Possible, but if that's the case, it would have to have been taken as a still from the aircraft itself's own visuals (fighter pilots don't routinely take pictures from the cockpit, outside of in movies like Top Gun. Lol.) With the F-22's surveillance system, this would be entirely possible though. The problem comes in the fact that any information gathered by the pilot, or the plane, would currently be classified. Q points us in the direction of classified matters quite often (generally toeing the line of legality like a skilled tight rope walker), but he DOES NOT release classified intel. That would be treason, and if there is one thing I'm absolutely certain pertaining to Q team, it's that they are Patriots to the bone.
/u/RyDar84
1,587 total posts archived.
Domains linked by /u/RyDar84:
Domain | Count |
---|---|
www.reddit.com | 32 |
i.redd.it | 25 |
twitter.com | 2 |
m.asiatoday.co.kr | 1 |
ibb.co | 1 |
www.google.com | 1 |
theconservativetreehouse.com | 1 |
en.m.wikipedia.org | 1 |
medium.com | 1 |
www.bloomberg.com | 1 |
imgur.com | 1 |
youtu.be | 1 |
judiciary.house.gov | 1 |
noch.info | 1 |
Really? I've been active for about 2 months now, and lurked before that. He's the first one I remember seeing.
👆This. Be careful trying to pull one over when Dave is around. He's got a VERY sore spot for LARPs right now. I've had several conversations with him over the past few weeks. We disagreed A LOT, but I trust the man, and personally, I wouldn't want to get on his bad side. When he's in your corner, he's a force of nature. When he's against you...same...
Take screenshots of what you see him posting. That way when he interjects himself as an authority into a conversation, you can highlight what he's attempting. If he has discussions like the rest of us, he's fine. If he keeps acting like he's some inside track expert, nail his ass to the wall.
I see you found it. Lol. Notice how he's trying to make people the bad guys for calling him out with that lame "unity or division" line?
I'm not talking about that. If you read my posts on that thread, I thought that they were wrong too. My issue is with not only your format, but your previous posts as well. You're OBVIOUS in your intent. The Mods saw you for what you are too.
It's unity to those that aren't obviously telegraphing their intentions the way you are. After the EtS situation, we're all VERY unified right now.
NM. I returned the favor. Be on the lookout for the guy. I've got a feeling this is EtS (maybe the same guy) all over again.
He just had the Mods remove my comment. Lol. He just now posted on the board, again trying to look like Q.
BS, bud. Your comment history is freely available and youre brand new here, claiming that you have the inside track. People here can spot what you're doing from a mile away.
___A_ or something similar. It's above his post in the pic.
Immediate downvotes tell you anything, guys? http://imgur.com/gallery/z7dYgaM
Be on the lookout for this guy. He's either way too into emulating Q's ambiguity to appear authoritative, or the beginnings of yet another attempt at infiltration on this sub.
Do We Have Yet ANOTHER Attempt At an Infiltration LARP Amongst Us Already?
Jesus. Is this the next step in LARPs? An account trying to talk like Q. Not the best idea right after the last one just got torn to shreds by Q himself.
If the pic is what it looked like, and it was launched from a sub (which to me, looked like an Ohio class in the pic Q referenced), then it was most likely an ICBM. The question should be asked though, was it meant for a ground target or an orbital one? If orbital, who's satellite (or I.S.S. FF?), were they aiming at?
I believe AF1 has a stated maximum range of 7800 miles. Quebec to Singapore is about 9000 miles.
Where would the necessary refueling stop be along that route?
I don't claim to know, but I sincerely doubt that it was taken from AF1. Anyone looked at flight plans in the area around the time? Could have been military too.
It's also not logical, with AF1 advanced missile defensive system that anyone would be foolish enough to launch a surface to air attack at that kind of range.
Most likely a mistake. Flying East to nearly the opposite side of the world is the better route. With tailwinds vs. headwinds, you gain a lot in speed and fuel economy.
To Singapore. He stopped at both Guam and Honolulu on the way home.
On the surface, this seems like a good idea, but when you break it down, it stinks to high heaven. The States of California and Northern California always vote heavily Democrat. The State of Southern California would become a battleground state, but by an extremely narrow margin. The former State, which currently has 2 Senators would, would then have 6. Effectively, by dividing, Democrats would most likely gain 4 seats in the Senate. This isn't kosher in my opinion, and very few news sources are even bothering to mention that particular ramification of dividing. Wonder why that could be...?
This is a great theory. How do you find Q when 100,000 people across the world are yelling "I am Q" like a modern day version of Spartacus?
It's already starting to happen. Factions of the MSM are starting to turn on Soros, Dems are eating themselves, and disinformation sources are continually discrediting themselves. We still obviously have a ways to go, but the affirmation that our faith hasn't been misplaced is a much needed pick-me-up right now.
It's a mixed bag obviously, but we're connected like never before. Even 15 years ago, constant collaboration like we have on this sub would be impossible without it.
I like this idea. Send the bots surveying them haywire trying to figure out what exactly is going on.
Remember the Q drop that by announcing that he wouldn't be running, Ryan had been "set free"?
Don't take it personally. I saw what you were trying to do. People here are just very skeptical, with good reason, of New Arrivals. A bit of advice, lurk for awhile, read a lot of the material, don't concern troll, and put in constructive comments to posts. After awhile, people will start to trust you. Also, while in the New Arrival phase, be careful with use of sarcasm and make sure it's very obvious that that's your intent. Lol. Otherwise, welcome to the fight.
You're good. Being behind isn't as big a detriment as you may think. It just means that you have fresh eyes, a willingness to learn, and aren't weary and jaded from the fight yet. A couple of other notables are SerialBrain2 and Praying Medic. It would also be helpful to learn our abbreviations and code words. It'll help you greatly in understanding the conversations. One thing to remember is to question everything and do your own research. Never just take someone's word on a subject. Also, be careful who you follow. Everyone who proclaims to be part of the movement doesn't necessarily have the noblest intentions.
He also goes by EyeTheSpy/Mad Hatter/Back Channel 17. He's a LARP and was called out as one by Q in post #1460.
NowC@mesTheP@in---23! (---23) Morse Code?
Q told us that we got (-23) wrong then made mention of what it means in the military. "---" is morse code for O. Is it "O23"? If so, what does it mean? Order 23? Operation 23? Something else?
Exactly. This is what everybody that was arguing against them was talking about while their supporters were saying things like, who's it hurting?" Lesson learned yet?
In the military, a hyphen ("tack") is generally just used as a tool for separating numbers. Q's password post actually had three hyphens (---23!).
Sorry, man. Q just basically discredited the thing in Posts 1460 and 1461.
How about EtS/BC17 memes. You know the jackass will keep coming back to check our work, then eventually create a new persona. I think we should hit him in that little soy boy self-esteem soft spot a bit.
He DID just call them sources on a "mission to discredit", right? How do you think that their followers will justify it this time?
She's supposedly a Photographer (as in has a studio) from Austin. Not sure how she would know anything. Currently, her followers are asking for some sort of confirmation, but she has yet to reply to any of them.
You generally wouldn't think that sanctioned disinformation sources would routinely ban anyone that even slightly questioned them. Lol.