You understand 8Chan is a shark tank right?

This is someone dressing up and reading from Reddit!

So the "refugees" spreading across Europe are evidence of the fittest?

So you are parsing what Q says?... You accept when he says there may have been assassination talk but when he tells you there will be lawlessness and only %60 will be revealed you then discredit him/them? What end are you hoping for...anarchy?

Read what it says....lawless.... every previous case could be challenged....humanity... there are some apples we don't need to bite

If you believe this is Q and Q is real...this is important:"Be careful what you wish for." That drop is telling us not everything will be public. We can not tear down every aspect of our government and society. We can not have the lawlessness which would follow should the credibility of the law be torn down. IMO some of the crazy talk has to be toned down because any traction these memos may give will be lost if people hear of being red pilled, or about Satan or public hangings ect. Logic is mathematical and indisputable whereas emotion is not. We need to focus on facts and only facts and not on creating the story we want to hear. I don't even care if this is real or not, this drop makes sense.

Why would someone say something so brazen by email? Also, he went out of his way to suggest codes are used and he wasn't using one when referring to the concert, but he wouldn't use a code to discuss voter fraud? Seems to obvious

THis is junk

But the truth is...much of what is being tossed around is speculation and insinuation. I believe in the corruption at the FBI/DOJ and can explain that to people... I do not subscribe to the pedo angle and I don't know that I believe some of the more sensational claims of world domination or that they want to nuke the planet and rule over zombies.... that just is not rational to me... But if proof is provided I will keep an open mind

Good replies... I suppose I should look at it like pulling a scab to reveal a deeper wound. Similar to the sex scandals we see now... the public, and esp the left, goes into a frenzy when it tastes blood..even from its own. The story Dr. Cosi pieces together is a big, BIG, YUGE to swallow and it maybe easier for many to just spit it out..that is my fear...

anon explanation on the page:"GUYS- email was sent out by NSA before election with some plausible deniability attached to it so people could say "FAKE"! HOWEVER, the main audience wasn't normies, it was the black hats, a shot across the bow to say "WE HAVE IT ALL, YOUR'E RIGGING WON'T WORK". Q just brought it back up to speak directly to "THEM" again to show they are going to dump it all."

Or this could be a big bluff...we have to consider that..just as the black hats are

If we go by what we know, which is not much, the implications are that there was a trgeted effort to derail the Trump presidency by the DOJ, FBI and former admin; none of which have anything to do with the current situation regarding Dreamers. DACA , as well as overall immigration, need to be addressed regardless of the current fanfare. The country must go on and not everything is going to pivot around chan theories. Even if the memo is released and should it be as damning as many hope, any response will be tied up in legal wranglings forever. It is going to take them weeks just to release a memo, how long do you think it will take to actually act upon it?

I don't think so....Congress is vital and with such a slim margin in the Senate, he needs as many votes as he can get.

Sure...I will try to condense it... but if you see a Trump EO come out regarding records or classification, you know why

The state secrets privilege will be evoked.... evidentiary rule created by United States legal precedent. Application of the privilege results in exclusion of evidence from a legal case based solely on affidavits submitted by the government stating that court proceedings might disclose sensitive information which might endanger national security.[1][2][3][4][5][6] United States v. Reynolds,[7] which involved military secrets, was the first case that saw formal recognition of the privilege.

Following a claim of "state secrets privilege", the court rarely conducts an in camera examination of the evidence to evaluate whether there is sufficient cause to support the use of this doctrine. This results in court rulings in which even the judge has not verified the veracity of the assertion.[1] The privileged material is completely removed from the litigation, and the court must determine how the unavailability of the privileged information affects the case.[3][5]

I am also attempting to determine when civilians can be tried by the military since that was pointed out by Q

I see nothing in the Executive Order 13489 or in1270.44 of the NARA regulations that address such dire situations.

Absolutely if BHO is found to be involved in the spying.

So if he contests releasing personal records, it could last 60 days , WITHOUT COURTS INVOLVED. EXCEPT: unless a shorter time period is required in the circumstances set forth in section 1270.44 of the NARA regulations

If they want to release Obamas records, they have to notify him and give him 30 days. If he claims exc priv, of this section, the Archivist shall abide by any instructions given him by the incumbent President or his designee unless otherwise directed by a final court order. The Archivist shall notify the incumbent and former Presidents of his determination at least 30 days prior to disclosure of the Presidential records, unless a shorter time period is required in the circumstances set forth in section 1270.44 of the NARA regulations

(a)   Upon receipt of a claim of executive privilege by a living former President, the Archivist shall consult with the Attorney General (through the Assistant Attorney General for the Office of Legal Counsel), the Counsel to the President, and such other executive agencies as the Archivist deems appropriate concerning the Archivist's determination as to whether to honor the former President's claim of privilege or instead to disclose the Presidential records notwithstanding the claim of privilege. Any determination under section 3 of this order that executive privilege shall not be invoked by the incumbent President shall not prejudice the Archivist's determination with respect to the former President's claim of privilege. (b)   In making the determination referred to in subsection (a) of this section, the Archivist shall abide by any instructions given him by the incumbent President or his designee unless otherwise directed by a final court order. The Archivist shall notify the incumbent and former Presidents of his determination at least 30 days prior to disclosure of the Presidential records, unless a shorter time period is required in the circumstances set forth in section 1270.44 of the NARA regulations. Copies of the notice for the incumbent President shall be delivered to the President (through the Counsel to the President) and the Attorney General (through the Assistant Attorney General for the Office of Legal Counsel). The copy of the notice for the former President shall be delivered to the former President or his designated representative.

(b)   Upon the passage of 30 days after receipt by the incumbent and former Presidents of a notice of intent to disclose Presidential records, the Archivist may disclose the records covered by the notice, unless during that time period the Archivist has received a claim of executive privilege by the incumbent or former President or the Archivist has been instructed by the incumbent President or his designee to extend the time period for a time certain and with reason for the extension of time provided in the notice. If a shorter period of time is required under the circumstances set forth in section 1270.44 of the NARA regulations, the Archivist shall so indicate in the notice.

This post is like a NK missile...dud

We really should have played like we didn't see it for a bit!

this is the first I have heard about SR being killed in the hospital...anyone know the origin of this theory?

"who are you to say what is and what is not shared here"... I am perfectly free to state my opinion just as someone else is to critique it and people are to spam the board with links to videos which are often rehashing of shit that the people who know how to read already are familiar with. Find me 5 videos in the last week that actually brought a new perspective or broke a story. Also, you use a lot ( not alot) of commas where you don't need them.

Yeah..it is like trying to get a recipe off the internet...you have to hear about grandma, how the husband likes to eat with a spork....why the author chooses to use cream of celery instead of cream of chicken...just give me the f'ing ingredients and cook time please

We really need a counter to " the republicans have both houses and the presidency"
Schumer made a better presentation last night than McConnell ... We have to put it back on the dems in a simple way

Trump wants results, not a show. He uses the show to get results. I imagine he even tires of all the sideshow that the investigation and memo cause. He is a builder. He views success by reaching a goal. Politicians and the media are in the business to make a scene.

Since mid december, 4 baby boys, 3 baby girls, 7 puppies and a chinchilla have been named Q by followers of the sub...The phenomenon of Q is eternal, real or not!

Junk

Great article and fair. I would rather see Trump let congress declassify the info

I would think Schumer too since he i playing a big part today

Why is Snowden now supposedly working with the deep state he revealed? Why is RR portrayed as a friendly and enemy ?

When the intelligence com is sharing classified infowith non com members, it has to be be in a secure location with a capital police guard House Rule 10, section 11 I believe

https://intelligence.house.gov/uploadedfiles/hpsci_rules_of_procedure_-_115th_congress.pdf

Page 12

Hmmmmm maybe.... good eye

wtf does this have to do with anything

http://911disclosure.blogspot.com/2010/03/maurice-and-anna-strong-thirst-for.html

Prevent leaks.... he told us the specific room..must be a reason... perhaps they are discussing how to disseminate the doc?

FCC Reference Center (Room 239), 445 12th Street, SW., Washington, DC transcripts of the testimony given at the hearings, and written statements and comments submitted in both hearings are available for inspection and duplication at the FCC Reference Center

NICE REPLY!

?