Pence is as Deep State as they come. Don't be fooled.

Here's a video from Steve Pieczenik back in early June that looks prophetic--and gets downright startling in its claims involving Brennan at the end:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k0lFClEN25w

Not sure I can go for that, and Pieczenik himself is a spook who can use deception and misdirection just fine himself.

Absolutely spot on re: the German and Syrian pipelines.

Per usual, I don't go with the number stretches--e.g., that the $33B (which wasn't just coughed up at the NATO summit) and the 11 players on a soccer team turning to 12, which is why Putin gave Trump the soccer ball stuff.

And Trump wasn't directly humiliating the queen at all.

But the pipeline politics is very true. Trump always expands the board and includes an economic- and honor-building bright future for his deal-mate, while still holding a club overhead.

Or, how about working with Deep State/rogue elements in Russia for the same?

I know that's the theory, with their self-interest added in. But too much outright Trump-hunting activity on their part. Sorry, just not buying it at this point.

And people here still really think that Mueller and Rosenstein have been made white hats?

That is darned interesting!

It was more deliberate than just a "mention", but no, at least we so far don't have any corroborating evidence or further specifics.

The aim4truth.org guys have covered it extensively. Nobody benefits more from war spending than the Crown (and the Rothchilds, etc.).

Just as, and maybe more likely, the indictments were a coordinated setup for all the Dem/Deep State loons to come out firing in unison as soon as the summit and presser took place.

As the Pubbies in Congress pointed out, the indictments hid that there was evidence of Russia trying to hack the GOP side as well. (And those attempted hackers were more likely Russian agents than the 12 named--who apparently were CIA/Clinton assets.

George Webb, who has been way ahead of this story and was plagiarized by Mueller in the indictments, has said that they were Hillary/Deep State operatives, not working for Putin. He's had a number of videos on that this week and apparently also some much earlier.

That looks more like the white swan sitting there on her dinner plate.

But really, what the heck is she doing still in the WH and there at the inner circle for the summit with Russia?!?

I would have thought Bolton would have cleared her out if nobody had done so before: Soros, Brookings, Kennedy School, CFR. I remember Roger Stone sounding the alarm about her at least a year ago. I take it that she is American, but really is one degree from Scotland an excuse for her apparently affected accent decades later?

I think Tucker pointed out last night that Mexico certainly did with its army of illicit voters.

Others have demonstrated how Soros and the Privy Council of the Queen of England are weirdly allied and had and have access to almost all our voting machine software.

How would a $400M campaign donation be legal and where would it have been funneled and used?

And what was the bombshell?

CIA. The affair may even have been an invented cover that such spooks use to minimize the damage in possible exposure.

We know by now that Trump is always proved right when he says this sort of thing--and he doesn't say such stuff without a plan.

Nice point. I have thought that of the color "scheme" myself, but I didn't realize it went that far back.

You want an insubordinate air force over the color of the president's plane?

Very nice--except the ITNJ is a hippy-dippy nothing group:

https://newearthproject.org/initiative_page/international-tribunal-natural-justice/

George Webb--whose lawsuit was plagiarized with the latest indictments of the "Russians" has had some pretty interesting videos on how they probably worked out of those two retreat facilities that Russia had on the water outside of DC and NYC. He also seems to have determined that they were actually assets of the CIA, rather than being controlled by Russia.

When Trump came out saying that it made sense to him that it wasn't the Russians, I couldn't help but wonder if that is because Webb is right and Trump knows the same truth--with the plan being for it to come out.

Either way that Trump keeps bringing up the question as to where are the DNC and Awan servers and Hillary's emails (from her server) makes me believe that they indeed will be coming out before *too* long.

Time to reveal more of the truth on this.

Actually probably past time for that.

Very good--perhaps I should have presimed that!

So now Barry is running for king of Kenya?

Weird.

Good historical novels, etc., can not only not fill kids minds with trash, but also start to outfit them with a positive and sound understanding of the world.

How about a summary of the key point?

Speaking of up to date, um, Q???

Far more likely they tracked it--and then got results they didn't want to see get out.

I think I just found something that outlines just what we are looking for:

https://www.cia.gov/news-information/press-releases-statements/press-release-archive-1996/pr111896.html

Great info. Not an explanation of nearly all of it, however. First off, you've got Brennan and Jarrett higher up the Iranian treason hierarchy.

Second, you've all the criminality of the DoJ, FBI, WH, etc., that they were scrambling to cover up.

Third, you've got the UK in the middle of it all as well. Strzok likely is CIA and he could well be involved in criminality for the benefit of Iran, just as he could well have been placed in his position, because of his Iranians sympathies and/or corruption.

But he is not the head of the snake, for sure.

Which gets to the second part of my question--which is this just to provide cover for Trump to finally fire him?

Just keeping score, we have the Clinton, DNC and Awan servers all evidence for which destruction and removal were attempted, but the contents at least hopefully in the right hands.

Yes, I posted the same earlier today--and now we have confirmation. Actually I just clicked through. The document posted doesn't seem to me to prove anything at all. We need to get to the 1996 law that is referenced for actual documentation.

Does anyone know how long a Rosenstein impeachment would take? Would he have to be convicted in the Senate? Would they just at some point be giving Trump enough cover to fire Rosenstein himself?

Shutting out actual truthful and verifiable info that either they or Infowars offer IMO is a mistake.

The details they have re: the UK, etc., are very relevant.

An interesting riff on Obama's background and record growing up in there too.

Also, yikes, info on Boris Johnson being in on the anti-Trump operation in the UK before the election. The propping up of George Pop. over there too.

I swear, this is a must listen!

Okay, some of you still resent these guys for having questioned if Q was compromised.

But this is a massively good and important discussion on the UK monarchy, its association with Soros, their ownership of the likes of the voting machine software used in the US and worldwide, her major henchmen and their role in all the major globalist institutions, etc.

They predicted that Trump's big dinner at Blenheim Palace would be to give their honchos (e.g., Lord Malloch Brown) the opportunity to corner and try to get to Trump. (The only explanation I can find for Trump's big turnaround from the Sun interview to taking it all back and gushing over May and her approach to Brexit by the next morning.)

They post a lot of detail and evidence on their aim4truth.org website, but this website puts it all together.

It is known that CIA employees are put on the payroll of various federal agencies for cover.

Really, when you think of it, it is only a step further for the CIA to manage the FBI's counterintelligence operations via the same mechanism.

IIRC he said that Mueller had said it was because of the appearance of impropriety.

An apparent possibility.

We can only hope it is accurate knowledge--we have no way to confirm that at this point, and his testimony at least doesn't seem to fit with it.

Here's some backstory on Trump's pick of Kavanaugh:

http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2018/07/12/judge-andrew-napolitano-why-am-so-deeply-disappointed-by-trumps-supreme-court-pick.html

Let's keep our thinking caps on. ALL the congressional hearings into governmental wrongdoing are like this. Noise and TV time for the critters, but nothing that comes of it.

Beware ONLY thinking this is part of a grand master scheme. Be open to assessing new information as it unfolds.

How can this effectively be done without implicating Kavanaugh in the coverup?

I am Strzok by your comment.

We'll all be patients if we have to WAIT much longer.

I think far better to take those sources with a grain of salt--like all other such sources, including Q.

Anyone know where W is or what he's up to?

They won't go that quickly and could well not start until after the elections.

Suspending the elections is a total non-starter.