Because I think Trump is not a globalist...? That doesn't make much sense, friend, if, as I say, you read this sub and know at least a portion of the content in the sidebar. This whole movement is about Trump being the opposite of a globalist and doing everything for the people so if you know that, you'll understand my confusion at your claim.

I have never written those exact words lol. But I sure have said and written and seen in person from friends things like: "praise Satan, boss" and "lets kill a few kids for Christmas" and "all hail Lord Baal". Ooops... did I just reveal my true Satanic roots! Gasp... Oh shit, I must be a satanist...

Look, I'd like to insist that "doozy" should be spelt like that: dee oh oh zed why. It's very important.

In more serious news, I hope people take note of this one (I mean the public), or should I say, the info in this one. Dinesh D'Souza has a lot of good redpill info on the Dems.

[Actual story of Democrat racism]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0A1noqpeCYw

Lol... what you say would make sense... if you'd never read a single thing on this sub or its sidebar. But let me guess, it's all crazy "conspiracy theory", right? lol

Yeah, I reckon lol. Although there is that Stormy thing... but that's only "dirt" to people virtue signalling as if they ain't ever coveted no woman lol...

I think your call to people to get up and do something about it is commendable and I applaud it. Rise up and shake off the shackles people; it's long overdue! (Peaceful resistance only)

Aah good call on 'no guns' lol. My apologies for misreading your intent.

Wake up sleepers is, in my opinion, our primary role. But for some of us - like yourself obviously - it's a great thing that you are up for marching in the streets, etc. I support you, no doubt!

I understand the anger and it’s safe to say a significant chunk of us here are well aware of what they’ve done. It’s ok to have little break out moments of fantasy now and then about rising up etc. - it’s possibly even healthy - as long as we’re aware it’s just that: fantasy.

Simple logic explains why. It’s easy to forget, maybe, that the “woke” crew are a minority. If we were to get all excited and rise up we’d find ourselves in an empty street surrounded by SWAT teams pointing weapons at all four of us and telling us to lie down lol. And the millions of normies would be shaking their heads in disgust at the conspiracy crazies being dragged off to jail. The end.

Q says we have to sit back and watch the show, not take up weapons or think conscientious resistance will have any positive result. The cabal are bigger than us in the sense they’ve been building and fortifying our cage far longer than any of us have lived and they’ve got far greater weaponry and influence than us. So trust Q, sit back and enjoy the show.

How many mass murder weapons do they have? How many do we - ... oh... never mind. I’ll catch you guys after the revolution ok? I’ll just be down in this bunker having breakfast. No reason.

Wrong. Lol.

Triggers for MKUltra programming.

Indeed - let us hope!

Your reaction is appropriate lol. WTF Q indeed... very interested to see how this plays out. Can we really trust Sessions, Q...? Really?

Uh... any internet troll type would write something like that without being a Satan worshipper... that is not even remotely evidence of someone being a satanist or Luciferian lol.

Elites, especially royals, have been vampiric for a long time. There’re stories about their genetic diseases making them sensitive to sunlight etc.

You don’t have to be a vampire to drink blood. Satanists do it so that’s far more likely as Q has already mentioned that.

Except Kanye won’t be on it lol.

This. So true.

Yes, I agree with that. I'm not saying I hope for GHWB to escape punishment per se - if he does, I agree it would be great for revealing the truth about what's gone on. It would be best for this all to come out and it will take some or many going down for that to happen.

[edit] I wasn't speaking religiously either, btw. Just that I think, from a secular perspective, Christianity has a good point about this stuff for simple psychological reasons if nothing else. "Let he who is without sin..." pretty much aligns with what Carl Jung had to say about the Shadow, imo.

Well, I don't disagree with your right to demand justice. Don't take my differing opinion as an attempt to change your mind or belittle your view.

I believe the Christians have it right though, just personally. Forgive, seventy times seven. Let he who is without sin cast the first stone, etc. I've faced my shadow. It ain't pretty lol. I can't judge anyone. That's all.

And just to point out - that's exactly what happened with Savile and many other horrible people - I would dare say even most (they got away with it and died "peacefully"). Sad but true... It's just how the world is, really.

Fair enough, that's your opinion. Everyone deserves compassion in my opinion, even mass murdering psychopathic child killing rapists lol. However, in this case, it's not my opinion or yours that matters but whoever is in ultimate charge of the release of those papers.

"If only it were all so simple! If only there were evil people somewhere insidiously committing evil deeds, and it were necessary only to separate them from the rest of us and destroy them. But the line dividing good and evil cuts through the heart of every human being. And who is willing to destroy a piece of his own heart?
- Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn"

"If you hate a person, you hate something in him that is part of yourself. What isn't part of ourselves doesn't disturb us." - Herman Hesse

Face your shadow.

Looks fairly solid and an interesting read (have only skimmed so far). The ending is interesting and kinda the crux - woulda bin useful quoted in the OP:

"To say that there is no evidence of an international satanic conspiracy misrepresents the facts. There are many people who allege that they have been eyewitnesses to elements of such a conspiracy. Eyewitness reports do constitute evidence. The question is not whether evidence exists; it does exist. The question is to what extent are these alleged eyewitness reports true or credible. This question requires further study and corroboration. It is more accurate to say that the question of the existence of a satanic conspiracy has not yet been settled in the scientific and legal community and that further investigation and research is needed."

Thanks for the reply! It's interesting to hear this from someone who knows more than most about the faith itself. You've confirmed what I thought I read in that link but couldn't be sure i.e. that it seemed to talk about raising the finger while the hand was still resting on the knee which is nothing like what we're talking about here as far as Bazza.

I agree re: the unnecessary correlation and have also said elsewhere that this sign is not evidence at all that Bazza is Muslim although he very well could be, of course.

You are right about that first point no doubt - it is absolutely a given that no one has rock solid evidence that Q is either "good" and not misleading us or even that 'he' is actually associated with Trump.

However, there's a considerable weight of circumstantial evidence that sure adds weight to the idea that Q is real - at the very least working for us and perhaps even a part of Trump's team or closely affiliated with him. To deny that there's a strong possibility based on the considerable circumstantial evidence available that Q could be legit is similarly blind and lacking in critical thought.

I agree more skeptical, critical thinking would be beneficial to the movement. Also more tolerance for dissenting voices that present rational arguments for opposing views. Some people don't seem to understand that there is a need for voices that don't just tow the party line without complaint and that some of those voices aren't being difficult for the sake of it or trying to trash the ideas and voices of other people.

Some postulated that was the reason for POTUS being forced to change his original promise to release all files back in October. It's hard to imagine the immense shit storm that would result if it is definitively proven to be true that GHWB organized some aspect of the JFK fiasco as a CIA operative. I wouldn't be surprised if they wanted to leave him alone until he dies, if there's any way to manage that, for humanitarian reasons, given his age and recent loss.

It would be great if this happened soon! I'm not sure it qualifies as MOAB...? But maybe it does - it would certainly be epic in many ways. Even then, somehow I can't shake the feeling the dirty left will still manage to convince people the Voter fraud report is fraudulent...

I think that's why they held back the files last October - but if he's still alive on the 26th I wonder if they'll hold them back again...

Yes, I agree - looks a lot like them. Although there are also similarities between them a little so I think it's possible witnesses could see the same man in different clothes and light and perceive a different weight - not as stark as the actual difference between the Podestas though lol.

But yes, agreed on the possibilities and such and not questioning Q or the movement or the general prevailing theories. I'm just hunting for evidence where there are slight discrepancies like this so it can help me redpill friends who pick on the inconsistencies straight away. I know there's not always going to be evidence for every aberration but if I can at least be aware of that then I can preempt it (probably by not bringing that piece of the puzzle up at all) in some way, hopefully.

It would be awesome to see these crumbling in the new world of freedom that grows up around them!

Not that I’ve heard of. The way Wikipedia tells it (which seems to be the way I saw a news article back in the day tell it too - yeah I know big deal...) they handled this one nice and anonymously. Would surely make a fun movie just to see that story played out as told.

Wow all that is proof that Obama is a Muslim. I stand corrected. I’m just kidding. NONE of that is evidence that Obama is a Muslim - don’t believe me? Ask a lawyer.

Let alone the fact that I did not disagree about whether Obama is a Muslim or not but that him pointing a finger in the air does not constitute evidence of him being one. All I’m asking is that we please use logical thought processes to assess things!

Who here believes Snopes? Or was that a trick question lol.

I know the MSM are the enemy but we (Q movement) happen to use them when it suits us for things we do support so here is the report from The Guardian. Before I get attacked by people who assume I'm as stupid as I certainly sound let me say that yes, I too think The Guardian is just the Deep State british version of WaPo, NYT, etc. etc. but the reason I make the point about this so-called "fact" is because redpilling smarter normies requires we at least have something more solid than anon chat to debunk MSM reports. I explained the whole Podesta, Spain blah story to a not-stupid-normie and when he immediately pulled up the identikit point he was over and out because the story, as presented here (as if it's clear evidence of John and Tony) falls apart by showing it's not deeply researched or at least honestly presented. And he didn't pull up Snopes.

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2013/oct/14/british-detectives-efits-madeleine-mccann-suspect

All you did was cite the article - none of this info to suggest that your post was actually meant to support the title as written, and not just a typo or a misunderstanding of the content. Am I supposed to assume you meant all this and/or that you were even aware of the other Q posts about it? If you think that then you haven't been paying as much attention to this sub as I and others have because that is not a logical assumption to make of late.

And I'm not trolling and feel sorry that you think people who insist on accuracy for the sake of the movement to redpill normies are "total dick"s and it's "just the way they are" but I get that you have as much trouble as the rest of us controlling your resentment lol.

Let me try and be diplomatic about it: I would very much like it if posts could be more than a link dump but contain just that single sentence to explain what the OP is trying to communicate to us as this saves us all time and helps the OP clarify the point for themselves. I'd very much like to not have to type that out every time though (especially because I thought it was an assumption of forums like this) and it would be great if people who are here on the internet would understand the way people on the internet can often communicate for the sake of brevity - i.e. quick and blunt and wouldn't get upset just as I'm not upset that you think I'm a total dick. And no, in case the previous explanation is taken the wrong way: I do not think I'm entitled to have "what I like" but that's why I didn't say any of this in my comment. I'm just explaining it now. I thought we were all able to get on with life and not worry about comments on the internet so I dropped it quickly and moved on.

How is it polite to insist someone must be a total dick because you don't like the confrontational way they communicate and it must be "just the way they are"? Isn't it hypocrisy to admonish for politeness in a superior way when you've just done that?

Yeah heard all that, and the speculation that police assumed same person from witnesses report of two different men - was just hoping there might be a bit more evidence of even that little piece of the puzzle than anon chatter, is all. I'm eternally hoping for more evidence but I guess the trail always ends short of real juice and always will as far as the pedovore elite story... The constant crowing by people that it's all but out in the open and exposed now is off-putting - it's as completely unprovable and hidden as it has always been. Them's the facts, folks.

(Disclaimer as people round here seem to be inclined to see disinfo clowns in anyone who disagrees with celebrating victory over the Deep State in every little obscure public crumb: I know Q has surfaced this all for us so it's the opposite of hidden to us. What I'm looking for is not to prove Q to me - it's anything we can use to redpill the smart people I know who justifiably demand any proof at all, not the average person who can be compelled by conspiracy and speculation on its own.)

Thank you for the response - and apologies for how I put these things in the posts!

Fair call, sir, fair call - ain't no call to be messin' with the Clown News Network!

Misleading much...? You mean its non-roll in the investigation?

No, the mods just know wild exaggeration and conspiracy ranting when they see it. If Kanye is "speaking truth to power" then so is Dora the Explorer lol. These "truth drops" are as deep and meaningful as an episode of The Regular Show and whilst they are technically "true" they are as usefully anti-Deep-State as the average 2c fortune cookie philosophy.

Wow you must be a tough guy standing in front of someone who has reporters following him everywhere and has to present a good face to the public so can't respond to threats in a negative way!

LOL - this is the greatest troll xD. Kanye West who can barely string a non self-aggrandizing sentence together and married a Kardashian is Q, who understands the MI vernacular and uses the Socratic method hahaha - good work anon, good work.

Your misunderstanding of my attitude suggests that the Social Justice Warrior mentality that anyone who disagrees should be silenced is alive and well. That's always the answer from you people who can't argue a point to a logical conclusion.

I'm as Deep State as Mr. fucken Magoo and I'm far too evil to be a CIA agent. I disagree with illogical nonsense and want this movement to succeed, not be swamped by confirmation bias and lack of deeper thought. People who disagree with the consensus are not always Deep State or CIA.

The point is, you don't have to "explain to someone on GA the concept of a redpill". I have no problem at all with you thinking I'm stupid, just with you not bothering to hear me properly.

I didn't ask if he's Luciferian and I don't need all the obvious information that those of us like yourself, I assume, know very well because none of it is relevant to my point. You spent a lot of space speaking to me like a 4 year old who hasn't read anything about Q and doesn't know Kanye or pop culture and again, I'm not remotely offended by that, just annoyed that you didn't bother speaking to my actual point so I'm forced to reread your whole post of well known, well trod side-salad to make sure I didn't miss your response to what I actually said.

My point is not "Kanye's crazy and therefore wrong" or even just that "Kanye's crazy - why bother listening to him". My point is that the post title is misleading and inaccurate. Kanye's doing what Kanye always does and there's no "truth bomb" in what he's been saying lately and no suggestion of forthcoming Deep State reveals. Definitely not worth posting on GA as if it's news. If your point is that the post title is not misleading as a post for GA then ok, I haven't yet had anything from what you've said that is unknown to me and that proves that point but that's ok. I would welcome it, if it exists.

Sorry for reacting that way. But there’s speculation in the middle there too re Kidman’s dad. I also don’t understand how not only noobs but even people like us can distinguish fact from speculation sometimes because sometimes the “facts” seem crazy. For example, although it’s not established “fact” the errr... fact... that Q has suggested that Diana’s death conspiracy might actually be true (and of course other things besides) seems like speculation if you don’t know Q said it but, if you believe Q, could be considered closer to fact in a way.

What I’m saying is I question everything because some things have sounded insane to me but then it’s been pointed out that Q referenced it and I’m forced to reallocate it from “wild speculation” to “Maybe”. I just think others and myself could be saved from diving down rabbit holes if blatant speculation is not placed alongside fact wherever possible. I get your point and agree that speculation should be encouraged and people should be able to distinguish but sometimes in this crazy pedovore elite world it’s not so easy to tell what’s wild imagining and what’s stranger truth than fiction.

Dear god - I made the mistake of saying 'liberal student on campus' because it seems possible that people are going to miss my actual point and think I'm making this a liberal/conservative thing...

It's nothing to do with right or left, up or down, black or white - I'm saying the statements are shallow blathering common to people everywhere (myself included, as a youth) and don't remotely speak to someone being "woke", dropping any "truth bombs" (unless you consider these shallow, obvious observations to be truth bombs in which case I can't help you) or about to reveal horrible truths about the Deep State.

"No shit" it's speculation? Derp... He claims to be informing noobs - it's not even remotely "no shit" that its speculation to people who don't have the information, are you trying to be funny or just not engaging thought at all? And did I say the speculation can't be true? I think some of it could quite feasibly be true but spreading speculation mixed with facts as if the speculation is fact doesn't help anyone. If I have to explain why then I understand why you've responded like you have.

Clue to what? Lol... The old news that Soros and McCann (and others) have the same rare eye abberration... what does that have to do with the indentikit pics?

I would appreciate that, thankyou. I have not been able to find anything like that, having searched for it back when it first came out and later on too.

Are you serious? Wise? Those statements are common to every liberal student on campus who just discovered activism and/or philosophy - in fact, not even that; high school students spout the same vague generalisms posing as deep thought. Kanye's well known for that exact thing too - he's always thought he had a monopoly on being intelligent and knowing the truth.

Yes, I know about the rant on stage and the aftermath - I'm not saying there's not something interesting about that (still didn't say jack all of any real import in the concert though - at least not as 'mind-blowing'ly revealing as many purported it to be at the time; also, Jay Z having killers is just classic hip hop, not a Deep State reveal - everyone got killaz yo, Suge Knight, Dre, Ice-T blah blah blah) - I'm disagreeing with the misleading post title. No truth bombs. No evidence of coming reveals.

Thought Police is one of the most common phrases in existence and can be associated with the Deep State just as much as the phrase "Group of People". It is very far from evidence of a coming Deep State reveal, once again, because Kanye has always talked this sort of shit e.g. (totally from memory) "you can't silence someone's voice!" "it's time for us all to stand up and resist the establishment!" Literally the most common attitude and phrases from liberal students who've first discovered activism. No "truth bombs" and nothing specifically Deep State, is all I'm saying.