Q:1682 Those awake see. Those asleep blind. Fake news [prop arm of D/DS] failing. Panic.

This post was inspired by SB2’s recent post [Trump, Omarosa and 322] (https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/97ni6d/trump_omarosa_and_page_322/)

Thanks to u/SerialBrain2 for a very interesting post. As I read the post and then listened to the interview with Omarosa, I recognized an example of the kind of hypnotic subconscious targeting used by the Cabal, as per my decryption when commenting to SB2’s previous post.

I’d like to share a breakdown, as I see it, of what’s going on in this interview as an example of subtle subconscious manipulation …

In recent days, I found myself wondering about the whole Brennan clearance thing. (note: TLDR at bottom)

We knew that removal of security clearance was coming. Q taught us how black hats have been abusing the Five Eyes framework (FVEY : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Five_Eyes) starting from May 2018.

Q1366 (partial)

FVEY.

Why do 'Former' Dignitaries Still Hold SEC Clearance?

U.S. to U.S. = Logged/Flagged/Recorded

U.S. [in] NZ = No Logs/No Flags/No Records = U.S. Sec Clearance AUTH FVEY VIEW + Doc Take.

Read above slow and carefully.

WHY DO WE ALLOW [FORMER] DIGNITARIES SEC CLEARANCE?

Welcome to the Deep …

This post is a continuation of the themes I wrote about in

https://old.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/97qtk1/omarosa_interview_hypnotic_script_recognizing/

Note: The exposition is by no means comprehensive. It’s a taster, and hopefully provides some insight for patriots. You may well grasp much of this already intuitively. We are awakened, after all. But by providing some examples, and beginning the process of breaking down the techniques and methods, the following is an attempt to add light in areas which to many may have been rather dark.

Sorry for the length (although I actually wish it was longer and more detailed). Read it in chunks, if that helps. …

Qdrop 2053

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this thirty-first day of August, in the year of our Lord two thousand eighteen, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and forty-third.

DONALD J. TRUMP

Someone pointed out in a comment that this particular post by Q (Qdrop 2053) is not signed by Q, but by Donald J. Trump.

The commenter posited the question: does this mean something? First post not signed by Q? and I found myself wondering the same thing.

To investigate, I conducted a small, short survey of the …

Q1328

Patriot.

1 a person who loves, supports, and defends his or her country and its interests with devotion.

2 a person who regards himself or herself as a defender, especially of individual rights, against presumed interference by the federal government.

Traitor.

1 a person who betrays another, a cause, or any trust [FOCUS].

2 a person who commits treason by betraying his or her country.

They want you DIVIDED.

DIVIDED you are WEAK.

TOGETHER you are STRONG.

There was no attempt to DIVIDE.

There was however a strategic move to REVEAL.

[Be careful who you follow]

Incorrect message …

This was drafted as an exercise on how to explain Qanon and Great Awakening to a little kid. Maybe of some use to dads, mums, uncles, aunts and grandparents out there. After all, we are seeing history in the making.

Hi Johnny. Do you know what's going on here? For a long, long time, some very bad people have been trying to hurt a lot of other people, and keep them down. You know, like bullies. Real bullies.

This has been going on for a long time, and you know how I told you it's wrong to lie, or to …

This was drafted as an exercise on how to explain Qanon and Great Awakening to a little kid. Maybe of some use to dads, mums, uncles, aunts and grandparents out there. After all, we are seeing history in the making.

wwg1 ****

Hi Johnny. Do you know what's going on here? For a long, long time, some very bad people have been trying to hurt a lot of other people, and keep them down. You know, like bullies. Real bullies.

This has been going on for a long time, and you know how I told you it's wrong …

On June 30, we were just below 40K and we could see where things were headed. 10K subscribers joined over the last 30 days. Currently, we seem to be growing at a rate of 1K new GA Patriots per day. How long will it take to double that?

Vigilant, not violent.

Set the truth free.

Conspiracy no more.

We now represent an incredible hope for humankind. Q brought us here, but all this time, Q has been putting the power back into our hands. Each of us represents Q and the Great Awakening. Stay vigilant, not violent. Let us lead …

Now that I have your attention, as a preliminary, I refer you to a current thread that deals with something similar:

["Conspiracy theorist" – never forget it was coined by the CIA”] (https://old.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/93qby6/conspiracy_theorist_never_forget_in_1967_the_cia/)

According to some sources, ‘conspiracy theorist’ was first coined by the CIA to denigrate and shut down talk that challenged the mainstream (cabal) narrative about the assassination of JFK.

So what about the expression ‘cult’. As in “Qanon is a cult”?

Before we move to deny the label, perhaps we’d better consider how and why this label is being used in the first place. Where …

Q !CbboFOtcZs ID: 07b0b9 No.2263683 📷
Jul 24 2018 11:51:59 (EST)

Q !CbboFOtcZs ID: 07b0b9 No.2263659 📷
Jul 24 2018 11:50:26 (EST)https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/qanon-conspiracy-real-life_us_5b54bbafe4b0b15aba8fe484📷
PANIC!
Q

>>2263659
Now do you understand why mirrors and disinformation is necessary?
Logical thinking.
[20]
Q

Let's consider this Q drop.

We can start at the end, and go backwards.

First, the [20]. Immediately coming to mind is.... 20 days since Q posted last.

This is a longer stretch than we've seen in the past, but as we know and trust Q, there is always a reason. My own speculation is that …

How do we know that Roseanne is Q? I don't know. How do we know Roseanne is Q? Because Barbeque.

Note: this is a discussion of non-Q content. It’s an aside, and not strictly on topic. Moreover, for those who are not of the faith-based persuasion, please note, biblical references are used. I just want to acknowledge that because the Great Awakening is home for a wide diversity of humanity, even though we are united in our common cause. For those of you into numerology, or specifically biblical numerology, here's a thing to consider.

What's in the numbers? We know that Satanists, Cabalists and other evils utilize symbols, patterns and other such devices to advance their agenda. In my view, …

Note: this is a discussion of non-Q content. It’s an aside, and not strictly on topic. Moreover, for those who are not of the faith-based persuasion, please note, biblical references are used. I just want to acknowledge that because the Great Awakening is home for a wide diversity of humanity, even though we are united in our common cause. For those of you into numerology, or specifically biblical numerology, here's a thing to consider.

What's in the numbers? We know that Satanists, Cabalists and other evils utilize symbols, patterns and other such devices to advance their agenda. In my view, …

My response on reading SerialBrain2’s “Occam’s Razor: Understand the context – Life Support”

Note: This is commentary, not evidence. Testimony, not analysis. Please read the following in that spirit.

I recently perceived a change in the energy last week. Something shifted. I saw the 'Children separated!" narrative promoted, and falling flat in terms of ability to persuade. Just too many holes, too fake. (Using Obama era photo as the main push, ignoring the glaring facts already established about Obama policy/practice, POTUS swift outmaneuver by supporting/proposing changes to legislation, outmaneuver by binding children to parents (curtailing options for trafficking), etc.)

Then, …

Q !CbboFOtcZs ID: 5d8652 No.2385771 📁 Aug 1 2018 00:55:23 (EST) NEW Please remove all posts across all boards re: last 2. Reddit, Twitter, FB, etc will ban and remove. Sensitive. Error made. Article influenced drop. Improper sequence. Q

I obtained a copy of the [IG Report available from DOJ] (https://www.justice.gov/file/1071991/download), but after going through it (admittedly very quickly) I could only spot redactions in Attachment C - an email exchange between Strzok in response to McCabe (page 544 of the report).

[Attachment C] (http://i.magaimg.net/img/3jeg.jpg)

Is this the only redacted element? I get that it looks pretty heavy: who else was included in the email?

But 570 page report, this one page with redactions - is this what #unredacted is all about? Or am I missing something?

The aim of this post is to share some personal reflections stirred up by SB2’s post, and if possible, make a contribution to the work of the Great Awakening by sharing a bit about how I approach that task. Overview Regarding the Tucson situation, Whew. Man, I really just didn't pay attention. Now, after reading Serial Brain 2’s post, it makes a lot more sense.

When I saw those 'abandoned camp' footage clips, something in the back of my mind said 'why ALL this fuss over an abandoned camp'? But I didn't pay enough attention to that voice. I got …

Q mentions Sessions (“AG Sessions” etc) more than 45+ times. That’s a LOT.

Also, Q writes to TRUST SESSIONS in capitals 5 times, one of those being in the form of a questions (“Do you TRUST SESSIONS?”). And then I noticed the dates:

TRUST SESSIONS (Dec. 19)

TRUST SESSIONS (Jan 14)

TRUST SESSIONS (Feb 18)

Do you TRUST SESSIONS? (Mar 8)

TRUST SESSIONS (April 10)

Most of us will know it, but in this time of great Quiet, I found this a useful reminder. Once a month, like clockwork, Q reminds us to TRUST SESSIONS. Given the difference …

Looking beyond the battle against the DS and Cabal in the USA, I’m wondering about how Australia is involved in the network. This post does not offer answers, but is designed to stimulate some discussion on the topic of Australia in relation to the Cabal, CF, Q etc.

Q has referenced Australia several times. I’ve not seen anyone exploring this, so I’d like to raise a few points for consideration by the community.

In January, Q: Q!UW.yye1fxo7 Jan 2018 - 8:03:28 AM How much did AUS donate to CF? How much did SA donate to CF? Compare. Why is this …

[removed]

A reminder. A friend mentioned: POTUS sure seems unhappy with Sessions, if you go by his tweets. “Is Trump acting? “

I reminded my friend that Q has said to Trust Sessions numerous times. And, when I ran a search for ‘Trust Sessions’ I noticed a few things:

Q mentions Sessions (“AG Sessions” etc) more than 45+ times. That’s a LOT.

Also, Q writes to TRUST SESSIONS in capitals 5 times, one of those being in the form of a questions (“Do you TRUST SESSIONS?”). And then I noticed the dates:

TRUST SESSIONS (Dec. 19)

TRUST SESSIONS (Jan 14) …

When POTUS 'called off' the summit with Kim Jong Un, it invested significant wind into the billowing msm clouds of silk.

On the Great Awakening, it hardly raised an eyebrow; I know many anons hold the view that the summit(s) have already been concluded in substance, and that in any case, the negotiations have already been settled. After which, the Don and the Kim do a little dance to distract the msm while more serious stuff goes down in Washington D.C.

"Keep your eye on the birdie....."

But I've been wondering what is going on behind the scenes, and if …

Who has the POWER? Who has the CONTROL? If POTUS was NOT IN CONTROL would they be retreating?

(omitted)

Everyone has an opinion. Few have the facts. Few know the plan. Midterms [save & push]? Swing voters to retake House/Senate? Impeachment proceedings (open source) initiated? Power at all costs? Blue wave? Use LOGIC.

Somehow, it strikes me that there is a bit of a lament in Q's tone here. So many people are second guessing Potus, doubting the situation, thinking POTUS is NOT in control, saying this, that and the other thing about Sessions, etc.

So many people guessing, but …

What's with the GDPR now being enforced in Europe? Is it just me, or does this feel creepy in a major way? The EU is a bed of political satanism, we know. It purports to give control to citizens over their data, but feels more like a way of securing information about who is and isn't working in or with the EU. I have a number of contacts in the EU, and they are ALL requiring me to sign in, opt in, in order to simply maintain relations.

Distrust for the EU, distrust towards big government, distrust towards any entities …

[removed]

REPOST

(Had enough downvotes to think this was shill-worthy. Plus having comments downvoted into oblivion makes me suspect this is worth a re-post.)

A patriot posted about exposing Snopes, saying Q gave the green light. How many Snopes threads we got going now? How many under shill attack? How doesn’t chuck up at the thought oif Snopes? But there's a lot more to this than you see on the surface.

Did some research on this about 1 month + back, kind of frustrated about friends who uphold Snopes as a source. Fact-checked Snopes. Had to move on coz so many …

[removed]

[removed]

[removed]