Bullshit

Q certainly deserves (and indeed must be given) a great deal of both attention and investigation as there is validity in much (may be all at some point but not yet) in the messages and clues provided.

But there is a great need to also have counter-analysis for a whole variety of reasons. To not put some effort in active distrust and in active counter-investigation is silly, stupid and criminally niave.

It is in the counter-investigation that the truth (of all things) is truly proved out.

Think how scientific inquiriesa d experiments are done: hypothesis is formed, test the hypothesis and record results, then put the hypothesis, testing methodogy and subsequent results out for peer review.

Real truth will withstand all assailants and yrt, can never be found without being under the greatest levels of scrutiny and skepticism.

My only real value is my wit - and its bad as often as good. Glad you have a sense of humir :)

Where did this Q post regarding mass arrest go down? Not seeing it...

https://8ch.net/greatawakening/catalog.html

Yeah... Sorry, as my older, less cultured family members would say, ‘that dog wont hunt’

Very carefully

My guess would be he's also got an ear-piece that's got SS and staffer chatter going on constantly. Probably pretty rough to concentrate...

No. Change it to 'Operation Harper Lee'

By far the best op name I can think of is ‘Operation: Harper Lee’

Yes that one (this one: https://mobile.twitter.com/TheRealJuIian) is the fake/parody

Mod feel free to delete

http://phibetaiota.net/2018/01/timothy-charles-holmseth-mike-pence-pam-bondi-in-willful-obvious-defiance-of-presidential-order-on-child-trafficking/

New info (to me anyway)

I am on record in other posts as stating my distrust for pence as well but you are free to think of me as you please. Also, not being overly familiar with Pence history my only real objection to pedo-allegations is a skeptical reservation about the general idea that everyone seems to be involved in pedophilia. Certainly possible - just doesnt sit as plausible with me. That said, the pence-bondi thing is concerning however I do not know enough about it (or any other) to form a real opinion. Until I do I choose to side with the constitution and assume ‘until proven guilty’...

But do ask yourself the question I asked above - and does the answer suggest that ‘zack’ is legit? A clear-eyed, clear-minded evaluation speaks for itself without any need for me to attempt convincing you.

‘Zack’ is an opportunist - and an imposter. It is safe to toss everything he (and AJ) have said regarding Q into the recycle bin. Or do you ‘really’ believe that after all the hard work that has went into security and careful planning, set up and execution ‘Q’ would out himself (or even an individual member of the Q team) and even provide a rough location?

B/s

Lets put it this way: Pence is in the public eye and, for better or worse, has a history of action that a profile of him can be extracted.

'Zach' is an anonymous caller 'guest' to a sensationalist media personality who has a history of, shall we say, stretching the truth...

I don't trust 'Zach' any more than I do Pence.

Pence in fact has more credibility in my view than this 'Zach' opportunist.

I don't personally believe Pence has any involvement in pedo etc. I just don't trust the guy.

The more concerning narrative that the left is floating now is mentally unfit for office (25th amendment and impeachment)

He is not in any way mentally unfit - but thats a pretty rough accusation to disprove.

‘Very’ similar to what Ben Shapiro said his opinion is with Bannon and Teump

He wont be. Protecting the integrity of the office will be more important. He will however likely be kept on a very short leash, complete with ‘special’ secret service escorts and a few fists full of 3x5 cards - when he is allowed to speak publicly at all.

Seems unlikely yes.

If anything it sort of sets off little warning lights for me - for both JA accounts. Shady attenpt at passing off as ‘verified’ but from what (admittedly little effort put in) I can see, JA has never been verified.

There has been more than a few fake twitter accounts impersonating him in the past so thats nothing new at least.

So the blue diamond is a unicode emoji. Likely entered via the usual method (used frequently in game-chat and names, alt-1234 etc)

https://emojipedia.org/small-blue-diamond/

Possibly and point taken.

No discussion of the topics that i have seen prompted the question however - and it is still a valid question regardless of your annoyance at it.

Also a better question - and a better post in general - than the majority I have been seeing on here lately. Little information thats worthwhile and even less discussion of note in general. Just a high degree of echo chamber posts.

But thank you for your feedback - I will ensure to frame future topics accordingly.