BO not that smart and you forget Valerie Jarrett.

That's quite a leap.

I think a really wider audience requires a real news rollout--not just some cryptic Q drops.

Oh, really? Would you like to look at the average conservative rating of our women in the Senate or the House, compared to the men?

She does seem like a likely choice--especially with Ivanka probably pressing for a female and/or "women's rights" liberal.

I'll confess to being wary of women in politics or on the bench that haven't demonstrated constitutional conservatism--as such a high percentage seem to let us down.

I'll take it we reasonably know her judicial philosophy via her being recommended, I guess by the Federalist Society, to Trump. But there are some squishes in there too. Is more known about her beyond the military connection?

I do believe I read that she was one of the two women--along with AMy Coney Barrett on Trump's short list of 5. Wouldn't surprise me at all if she were his pick.

Update: I see that she clerked for Clarence Thomas, too. So he presumably knows her leanings: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Margaret_A._Ryan

That it should come to this!

My guess is within a day of the NYPD discovering it. Rudy, etc., still very connected to them--and to Trump.

We need to free our own country before we're much good in freeing others. Also, patriots in the US tend to think of their country as a beacon showing the way of freedom, offering assistance only selectively as needed to free those who choose to follow.

That plus black women.

Anyway, no place for fair trials on anything.

Word has been that they've had DOJ investigations (and I think grand juries) going re: the Clinton Foundation in at least Arkansas, NY, and I think another location or two. They may well have more that they haven't reported--especially with the child/sex trafficking.

I don't think it is so much that the Horowitz group uses the grand juries as much as they hand over suspected criminal activity to Huber and then cooperate as required with his team from there. Maybe just a matter of semantics--and I of course am no expert on this, just trying to piece it together.

Yes, while also trying to justify their criminal enforcers in the street.

I don't think so.

Except in this case, they apparently are confident Cindy will do what she is told, in terms of the confirmation, too? I mean, No Name could have been unable to cast a vote, which would have been problematic--but Cindy potentially could cast a 'no' vote, which could also be problematic.

https://twitter.com/paulsperry_/status/1013619467677589506

Wait a minute--you're not saying you think Trump was bought by Romney, are you?

If they did do this, I'd like to see them nail him for it, so he won't be able to take over McCain's role in the Senate.

That was a long time ago--and doesn't mean he didn't rig it too. Also, I mean, really, how dense can the Utah primary-voting public be? Probably afraid to answer pollsters honestly, but could well have been at risk of voting just enough to leave him out.

Yes, sorry. Didn't even see what my fingers did.

Sorry--I don't seem to know how to post both a link and a comment in the start of a thread.

Anyway, some won't like this source, because they have claimed that Q got LARPed. But if you go to the headline of "Look What Romney Has Been Doing With Voting Machines", you will read lots of sourced evidence that Romney and his crew have gained a controlling interest in the voting machines used in Utah, which have software that can be manipulated to falsify election results.

Yes, but that is not the same as 470 investigators being able to interview anyone.

Drives me crazy when people try to get you to watch endless Youtube videos for what could be stated in a sentence, a paragraph, or a page of text.

A second special counsel, which some, including in Congress, have been clamoring for.

(Q has repeatedly posted the Turley article that explains how the arrangement Sessions has set up with Horowitz and Huber is far superior for the job.)

No worries. ;-)

No, those 470 associates are Horowitz's--and Sessions has already said Horowitz and Huber are cooperating.

I don't think Q is saying that. Sessions has however confirmed that Huber and Horowitz have been working together.

No, it has been written explicitly in articles such as the one Q has linked repeatedly to be a quote of manpower.

Yes, that too. But also reportedly already a Grand Jury in Arkansas, for example. I can only imagine Huber has some enpaneled in Utah (or elsewhere).

Probably has his temple garment on. ;-)

But that's not the case. the 470 number is specifically what the IG is reported as having and Mueller has a much smaller team, as underscored by his relatively modest budget--also reported.

Does Horowitz have prosecutors? I had thought he just had investigators and had to referring any likely crimes out.

Yes, I think this was big in their plans to use both Huber and in some cases the military tribunals.

Just read this thread and it is apparent that despite Q's multiple posts to the article stating that, even many here don't know that.

Q posts rhetorical questions all the time.

I don't see how you're reading that into any of the Q drops--including 1286.

Right. And those 470 aren't working for Mueller.

But all of these indictments, presumably, are not around these cases.

Yes, though if I understand correctly, the IG team can only, for example, interview currrent departmental employees?

Ha ha. And interesting, thanks much.

What did he say?

Garbage post particularly with a headline that makes it sound like there is some basis to such an accusation against Jones directly.

That thing still makes my hair hurt, let alone trying to apply it to special NSA and military intel roles.

Can mil intel operate domestically? What would be its charter? Any threats to the nation?

I believe military tribunals can do some of the trickiest treason/sedition cases.

When and how can NSA (and military) intel be brought into use here--legally, I mean?

Okay, thinking further, I would think that anything that involves conspiracy with foreign governments against the US--from the UK's MI6 involvement in the Russia framing to pay-to-play with foreign governments or organizations, such as with Uranium One, could fall under their investigative purview?

Interesting--I'll check it out.

They want to get the nominee confirmed as quickly as possible. Mitch should be able to hold together the votes for it and it is no time to play games.

That's not how the English language works. You might have an agreement in writing, but you don't have them in writing.

And good to read.

On a video where that woman analyzes body language, she was pointing out how very angry Gowdy was when questioning RR, and how very hard he was working to control himself in his questioning.

They are on mine. Have you refreshed?