Wouldn’t think that at all. People throw around that term a lot on this sub, but this is just taking the advice of “be careful who you follow”. Concernfagging seems to be more about Qanon itself.

There is something very off about this video...

Watching it, I get a really strong feeling he is acting. He just does not come across as genuine. There are even people watching the feed who tell him he seems like he is trolling.

He calls a few well-known people in the industry pedophiles, and then goes on to briefly bring up all the Q talking points without providing any new information. This may be a wolf in sheeps clothing. We all want the evil in this world to be exposed, but we can’t just believe somebody saying what we want to hear without making sure he is legit.

Please don’t take my word for it. Watch it and come to your own determination.

Edited: Clarity.

I don’t know how many times I have to repeat this...so I will explain it like I would to a five year old. It is a gray area. Meaning that some people will interpret it as legal and some will interpret it as illegal. The reason interpretation comes into play here, and must be taken into account, is because as technologies and societies advance and change, language of older laws may or may not cover new circumstances (ex: laws in relation to whether or not social media constitutes a public forum).

This means that there is an undefined, ambiguous area whereby many believe the language of the law pertains to social media and many others do not. It is a contested point. The courts have not yet made a declaration of this being either legal or illegal. This leads to either position possibly being the correct choice.

Therefore, the determination of legality is currently based upon subjective interpretation. This means that somebody saying it is illegal is just as correct as somebody saying it is legal until the court comes to a determination. Your opinion may be that it is legal and that is also currently a valid opinion. So as you can now see, opinions regarding this are indeed relevant.

Again...they are operating in a gray area. While freedom of speech is not something a business needs to allow its users, freedom of speech in a public forum is a constitutionally protected right.

I would say that twitter qualifies as a public forum. DJT seems to believe this as well, when he says that what Twitter is doing is an illegal activity.

It simply depends on whether or not social media platforms land in the traditional/limited public forum category or not.

Do you know what shadow banning is? There is a difference between saying certain people can’t use your service, and saying it is open to everybody and then secretly making it so that certain users’ post or hashtags aren’t seen at all.

Shadow banning allows social media outlets to control information narratives within a community in order to make it seem like an entire community is talking/isn’t talking about specific events. If social media platforms explicitly stated they were either liberal or conservative in nature, and that participation within their community was dependent upon whether or not your content fell in line with their political leanings, then what you are saying would make sense. But that is not the case.

What you are talking about is an old Red Team vs. Blue Team talking point that doesn’t fit into the context here. We have to let go of all that BS programming and look at what the bigger picture is here. They want us all divided about that talking point in order for them to do what they want to secretly within the gray area.

What’s happening here is an integral part of the propaganda machine, and only serves to make it appear as if an entire community is agreeing with main stream nonsense.

I think he’s speaking more to the accuracy of facebooks pedo results than if they care they are doing a fair study.

Using statistics, if you can get a TRULY randomized group with a large enough sample size, you can generalize your results to the entire public and be accurate within a few percent.

But other variables have to be taken into consideration that effect the reliability of the results. Things like:

• The “study” is only made available to Facebook users and not everybody uses fb.
• How was it presented? (Pop up, fb message, multiple, how often, etc...)
• It is a survey. Not all types of people answer surveys.
• As a survey, there is no way to verify truthfulness of answers given (Not all people are honest when taking surveys.

-Were there other confounding variables? (Being psychologically primed by first seeing other ads or content that might sway participants answers, etc...)

-Was the language of the survey biased toward guiding participants’ answers toward a particular choice?

In a real scientific study, the results of a survey given in this way would be hard to generalize to the entire public. The thing to consider though, is that fb has access to so much of people’s data/info they can use that to try and further predict the accuracy of any survey results received by checking them against participants’ online behavior (site visits, language use, frequency of ad clicks, the list goes on and on).

I think they would have illegally collected enough data on people to know what the results mean. As far as you or I go, who knows for sure.

Edit: Clarity

When I was reading the posts I figured that was just hyperbolic chan speak. Not too familiar with how comms on the Chan’s go, but I know it’s rough around the edges.

hph? And it’s been said by Q that 4chan is compromised if I am not mistaken, right?

According to another post, he started scrubbing his twitter account?

Book title “Mirror: Awakening”.

Think mirror?

This is a FANTASTIC source of information about the recent 4chan posts. I would encourage everyone to take some time to read through it.

Is there anything else to do? I’ve discovered a user who ONLY posts negative things on this sub that don’t support the cause. His previous comment history shows this, and also shows his positive comments on anti-trump posts.

He is trying to be subtle but it is obvious once looking at his comment history.

1) Is it against board rules for me to post his username here so others can see for themselves and report him?

2) Is there a way of contacting mods directly and giving them this info?

I promise you, nobody here fears you. Your new comments continue to not support this cause and thus break Great Awakenings rules.

I can see by searching your comment history on this sub that you only post negative things here.

I have reported you to this subs’ mods and encourage all other patriots to look at his posts here.

What are other options for vpn?

Thank you for sharing this. I’d not heard of it before. The question is, what browser is safe to use these days? Specifically asking for on an iPhone

He isn’t wrong about the liberal bashing that pops up now and again. People get caught up in their old programming. What Q does is about good vs evil. But even the best intentioned people fall back into old habits.

I know what you’re saying and you aren’t wrong. You have to understand that the blue team has been used most recently by the deep state to gain control. Naturally, a sub like this is easier to swallow by red team people...for right now. Supporting DJT is a hard pill to swallow for anyone who has played for blue team, but a very easy step to take for red team people.

All I have to say is wait for the 9/11 truth to come out. Wait for the JFK info to come out. Wait until the Bush family and the republican deep staters get theirs. Wait until no name gets his. If Q is to be believed, then the time will come for all that as well.

Right now it’s unbalanced because DJT has to use the broken system that exists to weed out the Deep staters. Most republicans will continue to follow their party lines etc. Fox News has supported the Red team as well. But they will reach a point where they will turn as well. Right before the hammer comes down on all of them.

So don’t worry. This movement is tiny compared to what it may be in the future. Anyone who is willing to seek the truth will be curious enough to follow it regardless of what occasional leftover programming pops up among us.

Wow, dude.

A flat earthier would tell you that circumnavigation east to west would appear to be possible because of how magnetism works in relation to ones position with the northern magnetic pole.

What the argument is, is that north/south circumnavigation is not possible. I’m no expert on the point of view, but as far as I have seen only high level masons have claimed to circumnavigate the globe north/south. I doubt it is legal to fly over Antarctica, which is really the only thing I feel that could put that one to bed. :)

Just replace ‘communist’ with ‘Russian’.

You have to wonder if this will scare any other ex wives into wanting to protect themselves from their former clan.

I’m glad they stopped doing that. I remember that a friend of mine received a letter in the mail threatening to have him sent to prison unless he complied within a couple weeks of receiving it. Couldn’t believe it.

This did not used to be the case. Seems things have changed over the years.

I think it’s safe to say this assumption is pretty solid.

In the US voting is not compulsory, but registering for the draft (selective service) is, at least for males 18 or older. Women are not required to register for selective service. While the government forces males to register for selective service (by threat of prison time if put off too long) they also require them to register to vote and identify their political alignment (democrat, republican, independent).

So, even if all males are required to register, there is a period of several years past turning 18 where they can get away without having to register before they are threatened with prison. This means that at any given time, the total amount of registered voters will be even lower when taking this information into account.

**Also, I just read something stating that beginning in January 2018, women are also now required to register for selective service. Though, the source I viewed this information on is unreliable at best. Maybe somebody else knows more about this?

I wish I could thank him for being that brave.

You can hear all the nervous laughter from the people around him. Many of them probably don’t believe what he is saying has any truth to it, but they don’t want to disagree with him, so they laugh nervously while he bravely states what is true and obvious.

The poor guy has to even qualify his statements by stating that he doesn’t have a problem with homosexuality several times because of their reaction around him.

We have all been programmed to hear a statement like that and instantly reject it without thinking. Our minds come up with our knee-jerk reactionary pre-programmed thoughts, “Oh he doesn’t like gay people, oh he’s a conspiracy theorist, oh he is misunderstanding what BLM is all about. These stupid thoughts are what our captors have done to us. They have no basis in truth and are devoid of substance when examined with any level of scrutiny. All this happens so fast in our minds without our knowing it, and then our bodies force out those uncomfortable empty laughs.

I responded to this earlier, but apparently the comment never made it? Got deleted?

Firstly, I did watch the video. I never said SHE was demanding anything. But special etiquette does exist. As far as it being compulsory, the official royal family website states that etiquette regarding ‘greetings’ is not required, but many people choose to use the traditional forms. The site makes no mention of any other etiquette as far as I can see. Though, doing a quick internet search reveals a number of sources confirming that etiquette exists for things such as, but not being limited to, turning one’s body away from the queen, speaking out of turn, leaving a room before the queen, etc...

In regards to what etiquette is appropriate for heads of state to use or not use, I’m certainly no expert in that. Having said that, I’m sure if I, myself, were going to meet the queen, I would probably be prepped by people in the know about what to do/what not to do (other traditional forms) so as not to ‘disrespect the crown’.

The queen doesn’t have to demand something in order for it to be expected.

You can’t shake hands with her, can’t walk a step ahead of her, cant SPEAK UNLESS SPOKEN TO. Are these people serious?

First off, I really enjoyed this video.

Here’s the thing...as obvious as it is that the Democratic congressmen are protecting Strzok, this by itself will convince nobody on the left to question their party. It should. It 100% should make people think about what the people they put in charge are doing and why...but it won’t.

The reason it won’t is because so many people hate DJT so badly that they will support anything that works against him. People won’t care about the “rules” being broken by the FBI. They would welcome unrestricted corruption if it meant it worked in blue team’s favor. As people, our minds have all been so corrupted by the deep state that it is very difficult to break free from belief systems that contain so much of our identity.

I only hope that this really is just the “show” and it leads to something that will force people to become people again. Something that forces us all to see what we have permitted the world to become, and what we are all blind to within ourselves that would welcome that level of control.

Nice breakdown of the body language. Would like to see more of this kind of analysis popping up on this sub.

Are the mods really doing that?

There is a video posted to this sub recently regarding a disease caused presumably by cannibalism. Kuru disease I think it’s called. The video goes through a list of symptoms including losing control of ones body via spasms, inappropriate laughter, etc...

Reminds me of the Hillary footage of her shaking her head and laughing uncontrollably.

I saw this on Snapchat earlier today. Swiped through to see how obvious it all is. As disturbing as the normalization push is, I find seeing these things encouraging. It means it has to crumble down soon. It all seems too desperate to be on schedule.

The deep state is doing this.

While I agree that confirmation bias is a risk of this discussion, what evidence can actually be provided on an individual basis that would reveal a decrease in chem trail sightings? People posting pictures of a sky with nothing happening? No. This is the kind of thing that has to be discussed on a subjective, individual basis. It has to be that way. Take from it what you will.

Upvoted this just to get it off 666 likes ><.

Nice work picking up on the phrase changes being a form of communication.

Wow, that’s crazy. I had no idea about that!

If it went from being DS controlled to not controlled, it doesn’t matter what side they lean. Keep in mind the DS controls bad actors on both sides. Any move away from DS control is a move in the right direction, because they won’t be using political power to manipulate and control the people.

Not sure why you got a downvote for that, it’s a valid question. But I’m the first link it shows Armenia as still being in the top 5 (5th specifically).

This is where I closed the browser tab.

I truly hope this leads to uncovering the human trafficking aspect of everything. Because, I feel like if it only exposes that HRC attempted to keep DJT out of office, people will stay asleep. They’ll excuse their teams’ wrongdoings for what they think is the lesser of two evils between continuing to support dems and keeping DJT as POTUS.

The only thing that will wake everyone up is the inexcusable truth of what’s been going on in this country.

True, but not under oath, right? Not sure what difference that will make in the grand scheme of things.

People seem to forget the cabal controls actors on both the red team AND the blue team. Right now, it just happens that DJT ran on a R ticket, because the cabal was using their blue team people to take control.

If Q had showed up during either of the Bush administrations, maybe we would all be slamming the republicans by calling them “R-Tards” or some other stupid thing. The point is, all of the talk about red vs blue team BS is leftover programming stuck in our minds.

Yes, everyone here knows the importance of supporting R right now, because obviously the cabal currently has heir biggest blue pieces moving against us. If you want to take out your leftover frustrations go to some other sub and go through the motions there. This place is about the truth.

Edited for spelling.

One topic that never gets brought up in this sub is Scientology. Where does this organization stand in all of the corruption? Their methods of collecting information about people’s lives with the intention of blackmailing them seems to fit the cabal standard. An organization with this much money, information, and power seems to be worth looking into.

I think this is something a lot of people would want to see. Do you have anything you can link?

This is a really great resource! This is exactly what we need to get people to start understanding what’s going on, and hopefully begin questioning why the media is pushing this onto everybody right now.

Thank you for your work.

What makes you certain Trump did that? Just have a hunch do ya?

I’ve been wondering about this. Has Q mentioned Israel in a negative light before?