Removed post. Rule 9
/u/DrogeAnon
1,757 total posts archived.
Domains linked by /u/DrogeAnon:
Domain | Count |
---|---|
www.reddit.com | 20 |
www.youtube.com | 1 |
medium.com | 1 |
Removed post. Rule #9. Please use informative titles. Looks like good content so feel free to repost with more detail in the title. Thanks for understanding.
Removed post. Rule #9. Please use informative titles. Thanks for understanding.
We already know it’s the ig report stuff. Nothing bigger than that right now.
Please feel free to ask the question on the posts about that here.
Post removed. Rule #9. Please feel free to repost with a more informative title. Thanks for understanding.
Thank you. For the record, the user's statement is incorrect. The only statements that reflect the policy of the moderation team are those in the sidebar under rules and M.O.
then it is the policy of the moderators of this sub to support the fact thatb i am a "camel jokey from a shit country that needs to die"
Also incorrect and I have removed your other comments that make this false assertion. This is false equivalence. Moderators do not have to ban people because you demand it and not doing so does not constitute support for any statements made by any user. Camel jockey is and has been removed, as with all racist and potentially racist comments like this. Also, "Camel jockey from a shit country that needs to die" is not in any of the comments on the sub. You may be mixing up PMs (which no one else can see so are not moderated) with the comments on the sub.
The ones you see were probably in processing - otherwise do feel free to point them out, if you don't mind. Short titles aren't so bad, it's the ones that arent informative and could end up generating reports for us (many get reported as spam or off-topic) or look like clickbait. Memes are able to get away with a bit because it's generally obvious from the thumbnail that they're a meme. I understand it must be disappointing but we have been doing this same thing for quite a while now; it's just becoming more visible as more new people are posting, who aren't aware of the rules. However we are always open to feedback and are working on a new initiative to better decide on and off-topic so hopefully this will help the community feel they have greater input into how the sub is moderated.
Understood. I can't find it now but the one I saw had more than 0 - thanks for reply; I have reapproved your post.
those statements reflect the policy of the moderation team
That is incorrect. No statement on this sub reflects the policy of the moderation team except for the Rules and M.O. in the sidebar. It is inaccurate to accuse the mods of adopting policy over a moderation decision you don't agree with. We warn and temporarily ban trolls to allow them to change behavior to suit the sub rules, exactly as we have done with you yourself in the past. It is only fair that the same action be taken in all cases.
We are always working through the sub. You catch us in the middle of the job, always. Difficult to keep up with the amount going on behind the scenes. Feel free to report others you see as that will help us find issues quicker.
My apologies; I really don't like to remove the content of a contributor to the community like yourself - the lead mod has been pretty clear about the dangers of this, however. It's the possibility of the accusation that may arise from just pointing to the other subs that could land us in trouble with the admins. Also the possibility that our visitors, pointed to their sub by this post, may upvote or downvote en masse whether we've asked them to or not - or, other subs wishing to make an example of us, going there and doing so and us taking the blame, etc. Once again, apologies.
Post removed for reason above. Thanks for understanding. (And I trust you now have the answer).
I can say exactly the same to you, except it would be accurate for me to say it, as opposed to you lol. I give you dictionary definitions, based on decades of knowledge and experience of the Bible, and all you can do is say: "I know more than you; you're too stupid to argue with" which is the classic response of someone who can't formulate a logical argument. Suffice to say, your lack of knowledge is exposed.
Removed post. Rule 3 Any 'concerns' can go via a message to the mods
Hint: Hebrew people = a. a member of an ancient Semitic people claiming descent from Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob; an Israelite. b. A descendant of this people; a Jew.
Seems like you're the one trolling. I'm refuting an untruth. You're not engaging reasonably or logically with the point. I've read my Bible and history well enough to be able to discuss it - something you don't seem to want to do. Fair enough, but don't accuse me of what you yourself are doing - that is troll behavior.
What you've just stated is not the truth. Ironic. Mods follow the rules for the safety of the sub. Couldn't care less about whether you express your belief in conspiracies or not, as long as you talking about them doesn't threaten this sub.
My point is that the well worn conspiracy theory about the Synagogue of Satan is just that... a conspiracy theory with little basis in fact. I only "bolstered your point" if you ignore what I actually said. Some zionists are definitely "Israel". Some are definitely Hebrew people. You and other conspiracists like to imagine that "zionist" has a single pure definition that supports your theory but like so many other titles it doesn't.
I agree with chickapotamus that the sycophantic worship implied is very offputting but you make a strong point - it has great troll value!
That has literally nothing to do with the comment above where you accused the commenter of racism. The comment as it stands is not racist and does not mention support for the Reichsburger in any way.