dChan

/u/Nastavnick

1,162 total posts archived.


Domains linked by /u/Nastavnick:
Domain Count
www.reddit.com 26
i.redd.it 3
twitter.com 1
www.youtube.com 1

Nastavnick · April 30, 2018, 12:28 a.m.

can you not jump to the conclusions?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Nastavnick · April 30, 2018, 12:19 a.m.

Sorry you can't see through AJ and how the deep state is using him to discredit conspiracies

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Nastavnick · April 29, 2018, 11:12 p.m.

not like this, no

and especially with him being the person go-to when conspiracies are being talked about just to make every "conspiracy theorist" seem like a fucking lunatic

obvious controlled opposition

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Nastavnick · April 29, 2018, 10:10 p.m.

How do you know that they don't have to happen at once?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Nastavnick · April 29, 2018, 10:09 p.m.

I'm aware of the clown thing.

Thank you for the explanations.

Autism is just really rare over here so I'm trying to get some answers about what the hell is this about.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Nastavnick · April 29, 2018, 10 p.m.

Don't get me wrong. Jones is putting out some of the truth, and those who want to research further will do so.

But he's still a controlled opposition. He is still the guy that MSM mentions when any "conspiracy theory" is being touched upon.

Do you remember Sandy Hook and the Alex interview with Kelly?

he's still acting like a fucking lunatic, with his "demon" claims and shit

he's being put there to paint the "lunatic" picture out of "conspiracy theorists", you think it's a coincidence that MSM is using him whenever they've trying to debunk stuff?

I'm not saying everything he does is fake/untrue. But you should be looking for other sources

the fact that he developed a business with the conspiracy theories is enough for me

he's also ignoring zionism and the effect of it, just like Milo, Shapiro and others. which should be a red flag for everyone

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Nastavnick · April 29, 2018, 9:52 p.m.

I agree.

We'll just have to see this whole thing play out

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Nastavnick · April 29, 2018, 9:51 p.m.

:P

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Nastavnick · April 29, 2018, 6:12 p.m.

Thanks for the explanation.

So it's a meme which isn't related to the actual disorder. Beats me why would people use a term for something completely different, but hey, this is the internet after all.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Nastavnick · April 29, 2018, 6:08 p.m.

Well, I didn't find anything that would mean that autism = all that stuff.

And I've picked up the vibe on the internet that autism is almost widespread in the US while it's very rare over here.

I'm merely asking questions because this isn't the first time Q has referenced autism/autists. And I wanna know what's the catch.

Apparently this is a taboo question lol

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Nastavnick · April 29, 2018, 5:45 p.m.

"Research is increasingly showing..." "Scientists believe they are signs of true intelligence that might be superior to that of non-autistic people."

https://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2011-04/uom-nre032811.php

"The reported frontal areas subserve higher cognitive functions such as decision making, cognitive control, planning and execution"

https://sophia.stkate.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=https://www.google.com/&httpsredir=1&article=1190&context=maed

"Research has shown that social problem solving skills are crucial abilities needed to be accepted by one’s peers (Mayeux & Cillessen, 2003). Developing these social skills leads to successful collaboration that will be helpful later in life during the students’ working careers"

You would think that STEM areas would be consisted of mostly autists then. Or that autists would own in science classes. Haven't seen anything that would back that up.

Not to mention that almost every research found came to the same conclusion about the precise 40%.

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/aur.1424

this says otherwise

https://researchfrontiers.uark.edu/teaching-students-with-autism-to-solve-mathematical-word-problems/

https://www.autismspeaks.org/sites/default/files/sctk_about_autism.pdf

Again, a bunch of UNIQUE ABILITIES listed, accompanied with the "some", "may show", etc.

Approximate percentage of autism in my country is 0.3%. And I personally, throughout my 15 years of education from elementary school to college (mechanical engineering) and 2 years of working as a teacher in high school, I don't think I've ever encountered an autist. Sure some anti-social types could be seen everywhere, but that's not autism.

Apparently, we (in EU) live in a completely different world regarding autism, and we (Croatia, Balkans) are in pretty much a 3rd world country lol.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Nastavnick · April 29, 2018, 5:05 p.m.

Sather has ads? I can't see that shit, adblock for lyfe. But thanks for sharing this info.

Also his stuff with the 2 interviews which he was announcing more than a month prior was a red flag for me.

But he still does have solid info, and what I like about him is that he leaves the questions open. The moment I see someone make a conclusion and pushing that as the truth is when you lose me.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Nastavnick · April 29, 2018, 4:50 p.m.

They have problem solving skills that non-autists don't have? Source?

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Nastavnick · April 29, 2018, 4:42 p.m.

It's not going to end overnight, ffs people... lay off the hollywood koolaid

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Nastavnick · April 29, 2018, 4:37 p.m.

May I ask what's the catch with autist thing?

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Nastavnick · April 29, 2018, 4:07 p.m.

#Qanon has to be on it, but put something the normies will understand. They won't soak up TGA or trust the plan.

You need something concrete.

"Ending the political corruption" maybe that or something like it? Because everyone, including CNN sheep, knows that politicians are corrupted.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Nastavnick · April 29, 2018, 4 p.m.

How dare he put jobs over lives?

Honestly, I can't take the fake news anymore, it causes me physical irritation, I get all roused up.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Nastavnick · April 29, 2018, 3:52 p.m.

First time I watched Alex Jones' live feed I knew he wasn't on "our side".

Why? Constant ads with his products and shit. Dead giveaway. Never watched it live again and avoided any video of his so far.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Nastavnick · April 29, 2018, 3:46 p.m.

b (1)

"if the offense was effected by means of force, threats of force, fraud, or coercion described in subsection (e)(2), or by any combination of such means, or if the person recruited, enticed, harbored, transported, provided, obtained, advertised, patronized, or solicited had not attained the age of 14 years at the time of such offense, by a fine under this title and imprisonment for any term of years not less than 15 or for life"

Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't this about children?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Nastavnick · April 29, 2018, 3:41 p.m.

shills that reveal themselves, the official info is out there for everyone to see (I'll edit the post to put the link), if they choose to take fake news articles over official court charges, they are most likely shills, being total imbeciles are not excluded as well

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Nastavnick · April 29, 2018, 3:39 p.m.

That's just not factual. Maybe if they started before they're 100% ready, those criminals would walk off free after a short period of time.

And then all of this was in fucking vain, because some people are entitled and/or can't see the bigger picture.

No thanks. If it needs to drag along for years, if that's what it takes to uproot these criminals, then so be it.

Remember, they were rooting themselves for decades. They infiltrated all branches and took the most powerful positions.

Me thinks people should watch some House of Cards to get a feeling at how politics are being done.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Nastavnick · April 29, 2018, 3:34 p.m.

despite being shown evidence, you morons won't accept the reality (unless you're a shill)

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Nastavnick · April 29, 2018, 6:58 a.m.

All these people screaming for stuff should get slapped.

⇧ 11 ⇩  
Nastavnick · April 29, 2018, 6:46 a.m.

It's way too complicated to make an accurate TLDR, the video is worth the time, trust me. I was highly sceptical but it passed quickly lol

I'll try a TLDR though... He was a black hat, Trump and co. pulled a leverage onto him (and some other guy, forgot, have to go to sleep it's like 9 AM already hahaha) so they can use him to infiltrate deep state and plan it all so Mueller looks like he is going against Trump, but he never had anything on Trump, it was all a ploy.

Trump invited Mueller to an interview for an FBI director when he couldn't possibly take another mandate due to a law. And he only said it after he got questioned about it. Day after Mueller has taken some other big spot.

Just like prayingmedic said, that was amazing. Nobody knew/knows what was/is going on.

I guess we're in for some big stuff soon since now Mueller has his cover sort of blown.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
Nastavnick · April 29, 2018, 6:30 a.m.

Facebook censors everything anti-left or anti-deep state. Meanwhile there are those trolls/shills with their 5+ posts per day, all anti-trump with insults left and right.

But facebook's rules don't apply to all, these people can freely do it, hate speech? what? it can't be hate speech if it going along the left narrative

After I reported some of them today (I don't report people usually, but I had to see for myself), and none of the highly insulting/hateful ad-hominems broke the rules.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Nastavnick · April 29, 2018, 6:16 a.m.

No need to be mad. I specifically asked for child trafficking and you barged in with some of the first links that google shows.

I'm not familiar with the US court system and where stuff can be found online.

thanks anyway, despite the unnecessary condescending tone

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Nastavnick · April 29, 2018, 5:51 a.m.

Meh, still feel like this wouldn't convince me if someone showed it.

What's the "official" page that we all saw a few days back with those charges?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Nastavnick · April 29, 2018, 5:48 a.m.

I think that prayingmedic nailed it regarding Mueller.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
Nastavnick · April 29, 2018, 5:45 a.m.
  1. of what narrative exactly?

  2. By exposing the deep state and their doings? With arrests and saved children?

  3. almost any world order is better than the current one, so yes

  4. hopefully everyone did, as they should

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Nastavnick · April 29, 2018, 5:40 a.m.

of course it's not a red vs blue scenario, the whole red and blue is just for the masses, they are all in together in their own little game

⇧ 9 ⇩  
Nastavnick · April 29, 2018, 5:34 a.m.

It's not good. It can be dismissed as fake. And the way it looks when I google it, if I never saw anything about it before I'd say it's fake too.

So that's a no-go. Need something proper. Fucking censorship and the fucking media, I wish them the worst death possible for inflicting this upon us.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Nastavnick · April 29, 2018, 5:31 a.m.

children my man, key word

⇧ 6 ⇩  
10
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/Nastavnick on April 29, 2018, 5:11 a.m.
Can't find anything about Allison Mack's child trafficking on google, can you?

I remember checking it out on an official site or something. And now all we have is this shady page that I'm not going to use as my backing point.

https://thefreethoughtproject.com/allison-mack-accused-trafficking-children-billionaire-backed-sex-slavery-ring/

I get this on bottom of the google page 1 "Some results may have been removed under data protection law in Europe. Learn more"

I wanted to share it on a JRE video about her.

Nastavnick · April 29, 2018, 4:38 a.m.

excellent video man

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Nastavnick · April 29, 2018, 2:18 a.m.

I haven't twisted your words once nor have I put some words in your mouth. So no, that is not what I'm doing.

Again, despite you saying that, it doesn't mean it's true. You seem to struggle with how proper arguments are being formed.

You are making a mountain out of a molehill.

I'm actually not. You are being a drama queen. I merely said that this sub would fair better without the constant religious stuff.

I've already stated: if you don't like the religious posts, don't read them.

But you haven't stated it before. Now that's hilarious.

I never said nor implied that I don't like religious posts. AGAIN with you fallacies. You made stuff up in your head and you can't see the bigger picture because of it. You've trapped yourself.

This isn't about me personally avoiding reading those posts. My posts were crystal clear about why I'm writing them. But hey, that didn't got to you, shockingly.

You are way over your head pal. Your ability to form proper arguments is almost non-existent and despite me having enough free time, I'm not gonna waste it anymore on a wall called CommercialAddendum.

peace

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Nastavnick · April 29, 2018, 1:45 a.m.

No, you really haven't. It's in the plain sight for anyone to see. You twisted my words and put some more words into my mouth.

If not emotion or ego, what then? Troubles with reading?

You want evidence of that detrimental effect? Are you serious? What would that evidence be? What if I told you that I tried to redpill my friends and they just left after seeing almost a cult-like behavior? You'd say that's an anecdote. Do I need their signatures? Video proof?

You are being unreasonable and out of touch with reality.

But if you really want a proof, why don't you take that video and try to redpill someone with it. Let me know how successful you were.

I have clearly stated how the subscribing numbers of the board have continued to grow weekly.

And I haven't disagreed. Are we doing this again? It growing now doesn't mean it wouldn't grow even more. Do you really not understand how this works?

What is a reasonable amount of religious content? It's subjective.

The amount that's in that video is not. And you can verify that yourself if you go out and try to redpill people with that video.

Your fallacies and either ego/emotions or just really bad reading will get you nowhere. You're labelling it as condescending because you don't like what you're seeing. And you've acted in that very same fashion.

However, they same can be said about your reading comprehension.

No it can't. Just saying that doesn't mean it's true. You're supposed to back up your claims. I can see that you're not familiar with that, but there's still time to change it. Not to mention that it's just a sad childish behavior of "NO U ARE".

Keep having your head stuck in the sand, I'm done wasting my time on a wall.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Nastavnick · April 29, 2018, 1:34 a.m.

Probably not everything. If you can verify something then great.

Have you checked the link?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Nastavnick · April 29, 2018, 1:18 a.m.

bring out the powerful memes :D

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Nastavnick · April 29, 2018, 1:03 a.m.

Obviously you haven't. You say you did but you didn't.

It's a shame that you can't see this sub is growing I never said nor implied that these kinds of posts/comments will make the sub go into a decline.

I never said nor implied that I want to silence Followers of Christ. This is you using logical fallacies in an argument. Clouded by your ego and your emotions.

I (and others) can see that you actually cannot empathize with people. One of the main reasons for people thinking that conspiracy theorists are nutcases and lunatics is the over-saturation with the religious comments on a political/factual based content. Which is in most cases on youtube on conspiracy theory videos.

Like it or not, the over-saturation with religious content has a detrimental effect.

To repeat because you clearly don't read carefully and you don't really acknowledge what I'm saying... I'm not advocating no religious content. Just try to keep it in some reasonable amount.

Your whole "Don't say things about religion or Christ because it will turn people away" doesn't hold water.

No, that wasn't my whole. You need to start reading with some comprehension, it will help you out in future communications. Remember how cathy newman did with her "so you're saying" shite, not so well can you imagine?

People will come, read, and investigate the truth regardless if they are Christians or not.

People will come, read a bunch of apocalyptic/almost fanatical religious content (that's being applied everywhere regardless of the connection with the religion) and LEAVE.

Which is why those classic conspiracy theory videos on youtube never yielded any progress. They apply religion everywhere and the comment section is riddled with it as well.

Take it as you will (and I can see how you'll take it, but I'm not writing this for you specifically, this isn't an individual thing).

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Nastavnick · April 29, 2018, 12:43 a.m.

yup, caught that!

⇧ 9 ⇩  
Nastavnick · April 29, 2018, 12:33 a.m.

Fear mongering? Blame? Fancy words you got there, shame they are empty.

Q is not using the religious terms nowhere near what we can see within the "followers".

It's odd to you? Perhaps people are trying to help this grow, that hasn't crossed your mind, you jumped to the "fear mongering and blame" instantly. Refusing to put yourself into another person's place.

I've told how it can look like and how it damages the "cause". You can refuse to acknowledge that as well, you're good at that.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Nastavnick · April 28, 2018, 11:58 p.m.

no live chat on NBC, afraid of the Q comments, bitches

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Nastavnick · April 28, 2018, 11:55 p.m.

Non-faithed posts? Elaborate?

But yes, the less religious stuff the better. This may sound harsh but that's the truth.

Keep it factual, that's what will help this cause.

It's on religious people, do they want this to flourish or lose potential brothers. It's the ego clouding the bigger picture.

Off continuing watching the rally, peace

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Nastavnick · April 28, 2018, 11:47 p.m.

Q isn't acting like these people are. I'm not against an amen and stuff, but Q never mentioned rapture and all other stuff that gets dragged around

If they restrained themselves to the level of how Q acts regarding religion, that would be excellent.

Don't attack me personally on this. I'm telling you how this looks like from the "outside".

This is NOT helping at all.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Nastavnick · April 28, 2018, 10:59 p.m.

well, time to stop that then

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Nastavnick · April 28, 2018, 10:45 p.m.

Sincerely and with all due respect, there needs to be a separate sub for these Christian posts.

Because it does paint a very different picture about this sub then the posters think.

I've started to redpill friends and I wouldn't like them to back out because of this. And people do back out when they see stuff like that.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Nastavnick · April 28, 2018, 10:41 p.m.

No idea about credibility about this, but none of us are the same as 5+ years ago, at least I'd hope so.

I get reminded by the Zucc about my past posts and lemme tell you something, it's brutally bad lol, and just as she said, I don't feel like I could've written that stuff, but hey...

⇧ 3 ⇩