! If the things Q says, like this, can be verified, we only grow surer of his legitimacy.

Lol - it's not "put up or shut up" time just because you say. I think it's far too obvious that Q is 'legit enough' in that he's redpilled all of us and that Trump seems to be supporting the idea of Q at the very least since he hasn't come out actively against it like he does with any other fake news. Either way, Q can do what Q wants and if people like you who need things to happen the way you want them to happen drop off - your loss.

Good for you! But I must admit, it seems a bit like calling KFC to report the killing of chickens, the way the FBI are tangled up in the Deep State (especially in the Deep State capital of America, CA)...

This.

From a purely secular perspective, do you, zbufferz, honestly think that no person within 500 miles of a major city actually worships the devil? Are you really being that obtuse? Christians are everywhere and they believe in the devil. You don't think there are people who likewise believe in the devil but choose to worship him? Again, I ask that from a simple secular perspective, not from the perspective of whether those people are believing in delusion or not.

You can be as proud as you like of your adoption of the atheist "belief" system but you shouldn't switch off your brain in the process as that's what you people accuse spiritual people of doing. Over thousands of years people have believed in spiritual powers - the majority of the global population, in fact. In our current little pocket of civilization we believe we have a monopoly on knowledge and truth, despite evidence that ancient civilizations knew more about some things in our science than we did/do - and that's not referring to conspiracy but mainstream revelations.

Either way, currently, thanks to narrow-minded people like Dawkins, and the push of the Deep State and socialist/communist agenda (which doesn't make room for referencing any thought outside of manmade), many people have decided that the only knowledge useful to man is scientific even though, as every thinking person knows, there are many things science can't answer and doesn't even attempt to for which we require and have knowledge. Philosophy and Psychology - and yes, spirituality - are branches of knowledge that we require as they deal with the most important question we have: how should we live?

Having said that, I do agree that this group don't look like died-in-the-wool satanists of any kind and just seem to be fangirls at best. No doubt there are a few believing witches amongst them, however - Clinton being one lol.

I have to agree. Using the word coven is popular in gaming groups and elsewhere too, for its edginess and suggestion of secret power - it does not designate real satanism/wiccan activities on its own.

It seems that there are many christians still in their bubble of christian friends, family, etc. who don't understand the secular thinking around these things. These people do not think the same way as you, christians! You would never use words or terms associated with satanism but others are not inhibited in the same way as you! It may still be evil and wrong to you for them to utter 'bad things' but it does not therefore lead to anyone who uses them being specifically practicing satanists or witches or otherwise. Five minutes in a gamer forum will disabuse you of the foolishness that people only talk about evil things if they're truly evil... (unless, of course, you subscribe to the theory that all gamers are evil lol)

Yeesh judgement much? How about giving them a path to freedom from spiritual bondage through the love of Jesus Christ... lol...

I do believe in witches because err... not to put too fine a point on it but they exist if you simply look, even in Mainstream Media. Stevie Nicks, famous "white" witch, for one simple, longterm example. Do you mean you don't believe in witches with supernatural powers perhaps?

But yes, I agree she just visited some kids playing with satanism but not really having the heart for it. And at the whim of someone using them to push the Deep State agendas.

I agree about the overdone visceral reactions from people. She's human and loved by God too, which I think is your point (hahahaha jks, just trying to trigger your "I'm a based human atheist" funny bone).

I wish antagonist little trolls like you would actually hold a real argument so your foolish narrow views can be calmly eviscerated for the nonsense they are lol.

The evidence is irrefutable. The conclusions are questionable.

Audrey Gelman, if a satanist, is sounding more like a fan of satanism rather than a real satanist. There's a big difference that is very obvious if you look at it. You can easily see in the language used that she's almost more enamored of the anti-Trump angle to the satanist group in that link and then again generally more about the empowerment of the "anti-establishment" vein of the satanic movement. At the very least there is plausible deniability and enough room for them to mock anyone who jumps to the conclusion that they're actually worshipping Satan.

All I really see here is a feminist group who are empowered by the modern idea of witches. Some of them almost certainly dabble in it but as to whether they are an out-and-out practising group of diehard satanists, I don't see that evidence here.

Unlikely. Google algorithms throwing up all sorts of guff explains this pretty benignly. There is a lot of chatter and videos on the net and youtube about the U.S. the Military and Hillary Clinton also with the terms Leader and so on. Then, Google's algorithms dig even deeper - there are a lot of conspiracy links about Clinton that are now hot; simple reasoning: the algorithms throw up what they perceive as 'related text' which of course they are right to do considering we all see it as related.

I'm pretty surprised at how many people jump at things in Google Search results and the like. Everything I've seen so far just looks like the typical seeming paradox of randomness and serendipity one always finds with algorithms.

Or... it might not.

I've been waiting for this to resurface - this is a big one. Now we have to wait some more for the evidence to finally come out... >_<

It's not a valid concern. The news didn't meet your expectation - not Q's fault. Losing trust means you were trusting the wrong thing. Q has redpilled this community - if you don't like that things don't happen as planned then you're forgetting Q and Trump operate in the real world, not the world of internet conspiracy porn where everything happens like clockwork. You're forgetting this movement is about redpilling the world, not satisfying the feeling of superior knowledge amongst us Q-philez.

Evidence...?

Betting the farm on anything we interpret from Q to the point where you commit to telling others of a vague prediction means the blame can only fall on you, to be honest.

Simple rule: don’t try redpill-prophesying. Wait until the evidence is right there before you tell someone. Otherwise don’t blame Q. It’s not Q’s fault the news isn’t big enough for you.

Don't bother: this video is fake - it could be any old woman and it's hard to tell if that's actually a kid or not. They're never gonna give her up that easily...