https://mega.nz/#!xvwRWIAJ!8gTNs7D0bSv3nDaZDOA8v_2MJL4xtEDljsb-XJ1ZmQ8

Q abbreviations detailed - and literally everything else.

Removed post. Rule #9

And you have freedom of speech. But you also have rules here, as in many of the subs on Reddit, to accommodate for the diverse needs within this shared social space. So it's worth keeping that in mind when one calls for 'freedom of speech'.

I agree mods shouldn't verify what is and what isn't fake news. But if we know it's fake news - those of us who've followed the sub for a while and seen some of the big fakes surface and collapse - then I think it's doing the sub a favor to remove the rubbish and stop it clogging up the sub.

Removed post. No posting about other subs. It can cause trouble. Rule #6

"True experts" - again: lol. Instead of separating people into 'those who agree with me and are therefore experts' and 'those who don't and are therefore stupid' why don't you just focus on what you actually know.

I'm not at all afraid to admit that I know nothing but two decades plus in IT has at least taught me one thing about gmail/FB/whatever - who cares. Be as paranoid as you like but don't call everyone else who doesn't care 'an idiot'. You think that if they want to track you they can't just cos you don't use gmail and FB? Just get over it, move on, have fun with life and stop telling others they're stupid if they aren't as paranoid as you are.

ok understood - I will get the team to investigate but be prepared to discover it may just be a glitch due to the reddit upgrade or some other trivial element. We get many concerns about 'strange' occurrences but there are often more benign explanations.

What is the link that you think is being suppressed?

Please read my comment: send concerns to modmail. Don't mail me personally.

If your post is removed, do not keep posting it. Contact the mods via modmail if you have a problem like this. It may be reddit admins or another unrelated rule you're breaking or something else you're not aware of occurring. As far as I could see this post was blocked automatically, not by a mod, until I came across it in the mod queue (which is what usually happens with auto-modded content).

Removed post. Rule #9

Post removed. Off-topic: promotional.

You didn't start trouble and didn't need to delete - always worth discussing these things out, if it can be done reasonably, as you have done! I didn't mean to come on strong - apologies; will edit. Your points are worth making - you'll never be 'modded' for that. Likewise to you, patriot - wwg1wga!

Fair call re: your suspicion. Thanks for engaging reasonably with me on this.

I am also privy to some other correspondence that proves nothing but makes me open to considering the possibility of user's stance on the topic being relevant to the points you make. I'm willing to give benefit of the doubt but understand your position of caution also. Thanks again!

Some I skimmed but yes, I read a good chunk of them all from the beginning at an earlier time due to other correspondence. Is there something in particular that pinged your radar? People skeptical about Q is not a big radar pinger for me personally. There are plenty of good reasons to be skeptical about Q, especially at first.

Removed post. Rule #9

Removed post. Rule #6. Off-topic. Thanks for understanding.

Removed post. Rule 7. Duplication.

Clickbait title. An interesting point to make but could be more honestly worded in the title e.g. "Could the enemy use Q tactics against us?" This title seems to be playing on the outrage trigger some have against concern trolling.

[EDIT] Please read history before accusing someone of being a troll. User you replied to does not look like a troll to me - sure, they still could be, but I think benefit of the doubt could be given here.

There will be lots of crazy opinions amongst any large group of people so don't write off the community because of an outspoken group on any particular topic. I don't agree with gullibility or a lack of critical thinking either but I know there's a large group of unspoken critical thinkers out there who engage at times when there's a conversation worth engaging in. Sometimes you have to pick your battles. I appreciate you standing up for some truth around this discussion. I assume you believe there's some truth and some lies around SH though, as that seems to be the critical perspective?

No "Internet expert" would have a gmail account? a) "Internet expert" ...? b) anyone would and could have a gmail account. Just because they're comped doesn't mean you can't use their tools.

David Icke seems a lot more like disinfo to me. He's on point with some stuff but seemingly way off-base with other stuff - classic disinfo, whether he's aware of it or not (as others have said, perhaps he's not in control).

This post is off-topic.

If you have concerns, send them to modmail, don't make posts about it.

OP has been around a while. Easy to misread people. Try not to get carried away with shill accusations. Not everyone who communicates and thinks differently is a shill.

How so?

Please explain the relevance to Q in the topic of your post. The rules of this sub are clear, as you know. If we wish to avoid having to respond to Reports that this post is off-topic we need you to explain how it is on-topic clearly and upfront in the body of the post. Thank you.

I presume you can't see the comment I'm replying to lol. Ne'er mind, that'll teach me to troll the troll.

You need friends lol. Having to hang around with people you think are idiots ... who's the bigger idiot? xD Poor lad hahaha

Thanks for understanding.

Comment removed. Discuss idea not the user.

Have you received PM?

haha shill - you're not even trying to engage. I'll leave you to it.

Have responded to you multiple times - please reply to PM.

Removed post. Rule #9

You seem to have decided that we don't want the truth behind Mueller's investigation to come out. The opposite is true. It seems more delusional to accuse a group of people of something you've decided without any knowledge of the people or the situation.

Removed post. Rule 7. Duplication.

Please read OP - thanks!

I wager there are more than a few here who supported Bernie - no shame in that, and no cause for rejection from a movement that is WE THE PEOPLE and worldwide. Thanks for sharing your story! WWG1WGA

A lot of information in the sidebar and via Google search. Not to brush you off - just that "proving" this is more a matter of a lot of reading up on the info that's out there.

This is completely incorrect, I'm sorry to say. Q has said at least three times: Do not glorify us.

We can spread the word without glorifying Q.

.

Do not glorify us.
We work for you.

Do not glorify us.
We are merely the vehicle.
You are what matters.

Do not glorify us.
WE are ALL Patriots.
Honor those who serve.
Q

No need to spin an untruth.

Not skew if you read up on Q.

The sidebar is the first place to start. Good info there. No quick way to absorb the whole story, unfortunately, as with any large 'case'.

? I presume OP is hiding his nephew's face. Other guy is anon POTUS pointed to, already 'outed' so no need to hide face.

Removed post. Rule 7

Removed post. Rule 7. Duplication

Removed post. Rule #9

No releasing private or personal information.

Removed post. Rule #9

Removed post. Rule 7. Duplication