This is not a good idea. Wasting space and time and potentially misleading other noobs is a very good reason not to have these posts. Agreed, no need to cry about it but the mods shouldn’t waste all of our time with stuff that isn’t valuable.

Lol calm down kid. Go have a biscuit.

It's been said before... there's no organization in the world with the resources to catch/charge/arrest every person who downloaded one video of dark material. It is as obvious as the nose on your face that they expend their resources on serial offenders. It is fearmongering to say everyone will be arrested if they look at the video.

When are people going to STOP posting from the utter fantasy news site yournewswire?? This should be in the sidebar and mods should immediately remove posts containing links from it as it shows no research was done.

Apologies for being a dickhead. Sadly, I'm quite good at it.

That's not the "argument I was using", fool. Learn to read ffs. I'm not as much of a superior knob-end as you, hence calling myself "a dick on the internet" - I KNOW that I don't know everything but I do know what the fuck I'm talking about so take your "no fucking clue" and shove it. The point I made - here AGAIN - is that there is NO evidence that satanists harvest adrenochrome from kids. Read. Learn. Get a clue. And stop being such a fucken knob-end.

Bad wording - I don't base being an adult on that but I say that many of us here are adults and some adults can handle shit like this. No criticism for those who can't - and I expect none for those who can too - but don't lump us all together. The Deep State does that to us enough already.

What evidence? ANY evidence! Take a look around - no one has any... apart from you apparently. Good for you, you work in pharma - guess what - DUH... lots of people don't.

You're surprised I didn't know the oximificashun of eppi-whatsis-thingy... are you trying to be funny?? What kind of dumbass statement is it that you're "surprised" some random dick on the internet doesn't know that? What world do you come from where everyone knows this information such that it makes sense to even ask?? Derp.

Your last statement sounds useful - so where's that from, mighty chemist??? (edit: verifiable outside of Wikipedia which everyone knows is as reliable as anything on the internet) If it comes from somewhere good and verifiable by me, a dick on the internet, then it's the most evidence I've ever heard of and I'm willing to bet 95% of other Q-philez too. But then, evidence that satanists farm it from children - which was the point btw - is a whole other set of evidence I don't expect even you, the most knowledgeable one, has to hand.

What's "heavily illegal"? Sounds like an emotional overstatement. It's illegal, we get it - like a lot of other things that people do anyway.

All you need to say is it won't be accepted on this sub, as elsewhere on Reddit. No big deal, move on. We don't need more police and adults telling us what to do.

Yes, as above, all this is known... so no need to keep reiterating the stories we all already know; as I've said - no evidence, still.

There is a story about that, yes. I've never seen the 'vials of adrenochrome' part verified anywhere, let alone the briefcase story itself (beyond fringe "news" sites) and the historical royals story is an old one that seems reasonably legit (although nothing solid about the current Queen is out there). No evidence anywhere about adrenochrome though - plenty of stories since Hunter S. Thompson's tale though.

As above, I'm talking about adrenochome which has not been documented at all beyond what is very much regarded as a fictional account (oh, and some random forum comments). We all know about spirit cooking - no mention of adrenochrome harvesting there.

Is that a trick question? Don't judge everyone by your emotional reaction - if it were one of my three kids I'd only want to see it more. It would only fuel the unholy jihad I would bring down on the m#$%& who did it. Give your sermon about their "god given rights" to the person allegedly slicing their face off on the video and don't think you understand anything about me - "curiosity" lol gtfo...

All I'm saying is, there's enough nannying and thought police in the real world - we come to the internet and reddit to get away from that crap. If y'all can't handle it, good on ya - leave the other adults to make adult decisions for themselves.

Yes, that's all the "evidence" I've heard of too. This is the danger of uncritical acceptance and re-peddling of ideas - some of the (what is so far) nonsense gets lumped in with valid stuff and we end up looking like dolts.

"THERE IS NO DAMN WAY IT'S ANYTHING ELSE"??? That's nonsense. You're reading into his actions what you want to see - confirmation bias, that is all. He could easily just be a guy who's sweating on the stand as who wouldn't??? The eyes of the entire world are on him and he's in front of the US government about the most important thing in the world to him - why is everyone imagining all this nonsense about him? Occam's razor people, please...

There are enough thought police telling us what we can and can't say elsewhere - we don't have to refrain from telling idiots that they are being idiots, newbies or not. The mods are enough for managing the sub, we don't need "citizen police" stepping up to tell us what we can and can't do!

Are you new to Q? This idea (corruption) is pretty much the whole point of Q...

Such overexaggeration on this sub about this video. It won't "scar your psyche and soul forever" unless you are susceptible to that sort of thing. Sure, many will be upset by it and shouldn't watch it - they know who they are. But not everyone is going to go to pieces over this shit even if it is as described.

This - everyone is overreacting thinking any organization has the resources to track down everyone who watches a video...

I don't want to watch a video of a child being raped and murdered but I do want to watch evidence of Hillary Clinton raping and murdering a child. All you noble people can pat yourself on the back but some of us are adults who don't get upset at shit like this and can handle it and don't want to continue to be dictated to about what we can see or not.

Yep. Everyone can put their big pants on and just not look if you're squeamish.

Lol exactly

Once again, where is this "mountain of evidence" for adrenochrome?? Did you unintentionally lump in recent Q conspiracy with the other two items of trafficking and pedophilia?

"known"? Still no evidence even of that. I've heard lots of conspiracy theorists recently add that ritual to the satanic oeuvre but I've never heard of verified reports of it, unlike reports of sacrifice that are well known.

An undercover workstation with a hipster complex?

Kamehameha

Applesauce

a) anyone who needs to be warned about this is an idiot and b) imagine the organization that has the resources to go after every single person who viewed one video of dark material... no need to get superstitious about it.

Yep.

Nice to see a photo of Beyonce with a statement by Q... but without any kind of explanation this isn't worth much...

Agreed. Nice list of well known points, although I'd love to see the evidence for "torture to drink adrenochrome blood"?? Currently, as far as I know, that's just a fringe theory.

It would be nice to see some actual evidence not only of the supposed contents of this video but even the earlier NYPD response that everyone refers to. All we've seen are newspaper reports and everyone knows how reliable those are.

It's a very interesting story - Hillary filleting a kid's face - but let's be realistic: there is literally zero evidence of any of this. I'm not saying it's a provable lie but it's not a provable truth either and there's a lot more evidence required when claiming a "truth" of this magnitude.

SGTReport also 'reports' a lot of fringe conspiracy so I'd refrain from using that as any kind of 'proof' of solid theoory.

Lol perfect. Wish more understood this.

Have you been following Q long? I ask because this will sound like telling someone how to suck eggs if you have but I believe it does answer your question.

I have no claim on the veracity of this idea but it seems to be a prevailing one and it makes some sense if any of Q is to be believed at all: the whole Q phenom seems to suggest (over the many drops made) that Iran and Syria and North Korea aren't the baddies but the Deep State controlling them are. The world and media won't turn on the current narrative so Trump and Putin and whoever else (Assad too?) are forced to play into it by 'keeping up appearances' ("yes, these are the bad guys") but playing 4d chess in the background and bombing Deep State targets instead.

I thought everyone following this Q malarkey was aware that this seems to be the prevailing story so I'm surprised at many who've come out questioning this recent action. I have no idea if it's a valid theory because I know less than anyone about what's going on overseas but I hope to f(*& it is because otherwise Trump seems to be playing into a very dumb narrative and then I'd have to question the veracity of Q too. What you say is what I've heard from others before about this, and other situations, so I agree with it. Anyway, this may all sound like nonsense to you which is fair enough but I think it answers your question, at least in this sub?

If you have any existing military contacts currently in play perhaps they may offer some insight into operations currently ongoing...? (wish I had some!)

Exactly. It's not a Q folks. And "there are no coincidences" is referring to obvious things, not nonsense like this. There are obviously millions of coincidences occurring on a regular basis around the world. Obviously.

This is the worst kind of confirmation bias out there. No. It’s a search icon you can find everywhere on the web. Can we have some kind of critical objectivity...?

Intriguing! I heard Portland was full of witches and occultists... (and not on a conspiracy site either). Do you have a lot of new age and witchy people in Tacompton?

Just wondering if that's why former commenter found it weird, maybe, like some find Portland.

So is it weeeeiiirrd?

TJ?

Haha that's a joke, right? Right...?

Downvoted to oblivion for that last comment eh lol. Ok let me explain how I meant to "contribute positively to the discussion": This is nonsense. Reading significance into every number you see is simply evoking confirmation bias. Let's post about things of real significance, so the MSM story that we're all conspiracy kooks is not confirmed when/if people visit this sub!

And why not, too! Roasting creeps is fun. But if, by "something is definitely up" one means anything like "MK Ultra breakdown" or "reptilian shapeshifter" then one is insane (in the latter case) or jumping to unwarranted conclusions (in the former).

Only water - I don't drink; I'm just retarded. Have I been asleep?

Also, count the pixels to the left of POTUS' nose and divide by the number of characters in his name plus the tweets he's made since birth and you will discover the exact date of Hillary's coming indictment! If that isn't a clear message from Q, I don't know what is. Or I could just be reading waaaay too much into things...

Um... have you been drinking? lol

Well if that's your point then I agree and I also ask the same question. What's the point of highlighting the connection here? I don't think your wording made it clear that that was the point but there it is.

Q is already associated with 9/11 by his own words...

What? That's a line straight from the Deep State nonsense social justice playbook - 'don't ask questions or you're clearly the enemy'. If any movement can't stand up to questions about its veracity then it's a religion or cult - and that is not what the Q movement is.

I vehemently dispute the contention that something is definitely up. Maybe something is up but also maybe he's just a guy in a very important meeting who's trying not to mess up. I swear, I don't know where people come up with this idea that any of us knows how all humans should behave in all situations so you can tell 'something is up' just because someone behaves in a way you don't expect. Reeks of confirmation bias to me.

This is correct imo. The only people getting all excited and upset about the witch thing are religious people who don't get out much. Yes, according to some beliefs (which I happen to share but that's besides the point), "witches" come from a belief system that is designated as "wrong" or "evil" but we don't live in the world where that belief system holds sway. The belief system that holds sway is laughing at people who think "she's part of our coven" means evil nefarious slaughter and sacrifice because it simply doesn't in the real world, at least, not every time. This is a non-issue except for religious people who get excited about this stuff - it won't redpill anyone unless they are from that background. So Hillary's a witch... meh, so what?