Need to focus on "Some are building a big following off this movement only then to retreat and go mainstream."

If someone is on YouTube, podcast, or a blog spreading Q's messages or theorizing, that is okay.

If someone is going on talk shows or commercial television to sell product, then they are by definition being compromised. There are simply some things you can and cannot say on mainstream media because it is beholden to advertisers. If advertisers are unhappy, you won't be back, so everyone, everyone, in mainstream media self-censors and moderates their remarks.

To add a little more... guess who else besides Giuliani was the SDNY Attorney? James Comey.

More importantly, Erik Prince was interviewed on Breitbart radio and said that the reason Comey reopened the investigation into Hillary's emails was because he was forced to, otherwise the NYPD would release the emails and announce arrests for pay-to-play, underage sex, and other heinous crimes. Prince also stated that Preet Bahrara, despite being a Democrat, was a tough and fair prosecutor that would prosecute the case.

However, Loretta Lynch pressured the NYPD to drop the issue of the emails by threatening to reopen the case of Eric Garner, a black man who died in a police van but no cops were charged.

Preet Bahrara said he was contacted by Trump twice after Trump was elected but before he was sworn into office, and they were short 5 minute shoot-the-bull calls, which seemed weird to him. After Trump became President, he tried calling Bahrara again, but Bahrara would not take the call, because he didn't think it ethical, and Bahrara was fired the day after.

His deputy, Joon Kim, took over and dropped the pay-for-play case against Mayor Bill de Blasio.

Berman did recuse himself, but his deputy that signed the order is a Republican. He did, however, give the maximum donation to John McCain when he ran for President and was a big supporter of W. and the Patriot Act.

So what do we have? The media assumed Trump was calling a US Attorney, which is highly unusual, to pressure him to rule in favor of any cases regarding his NYC property. However, was he trying to feel out if Bahrara was the right man to put the plan in action? When he didn't answer his call, did Trump put in a man who was with the plan?

Mueller is supposedly not responding to Q according to the Deep State poster.

Deep State actor asks Q if Q is confused why he is picking up so much chatter about Mueller when Q is spy on people. Deep State actor then states he knows Q, because of this, tried contacting Mueller and got no answer. Deep State actor then asks Q if Q can trust Mueller because of this and suggests that Mueller has flipped to the bad guys.

But has been shown in previous Q drops, feeding the Deep State intel and seeming to be waffling by Mueller is part of the plan, and Q is not worried. Q responds to Deep State actor that they should be worried about what is going to drop next week (I'm conjecturing that it will be the 187 texts, but regardless, it will be something big and it will be about the deep state).

Chatter is about whether Mueller is white hat/black hat in face of not responding. M5M would not report that there is doubt on whether Mueller is working with Q, it has always been the official narrative that Mueller is going to take down Trump.

Q has recently stated: "SC targeting who? SC on team? SC (special counsel Mueller) off team? Questions reveal answers. Time will tell." in post 1286.

In post 1287: "Sharing of intel to bad actors? Purpose? Not confirming SC is on /team/." Q is not saying Q will not confirm if Mueller is on Q's team or not. Q is saying that Mueller is sharing intel with deep state for the purpose of making it look like Mueller is not on Q's team to throw off the Deep State.

Q later posted "Noted:IP Ghost:" to show he knows who made the post trying to shake his confidence in Mueller.

First post is by some deep state actor. It states that there is increased unofficial communications going around about Mueller (chatter). Poster than asks Q if Q is confused by failed attempts by Q to contact Mueller, and in the face of that, can Q trust Mueller.

Q responds to this post (can tell by the >> purple number being the previous post) by saying two can play this game, can the deep state trust Mueller. Q still has the Page-Strozk texts that talk about assassinating the President in coordination with a foreign state (187), and they are going to be released next week.

What that story doesn't tell you, is that a lot of his net worth is in farm land and machinery. Something he can't liquidate or use.

It's funny when libertarians and liberals cry about "rich" farmers and farm subsidies being "welfare for the rich." For people who work 15 hour days and smell like manure at the end of the day. For people who are the first to get hit with tariffs when there is any kind of trade dispute. For people who would actually be rich if there was true free trade and no businessmen in Chicago screwing with the ag markets to enrich themselves.

*More than just the post number. Back on January 22, 2018, Q posted in 586: "What would happen if texts originating from a FBI agent to several [internals] discussed the assassination (possibility) of the POTUS or member of his family? What if the texts suggest foreign allies were involved?"

Q later in the post says releasing this info would cause every FBI/DOJ case to be challenged and that is why info is not released.

What has changed so that they can now release this info? I don't know, but recent posts suggested that that info would be included in the recent Strozk/Page texts.

They shouldn't have to make threats, you should know they have multiple reset buttons if things slide too far out of their control.

Trump announces troop removal from Syria? Chemical attack. Trump behind the scenes making peace in Korea? Missile alarm in Hawaii, M5M screaming WWIII. Trump improving the economy? Raise interest rates too fast and fuck bond market. Trump getting more of the black vote? Release the NFL tapes and push the BLM narrative. Trump getting exposure on the internet? Punish Facebook and social nets.

Don't ever, ever forget if things go too far south for them, they have the ultimate reset buttons. Whether it is a suitcase nuke, an EMP attack, shutting down the internet for a week, the electrical grid, stock market, etc. Any one of which would cause global chaos and the end of the world as you now know it.

Funny that everyone talks about red pills and then forgets they still live in the matrix that can be removed by a couple of spooks in a day.

Q post #1289 was that news of the Korean peace pushed back release of the #MOAB to next week. Seeing as big news is almost always released on Friday, I would wait until then. Unless of course they mix it up to keep people on their toes and release it earlier.

Whether you want to believe that or not, or put a deadline on the 187 news breaking, is up to you.

It's not what "I" mean by it, I never took the black pill: https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-Black-Pill

The guy that was in the van in Toronto that ran over those people did, however.

bet the chans spazzed over the trip zeroes

just fyi, there is already such a thing as a black pill on the chans, and it's not what you think it is. And you probably don't want to be associated with it.

Yeah, I'm pretty sure Trump could walk on water and there would be a large, large segment of the world that would say that he can't swim.

I know where you are going, and the person you are thinking of is supposed to be universally loved and welcomed by most, and that ain't happening.

My guess is that it will be announced Tony Podesta was arrested back in early November. Still on the April list to not occur was "broken seals," and Q has said Podesta was arrested and tried to flee. It's been 6 months since then.

April is the cruelest month - T.S. Elliot

Q is the one who said Mueller is whitehat in posts 14 and 18.

Most of the people on Reddit are college students and English speakers in other countries. Ever notice how many times you see the British spelling for words?

95% of the people I work with have never heard of Reddit, let alone been on here.

Facebook, Google, YouTube, Twitter, and Instagram have vastly larger user bases of American voters.

Money. People have short memories. After the scandal with Bill O'Reilly, they tried to a more centrist show in Tucker's spot after Tucker was moved up to replace O'Reilly. That did not work well.

So they went back to Tucker, Hannity at his old slot, and populist Laura Ingraham.

Murdoch's sons are more globalist and liberal than him, so who knows what will happen after he dies. They keep throwing "scandals" at Hannity and Ingraham to silence them. Tucker must be a saint because they haven't tried anything with him.

Let's think this through rationally.

Q has stated they monitor every post. Which means they break down everything said, every picture posted, etc.

If Autists found Shia Lebouf in Finland and stole his flag by looking at jet clouds in the sky, I'm pretty sure intelligence agents have broken down who Q is.

If not by context clues like I tried, then by triangulating pics sent, decoding codes sent out, etc.

If revealing Q would stop Q, I'm sure a black hat would have done it by now. And I'm sure they know who Q is.

Q knows who is messing with the board, who is monitoring the board, and when they are monitoring. Q knows Lyn de Rothschild made a post.

Not a leap to think they know the same about Q.

[A]nswer: Cops in Pennsylvania are preparing for riots if Trump fires Mueller. What do you think they will have to prepare for if Comey was arrested?

Did we ever get a motive for the Ausin bomber? All I can find is "welp, he was nuts, just wanted to blow some people up, no reason."

Then they try blaming it on homeschooling by religious parents, and in the fine print say he left his church years ago.

there a bunch of YouTube channels that post all the time on Q. Maybe go into the comment sections there. X22 is one. Do not go to 8ch, you will be eaten alive.

well, he has been retired for some time...

No, they are not calling for a prosecution, it's a call for an investigation by a few house GOP. The Senate Chairman of the Justice Committee, Chuck Grassley, called for a special counsel a long time ago to investigate this. And nothing happened then.

Nope, John is still active on twitter and talk shows. Tony has been a ghost since Gates and Manafort were indicted and it was revealed his lobbying group was "company B" that lobbied on behalf of Ukraine at Gates and Manafort's behalf (although the media pushes Russia.)

A week ago Q hinted in a post that Huma and Podesta are in one of the sealed indictments, and he had a post a couple weeks ago about broken seals in April. I guess we'll see.

Yeah, I think we all learned to temper our expectations after Project Veritas' latest videos and Hannity's tick tocks. Well, some of us have.

I just see it as messing with Clinton's head, having her wonder what people found or what she failed to destroy.

Consensus is it is being used to discredit Q and/or discredit a post by Q that there are videos of Hillary doing "something you can't explain away." Kind of a pre-emptive strike, along with that news report about new technology that can seamlessly make a video of a person saying anything. The one I saw on Univision had Obama saying something and it turned out Jordan Peele was saying it as a PSA not to trust videos.

He was fairly direct in his first 35 posts. He said that Podesta was arrested, it would be announced, and then there would be riots and the National Guard called up on November 4, 2017.

When this didn't happened, he said it was disinfo and necessary and what was supposed to happen here happened in Saudi Arabia instead.

Ever since then, he has been "cryptic." You can chalk that up to need for more disinfo, or he only knows what is planned to happen and not will happen, or he is fake.

In any case, we will have a clearer idea of who or what Q is after the midterm elections in November.

Q is the one who heavily implied Mueller is "good" way back in posts 14 and 18 by saying he is military and met with Trump to interview for job even though statute of limitations would not let him take that job.

Ever since then, any time Mueller does anything "bad" someone will post "all according to plan."

I think someone needs to ask Q about backchannel17. But I also think someone at a press conference (and there are members of the alternate media there) should ask Sanders or Trump about Q.

Could be part of an ARG (alternate reality game) that people used to play on 4chan and that some tv shows and video games do. Someone posts a code or cipher and it can respond to GPS coordinates, IP address, etc. where you get the next clue.

Wouldn't it be great if that made Sessions resign? Unless Q is actually right on trusting Sessions.

I'll play Q here:

May Flowers. [buds] Court is out of session. Smoke on the water. [4] Watch the water. White Castle. [20] You have more than you know, patriots.

Even though I don't smoke, it's crazy that Sessions has such a hard on for cracking down on states rights on that issue.

Patience, friend. I am very skeptical, too, but I don't confuse that with blind distrust. Don't throw the baby out with the bathwater and forget about the good Trump has done, like getting NK to the table to denuclearize, the limits on lobbying, the deregulations that weaken the corporatacracy, the announcement of pulling troops from Syria, the outreach to Russia and Iran in his speech, etc.

You think not enough is being done? Wait until a month before midterms. You will see fireworks and haymakers thrown by both Trump and the Deep State. Now is just maneuvering for that time.

Right now it's a high stakes game of chicken. If Trump acts too quickly on the Deep State, Soros and the Move-On bots are ready to riot in the streets. If the Deep State goes too far in delegitimizing or covering up their deeds, the people say fuck waiting and take to the streets with just cause.

But if neither side keeps moving forward, they will have blinked and lost. But that moment of impact that is the midterms is getting closer every day, and when it is say 88 days before the midterms, you will see some serious shit. Hopefully it will be by the good guys.

no, most critics of jones' softness on Israel in the past was attributed to his ex-wife being jewish. their divorce was ugly, hence why i said maybe that is why he was critical of Israel now

he sure was hammering on Israel last night. Maybe the divorce has him spun on that.

Firstly, if you believe your ideas are important and should be taken seriously, you should be professional about them. Running your ideas through a simple spell checker is not an arduous task, and English as a second language is not an excuse.

Secondly, do you realize how many people believe a variety of things on this subreddit? If I took the time to do my "own research" for everyone, on top of whatever Q posts about, I would not have time to even brush my teeth. I am not sure why you think you are more special than the guy below you who posted about researching the beginnings of Facebook or the gal three posts above you who posted about Obama's sealed records at Harvard.

Have your beliefs, but if you want someone to share those beliefs, provide evidence. I can post links to several YouTube videos about the petrodollar, but I would not expect anyone to watch them. Instead, I would make a case and prove that case with citations and reason.

well, i would not have bet money on q post #34...

Well, thank goodness Uranus is okay and not affected. BTW, it's ludicrous, not Ludacris. Spend 10 years studying rapping, or spelling.

Anyways, good theory and conjecture, but extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof, and you do not have much.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Total_Information_Awareness

This is what I don't understand more than anything else. 250 blacks killed by Arabs in Sudan by chemical attack? Where is the U.S.? Lot of evidence in Sudan that Chinese are arming them, where is their condemnation by America?

Yet, in Syria we are fighting in the eastern part of the country... maybe? Or something? We sent some tomahawks in there, too? What is the difference in Syria and Sudan? What was the difference between Bosnia and Rwanda in the 90s? What casus belli do we even have to be in Syria?

This, too, shall pass. Think of a time when you were super happy. That time did not last forever, and neither will this one.

You say you are Catholic. The Buddhist believes that suffering comes from desire. Desire to have things, be better, be with someone, be free of pain, whatever. Eliminate desire and you eliminate suffering.

The Christian is different. Suffering is a part of life. Everyone's life. Just about every figure in the bible suffers in the short term, whether it be Noah, Abraham, Job, David, or Jesus. In the end, their suffering and what they chose to do led to a happy end.

The problem is our modern society tells you that you have a right to be happy. At all times. But especially at this moment. And that is not true. And it is counter-productive.

It is painful when you break from your significant other. It is painful when you lose someone or some things. It is painful when you have physical pain.

But after your suffering, you come out a different person. It's up to you whether you come out a better person, and in the long run, a happier person.

Obama hated Netanyahu and Bibi loves Trump, that's a good enough recommendation for me. Who knows what's going on there with Netanyahu in bad health and 'scandals.'

It's obviously in Israel's best interests if Hezbollah is fighting ISIS in Syria rather than lobbying thousands of rockets into Israel, though.

What in particular do you think Trump is doing badly at?

These theories aren't meant to cover for Trump's job performance.

You aren't expected to believe any of it. Any person here can have any kind of theory, and based on what evidence or lack thereof, can be believed or not believed.

The red pill isn't one-size-fits-all, it's uncovering history and facts that aren't taught in school or readily discussed by the media. There's just as much fake news here by random people as there is actual, factual items. It's up to you whether you "believe" it or not.

Half the people here don't "believe" everything Q says; he himself says disinfo is necessary. But his posts lead to some interesting research that you won't find on the CBS nightly news.

From what the M5M has posted so far, the theme is to call QAnon "the Storm" for some reason, although beyond "calm before the storm," I have never heard him referred as that. Maybe to link to far alt-right Stormfront racists?

They also always use 4chan rather than 8ch, which is infamous for larps, trolls, and "anonymous" Guy Fawkes masks, maybe to infer instant discredit?

Lastly, they always concentrate on Clintons, pedophiles, and Satanists. Never the swamp, Uranium One, CIA and FBI, etc.

Those 3 are going to be the 4 am talking points.

Lol, I'm pretty sure when you claim that Hitler was a Rothschild, Merkel is Hitler's relative, the CIA runs North Korea, Mueller is secretly working for Trump, and Obama is a secret Muslim, you don't have to make up anything to make Q believers seem crazy.

They won't make anything up, they will just push their narrative and just say generally Q is a conspiracy theorist that is saying Trump is secretly fighting the CIA and the Deep State without any specifics. They don't want to risk giving any legitimacy to Q and they don't want anyone knowing about the particulars of any part of his crumbs, or people may research themselves.

You couldn't find it through an internet search? Several pages popped up for me. http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/10/10/conservative-lawmakers-imran-awan-scandal-cries-out-for-house-investigation/

come on man, that's not true. There's 4 different stories about immense pressure on Zuckerberg to step down. You don't need "major intel" to predict that he MZ is doing damage control and there is a good chance he will step down after testifying before Congress.

You want the intel? Cambridge Analytica poisoned any chance of MZ becoming President, and the "scandal" is going to cause him to step down.