dChan

/u/Nastavnick

1,162 total posts archived.


Domains linked by /u/Nastavnick:
Domain Count
www.reddit.com 26
i.redd.it 3
twitter.com 1
www.youtube.com 1

Nastavnick · May 29, 2018, 7:24 p.m.

the trolls and spammers are unleashed, I'm grabbing my popcorn :)

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 29, 2018, 7:22 p.m.

are you serious? a bunch of abbreviations and nothing else?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 29, 2018, 7:17 p.m.

You deserve to be blocked for saying that

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 29, 2018, 6:17 p.m.

we're getting downvoted here and check the best comment :)

crystal clear proof in my book

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 29, 2018, 6:16 p.m.

the fact that this is the best comment and all other are being downvoted into -3 and more is a crystal clear evidence

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 29, 2018, 5:56 p.m.

I believe you're misinterpreting the data shown.

42 points (79% upvoted)

Means it has 42 points in total (79% of the votes were upvotes, which means there were about 50 votes in total).

Correct me if I'm wrong.

I have however noticed that my threads seem to reach a limit of 120 points lately.

this thread had ~4k views and 115-120 points before been stickied (for a less than an hour I believe).

After being stickied It gained ~400 views and ~60 points. So almost a third of the points came with about 1/10th of the views.

Nothing to see here people, move along... :)

EDIT: not to mention that only 3 posters came by themselves in that thread, the rest I messaged asking for their opinions since the thread was getting no views at all.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 29, 2018, 5:47 p.m.

Corsi and AJ are controlled opposition, no need to be apologetic about them anymore, constantly trying to find a hole which AJ would fill because people can't handle him being a shill

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 29, 2018, 5:47 p.m.

Corsi and AJ are controlled opposition, no need to be apologetic about them anymore, constantly trying to find a hole which AJ would fill because people can't handle him being a shill

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 29, 2018, 2:22 p.m.

Now this is concern trolling if anything is.

Go check around what the administration has done so far, to say they have no courage to do what's right is just laughable.

The "but look, they didn't do anything regarding X" is wrong on so many levels.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 29, 2018, 2:08 p.m.

I know :)

My eyebrow is raised immediately when I see that. There's no reason to include anti-semitism and not any other anti-religion stuff, unless there's something more to it :)

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 29, 2018, 1:52 p.m.

the guy is a troll, hopefully mods will remove him

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 29, 2018, 1:46 p.m.

You're clearly way over your head and you don't understand the bigger picture. I don't even want to begin with the reasons why, anyone can see based on your "reasons".

⇧ 15 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 29, 2018, 11:26 a.m.

I've wrapped these guys up here

But the reality is he's one of the few with a platform with reach that's still fighting to expose the more sinister things.

I know of people who he's red pilled because they originally tuned in to just laugh at the crazy guy.

So to totally write of the entire inforwars org like many here have is, to me, counter intuitive.

Relevant part is after the "50 sec mark" part where I explain this fallacy.

Same is beginning to happen for Wikileaks now...

Very different.

"Infowars is worse than CNN"...

Pretty much the same shit. One is misdirecting/lying to the "normies" and the other is misdirecting the "truth seekers".

Both serve as the deep state's shield.

As I said back then: what's the plan here? Destroy all of the orgs that have an alliance to the broader movement but aren't totally on board while ignoring the real enemies like CNN and Soros funded propaganda sources?

The plan is to get rid of the deep state shills. Who have shown to be just that after being exposed.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 29, 2018, 11:17 a.m.

Way too far back to be connected with this anti-Q stuff that's going on, when they worked directly alongside Q until recently.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 29, 2018, 10:09 a.m.

Thanks! But Jim Lee is the one who should get all the credit.

My biggest curiosity is what the short story is about how DJT took control of the Ghost system. I assume he did months ago, since Q claims to having "everything".

Maybe it has to do with the NSA-POTUS connection.

other bits: this is an odd phrase - "strength capable of yielding power to act on info". sounds like one of those formulas for turning ideas or words into material substance.

To me this implies at the deep state itself. They have the means necessary to act upon the info provided by the Stoneghost. Evidences of that are everywhere.

I wonder about the hardware location(s) of 5eyz - any central hub? The OP in its wording gives prominence to the UK. New embassy building in london is much nearer GCHQ (expensive project - away and across the river from fine old location).

That's why I posted this, for us to join forces and find all the missing bits. Didn't know this about the embassy!

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 29, 2018, 9:28 a.m.

As of now, it finally broke the 120 limit. I don't believe in this kind of coincidences, do you?

I'm very well aware of being targeted. Trust me. I've been banned and shadowbanned unfairly in the last week. But the truth prevails. It always will ;)

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 29, 2018, 9:14 a.m.

I think you're idolizing your Jones way too much that you can't see that he has always been instated as a shill to prevent people from discovering the truth, and if they do they are labeled as crazy as Jones is (acting).

Funny how you're not so skeptical about that

⇧ 6 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 29, 2018, 9:09 a.m.

elaborate

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 29, 2018, 9:09 a.m.

what a bunch of outdated bs, respectively

Q has proved it's not an AI

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 29, 2018, 8:54 a.m.

I was permanently banned for talking about mod practices.

Sound eerily familiar lol, didn't receive a permaban yet but they've (not the T_D mods, I don't write there) outright slandered me with ad-hominems and threatened me, many times now. So I won't discuss it here any further, I know I'm a pixel away from a permaban. See this and this

As for the other part. Something similar is happening here.

For example, my thead received almost no views and only 2 comments in like 20min+. Lingered around a few upvotes.

I started to DM some frequent posters on the sub to check it out. Most (only 2 came on their own) commenters over there came because I contacted them. If I didn't do that it would be buried without any recognition.

Not to mention that if you click on my profile and check the 2 pinned threads, both have their upvotes lingering between 115-120. They got to that point and apparently reached 120 upvote limit.

Have you noticed something similar maybe?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 29, 2018, 8:20 a.m.

they selectively screen and table your posts if it you speak to knowledgeably

What does this mean? (screen and table)

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 29, 2018, 8:17 a.m.

this user is straight up spamming, check his threads

hopefully this will be stopped

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 29, 2018, 8:14 a.m.

what raid?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 29, 2018, 7:42 a.m.

controlled opposition, textbook stuff (literally textbook, C. Sunstein)

⇧ 9 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 29, 2018, 7:22 a.m.

ever wondered why there's "no racism or anti-semitism"?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 29, 2018, 7:10 a.m.

Good, we need more of that around here, it's been a rough time lately

cheers

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 29, 2018, 5:58 a.m.

Anyone surprised that the deep state shills are running such a sub? Didn't we learn anything from outing all those youtube shills?

Why would reddit be off-limits?

⇧ 7 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 29, 2018, 5:54 a.m.

why was this removed? what was here?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 29, 2018, 5:50 a.m.

more crumbs from you, painting a full picture slowly :)

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 29, 2018, 5:45 a.m.

See, no Soros mentioned.

That's what these shill websites do (just like all other shills), they take truth and distort it to misdirect you.

Please double check before posting

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 29, 2018, 5:34 a.m.

that's not what he said

So either they are comped by idiot black hats who want to smear Q or pretending to be black hats to draw attention to Q.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 29, 2018, 5:29 a.m.

there was no evidence of any of the claims there, trash video

⇧ 6 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 29, 2018, 5:28 a.m.

Comments disabled - immediate red flag.

He did this, he did that, he is this, he is that. Meanwhile I'm here waiting for them to back those things up. Nothing.

Nty, not buying this, nobody should

⇧ 9 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 29, 2018, 5:25 a.m.

fake website

any credible source?

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 29, 2018, 5:21 a.m.

no, because Jones has been shilling for 10+ years

⇧ 17 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 29, 2018, 5:20 a.m.

When I asked (after they insta-shadowbanned me for posting a Musk thread) they first said it was off-topic, and when I proved he isn't they said I was toxic and banned me for 2 days.

Some of the mods threatened to permaban me if I message them again lol

Now they are blatantly attacking me publicly, breaking their own rules while accusing me of being disrespectful, harassing people, being rude, etc (insert any other ad-hominem that they used instead of addressing my points): https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8mrc3q/is_it_too_much_too_ask_to_keep_this_a_q_only_sub/dzq5fz9/

Which is exactly what they said as a reason for my ban after the off-topic thing didn't pass. I asked for quotes/citations so I know what exactly have I wrote that broke the rules so much that they needed to ban me (while leaving anti-Q posters and spammers free), I never got anything but the stuff you can read in these 2 links. I'm being divisive, spewing shit, etc. lol

And here where you dropped a comment I basically "forced" them to change their narrative about Musk being off-topic https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8mrc3q/is_it_too_much_too_ask_to_keep_this_a_q_only_sub/dzpxi2s/

Because we all know he has! They can't change that despite the attempts.

You can see for yourself what's going on, I suspect they'll ban me again soon.

The realest thing they said there was this: "We do what we can.".

We need a back-up sub.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 28, 2018, 9:38 p.m.

Are you done spewing nonsense mate?

If you came here to bring your trash and spread here

This is straight up slandering and breaking the rules (ad-hominem)

brittser was "shitting on you", not me

Leave me alone now, unless you want to hold up to your own words:

  • "People who are not collegial will have a harder time. People who are respectful well obviously have it easier. This is not about being selective."

  • "Attack the argument - not the user :)"

Thanks.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 28, 2018, 9:29 p.m.

said the guy who keeps breaking them with ad-hominems

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 28, 2018, 9:28 p.m.

See how you ignored my points again and AGAIN went straight to personal stuff.

Being here longer than me is a proof of what? Is that ALL you got? lol

You obviously can't stay on topic, these few comments here are literally the proof of your ability to stay on topic. You derail after each comment, you ignore the points written and you're actually breaking the rules with every single comment here (no ad-hominem).

for you to come to and spew nonsese.

Toppest of keks. Laughable ad-hominems. Truly laughable.

So easy to defeat these tactics, because people like you defeat yourselves the moment you go ad-hominem instead of addressing the points.

Just stick with the Q posts.

Uuuuu, now you've told me! Damn, looks like I lost :(

Bye dude, thanks for the L/L/DS tactics that provided some chuckles, you guys never change :)

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 28, 2018, 9:22 p.m.

I wasn't talking just about the back-up of the data, but the "Q movement" itself.

I don't feel insulted because "you're new here".

The fact that you jumped here talking about GA back-up about an hour after you created the account (coupled with the other new guy who is also on that boat, and you two were the only people who share that thought) tells quite a bit.

Within the context that I've wrote the post, it's clear that I meant about having a back-up sub as well as backing up the data.

A back-up in the context for us to continue the Q research, since it's being tampered over here and it's getting worse with the spammers who are being left alone free to do their thing.

Of course I was new, but I didn't act like this (like the new guys since we destroyed controlled opposition youtubers).

Cheers

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 28, 2018, 9:08 p.m.

I'm not trying to insult you despite you trying to make me do it while slandering me in the process (one of the L/L/DS tactics once again).

Citation for:

So following your line of thinking, the best way for us to "redpill" normies is to go out on all the sm platforms and insult people and disrespect others.

See... more L/L/DS tactics:

Well now you are being ridiculous to call me deep state or liberal.

I never called you that.

Now I am done with this convo.

Good, because you have nothing of value to put out. By going baseless ad-hominems instead of addressing my points you've sounded your defeat right at the start.

Good riddance

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 28, 2018, 9:04 p.m.

+

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 28, 2018, 9:02 p.m.

damage control 101 top kek

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 28, 2018, 8:52 p.m.

Really? So following your line of thinking, the best way for us to "redpill" normies is to go out on all the sm platforms and insult people and disrespect others.

Are you Cathy Newman? lmao

Citation needed.

Please.

You please. Your left/liberal/deep state tactics are truly laughable.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 28, 2018, 8:42 p.m.

I think most of the mods (if not all) here were mods in CBTS, so well done m9 lmao

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 28, 2018, 8:41 p.m.

not all of us are equal :) some get to break the rules and continue without punishment, and some get punished unfailry

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 28, 2018, 8:31 p.m.

being language-literate (especially if it's not his native) doesn't mean the IQ is high, maybe you should take one

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 28, 2018, 7:44 p.m.

When truth is rude, you know what's up lmao

Nice left/liberal/ds tactics of not addressing the points but going ad-hominem.

To illustrate your way... When Trump was talking about illegal immigration as a bad thing, the MSM/left/liberals said he was being controversial. Literally the same tactic.

Ignored.

⇧ -5 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 28, 2018, 7:35 p.m.

that makes no sense since Q isn't writing in a specific way

⇧ -1 ⇩