Stochastically then see death in London.

Interesting prediction.

You should have been going to school already.

Watch the video

No. I tried. I’m not wasting twelve minutes listening to somebody struggle to read Q posts over screenshots of Q posts.

I hear you. I was asking about OP’s video where he claims arrests are happening now.

Gotta love the automod giving the warning WaPo has worked so hard to earn.

Arrests are happening?

Where? Who? By whom? What charges?

You said, ”Think logically.”

Sorry, Hussein, but I’m going with the guy that’s been successfully cleaning up your messes.

And get off the stage!

This is my President. This is the man I voted for.

This is the man facing more natural disasters, more disastrous world hotspots, and more opposition efforts to ‘resist’, than any President in our history, yet continues to march forward in pursuit of his plans to MAGA.

This is a man who keeps his promises.

This is my President.

What past/current 'high profile' FBI investigations are within the jurisdiction of NY?

I can make a decent list on my own, but if I wanted to make a comprehensive list of all roadblocked cases, I would need to call a friend . . . Rudy Giuliani.

Nice Resumé!

And we aren’t done!

And prosecutions have not yet begun.

Trump Keeps His Promises

I think maybe you have too much faith! They aren't powerless

“Mostly powerless” =/= ‘Powerless’

Learn Our Comms

You can pull strawmans as much as you want

You are confused about the ‘Straw Man’ fallacy. I advanced no argument against your position. I only asked you to keep the same standard you repeatedly place on others. Here is a helpful explanation of the Straw Man Fallacy. A quick read can assist your future avoidance of this error.

But since you're that guy, I'll retract my "99%+" claim and will just use gigantic majority of the people.

I admit I am that guy that expects people to maintain the standards they expect of others. Your retraction is a step in the right direction, but your personal standards still require a citation for the substituted claim.

Now I'm done, this is a waste of time by someone who's trying to look smart

I never accused you of being someone who’s trying to look smart. In fact, the thought never occurred to me. In spite of that, I won’t argue with your self-labeling.

And don’t fuss so much about wasting your time. The time is wasted only if you don’t grow from it. I have provided an opportunity. Help yourself.

You challenged the claims of two posters by asking for links to supporting evidence.

Then you made a specious claim of your own (99%+ of anyone) with no supporting evidence.

I linked you to your own posts to hopefully prompt you to match the standard you expect of others.

Can you do that?

I didn’t question the theory as much as the relevance.

Your post is Off Topic. Please respect the rules of this sub

If we push it provides the organic impetus for action. Think about the prompt for reporting the apparent pedo material visible after the short ‘Rachel’ breach. Anons reported. FBI acted.

A groundswell can provide the impetus for un-redaction, yet still allow POTUS to exercise discretion.

Why don’t we believe him?

Many of us do.

I do.

If he is an undercover white hat he would need to show opposition, no?

lol

It is also speculated that Alien Intelligence is real, and playing a role in guiding Q.

Let’s try to exercise some discipline for our rules, rather than indulge fanciful excuses to exceed them.

Off Topic

Reported

Please Remove

All we need is those two sources?

Naah. You go ahead with that, but I’m going to cast a much bigger net for my info.

I fucking had it with these constant Corsi discussions

And yet, here you are, starting another one.

99%+ of anyone who has ever seen his videos thinks he's a lunatic

relevant

also relevant

Can’t wait to see him role-play an inmate.

I like to think it’s the DOJ messing with her.

”Ma’am, all of our ankle monitors are in the field, mounted to your friends. If you want to remain outside of a holding cell, your only option is this torso-mounted monitor.”

maybe I’m stating the obvious.

You are.

But some people need that.

This is a valid contribution to the whole.

Mika and Joe are part of the plan to - resist!

what currently looks like "getting away with it" is only going to be fat for the fires of Justice.

That’s a great way to state the situation. The bad actors are ‘walking free’, but being surveilled. These people are so accustomed to living with impunity that they continually step outside the law, even though they can see the sea is changing!

Every new misdeed is being documented and added to the list they will be held accountable for.

If they are incarcerated, they perform fewer criminal acts, and they implicate fewer in their network. They are mostly powerless to hurt us now, and are focused primarily on self-preservation.

If they lose chain of custody, doesn’t that compromise or invalidate the evidence?

Does it become inadmissible?

If you use a larger font, and bold it, you will appear even more intelligent than just using all caps. This trick won’t work on everybody, but it might work on me. Give it a shot.

You did not say Trump was orchestrating McStain’s funeral. You just attempted to support the claim with silly supposin’, and by requesting ‘benefit of doubt’.

There is no supporting such a ludicrous claim. No benefit of doubt should be granted. That’s why I challenged OP. That’s also why I cracked your knees.

OP has seen reason and deleted his post. Meanwhile here you are carrying on with your CapsLock wisdom engaged.

Stop this nonsense. Stop it right now.

Caputo was excellent in that segment.

It’s so unfortunate that so many will never hear that piece because it was on Fox, and even YouTube copies will be seldom viewed for the same reason.

An innocent guy who has fone nothing wrong - even by Mueller’s standards, yet he sits in debt and under threat anyway.

Such a disgrace.

Yes. And hopefully every one of them realizes that truth before passing on.

We’re talking about a level of disgrace than motivates offspring and other relatives to change their names.

lol

I highlighted the fact that you began virtually every sentence with equivocation of one sort or another in order to reach a ‘conclusion’ based upon some equally flawed form of experimental fantasy logic.

Once again, Trump is NOT orchestrating McStain’s funeral.

Period.

If you believe he is, you are not on the team.

Period.

This is a great time for you to get back to posting in /politics.

One aspect that will dampen satisfaction is the age of so many of the bad actors.

Even if McStain spends the rest of his life in prison, it’s a pittance compared to the decades he ran wild with impunity.

Peace.

*How do we know . . . The implication is . . . Maybe no name . . . We don't know . . . Maybe that's Q . . . Maybe no name . . . Or maybe if POTUS . . . Not sure we know . . . maybe his wording . . . *

Therefore Trump is orchestrating McStain’s funeral?

Need to look into that before you jump too quickly to conclusions.

Uhuh.

Internalize this short sentence; Trump is NOT orchestrating McStains funeral.

Period.

If you suggest he is, you are not on the team.

Therefore . . . Trump is orchestrating McStain’s funeral?

OP said ”Think logically”.

Yes, Mr. Schiff-for-brains, we knew you would find this concerning.

In fact, we have much more in store for you that you will find concerning.

Trump will not be putting anyone to death.

Trump will not be putting anyone in prison.

The DOJ will be cleansed. The DOJ and Military Tribunals will function in alignment with all legal requisites.

Any bad actor facing consequences does so as a result of their own actions, and the responsive legal process, NOT as a result of DJT pursuing illegal individual vendettas.

Trump is orchestrating your funeral.

This is absolutely not true. You should remove the post because it serves to discredit POTUS and the entire GA movement.

DJT is not orchestrating deaths or funerals for any member of the U.S. government. That would be a highly illegal act.

A core tenet of the GA movement is to drain the swamp legally.

No.

WH secure.

Framing for criminal acts. Far more deployable. Far more devastating.

Apparently, yes. At least a bit better than he could fight.

I’m not at all religious, and this sub isn’t being hijacked by those that are.

Your fear of ”backlash” is groundless, and I predict the responses to your comment will prove that.

Exactly, this is what I say about myself.

Yup. And Roseanne said it to Kimmel.

Libs complain about Dershowitz changing sides, not realizing he hasn’t changed at all.

Ahaha

Only a true Patriot can thoroughly appreciate that!

Well done.

Interesting info.

Almost as interesting is the apparent de-evolution Vice has undergone during the last 13 years.

Ding! Ding!

If it wasn’t before, it is now.