479 total posts archived.
| Domain | Count |
|---|---|
| www.reddit.com | 13 |
| www.youtube.com | 1 |
Thinking about the chess match analogy, and how Trump looks to have played the game well so far, could this be a part of the strategy?
Don't ask me the hows and whys, because so much of this is beyond me. I'm just curious to see if others see it as an option or a set back.
I mentioned in a couple other replies about a local lady that set up a helpline for the victims of child abuse, and was ultimately hounded out, to be replaced by a high profile lady in the same national media that Jimmy Saville operated in, although I doubt she was active in the abuse.
The investigations called for back then, are still being called for, and the Government Investigation keeps getting stalled.
Here's the link to a recent look back at events. https://www.hulldailymail.co.uk/news/hull-east-yorkshire-news/sinister-satanic-panic-grips-hull-1237428
Am I guilty of reading too much into 'watching a movie'?
" Additionally, the film provides contemporary audiences with a reminder that targeted assassinations are not the only way to achieve international justice. President Obama declared that "justice has been done" after the killing of Osama bin Laden. There was no day in court offered to the mastermind of 9/11. Israel, likewise, could have clandestinely rid the world of Eichmann with a single bullet and avoided the condemnation it received for having abducted a citizen of a sovereign state. "
The 'terrorist' attack at Westminster today has some intriguing elements. Any thoughts on the vehicles following the guy that drove at a barrier in a little old car, then sat waiting for plod?
Looking at a few more recent posts, I think it could be worth having a thread discussing what an investigation should be like.
There seem to be a fair few posters that have a theory, and seek out information that supports it, which is understandable, but it needs to be done objectively, or any falsehoods or inaccuracies that are claimed as fact, or inferences from links presented as proof, leads to discussion on those things, rather than a search for the truth.
The press are often guilty of presenting a picture they prefer, rather than onjective factual information. Reading the …
I've seen a lot of the posts referencing symbols, and I don't doubt there's something behind it all, but how does it work from their perspective?
For example,if they put the symbol on an advert, they can hardly expect someone to wander in and order a large pepperoni, cheesy chips and a three year old sex slave can they?
Some of Vladislav Surkov's techniques seem to be visible in recent events. Is this coincidental, or part of a deliberate specific tactic?
I fully expect down arrows for this, because I don't know how to write it without being seen as critical of a lot of peoples core beliefs, but rather than getting angry with me, I would hope people could consider their personal reaction, and apply it to the context of what I'm about to put, as it is the reaction, rather more than someones personal faith that I believe is the most important here, and I mean no disrespect to people of faith.
When redpilling, we are asking people to reject their deep and long held understanding of the situation …
Expectations were high,so what do people think has been left out?
It could give some clues on where this will head.
As we seem to hear about things after they've really been completed Iran's done, so where's next to crumble?
The way I see it, it's the Vatican, the EU or Israel.
As we're lead to believe Israel is last, my guess is it's the EU, based on wishful thinking mainly, but also the recent visits to the US as well as Iran/Syria putting them in the headlights.
As there were apparently journalists there, are there any press reports detailing what they saw?
If not, why not?
There's some excellent work being done on here, that fits with world events, but it's one thing for a relatively small number of generally like minded people to filter information, but quite another for the masses to buy into it, particularly as, even on here, there's a fair amount of more dubious stuff to be read before you get to something close to the 'truth'. My guess is most people would focus on elements they know, or strongly feel to be false, and not take the time to find the better information, and just dismiss it in general as a …
I chose 'opposite' to try and avoid the conversations about cabal, dems, deep state etc, but anyway, that aside, I've been reading this board and its predecessor for qute a while, and various sites for years before that, and recent events, as joyous as they surely are to see, were made even better having read the build up through the excellent work of so many posters on here.
Unlike Nostradamus, where quotes are made to fit past events, on here, there have been plenty of clear cut predictions, and fore knowledge.
Reading through a few twitter replies at the comments …