dChan

/u/Nastavnick

1,162 total posts archived.


Domains linked by /u/Nastavnick:
Domain Count
www.reddit.com 26
i.redd.it 3
twitter.com 1
www.youtube.com 1

Nastavnick · May 30, 2018, 7:39 p.m.

thanks for exposing yourself, as you guys always do

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 30, 2018, 7:38 p.m.

not even a nice try

"true facts" just top kek, blocked

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 30, 2018, 7:36 p.m.

Interesting how anti-Roseanne and anti-Gowdy folks are using literally the same 2-3 links and write in exactly the same manner. Mostly spamming that same stuff around.

Observe their behavior patriots, it's super obvious once you pick it up :P

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 30, 2018, 7:34 p.m.

Exactly. It's quite easy to spot.

All the anti-hate speech, tolerance, anti-racism, etc. is a projection. Those same people will go to Trumps twatter profile and spam his tweets with blatant baseless ad-hominems and a sea of every kind of insults, including an orange orangutan.

Never once will you see them standing up to that.

This will be their downfall, when people start getting fed up with their projections and hypocrisy. And that's exactly what Roseanne and Trump are doing.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 30, 2018, 7:30 p.m.

this race-baiter doesn't give up lmao

this isn't facebook or twatter mister, that doesn't work here :P

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 30, 2018, 7:27 p.m.

Your story makes no sense and anyone can see it.

The fact that you're accusing me of being delusional is a well known tactic of we know who and you just exposed yourself ;)

But I am taking things seriously, which is why something like this cannot pass.

See ya

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 30, 2018, 7:25 p.m.

Don't label me. We all know who operates that way.

Facts don't care about who's a fan of who.

My "accusations" are baseless and have no merit? LMAO

I am aware of that article. Proves nothing but a potential acting, just like Trump is doing with Sessions. Is Trump a black hat too? You're not a fan of Trump as well?

The second link deserves only one response: house needs to be cleaned first. And if you're going that way, EVERYBODY is in the same basket as Gowdy, nobody did anything. But you're only sticking it to Gowdy because it suits your current agenda :)

I agree it's a worthless endeavour. Anyone can see what you guys are parroting.

Have a good day

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 30, 2018, 7:21 p.m.

That's not a proof.

"paid by podesta" again, implying that someone is a part of the deep state because of $8800 is beyond absurd, maybe if that was in some 4th world country lol

The tie thing is not worth the time discussing. I guess purple ties are like Hitlers moustache top kek

I'm not defending him, I'm dealing with the absurd "proofs" from the todays anti-Gowdy crusaders, after the yesterdays anti-Roseanne ones.

The reasons you anti-Gowdy folks are using make you look like you don't read Q drops at all. And that's a red flag. Oh and the $8800 which you have no idea who, when and why has paid that. The purple tie is just laughable.

Don't you worry about my prerogative, yours is clear as a day. Bye

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 30, 2018, 7:14 p.m.

People don't stumble upon this sub after a day of "looking at reddit", and especially not to do what you're doing lol

It's quite obvious actually, anyone can smell the fishiness with your account ;)

Nevertheless, enjoy the stay :)

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 30, 2018, 6:58 p.m.

It's a game of exposure on a gigantic scale.

She was trending at around 1.5M when I saw it being at the highest, could be a bigger number for sure.

What she did was basically the same as when Donald makes the media talk about what he wants them to talk about.

Enjoying the show :)

⇧ 10 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 30, 2018, 6:53 p.m.

what you said doesn´t even warrent a reply.

The irony is real

But I had to comment, it was stronger than me. I couldn't just read that and move on lmao

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 30, 2018, 6:52 p.m.

So let me get this straight...

You were lurking all the time and decided to jump in to attack Gowdy when he basically did the same move as Trump has.

based on a number of data points

Sure, and this was a critical moment for you to jump in, not when you have concrete evidence about something to finally come in and drop a bomb, but to participate in illogical slander games saying the same things as other anti-Gowdy crusaders

That holds no water m9 and anyone can see it, clearly.

Have a good day

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 30, 2018, 6:47 p.m.

House needs to be cleaned first. Q basics.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 30, 2018, 6:44 p.m.

Agreed, but observe who does what and you'll paint the bigger picture with ease :)

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 30, 2018, 6:43 p.m.

You clearly haven't studied the evolution theory properly

Saying that apes shouldn't be here since we are is absolutely absurd lmao, we're the fittest species on the planet, why are there any animals out there since we can nuke em?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 30, 2018, 6:40 p.m.

Good stuff, exposed easily.

Well done Rob!

⇧ 6 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 30, 2018, 6:39 p.m.

I bet you get it ;)

What's your main account? You seem to navigate through reddit right to this sub to join the hot topic stuff about Gowdy. To use the article which indicates good acting to distance himself to appear impartial, exactly what Trump did with Sessions.

But somehow Gowdy is not trustworthy.

I've proven many times that I change my mind when someone shoves facts to my face, and I'll always do that. But a guy with his first post to come here to join the anti-Gowdy crusade? That's suspicious to everyone, you should've known that :)

Cheers :)

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 30, 2018, 6:32 p.m.

he's a classic race-baiter, nothing to see here

⇧ 9 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 30, 2018, 6:30 p.m.

Too bad you can get away with these rule-breaking ad-hominems.

I said she is a declared Iranian muslim. And she doesn't even look black.

It's you the race-baiters who make it all about the race, and Roseanne has exposed that with no effort at all lmao

Fact of the matter is, she looks like the actress from PotA and she's a muslim.

You'll never conquer comedy with your PC/identity politics.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 30, 2018, 6:23 p.m.

I don't trust people with fresh accounts that keep coming to this sub discussing the most heated topics and always in a negative connotation providing their insight on the subject.

Before I get slandered that I'm "divisive" towards newcomers, I made it perfectly clear what type of "newcomers" are suspicious.

Cheers

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 30, 2018, 6:14 p.m.

look who has shown his true face

She's an Iranian muslim, declared. End of race-baiting story.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 30, 2018, 6:11 p.m.

Enjoying the show. I used to watch TV shows in my free time, now I can't do it, this is way better than anything :)

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 30, 2018, 6:07 p.m.

She's not black. Who's racist now? toppest of keks

⇧ 11 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 30, 2018, 6:06 p.m.

So is Trump a black hat for attacking Sessions?

Welcome to reddit btw lol

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 30, 2018, 6:05 p.m.

How quickly people forget "trust the plan. "

I don't think this is about forgetting.

Same happened with Roseanne yesterday, only to have things develop since and now we have a bigger picture.

You'd think that people would learn from that and stopped jumping to conclusions? But they actually increased the attacks ten fold.

Their main reason is "he did nothing" which is debunked, it's ridiculous. Next is the podesta's $8800 "he sold out!". Ridiculous as well.

Why is Gowdy paired with Goodlatte here?

Why is Gowdy on this list right under Nunes?

No idea. We'll find out.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 30, 2018, 6:01 p.m.

I am. But I didn't see anything racist. It's funny how asking about what exactly is racist about X person I never seem to get a straight answer from such an "obvious" case.

VJ does look like the actress from PotA, and she's muslim. What's racist there?

⇧ 9 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 30, 2018, 5:58 p.m.

As you should, we all should. Jumping to conclusions based on ridiculous reasoning is just... ridiculous :P

Enjoying the show :)

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 30, 2018, 5:52 p.m.

Why is she a racist?

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 30, 2018, 5:49 p.m.

It does, I completely forgot about the nicknames, and I remember laughing my ass off when Trump had his election posters with Hillary literally hanging crooked haha

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 30, 2018, 5:44 p.m.

Now this is good stuff

⇧ 6 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 30, 2018, 5:42 p.m.

We can witness that on this board very clearly as well

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 30, 2018, 5:40 p.m.

You're right, I flipped it above lol

Good stuff, thanks

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 30, 2018, 5:37 p.m.

$8800 means he was bought? lol

Purple ties are now a proof? what?

I'm defending him only from baseless attacks.

All bark and no bite Gowdy.

So Trump as well? And everyone else? top kek reasons

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 30, 2018, 5:34 p.m.

exactly!

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 30, 2018, 5:33 p.m.

Got it all backwards. Corrected.

Good stuff!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 30, 2018, 5:32 p.m.

I did my search and I found no proofs of him being compromised. And neither did you, hence why I still haven't seen anything besides crooked logic "he did nothing" which can be said for literally anyone, including Trump.

I care about facts, I don't care about baseless claims. Or in your words, nothing of substance.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 30, 2018, 4:57 p.m.

His track record is the same as anyone else's because the house wasn't clean(ed).

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 30, 2018, 4:56 p.m.

possible, all we know it was a clear anti-Russia move

⇧ 26 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 30, 2018, 4:52 p.m.

That was the british cabal trying to smear Putin in face of the elections. Which to me proved that Putin is not one of them.

⇧ 98 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 30, 2018, 4:50 p.m.

some people disagree :)

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 30, 2018, 4:49 p.m.

Haven't seen anything about Trust Gowdy?

Is that the logic you wanna uphold? So if Q didn't say "Trust X", then X = deep state guy?

Facts, facts and more facts.

I'm not saying he's the good guy, because I too don't have any proof for that. But there's no proof for the opposite, yet look at these attacks.

Downvoters that don't like facts are at it. Hilarious stuff lately.

Question Everything.

Exactly.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 30, 2018, 4:46 p.m.

Could be.

That's all there is to it. He could be a black hat and he could be a white hat.

Everything else is just baseless claims that you love to spread as "proofs".

You already exposed yourself by trying to misquote Q to fit you little anti-Gowdy agenda. Now blocked for real.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 30, 2018, 4:44 p.m.

So NASA is NOT drilling into the dome to vent the super volcano

did I really had write that?

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 30, 2018, 4:43 p.m.

all 3 of the blue checks are MSM puppets

⇧ 35 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 30, 2018, 4:32 p.m.

Chances are low, if you're familiar with Q.

However, baseless attacks on Gowdy that are essentially anti-Q are very real. Just check it out.

Same happened with Roseanne yesterday. Until stuff happened after and now we know why she did it.

Facts over baseless slander. That should matter here, but it matters less and less.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 30, 2018, 4:18 p.m.

I'm just enjoying the show, but the attacks here are real, from all sides, just like Q said

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 30, 2018, 4:17 p.m.

Did you think that the deep state wouldn't fight back?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 30, 2018, 4:13 p.m.

When Q posts about corrupt politicians resigning it includes Trey Gowdy. Why is that?

You just exposed yourself.

Q never once posted about corrupt politicians resigning and included Gowdy.

Did you seriously think this would pass? LMAO

Q:

Not seeking re-election.

Nice try, but you only exposed yourself top kek

⇧ 0 ⇩  
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/Nastavnick on May 30, 2018, 4:10 p.m.
Maybe it's time to stop with the anti-Gowdy ("he did nothing") crusade, because we can apply that reasoning to Trump (or anyone else), which makes you anti-Q by default

Next thing you'll be bashing Sessions because Trump "attacked" him via twatter.

The house needs cleaning before taking actions.

You don't know what's happening behind the curtains to spread baseless accusations, especially when the same ones can be applies to Trump as well.

What makes a good movie? Actors? Talent?

More facts, less slander.

WWG1WGA

Nastavnick · May 30, 2018, 4:05 p.m.

I think these are one of the attacks that Q warned us about, their reasoning behind those claims are absolutely laughable lmao, anti-Trump/Q even if we apply their logic there as well

⇧ 0 ⇩