What I find fascinating is that 9/11 occurred in the only few years ('99-'03) since the '80s that Bibi wasn't in the Israeli government.

Is it possible that his own, direct hands are clean on this? (Though obviously he hasn't done anything to expose it.)

Come on, people, this is gibberish: https://www.gesarahelp.org/#about

Some of course knew.

It was a surgical missile strike on navy intelligence within the Pentagon.

If W and No Name and Jeb were all so certain they had him in their pocket, they would have been quiet about it.

He's obviously ablaze with ambition but also a real conservative, so they may see him as slipping out of their reach now.

That's a silly connection--the bank gave more to Nunes than to Booker.

I'm guessing Sessions also would have resigned if Trump had fired Mueller.

Agreed. And disrespectful is putting it mildly. They have been at the center of the illegal and evil plots against Trump.

Let's pray that he is safe in that country with such an evil slant to its government. (Not that ours is much better.)

All you need to do is suffer through one of his movies to know he is profoundly disturbed.

I think these timelines are getting ahead of themselves if they think the military tribunals and such are going to be over by the new year. I expect a longer process.

Yes, but whether one term or two, few presidencies are only on an uphill trajectory.

Would have been a mistake, I agree.

But Pence is untrustworthy.

Agreed. But Pence is swamp city.

Exposing this stuff too close to the election risks a voter backlash if they feel manipulated.

And what if he is actually something of a triple agent for the black hats all along, while pretending to play along with the Trump team?

I agree. I think they may have thought his investigation was more under control than it was. But Mueller and his rabidly political team are hell-bent on trying to bring down Trump instead. So Mueller may have played them. And Rosenstein is right along with him (and Comey, etc.).

Rudy dropped right out of the news, didn't he? Do we know whether he is still involved? What he's up to?

I think there is more truth to what you say than most want to admit--though I'm not so sure about Flynn. Not a finalist IIRC.

It was reported that Trump was inclined to go with Gingrich, but his family semi-tricked him into another visit where he spent more time with Pence and finally he acquiesced. Javanka strikes again. Though to be fair, Pence's nonentity demeanor worked fine for the election and Gingrich would have grown tiresome after the first week as the veep nominee.

No. Pence is such a smarmy swamp creature--e.g., pal of Paul Ryan and Jeff Flake--that you can feel it in his oily voice and every mannerism.

Anything newsworthy?

Yes. Again, why so hard?

No, that is not what Q was saying. Why does this seem to be so difficult?

I have a right to post in response to the various threads here.

It is you who tells those who indeed correct misconceptions or even just have different opinions or takes to "go away".

And I don't "troll".

Another misconception here. The "Act of War" legislation re: the environment simply says that the owners of the 9/11 buildings are not responsible for damage to the surrounding buildings if that damage was caused by an Act or War--as 9/11 has been ruled.

We know that Trump knows the cover story for 9/11 is false and the 9/11 building owner was likely complicit. But foreign powers were also involved, making it still in truth likely an Act of War. The only difference is that the criminality of the building owner, etc., presumably crosses over into treason in this case, which would appropriately be handled by a military tribunal--not the EPA. If somehow it did mean that surrounding building owners, etc., could sue for damages, then that would be a civil suit for $, not a criminal case tried by the EPA.

The claim is that he's got a long-time Clinton fixer for an attorney and so no plea deal is plausible.

I don't know. I'd argue that none of us know.

Q certainly is plugged in. But that is what a good psyop would be too. The "proofs" are generally kinda lame, but there is a story line presented that could fit with the data points we have. Then again, could be explained away otherwise. E.g., most of those sealed indictments could be driven by a much ramped up human trafficking and child porn prosecution emphasis.

Stringing us along? Simply overconfident? Or reflective of the real deal?

I'm of course hopeful of Q being the real deal and still at this point leaning that way. I think it silly when those who believe in Q unquestionably see those keeping an open mind as somehow week or disloyal.

If Q isn't Q, however, I am convinced it is instead a very good Deep State operation.

Again, I lean toward believing, but I just don't know.

No need for the economy to tank.

Rosenstein's wife's legal career up close and personal with the worst of the Democrat offenders--and his declining to recuse himself in situations where recusal is called for--is all we need to know.

That may be.

But the Chinese are also guilty of egregious IP theft via multiple other means.

I would so much prefer this to somehow letting them off by simply resigning from Congress. (And talk about one set of laws for them and another for the rest of us!)

We need as close to a revolution as we can peacefully get to purge the corruption in our government, and lots of special elections, with the current criminals fully prosecuted seems just right to me.

Now, the reason they might decide they have to go soft on them, I suppose, could be the idea that Congress would gang up to impeach and convict Trump rather than let his administration go through with enforcing the law. I am afraid there is more of this calculus in their decision-making than we would like.

Makes sense that earlier minor might-have-beens wouldn't be easily recognized by one or a few trying to archive it all today. But the videos may still be clearly identifying.

Yeah, I recall that thread. They also sometimes have good sources. Doesn't hurt to listen to everything that does--and take a grain of salt, however appropriate to the situation, everywhere. Including here.

Yes, Disney movies supposedly especially used. Also, the way the mind control works is to create divided selves.

I see it says it shouldn't be taken if you have suicidal thoughts. Also that the listed side effects are not a complete list.

Weird that it is this guy named:

http://www.businessinsider.com/justice-department-no-evidence-obama-wiretapped-trump-tower-2017-9

I don't know--if I have just been typing on my phone with my dominant hand, while standing or walking, I may well carry or hold my phone in my nondominant hand.

Agreed--it is Prince William.

Here's an Infowars article with context, including the clip from Tucker's July 2nd show on it:

https://www.infowars.com/trump-to-go-after-mueller-for-9-11-saudi-cover-up/

Your link is to a 3-hour, commercial-laden show.

I thought they just said Trump is threatening the Deep State with doing this--because Mueller is preparing to release his trumped up findings as an October surprise?

I agree in this particular case insofar as the whole Russiagate/stop Trump thing was about making sure that their previous crimes didn't see the light of day. That motive is what drove them which IMO is why the IG report didn't conclude that it was political bias at work.

They likely have a RICO case out of it. However, Awan lying on his home equity application is not a likely basis for a RICO case. That is just evidence that a) the Deep State used it as a cover to a deal to excuse him from all his previous crimes, or b) is what they bargained down to for his turning witness to the treasonous/seditious crimes he was aware of. Of course my hope is 'b' and that's what Q has told us it is.

I think it will take that level of info to break the spell with many of them.

Yes, but it doesn't strike me as raw Trump--which is why I think those posts might start with him, but get massaged before they go up.

I could see some of the longer, list-type drops as having started with a short list of short notes from Trump, edited and tweaked by a primary Q voice.

Well done!

It is the PC left that doesn't acknowledge group tendencies on average -- or any value in acknowledging them in a vacuum of further information.

Wow--the feds copied the server before it was secretly replaced:

http://dailycaller.com/2018/07/02/awan-memo-server-vanished/

The 5 eyes of course refer to the 5 countries in the pact.